Treatment of uretero-intestinal and ureterovesical strictures by Acucise balloon catheter

Percutaneous Ureteral Stent Insertion in Patients with Benign Uretero-Ileal Anastomosis Strictures Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy: Assessing Risk Factors for Stent Patency

We aimed to investigate the risk factors of early double-J ureteral stent (DJUS) dysfunction rates and the long-term patency of DJUSs inserted via a percutaneous approach in patients with benign uretero-ileal anastomosis stricture (UIAS) who had undergone radical cystectomy. In this retrospective study, 63 DJUS placements were placed via a percutaneous nephrostomy tract in 42 consecutive patients between May 2020 and March 2023. The technical success rate was 100% in all patients without major complications. The early dysfunction rate and long-term patency rate were 38.1% (24/63) and 84.2% (32/38), respectively. The blood clot retention grade, balloon dilatation, and length of the ureteral stricture exhibited a significant correlation with early DJUS dysfunction (blood clot retention grade: odds ratio (OR) 6.922 in grade two, p = 0.009; balloon dilatation: OR 0.186, p = 0.017; length of ureteral stricture: OR 8.715, p = 0.035 in moderate stenosis, and 7.646, p = 0.028 in severe stenosis). A multivariate Cox's proportional hazard analysis revealed that blood clot retention grade and length of ureteral stricture were independent predictors of long-term DJUS patency. Percutaneous insertion of the DJUSs was safe and effective in patients with benign UIAS.

Optimizing decision-making process of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture treatment after radical cystectomy

PURPOSE

To identify preoperative predictors of endo-urological treatment (EUT) failure while promoting a new diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for benign uretero-enteric anastomosis stricture (UES) management after radical cystectomy (RC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We relied on a prospectively maintained database including 96 individuals (122 renal units) who developed a benign UES at our institution between 1990 and 2018. UES was classified into two different types according to morphology: FP1 (i.e., sharp or duckbill) and FP2 (i.e., flat or concave). EUT feasibility, success rate, as well as intra and postoperative complications were recorded. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) assessed for predictors of EUT failure.

RESULTS

Overall, 78 (63.9%) and 32 (26.3%) cases were defined as FP1 and FP2, respectively. EUT was not feasible in 33 (27.1%) cases. After a median follow-up of 50 (IQR 5-240) months, successful treatment was reached only in 15/122 (12.3%) cases. EUT success rates raised when considering short (< 1 cm) (16.8%), FP1 morphology (16.7%) strictures, or the combination of these characteristics (22.4%). Overall, 5 (5.2%) cases had CD ≥ III complications. FP2 (OR: 1.91, 95%CI 1.21-5.31, p = 0.03) and stricture length ≥ 1 cm (OR: 9.08, 95%CI 2.09-65.71, p = 0.009) were associated with treatment failure at MVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment for benign UES after RC is feasible but harbors a low success rate. Stricture length and radiological morphology of the stricture are related to endoscopic treatment failure. Surgeons should be aware of the stricture features during the preoperative decision-making process to choose the optimal candidate for endoscopic treatment.

Contemporary management of benign uretero-enteric strictures after cystectomy: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Uretero-enteric stricture (UES) is a common post-operative complication after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. The aim of this systematic review is to discuss the contemporary management of benign UES after cystectomy and to compare the different surgical approaches.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was performed from January 2000 through January 2021. Search engines used included PubMed, Embase and Medline databases. Search query was: ((ureteroileal OR uretero-ileal OR ureteroenteric OR ureteroenteric) AND (stricture OR stenosis)) AND (management OR treatment). Study selection followed the PRISMA statement. Studies tackling management of UES, either through open, endoscopic, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approaches, were included in our systematic review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Forty-one studies were finally included in this systematic review. No prospective studies were found; all included studies were retrospective. Open surgical repair had a 78-100% success rate, a significant rate of complications, and a low recurrence rate (6-8%). Endourological management decreased complication rate, length-of-stay, and blood loss, with however lower success (15-50%) and higher recurrence rates (62%-91%) compared to open surgery. Robotic assisted surgery showed comparable success rates to open surgery (80-100%), while limiting the number of major complications and hospital length-of-stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of UES remains challenging. Open surgery maintains a role given its high success rate, at the cost however of a significant morbidity. On the other hand, endourological procedures offer a favorable and low complication risk, but a low long-term success rate. Robotic-assisted surgery is emerging with a valid resolution of UES as it offers comparable success rates to an open approach, while reducing surgical morbidity. Head-to-head comparisons are awaited to confirm these findings.

Internal double-J stent was associated with a lower incidence of ureteroileal anastomosis stricture than external ureteral catheter for patients undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Proper techniques used in procedures might play an important role in reducing ureteroileal anastomosis stricture (UIAS) for patients undergoing orthotopic neobladder. The present study was to evaluate the efficacy of internal double-J stent versus external ureteral catheter on UIAS for patients undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature referring to the topic was performed on 10th January 2019 in PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar, by using key words as radical cystectomy, orthotopic neobladder, stricture, stenosis. The Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.3 software was employed for data analysis. The incidence of UIAS was evaluated as primary outcome.

