Modulation by APGW-amide, an Achatina endogenous inhibitory tetrapeptide, of currents induced by neuroactive compounds on Achatina neurons: amines and amino acids

Effect of APGW-amide on [Ca2+]i in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells

In order to determine whether Ala-Pro-Gly-Try-NH2 (APGW-amide) could affect mammalian excitable cells, we investigated the effect of APGW-amide in PC12 cells. APGW-amide caused a rapid [Ca2+]i elevation, which was completely prevented by elimination of extracellular Ca2+ with EGTA and inhibited by two L-type Ca2+ channel blockers. [Ca2+]i elevation was also blocked by a specific PKC inhibitor and prolonged pretreatment of cells with PMA. These results indicate that APGW-amide elevates [Ca2+]i in PC12 cells, possibly by Ca2+ influx via L-type Ca2+ channel activated by PKC.

Modulation by APGW-amide, an Achatina endogenous inhibitory tetrapeptide, of currents induced by neuroactive compounds on Achatina neurons: peptides

1. Modulatory effects of APGW-amide (Ala-Pro-Gly-Trp-NH2), proposed as an inhibitory neurotransmitter of Achatina neurons, perfused at 3 x 10(-6) M on the currents induced by neuroactive peptides, ejected by brief pressure, were examined by using Achatina giant neuron types, v-RCDN (ventral-right cerebral distinct neuron) and PON (periodically oscillating neuron), under voltage clamp. 2. Outward current (Iout) caused by FMRFamide (Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-NH2) on v-RCDN, which was probably K+ dependent, was inhibited with membrane conductance (g) increase by APGW-amide. From the dose (pressure duration)-response curves of FMRFamide and a Lineweaver-Burk plot of these data, the inhibition caused by APGW-amide was mainly in an uncompetitive manner. 3. Iout caused by APGW-amide on v-RCDN, which was probably K+ dependent, was inhibited with g increase by APGW-amide. The inhibition caused by APGW-amide was partly in a competitive manner and partly in a noncompetitive manner. 4. Iout caused by [Ser2]-Mytilus inhibitory peptide, [Ser2]-MIP (Gly-Ser-Pro-Met-Phe-Val-NH2) on v-RCDN, which was probably K+ dependent, was inhibited with g increase by APGW-amide. Because the modulation of this current was not so marked, a dose-response study of this compound was not carried out. Iin induced by oxytocin on PON was not affected by APGW-amide. 5. From the dose-response curves of APGW-amide, perfused consecutively, the inhibitory effects of APGW-amide on the Iout caused by APGW-amide were stronger than those on the Iout caused by FMRFamide. 6. The inhibition of the APGW-amide-induced Iout on v-RCDN by APGW-amide was partly due to the competition in the receptor sites and partly to the g increase. The inhibition by APGW-amide on the Iout induced by FMRFamide and [Ser2]-MIP would be partly due to the g increase. In addition, we consider that APGW-amide affects intracellular signal transduction systems or ionic channels, thus modulating these currents. 7. The currents modulated by APGW-amide were different from those modulated by achatin-1, another Achatina endogenous neuroexcitatory peptide. We consider that the mechanisms underlying the modulatory effects of APGW-amide are different from those of achatin-I.