On the elastic properties of tetramethylrhodamine F-actin

Protein osmotic pressure and cross-bridge attachment determine the stiffness of thin filaments in muscle ex vivo

The properties of some models of the actin filament are compared with those of the thin filament in muscle. The greater stiffness of thin filaments ex vivo with respect to F-actin in vitro is attributed to the effect of both protein osmotic pressure and the attached cross-bridges. By comparing the stiffness of thin filaments in vitro and in isometric and rigor muscles the stiffness of thin filaments in relaxed muscle is computed. The upper limit of thin filament stretching is deduced to approach approximately 10 nm microm(-1). It is also calculated that, on stretching by 2.02 nm of the fully non-overlapped thin filament or by 1.59 nm of the thin filament on isometric contraction, the energy released on the hydrolysis of one molecule of ATP is fully used up.

Formation and destabilization of actin filaments with tetramethylrhodamine-modified actin

Actin labeling at Cys(374) with tethramethylrhodamine derivatives (TMR-actin) has been widely used for direct observation of the in vitro filaments growth, branching, and treadmilling, as well as for the in vivo visualization of actin cytoskeleton. The advantage of TMR-actin is that it does not lock actin in filaments (as rhodamine-phalloidin does), possibly allowing for its use in investigating the dynamic assembly behavior of actin polymers. Although it is established that TMR-actin alone is polymerization incompetent, the impact of its copolymerization with unlabeled actin on filament structure and dynamics has not been tested yet. In this study, we show that TMR-actin perturbs the filaments structure when copolymerized with unlabeled actin; the resulting filaments are more fragile and shorter than the control filaments. Due to the increased severing of copolymer filaments, TMR-actin accelerates the polymerization of unlabeled actin in solution also at mole ratios lower than those used in most fluorescence microscopy experiments. The destabilizing and severing effect of TMR-actin is countered by filament stabilizing factors, phalloidin, S1, and tropomyosin. These results point to an analogy between the effects of TMR-actin and severing proteins on F-actin, and imply that TMR-actin may be inappropriate for investigations of actin filaments dynamics.

Real-time measurements of actin filament polymerization by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy

Understanding the mechanism of actin polymerization and its regulation by associated proteins requires an assay to monitor polymerization dynamics and filament topology simultaneously. The only assay meeting these criteria is total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (Amann and Pollard, 2001; Fujiwara et al., 2002). The fluorescence signal is fourfold stronger with actin labeled on Cys-374 with Oregon green rather than rhodamine. To distinguish growth at barbed and pointed ends we used image drift correction and maximum intensity projections to reveal points where single N-ethylmaleimide inactivated myosins attach filaments to the glass coverslip. We estimated association rates at high actin concentrations and dissociation rates near and below the critical actin concentration. At the barbed end, the association rate constant for Mg-ATP-actin is 7.4 microM(-1) s(-1) and the dissociation rate constant is 0.89 s(-1). At the pointed end the association and dissociation rate constants are 0.56 microM(-1) s(-1) and 0.19 s(-1). When vitamin D binding protein sequesters all free monomers, ADP-actin dissociates from barbed ends at 1.4 s(-1) and from pointed ends at 0.16 s(-1) regardless of buffer nucleotide.

N/A

N/A

On the stiffness of the natural actin filament decorated with alexa fluor tropomyosin

Natural, phalloidin-free, actin filaments were decorated with tropomyosin made fluorescent by reaction with alexa fluor (R) 488 C(5) maleimide. The elastic modulus by stretching of these filaments was then determined and found to span between 38.2 MPa and 61.48 MPa. We tried also to determine the yield strength of the same filaments in the laser light trap operated at 920 mW, the maximum power of the apparatus. Only two out of the 10 filaments tested were broken under these conditions, yield strength being 50.5 and 55 pN, respectively.