B-mode, utero-ovarian and intratumoural transvaginal colour Doppler ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumours

[Sonographic diagnosis of presumed benign ovarian tumors]

To discriminate ovarian lesions is of particular importance in gynecological practice. Two main problems need answers: discrimination of benign and malignant adnexal masses and choice of the appropriate surgical treatment if necessary. Nearly 2% of the adnexal masses are ovarian carcinomas or borderline tumors. It is now, well established that ultrasonography is the gold standard for ovarian cyst diagnosis. The purpose of this data was to review the literature and to establish, with the evidence base medicine model, which parameters and existing diagnostic models using ultrasound and Doppler perform best in the evaluation of adnexal masses. Transvaginal sonography has demonstrated considerable advantage over conventional transabdominal sonography. However, transparietal sonography is still useful in large tumors. Definition of the nomenclature and classification was done and should be used. Unilocular ovarian cyst characterization seems easy using sonography and Doppler. In front of complication, discrimination of such functional cyst may be difficult but spontaneous regression confirms usually the expectative management. Dermoid cysts and endometriomas seem to be easier to discriminate from other adnexal masses. Ultrasound and morphologic parameters have a sensitivity of about 90% and a specificity of 80%; that makes this exam the gold standard for ovarian masses diagnosis. Only 50% of ovarian masses are characterized by sonography. Scoring systems help to differentiate benign from malignant masses (sensitivity of about 90%). Logistic regression and models are good methods especially for LR1 and 2 and RMI and may be useful for malignancy prediction but are difficult to use in current practice. Expert diagnosis is a subjective but most important performing parameter. Any suspicious ovarian mass or not easily diagnosed mass requires sonography by an expert, which can first use all the techniques and the different parameters to discriminate benign and malignant tumors. An explicit report will help the physician to define the right attitude for an appropriate management. Six to 16% of adnexial masses are complex or not classified and will result in MRI prescription or surgery.

Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline

QUESTIONS

What is the optimal strategy for preoperative identification of the adnexal mass suspicious for ovarian cancer? What is the most appropriate surgical procedure for a woman who presents with an adnexal mass suspicious for malignancy?

PERSPECTIVES

In Canada in 2010, 2600 new cases of ovarian cancer were estimated to have been diagnosed, and of those patients, 1750 were estimated to have died, making ovarian cancer the 7th most prevalent form of cancer and the 5th leading cause of cancer death in Canadian women. Women with ovarian cancer typically have subtle, nonspecific symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, changes in bowel frequency, and urinary or pelvic symptoms, making early detection difficult. Thus, most ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, when the cancer has spread outside the pelvis. Because of late diagnosis, the 5-year relative survival ratio for ovarian cancer in Canada is only 40%. Unfortunately, because of the low positive predictive value of potential screening tests (cancer antigen 125 and ultrasonography), there is currently no screening strategy for ovarian cancer. The purpose of this document is to identify evidence that would inform optimal recommended protocols for the identification and surgical management of adnexal masses suspicious for malignancy.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes of interest for the identification question included sensitivity and specificity. Outcomes of interest for the surgical question included optimal surgery, overall survival, progression-free or disease-free survival, reduction in the number of surgeries, morbidity, adverse events, and quality of life.

METHODOLOGY

After a systematic review, a practice guideline containing clinical recommendations relevant to patients in Ontario was drafted. The practice guideline was reviewed and approved by the Gynecology Disease Site Group and the Report Approval Panel of the Program in Evidence-based Care. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through a survey, the results of which were incorporated into the practice guideline.

PRACTICE GUIDELINE

These recommendations apply to adult women presenting with a suspicious adnexal mass, either symptomatic or asymptomatic. IDENTIFICATION OF AN ADNEXAL MASS SUSPICIOUS FOR OVARIAN CANCER: Sonography (particularly 3-dimensional sonography), magnetic resonance imaging (mri), and computed tomography (ct) imaging are each recommended for differentiating malignant from benign ovarian masses. However, the working group offers the following further recommendations, based on their expert consensus opinion and a consideration of availability, access, and harm: Where technically feasible, transvaginal sonography should be the modality of first choice in patients with a suspicious isolated ovarian mass.To help clarify malignant potential in patients in whom ultrasonography may be unreliable, mri is the most appropriate test.In cases in which extra-ovarian disease is suspected or needs to be ruled out, ct is the most useful technique.Evaluation of an adnexal mass by Doppler technology alone is not recommended. Doppler technology should be combined with a morphology assessment.Ultrasonography-based morphology scoring systems can be used to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses. These scoring systems are based on specific ultrasound parameters, each with several scores base on determined features. All evaluated scoring systems were found to have an acceptable level of sensitivity and specificity; the choice of scoring system may therefore be made based on clinician preference.As a standalone modality, serum cancer antigen 125 is not recommended for distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses.Frozen sections for the intraoperative diagnosis of a suspicious adnexal mass is recommended in settings in which availability and patient preference allow. SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR AN ADNEXAL MASS SUSPICIOUS FOR MALIGNANCY: To improve survival, comprehensive surgical staging with lymphadenectomy is recommended for the surgical management of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. Laparoscopy is a reasonable alternative to laparotomy, provided that appropriate surgery and staging can be done. The choice between laparoscopy and laparotomy should be based on patient and clinician preference. Discussion with a gynecologic oncologist is recommended. Fertility-preserving surgery is an acceptable alternative to more extensive surgery in patients with low-malignant-potential tumours and those with well-differentiated surgical stage i ovarian cancer. Discussion with a gynecologic oncologist is recommended.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of ovarian tumors()

