From electrical wiring to plastic neurons: evolving approaches to the study of pain

Sensory perception thresholds in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To compare sensory thresholds in different nerve-fiber types in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) and healthy controls, using thermal sensory testing and measuring current perception thresholds (CPT).

METHODS

We enrolled 22 men with CPPS and 20 healthy control participants. We determined the thermal sensory perception thresholds of C and Adelta nerve fibers on the perineum and left posterior thigh. To test CPT, we used sine wave electrical stimulation at 5, 250, and 2000 Hz, resulting in the selective depolarization of small unmyelinated C fibers, small myelinated Adelta, and large myelinated Abeta fibers, respectively. We bilaterally tested the hypothenar surface of the palms, medial parts of soles, midshaft of penis, and 1 site in the midperineum, for a total of 7 sites.

RESULTS

The mean age of men with CPPS was similar to that of controls [42.8 (standard deviation, 9.4) and 40.4 (standard deviation, 13.2) years, respectively, P = .548]. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for thermal perception thresholds in both the perineum and left thigh (P >.05). There was also no difference between the 2 groups for CPT values of all 3 frequencies of stimuli in each area tested (P >.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of sensory threshold differences between men with CPPS and controls, with either thermal stimulation of C and Adelta fiber afferents or electrical stimulation of C, Adelta, and Abeta fiber afferents, discounts the existence of a peripheral neuropathy as a cause for pain in men with CPPS.

Nociceptive behavior in animal models for peripheral neuropathy: spinal and supraspinal mechanisms

Since the initial description by Wall [Wall, P.D., 1967. The laminar organization of dorsal horn and effects of descending impulses. J. Neurophysiol. 188, 403-423] of tonic descending inhibitory control of dorsal horn neurons, several studies have aimed to characterize the role of various brain centers in the control of nociceptive input to the spinal cord. The role of brainstem centers in pain inhibition has been well documented over the past four decades. Lesion to peripheral nerves results in hypersensitivity to mild tactile or cold stimuli (allodynia) and exaggerated response to nociceptive stimuli (hyperalgesia), both considered as cardinal signs of neuropathic pain. The increased interest in animal models for peripheral neuropathy has raised several questions concerning the rostral conduction of the neuropathic manifestations and the role of supraspinal centers, especially brainstem, in the inhibitory control or in the abnormal contribution to the maintenance and facilitation of neuropathic-like behavior. This review aims to summarize the data on the ascending and descending modulation of neuropathic manifestations and discusses the recent experimental data on the role of supraspinal centers in the control of neuropathic pain. In particular, the review emphasizes the importance of the reciprocal interconnections between the analgesic areas of the brainstem and the pain-related areas of the forebrain. The latter includes the cerebral limbic areas, the prefrontal cortex, the intralaminar thalamus and the hypothalamus and play a critical role in the control of pain considered as part of an integrated behavior related to emotions and various homeostatic regulations. We finally speculate that neuropathic pain, like extrapyramidal motor syndromes, reflects a disorder in the processing of somatosensory information.

Region- or state-related differences in expression and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) in naïve and pain-experiencing rats

BACKGROUND

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), one member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, has been suggested to regulate a diverse array of cellular functions, including cell growth, differentiation, survival, as well as neuronal plasticity. Recent evidence indicates a role for ERKs in nociceptive processing in both dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord. However, little literature has been reported to examine the differential distribution and activation of ERK isoforms, ERK1 and ERK2, at different levels of pain-related pathways under both normal and pain states. In the present study, quantitative blot immunolabeling technique was used to determine the spatial and temporal expression of ERK1 and ERK2, as well as their activated forms, in the spinal cord, primary somatosensory cortex (SI area of cortex), and hippocampus under normal, transient pain and persistent pain states.