RESULTS

Five studies were included eventually. The incidence of UIAS was lower in the group of internal double-J stent than that in the group of external ureteral catheter (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.97; p = 0.04) with a low heterogeneity (I² = 0%). Besides, internal double-J stent group had a trend of a shorter length of stay than external ureteral catheter group.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the present meta-analysis, internal double-J stent placement was associated with a lower incidence of UIAS than external ureteral catheter for patients undergoing orthotopic neobladder. In addition, a trend of a shorter hospital stay was also detected, thus, internal double-J stent placement may be favored in the view of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Current status of minimally invasive endoscopic management of ureteric strictures

Endourological techniques are used more often nowadays in the treatment of ureteric strictures of various etiologies. Advances in technology have provided new tools to the armamentarium of the endoscopic urological surgeon. Numerous studies exist that investigate the efficiency and safety of each of the therapeutic modalities available. In this review, we attempt to demonstrate the available and contemporary evidence supporting each minimally invasive modality in the management of ureteric strictures.

Crossing ureteric strictures: microcatheters to the rescue when conventional methods fail

Tight distal ureteric strictures can be most challenging to traverse both from above, by interventional radiologists, and below, by urologists. Despite the advent of numerous guidewires, manufactured from different materials, often ureteric strictures are too tight to allow conventional guidewires to pass through. We describe an alternative approach to cross tight ureteric strictures, using a microguidewire and microcatheter combination.

Treatment of Ureterointestinal Anastomotic Strictures by Diathermal or Cryoplastic Dilatation

BACKGROUND

Ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures (UAS) complicate 10-15% of surgeries for urinary diversion and are the main cause of deterioration in renal function. Treatments are surgical revision, management with autostatic stent, balloon dilatation, endoscopic incision, and percutaneous transrenal diathermy (Acucise). A new option is cryoplastic dilatation (Polar-Cath).

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility, complications, and preliminary results of UAS treatment using the Acucise and Polar-Cath systems.

METHODS

Nineteen UAS, diagnosed by ultrasonography or computed tomography and sequential renal scintigraphy, occurred in 15 cancer patients after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Fifteen were managed with balloon diathermy and 4 by balloon cryoplasty in a three-stage procedure--percutaneous nephrostomy, diathermal or cryoplastic dilatation, and transnephrostomic control with nephrostomy removal--each separated by 15 days. All patients gave written informed consent.

RESULTS

Dilatations were successful in all cases. The procedure is simple and rapid (about 45 min) under fluoroscopic control and sedation. Procedural complications occurred in 1 (5%) patient with UAS after Wallace II uretero-ileocutaneostomy: a common iliac artery lesion was induced by diathermal dilatation, evident subsequently, and required surgical repair. Patency with balloon diathermy was good, with two restenoses developing over 12 months (range 1-22) of follow-up. With balloon cryoplastic dilatation, one restenosis developed in the short term; follow-up is too brief to assess the long-term efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Our short-term results with diathermal and cryoplastic dilatation to resolve UAS are good. If supported by longer follow-up, the techniques may be considered as first-choice approaches to UAS. Surgery should be reserved for cases in which this minimally invasive technique fails.

Endoscopic ureterotomy for the treatment of ureteric stricture following laparoscopic oophorectomy

We report a case of ureteric stricture formation in a 40-year-old woman after laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy and ureterolysis for removal of a large benign ovarian cyst. Ten days postoperatively, she was examined for gradually increasing loin pain and was found to have a short-segment ureteric stricture. She was initially treated conservatively by placement of a ureteric stent. The stent was removed after 6 weeks, and the ureteric obstruction reoccurred. She was subsequently successfully treated by endoscopic ureterotomy.

ENDOURETEROTOMY BY INTRALUMINAL INVAGINATION FOR NONMALIGNANT URETEROINTESTINAL ANASTOMOTIC STRICTURES: DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP

PURPOSE

We describe a new surgical endoscopic technique for nonmalignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures. This procedure involving endoureterotomy by intraluminal invagination (the Lovaco technique) is performed by adopting a combined percutaneous antegrade and endoscopic retrograde approach. The results obtained by this technique are reviewed with long-term followup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 25 ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures were subjected to endoureterotomy by intraluminal invagination, including 12 left, 7 right and 3 bilateral cases. Surgical success was defined by radiological improvement and/or the ability to recover normal activity in the absence of flank pain, infection, or the need for ureteral stents or nephrostomy tubes.

RESULTS

At a median followup of 51 months (range 2 to 145) the success rate for endoureterotomy by intraluminal invagination was 80% (20 of 25 ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures). No complications were recorded in the patients following endoureterotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This new endoureterotomy technique for ureterointestinal strictures following urinary diversion can be applied to any type of urinary diversion. It allows direct visualization of the stricture and stricture tissue biopsy. Intraluminal invagination makes it possible to increase the distance between the stricture, and the retroperitoneal vessels and bowels. The technique provides the control required to ensure full-thickness and full-length stricture incision. The success rate is high and it persists after long-term followup.