INTRODUCTION

Vascularity influences the characteristics of gynecologic tumors observed with direct imaging techniques that reveal the macrovascular component of these lesions (color and power Doppler) and with indirect imaging involving the administration of contrast agents to examine the microcirculation and interstitial perfusion (contrast-enhanced computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance [MR] imaging). The purpose of this study was to determine whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) of ovarian lesions provides useful information that cannot be obtained with conventional US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used CEUS to assess 72 nonspecific adnexal lesions in 61 patients. CEUS was performed with a 4.8-ml bolus of a second-generation ultrasonographic contrast agent and dedicated imaging algorithms. For each lesion, B-mode morphology, CEUS morphology, and time/intensity curves were evaluated.

RESULTS

In 8/61 cases (13.1%) CEUS offered no additional morphovascular information. In 38/61 cases (62.3%), it provided additional information that did not modify the management of the lesion, and in 15/61 cases (24.6%) it gave additional information that modified the management of the lesion. Malignant lesions were characterized by significantly shorter times to peak enhancement (11.9 ± 3.1 s vs 19.8 ± 4.0 s p < 0.01) and significantly higher peak intensity (24.7 ± 4.2 dB vs 17.8 ± 3.3 dB p < 0.01) compared with benign lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS improves diagnostic confidence in the characterization of liquid-corpuscular lesions where conventional US is inconclusive. CEUS can be proposed as a valid alternative to CT and MR. However, information obtained by CEUS influences the therapy in a limited percentage of cases (24.6%).

Doppler ultrasound assessment and serum cancer antigen 125 in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

To differentiate benign from malignant ovarian tumors based on sonographic detection of a solid component.

METHOD

Sixty-three women with ovarian masses were evaluated preoperatively by gray scale and power/color Doppler ultrasonographic examination, with specific predefined criteria for the solid component. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated and assessed against the histopathologic outcome. The contribution of cancer antigen (CA) 125 levels to the diagnostic accuracy was also assessed.

RESULT

Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 95.2%, 91.3% and 100%, respectively, with two false-positive results. Had an elevated CA 125 level (>35 U/mL) been included in the malignancy criteria, the false-positive results would have been eliminated, giving an accuracy of 100%.

CONCLUSION

Sonographic evaluation with predefined specific criteria for the detection of a solid tumor component is an accurate method of preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. A serum CA 125 assay may assist in eliminating false-positive results.

Contrast-enhanced sonography helps in discrimination of benign from malignant adnexal masses

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential efficacy of real-time contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in a pilot study.

METHODS

Before surgical treatment, adnexal masses were prospectively evaluated with power Doppler sonography before and after injection of a contrast agent. Real-time postinjection sequences were computerized with time-intensity analysis software to determine an enhancement curve and contrast parameters. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibilities of these criteria were assessed on a subsample. These contrast parameters were compared between benign and malignant tumors using logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity were used to compare contrast parameters with sonographic and Doppler variables.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine women were included, for a total of 101 adnexal masses. There were 23 cases of ovarian malignancies and 78 benign adnexal lesions. Our procedure had excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility, with an average intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92. The time before enhancement and intensity ratio did not reliably differentiate between the benign and malignant masses. Washout times and areas under the curves were significantly greater in ovarian malignancies than in other benign tumors (P < .001), leading to sensitivity estimates between 96% and 100% and specificity estimates between 83 and 98%. Contrast parameters had slightly higher sensitivity and slightly lower specificity when compared with transvaginal sonographic variables of the resistive index and serum cancer antigen 125 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced power Doppler imaging may easily and precisely discriminate benign from malignant adnexal lesions. Larger studies are needed to determine the appropriate use and benefits of this new procedure.

Combined transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler sonography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis

OBJECTIVE

Transvaginal sonography is limited in its ability to assess early stage cancers of the ovary as well as in distinguishing benign processes. As a method for characterization of tumor vascularization, color-coded Doppler sonography may be able to improve the diagnostic accuracy of B-mode sonography.

METHODS

Preoperative transvaginal B-mode and Doppler sonography was performed in 63 patients with unclear adnexal lesions prior to operation. Using multiple logistic regression, the independent variables of each procedure were selected and combined to yield a diagnostic flow chart. The diagnostic accuracy of this decision matrix was tested on 257 patients with unclear adnexal tumors.

RESULTS

In the 63 adnexal tumors investigated, the diagnostic impact of isolated sonomorphological assessment with evidence of a "solid area" was 78%. Using Doppler sonography, the best discrimination was achieved by displaying the vascular distribution ("central vascularization"). Combining these independent significant variables of the two procedures raised the diagnostic accuracy to 90% (sensitivity 86%, specificity 93%). The validity achieved by this combination was confirmed by the independent application of this method to the 257 adnexal tumors with unclear malignancy status (diagnostic accuracy 93%, sensitivity 92%, specificity 94%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sonography and Doppler sonography achieves high and reproducible diagnostic accuracy in preoperative malignancy status assessment of adnexal tumors. The additional use of Doppler sonography can thus provide significant aid both for differential diagnostics of adnexal lesions and for the choice of surgical route in the case of an existing indication for operative therapy.