Functional analysis of GnRH receptor ligand binding using biotinylated GnRH derivatives

Antagonist and agonist binding models of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the most important classes of drug targets. Since the first high-resolution structure of a GPCR was determined by Palczewski and co-workers [K. Palczewski, T. Kumasaka, T. Hori, C.A. Behnke, H. Motoshima, B.A. Fox, I. Le Trong, D.C. Teller, T. Okada, R.E. Stenkamp, M. Yamamoto, M. Miyano, Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G-protein-coupled receptor, Science 289 (2000) 739-745], development of in silico models of rhodopsin-like GPCRs could be rationally founded. In this work, we present a model of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor based on the rhodopsin structure. The transmembrane helices are modeled by homology, while the extra- and intra-cellular loops are modeled in such a way that experimentally determined interactions and microdomains (e.g., hydrophobic cores) are retained. We conclude that specifically tailored models, compared to more automatic approaches, have the benefit that known interactions are easily introduced early in the homology modeling. Furthermore, tailored models, although more tedious to construct, are better suited for drug lead finding and for compound optimization. To test the stability of the receptor, we performed a 1 ns molecular dynamics simulation. Moreover, we docked two agonists (native GnRH and Triptorelin, [dTrp(6)]-GnRH) and two antagonists (Cetrorelix, dNal(1)-dCpa(2)-dPal(3)-Ser(4)-Tyr(5)-dCit(6)-Leu(7)-Arg(8)-Pro(9)-dAla(10)), and the covalently constrained dicyclic decapeptide dicyclo(1,1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Glu(1)(Gly(1)')-dCpa(2)-dTrp(3)-Asp(4)-dbu(5)-dNal(6)-Leu(7)-Arg(8)-Pro(9)-dpr(10)-NH(2)] into the putative receptor binding site. The docked ligand conformations result in ligand-receptor interactions that are generally in good agreement with site-directed mutagenesis and ligand-binding studies presented in the literature. Our results indicate that the binding conformation of the antagonists differs from that of the agonists. This difference can be linked to the activation or inhibition of the receptor.

Use of a highly specific monoclonal antibody against the central variable amino acid sequence of mammalian gonadotropin releasing hormone to evaluate GnRH-I tissue distribution compared with GnRH-I binding sites in adult male rats

PROBLEM

Recent evidence shows the existence of numerous isoforms of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), with high sequence homology and a core variable region. This raises the issue that previous GnRH distribution studies may have identified a variety of isoforms. This investigation was carried out to confirm the distribution and binding activity of GnRH-I only.

METHOD OF STUDY

A monoclonal antibody (7B101D10), with specificity for the core region of GnRH-I was used to stain formalin-fixed tissue sections from adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, while a biotinylated GnRH-I sequence was used with avidin-labelled HRP to evaluate regions of GnRH-I binding.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

GnRH-I expression was only found in the hypothalamus, cerebellum, anterior/fore brain and in Sertoli cells, while, binding activity was only present in the pituitary, subendocardium and subepicardium, thymic lymphocytes, peripheral blood lymphocytes and neutrophils. There was overlap in the olfactory neurons, liver (Kupffer macrophages and hepatocytes), spleen (lymphocytes and dendritic cells), myocardium and testes (spermatozoa and Leydig cells) and this may be further evidence of the paracrine/autocrine activity of a neuropeptide.

Critical implication of transmembrane Phe310, possibly in conjunction with Trp279, in the rat gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor activation

The GnRH-R belongs to the superfamily of heptahelical GPCRs. A three-dimensional model of GnRH binding to its receptor predicted that Trp3 was the most deeply buried residue, potentially allowing it to interact with both Trp279, a highly conserved residue in the TMH 6 of GPCRs, and Phe310, present essentially in TMH 7 of GnRH-Rs. Replacement of Phe310 with Leu, the most common positional residue in GPCRs, induced a slightly decreased Bmax (1.6-fold) and affinity (3.8-fold); in addition, IP production was completely abolished. Similarly, replacement of Trp279 with Ser depressed the Bmax by 5.2-fold, the affinity by 2.3-fold, and totally abrogated IP production. The effect of the double mutation was not additive on binding, since the Bmax was reduced to the level of the Phe310Leu mutant, although the Kd was restored to a value not significantly different from that of the wild-type. The double mutant was also unable to induce IP production. Unexpectedly, no influence of any single or double substitution was noted on receptor internalization. These data provide evidence for the crucial role of Phe310, possibly in conjunction with Trp279, on GnRH transduction and suggest that the conformation for phospholipase C activation may not be required for GnRH-R internalization.