RESULTS

In naïve rats, we detected regional differences in total expression of ERK1 and ERK2 across different areas. In the spinal cord, ERK1 was expressed more abundantly than ERK2, while in the SI area of cortex and hippocampus, there was a larger amount of ERK2 than ERK1. Moreover, phosphorylated ERK2 (pERK2), not phosphorylated ERK1 (pERK1), was normally expressed with a high level in the SI area and hippocampus, but both pERK1 and pERK2 were barely detectable in normal spinal cord. Intraplantar saline or bee venom injection, mimicking transient or persistent pain respectively, can equally initiate an intense and long-lasting activation of ERKs in all three areas examined. However, isoform-dependent differences existed among these areas, that is, pERK2 exhibited stronger response than pERK1 in the spinal cord, whereas ERK1 was more remarkably activated than ERK2 in the S1 area and hippocampus.

CONCLUSION

Taken these results together, we conclude that: (1) under normal state, while ERK immunoreactivity is broadly distributed in the rat central nervous system in general, the relative abundance of ERK1 and ERK2 differs greatly among specific regions; (2) under pain state, either ERK1 or ERK2 can be effectively phosphorylated with a long-term duration by both transient and persistent pain, but their response patterns differ from each other across distinct regions; (3) The long-lasting ERKs activation induced by bee venom injection is highly correlated with our previous behavioral, electrophysiological, morphological and pharmacological observations, lending further support to the functional importance of ERKs-mediated signaling pathways in the processing of negative consequences of pain associated with sensory, emotional and cognitive dimensions.

On the enigma of pain and hyperalgesia: A molecular perspective

Pain is a common symptom of injuries and inflammatory-related conditions. The perception of pain, commonly known as nociception, depends on integrated receptors and molecular pathways. Inflammatory mediators are involved in the genesis, persistence, and severity of pain. Noxious stimuli can trigger a cascade of inflammatory loops that feedback onto sensory modalities and domains of the CNS, in an attempt to alert the brain of deregulated homeostasis. Understanding the mechanisms of pain continue to make nociception and hyperalgesia a burgeoning field of research.

Chronic pain/dysfunction in whiplash-associated disorders

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this article are (1) to review current knowledge of and recent concepts pertaining to the causes of chronic pain and/or dysfunction following whiplash-type injuries and (2) to acquaint those who treat these types of injuries with possible mechanisms of continued pain and or dysfunction following whiplash.

DATA COLLECTION

A review of the literature on mechanisms of injury and neurologic considerations was undertaken. A hand search of relevant medical, neuroscience, chiropractic, and online Index Medicus sources and other sources involving mechanisms of nociception, neurotransmitters, and receptors that might evolve from whiplash-type soft tissue injuries was conducted.

RESULTS

Pain is a complex phenomenon that has great variability. Chronic pain appears to involve a deficient descending inhibitory process and/or ongoing excitatory input.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variety of reactions by individuals to any given type of stimulus. Injury may lead to increases in neuronal activity and prolonged changes in the nervous system. Chronic pain may be seen as part of a central disturbance accompanied by disinhibition or sensitization of central pain modulation, mirrored in the immune and endocrine systems. Patients with chronic whiplash syndrome may have a generalized central hyperexcitability from a loss of tonic inhibitory input (disinhibition) and/or ongoing excitatory input contributing to dorsal horn hyperexcitability. Dysfunction of the motor system may also occur, with or without pain. The purpose of treatment should be not only to relieve pain but also to allow for proper proprioception.

Acute pain and pain control: state of the art

Recognition and treatment of pain in the emergency department has undergone an evolution in the past decade. Emergency clinicians, educators, and researchers have begun to address the undertreatment of pain as well as challenge the long-standing dogmas concerning pain treatment. Well-described barriers, both psychological and educational, contribute to our providing inadequate pain relief. This state-of-the-art update describes the current perception of our practice with regard to pain relief and how it can be modified. Pain and pain control is such a broad and complex topic that only new advances and important principles relevant to the practice of emergency medicine are presented. Headache, pediatric pain, and procedural sedation and analgesia are not covered in this article as they will be addressed in future state-of-the-art articles.