Reversed circadian blood pressure rhythm preserves fetal growth in preeclamptic pregnancy

Excessive umbilical cord coiling confers risk of elevated nocturnal blood pressure and severe/early-onset preeclampsia

BACKGROUND

The associations between umbilical cord coiling, feto-placental vascular resistance and maternal blood pressure (BP) are not well understood.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed 502 pregnant women suspected of hypertensive disorders in the third trimester from a hospital-based cohort, who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring and umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry examinations within 14 days before delivery. By applying quantile regression, a significant quantile-dependent positive association between umbilical cord coiling index and umbilical artery pulsatility index (UAPIMOM; converted to multiples of median) was observed from above 0.75th quantiles for each parameter.

RESULTS

Using the cutoffs both at the 0.75th quantile to define high umbilical cord coiling (≥0.28 coils/cm) and high UAPIMOM (≥1.30), respectively, a graded increase in BP level was observed from patients with both low, either high and both high categories. Multivariate linear and quantile regression revealed that the high umbilical cord coiling/high UAPIMOM interaction was significantly correlated with night-time mean DBP level. Moreover, umbilical cord hypercoiling (≥0.3 coils/cm) was significantly correlated with night-time DBP with an average increase of ∼5 mmHg from the 0.05th to 0.70th quantiles and independently predicted the occurrence of severe (odds ratio 2.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-4.41) and early-onset (odds ratio 2.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-4.97) preeclampsia after adjusting for covariates. Further mediation analysis showed that elevated high UAPIMOM (≥1.30) could explain 11.4% of the umbilical cord hypercoiling → high night-time DBP association.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, this retrospective study identifies excessive umbilical cord coiling, and its interaction with increased feto-placental vascular resistance, as novel risk factors for nocturnal BP elevation and preeclampsia.

Biological rhythms and preeclampsia

The impact of impaired circadian rhythm on health has been widely studied in shift workers and trans-meridian travelers. A part from its correlation with sleep and mood disorders, biological rhythm impairment is a recognized risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and breast cancer. Preeclampsia is a major public health issue, associated with a significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. While the risks factors for this condition such as obesity, diabetes, pre-existing hypertension have been identified, the underlying mechanism of this multi-factorial disease is yet not fully understood. The disruption of the light/dark cycle in pregnancy has been associated with adverse outcomes. Slightly increased risk for "small for gestational age" babies, "low birth weight" babies, and preterm deliveries has been reported in shift working women. Whether altered circadian cycle represents a risk factor for preeclampsia or preeclampsia is itself linked with an abnormal circadian cycle is less clear. There are only few reports available, showing conflicting results. In this review, we will discuss recent observations concerning circadian pattern of blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies. We explore the hypothesis that circadian misalignments may represent a risk factor for preeclampsia. Unraveling potential link between circadian clock gene and preeclampsia could offer a novel approach to our understanding of this multi-system disease specific to pregnancy.

Circadian pattern of blood pressure in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia

AIMS #ENTITYSTARTX00026;

OBJECTIVE

To find out the circadian pattern of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia.

METHOD

A cross-sectional prospective observational case control study. Blood pressure was sampled in thirty-five normotensive pregnant women (control) and thirty five preeclamptic women (study group) by using non-invasive automatic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring machine for 72 h.

RESULTS

Blood pressure (BP) was not constant over 24 h period and it oscillated from time to time in control group. BP was maximum during early part of afternoon. However, in preeclampsia besides quantitative increase in BP, circadian BP oscillations were less pronounced and in around 50% subjects BP was maximum during evening and night hours.

CONCLUSION

Both systolic and diastolic BP showed definite reproducible circadian pattern in both preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. This pattern both quantitatively and qualitatively was different in preeclamptic women. Standardized 24 h BP monitoring allows quantitative and qualitative evaluation of hypertensive status and is important for timing and dosing of antihypertensive medications.

Diurnal blood pressure variation in the evaluation of early onset severe pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To study the association between diurnal variation in blood pressure, the mean daily blood pressure and various complications of pregnancy in patients presenting with severe pre-eclampsia before 34 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-four women presenting to a tertiary hospital in South Africa with severe pre-eclampsia between 28 and 34 weeks' gestation were managed expectantly for at least 8 days. We measured maternal blood pressure every 30 min with the pregnancy validated Spacelabs 90209 automated blood pressure monitor for 24h periods on alternative days. The mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure measurement, the mean diastolic blood pressure for daytime and nighttime, the day-night blood pressure difference and the night-day ratio were compared with the occurrence of abruptio placentae, gestational age at delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, birth weight, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler FVW and reason for delivery.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-six 24-h studies were analyzed. The day-night blood pressure difference decreased with increasing mean diastolic blood pressure (r=-0.323, p<0.0001). A combination of normal mean diastolic blood pressure and normal day-night blood pressure difference was associated with increased gestational age and lower caesarean section rates.

CONCLUSION

The combination of mean diastolic blood pressure and day-night blood pressure difference may be a supplementary measurement of disease severity in early onset severe pre-eclampsia and seems to be of prognostic value.

The prevalence and clinical significance of nocturnal hypertension in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To determine (a) the prevalence of hypertension during sleep in pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension, and (b) whether women with hypertension during sleep have worse pregnancy outcomes than hypertensive pregnant women with controlled (normal) blood pressure (BP) during sleep.

DESIGN

Prospective double-blind cohort study.

SETTING

Inpatients and outpatients managed in a day assessment unit (DAU) at St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 186 hypertensive pregnant women, 158 of whom had successful 24 h BP monitoring; 40% had proteinuric pre-eclampsia (PE), 43% gestational hypertension (GH) and 17% essential hypertension (EH).

INTERVENTIONS

Blood pressure, 24 h non-invasive, monitoring (Spacelabs 90207) was undertaken successfully in 158 women with PE, GH or EH, whether or not they were receiving antihypertensives. Women and clinicians were blinded to results of these BP monitors. Sleep hypertension was defined as BP > 117/68 mmHg at 26-30 weeks or > 123/72 mmHg after 30 weeks gestation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Maternal and fetal outcomes were compared between women with and without sleep hypertension and the prevalence of sleep hypertension was determined.

RESULTS

Sleep hypertension was present in 59%, more commonly in PE (79%) than GH/EH (45%), P < 0.0001. Sleep hypertensives also had higher routine sphygmomanometer BPs [137(10)/91(7) mmHg; mean(SD)] than women with normal sleep BP [130(12)/ 87(8) mmHg] P = 0.007, and higher awake ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) BPs [137(8)/88(7) versus 127(7)/79(6) mmHg], P < 0.0001. Awake, but not sleep, average heart rate was lower in sleep hypertensives [85(11) versus 91 (10) beats per minute, bpm], P = 0.002. Sleep hypertensives had a significantly greater frequency of renal insufficiency, liver dysfunction, thrombocytopenia and episodes of (awake) severe hypertension (P < 0.05), as well as lower birth weight babies [2715 (808) versus 3224(598) g, P < 0.0001].

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension during sleep is a common finding in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, particularly pre-eclampsia. These women also have higher awake BPs and a greater frequency of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. These findings are largely explained by the greater likelihood of pre-eclamptics having sleep hypertension.