Interrelated modification of excitatory and inhibitory synapses in three-layer olivary-cerebellar neural network

Beyond the basal ganglia: cFOS expression in the cerebellum in response to acute and chronic dopaminergic alterations

The suggestion of an anatomical and functional relationship between the basal ganglia and cerebellum is recent. Traditionally, these structures were considered as neuronal circuits working separately to organize and control goal-directed movements and cognitive functions. However, several studies in rodents and primates have described an anatomical interaction between cortico-basal and cortico-cerebellar networks. Most importantly, functional changes have been observed in one of these circuits when altering the other one. In this context, we aimed to accomplish an extensive description of cerebellar activation patterns using cFOS expression (cFOS-IR) after acute and chronic manipulation of dopaminergic activity. In the acute study, substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) activity was stimulated or suppressed by intra cerebral administration of picrotoxin or lidocaine, respectively. In addition, we analyzed cerebellar activity after the induction of a parkinsonism model, the tremulous jaw movements. In this model, tremulous jaw movements were induced in male rats by IP chronic administration of the dopamine antagonist haloperidol (1.5mg/kg). Acute stimulation of SNc by picrotoxin increased cFOS-IR in the vermis and cerebellar hemispheres. However, lidocaine did not produce an effect. After 14days of haloperidol treatment, the vermis and cerebellar hemispheres showed an opposite regulation of cFOS expression. Chronic dopaminergic antagonism lessened cFOS expression in the vermis but up-regulated such expression in the cerebellar hemisphere. Overall, the present data indicate a very close functional relationship between the basal ganglia and the cerebellum and they may allow a better understanding of disorders in which there are dopamine alterations.

Model-founded explorations of the roles of molecular layer inhibition in regulating purkinje cell responses in cerebellar cortex: more trouble for the beam hypothesis

For most of the last 50 years, the functional interpretation for inhibition in cerebellar cortical circuitry has been dominated by the relatively simple notion that excitatory and inhibitory dendritic inputs sum, and if that sum crosses threshold at the soma the Purkinje cell generates an action potential. Thus, inhibition has traditionally been relegated to a role of sculpting, restricting, or blocking excitation. At the level of networks, this relatively simply notion is manifest in mechanisms like "surround inhibition" which is purported to "shape" or "tune" excitatory neuronal responses. In the cerebellum, where all cell types except one (the granule cell) are inhibitory, these assumptions regarding the role of inhibition continue to dominate. Based on our recent series of modeling and experimental studies, we now suspect that inhibition may play a much more complex, subtle, and central role in the physiological and functional organization of cerebellar cortex. This paper outlines how model-based studies are changing our thinking about the role of feed-forward molecular layer inhibition in the cerebellar cortex. The results not only have important implications for continuing efforts to understand what the cerebellum computes, but might also reveal important features of the evolution of this large and quintessentially vertebrate brain structure.

The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit with synaptic plasticity. II. Mechanism of synergistic modulation of thalamic activity via the direct and indirect pathways through the basal ganglia

A possible mechanism underlying the modulatory role of dopamine, adenosine and acetylcholine in the modification of corticostriatal synapses, subsequent changes in signal transduction through the "direct" and "indirect" pathways in the basal ganglia and variations in thalamic and neocortical cell activity is proposed. According to this mechanism, simultaneous activation of dopamine D1/D2 receptors as well as inactivation of adenosine A1/A(2A) receptors or muscarinic M4/M1 receptors on striatonigral/striatopallidal inhibitory cells can promote the induction of long-term potentiation/depression in the efficacy of excitatory cortical inputs to these cells. Subsequently augmented inhibition of the activity of inhibitory neurons of the output nuclei of the basal ganglia through the "direct" pathway together with reduced disinhibition of these nuclei through the "indirect" pathway synergistically increase thalamic and neocortical cell firing. The proposed mechanism can underlie such well known effects as "excitatory" and "inhibitory" influence of dopamine on striatonigral and striatopallidal cells, respectively; the opposite action of dopamine and adenosine on these cells; antiparkinsonic effects of dopamine receptor agonists and adenosine or acetylcholine muscarinic receptor antagonists.

The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit with synaptic plasticity. I. Modification rules for excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the striatum

It is pointed out that Ca(2+)-dependent modification rules for NMDA-dependent (NMDA-independent) synaptic plasticity in the striatum are similar to those in the neocortex and hippocampus (cerebellum). A unitary postsynaptic mechanism of synaptic modification is proposed. It is based on the assumption that, in diverse central nervous system structures, long-term potentiation/depression (LTP/LTD) of excitatory transmission (depression/potentiation of inhibitory transmission, LTDi/LTPi) is the result of an increasing/decreasing the number of phosphorylated AMPA and NMDA (GABA(A)) receptors. According to the suggested mechanism, Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and protein kinase C, whose activity is positively correlated with Ca(2+) enlargement, together with cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (cGMP-dependent protein kinase G, whose activity is negatively correlated with Ca(2+) rise) mainly phosphorylate ionotropic striatal receptors, if NMDA channels are opened (closed). Therefore, the positive/negative post-tetanic Ca(2+) shift in relation to a previous Ca(2+) rise must cause NMDA-dependent LTP+LTDi/LTD+LTPi or NMDA-independent LTD+LTPi/LTP+LTDi. Dopamine D(1)/D(2) or adenosine A(2A)/A(1) receptor activation must facilitate LTP+LTDi/LTD+LTPi due to an augmenting/lowering PKA activity. Activation of muscarinic M(1)/M(4) receptors must enhance LTP+LTDi/LTD+LTPi as a consequence of an increase/decrease in the activity of protein kinase C/A. The proposed mechanism is in agreement with known experimental data.