Association of allelic loss at 8p22 with poor prognosis among breast cancer cases treated with high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy

Implications of genomic instability in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer

Tumorigenesis is a multistep process resulting from DNA mutations observed at the DNA sequence and chromosome level as well as epigenetic changes, which affect expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Breast cancer is a very heterogeneous disease that manifests in various histological and clinical types. Defects in the biological action of the genome driven by various alterations, such as point mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, lead to the collapse of genome integrity, uncontrolled cell proliferation and failure in apoptotic cell death. Detailed profiling of breast cancer-associated genomic alterations is indispensable for the design of individualized anticancer therapy, by suggesting diagnostic and prognostic criteria as well as the outcome of applied treatment. Among various directions of cancer research, identification of genomic alterations in breast cancer and their translation into clinical applications is at the forefront.

Selective genomic copy number imbalances and probability of recurrence in early-stage breast cancer

A number of studies of copy number imbalances (CNIs) in breast tumors support associations between individual CNIs and patient outcomes. However, no pattern or signature of CNIs has emerged for clinical use. We determined copy number (CN) gains and losses using high-density molecular inversion probe (MIP) arrays for 971 stage I/II breast tumors and applied a boosting strategy to fit hazards models for CN and recurrence, treating chromosomal segments in a dose-specific fashion (-1 [loss], 0 [no change] and +1 [gain]). The concordance index (C-Index) was used to compare prognostic accuracy between a training (n = 728) and test (n = 243) set and across models. Twelve novel prognostic CNIs were identified: losses at 1p12, 12q13.13, 13q12.3, 22q11, and Xp21, and gains at 2p11.1, 3q13.12, 10p11.21, 10q23.1, 11p15, 14q13.2-q13.3, and 17q21.33. In addition, seven CNIs previously implicated as prognostic markers were selected: losses at 8p22 and 16p11.2 and gains at 10p13, 11q13.5, 12p13, 20q13, and Xq28. For all breast cancers combined, the final full model including 19 CNIs, clinical covariates, and tumor marker-approximated subtypes (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor, ERBB2 amplification, and Ki67) significantly outperformed a model containing only clinical covariates and tumor subtypes (C-Index(full model), train[test]  =  0.72[0.71] ± 0.02 vs. C-Index(clinical + subtype model), train[test]  =  0.62[0.62] ± 0.02; p<10(-6)). In addition, the full model containing 19 CNIs significantly improved prognostication separately for ER-, HER2+, luminal B, and triple negative tumors over clinical variables alone. In summary, we show that a set of 19 CNIs discriminates risk of recurrence among early-stage breast tumors, independent of ER status. Further, our data suggest the presence of specific CNIs that promote and, in some cases, limit tumor spread.

Loss of heterozygosity at D8S298 is a predictor for long-term survival of patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I of hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Our previous studies have shown that chromosome 8p deletion correlates with metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study was to determine whether 8p deletion could be used in predicting the prognosis of patients with HCC, particularly in those with early stage of HCC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 131 patients with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage I of HCC who underwent curative liver resection were enrolled. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was examined using 10 microsatellite markers at chromosome 8p, as well as 14 microsatellites at chromosome 1p, 17p, 4q, 13q, and 16q, and their association with 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients was analyzed.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort of patients, the mean LOH frequency at these 24 loci was 43.2%; LOH frequencies at D8S298 and D1S199 were 31.5% and 33.7%, respectively. LOH at D8S298 was associated with a worse 5-year OS (P = 0.008) and DFS (P = 0.038) in patients with TNM stage I of HCC. Likewise, the patients with LOH at D1S199 had a worse 5-year OS (P < 0.001) and DFS (P = 0.014) compared with those without LOH at D1S199. In multivariate analyses, LOH at D8S298 was an independent predictor of decreased DFS (hazard ratio, 0.372; 95% 95% confidence interval, 0.146-0.948; P = 0.038), whereas LOH at D1S199 was an independent predictor of decreased OS (hazard ratio, 0.281; 95% confidence interval, 0.123-0.643; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

LOH at D8S298 and D1S199 is independently associated with a worse survival in patients with TNM stage I of HCC after curative resection and could serve as novel prognostic predictors for this subgroup of patients.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with different histopathological grades and corresponding new breast tumour events: analysis of loss of heterozygosity

To compare chromosomal alterations in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of different histopathological grades and to study aberrations between primary DCIS and corresponding ipsi- or contralateral new in situ or invasive tumours, a study was undertaken of the pattern of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosomal regions in which LOH has previously been described in invasive breast cancer. LOH was analysed using 19 microsatellite markers located on chromosomes 3p, 6q, 8p, 8q, 9p, 11p, 11q, 16q, 17p, and 17q in 30 women with a primary DCIS. Eleven women with DCIS of grade 1 and 19 with grade 3 according to the EORTC classification system were included. In six patients LOH was also analysed in a subsequent new breast cancer. Fractional allelic loss (FAL, the ratio of chromosomal arms where allelic loss was detected divided by the total number of chromosomal arms with informative markers) was statistically significantly higher in grade 1 DCIS compared with grade 3 (p=0.02) for the 19 loci, indicating that the amount of allelic loss does not correlate with increasing aggressiveness of the studied tumours. Also observed was a complete heterogeneity of LOH in the primary DCIS and their corresponding new events, suggesting that these events probably developed from genetically divergent clones.

A network of clinically and functionally relevant genes is involved in the reversion of the tumorigenic phenotype of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells after transfer of human chromosome 8

Several investigations have supposed that tumor suppressor genes might be located on human chromosome 8. We used microcell-mediated transfer of chromosome 8 into MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and generated independent hybrids with strongly reduced tumorigenic potential. Loss of the transferred chromosome results in reappearance of the malignant phenotype. Expression analysis identified a set of 109 genes (CT8-ps) differentially expressed in microcell hybrids as compared to the tumorigenic MDA-MB-231 and rerevertant cells. Of these, 44.9% are differentially expressed in human breast tumors. The expression pattern of CT8-ps was associated with prognostic factors such as tumor size and grading as well as loss of heterozygosity at the short arm of chromosome 8. We identified CT8-ps networks suggesting that these genes act cooperatively to cause reversion of tumorigenicity in MDA-MB-231 cells. Our findings provide a conceptual basis and experimental system to identify and evaluate genes and gene networks involved in the development and/or progression of breast cancer.