Gastric ECL-cell hyperplasia produces enhanced basal and stimulated gastric acid output but not gastric erosion formation in the rat

Mechanism of acid hypersecretion post curative gastrinoma resection

BACKGROUND

Some patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome post curative gastrinoma resection continue to show gastric acid hypersecretion; however, the mechanism is unknown.

AIM

The aim of this study was to prospectively study acid secretion following curative gastrinoma resection and analyze factors contributing in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

METHODS

Fifty patients cured post gastrinoma resection were studied with serial assessments of acid secretory status, cure status and ECL-cell status/activity (with serial biopsies, CgA, urinary N-MIAA). Correlative analysis was performed to determine predictive factors.

RESULTS

Hypersecretion occurred in 31 patients (62%) and 14 had extreme-hypersecretion. There was an initial decline (3-6 months) in BAO/MAO, which then remained stable for eight years. Preoperative BAO correlated with the postoperative secretion, but not other clinical, tumoral, laboratory variables, the degree of postoperative acid suppression or type of antisecretory drug needed. Hypersecretors had greater postoperative ECL changes (P=0.005), serum CGA (P=0.009) and 24-h urinary N-MIAA (P=0.0038).

CONCLUSIONS

Post curative resection, gastric hypersecretion persists long term (mean 8 years) in 62% of patients and in 28% it is extreme, despite normogastrinemia. No preoperative variable except BAO correlates with postresection hypersecretion. The persistent increased ECL-cell extent post curative resection suggests prolonged hypergastrinemia can lead to changes in ECL-cells that are either irreversible in humans or sustained by unknown mechanisms not involving fasting hypergastrinemia and which can result in hypersecretion, in a proportion of which it can be extreme. Whether similar findings may occur in patients with idiopathic GERD treated for prolonged periods (>10 years) with PPIs, at present, is unknown.

Successful drug development despite adverse preclinical findings part 1: processes to address issues and most important findings

Unexpected adverse preclinical findings (APFs) are not infrequently encountered during drug development. Such APFs can be functional disturbances such as QT prolongation, morphological toxicity or carcinogenicity. The latter is of particular concern in conjunction with equivocal genotoxicity results. The toxicologic pathologist plays an important role in recognizing these effects, in helping to characterize them, to evaluate their risk for man, and in proposing measures to mitigate the risk particularly in early clinical trials. A careful scientific evaluation is crucial while termination of the development of a potentially useful drug must be avoided. This first part of the review discusses processes to address unexpected APFs and provides an overview over typical APFs in particular classes of drugs. If the mode of action (MoA) by which a drug candidate produces an APF is known, this supports evaluation of its relevance for humans. Tailor-made mechanistic studies, when needed, must be planned carefully to test one or several hypotheses regarding the potential MoA and to provide further data for risk evaluation. Safety considerations are based on exposure at no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAEL) of the most sensitive and relevant animal species and guide dose escalation in clinical trials. The availability of early markers of toxicity for monitoring of humans adds further safety to clinical studies. Risk evaluation is concluded by a weight of evidence analysis (WoE) with an array of parameters including drug use, medical need and alternatives on the market. In the second part of this review relevant examples of APFs will be discussed in more detail.

Low gastric acid and high plasma gastrin in high-anxiety Wistar Kyoto rats

OBJECTIVE

Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats are more susceptible to stress-evoked ulcerations than Sprague-Dawley (SPD) rats. We have already demonstrated that gastrin cells are more active and ghrelin cells less active in WKY rats than in SPD rats. The purpose of this study was to compare endocrine cell activity and gastric acid output in WKY and SPD rats.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Gastric acid output was determined in conscious rats with gastric fistula. Plasma gastrin and ghrelin levels were measured after an overnight fast. Acid secretagogues (gastrin, histamine and carbachol) were given by continuous subcutaneous infusion.

RESULTS

The volume of gastric juice, and the acidity and acid output were all significantly lower (p <0.05) in fasted WKY rats than in fasted SPD rats. Gastrin evoked a 4-fold (p <0.01) and 3-fold (p <0.05) increase in gastric acid output in SPD rats and WKY rats, respectively. Histamine raised the acid output 1.6-fold in SPD rats (p=0.06) and 3-fold in WKY rats (p <0.05), while carbachol failed to affect the acid output (weak increase, p >0.05). Fasting plasma ghrelin levels were 2-fold higher in SPD rats than in WKY rats (p <0.01) while fasting gastrin levels were 10-fold higher in WKY rats than in SPD rats (p <0.05). Neither the parietal-cell density nor the oxyntic mucosal thickness differed between the two strains.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that a high gastrin cell activity in WKY rats is secondary to a low gastric acidity. Whether the high gastrin cell activity is linked to susceptibility to stress ulcer in WKY rats warrants further investigation.