The effects of nicotinic and muscarinic receptor activation on patch-clamped cells in the optic tectum of Rana pipiens

Muscarinic inhibition of recurrent glutamatergic excitation in frog tectum column prevents NMDA receptor activation on efferent neuron

It is widely recognized that neuronal network activity can be modulated via activation of nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors located pre- and postsynaptically. It was established in our earlier study that the activation of presynaptic nicotinic receptors greatly facilitates the retinotectal glutamatergic transmission. In the present study, we have determined a transmitter of tectal recurrent excitation and explored the effects of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation on the recurrent excitation and the activity of frog tectum column in vivo. Discharge of a single retinal ganglion cell was elicited by a minimal electrical stimulation of the retina. Evoked activity of the tectum column was recorded using the carbon-fiber microelectrode inserted into the tectum layer F. We found the following: 1. The recurrent excitation in the tectum column was not affected by d-tubocurarine (10 μM) and was greatly depressed by the kynurenic acid (500 μM), demonstrating glutamatergic nature of the recurrent excitation. 2. The glutamatergic recurrent excitation was largely reduced by carbamylcholine (100 μM) and oxotremorine-M (10 μM), demonstrating that the activation of muscarinic receptors, located, presumably, on the presynaptic terminals of recurrent pear-shaped neurons, inhibits the recurrent excitation in the tectum column. 3. The muscarinic inhibition of glutamatergic recurrent transmission had critical influence on the activity of the tectum column, preventing the generation of an output signal through suppression of the NMDA receptor activation and establishing necessary conditions for returning of the network to its resting state.

Stimulus-driven competition in a cholinergic midbrain nucleus

The mechanisms by which the brain selects a particular stimulus as the next target for gaze are poorly understood. A cholinergic nucleus in the owl’s midbrain exhibits functional properties that suggest its role in bottom-up stimulus selection. Neurons in the nucleus isthmi pars parvocellularis (Ipc) respond to wide ranges of visual and auditory features, but they are not tuned to particular values of those features. Instead, they encode the relative strengths of stimuli across the entirety of space. Many neurons exhibit switch-like properties, abruptly increasing their responses to a stimulus in their receptive field when it becomes the strongest stimulus. This information propagates directly to the optic tectum, a structure involved in gaze control and stimulus selection, as periodic (25–50 Hz) bursts of cholinergic activity. The functional properties of Ipc neurons resemble those of a “salience map”, a core component in computational models for spatial attention and gaze control.

Electrophysiological properties of isthmic neurons in frogs revealed by in vitro and in vivo studies

The frog nucleus isthmi (parabigeminal nucleus in mammals) is a visually responsive, cholinergic and anatomically well-defined group of neurons in the midbrain. It shares reciprocal topographic projections with the ipsilateral optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) and strongly influences visual processing. Anatomical and biochemical information indicates the existence of distinct neural populations within the frog nucleus isthmi, which raises the question: are there electrophysiological distinctions between neurons that are putatively classified by their anatomical and biochemical properties? To address this question, we measured frog nucleus isthmi neuron cellular properties in vitro and visual response properties in vivo. No evidence for distinct electrophysiological classes of neurons was found. We thus conclude that, despite the anatomical and biochemical differences, the cells of the frog nucleus isthmi respond homogeneously to both current injections and simple visual stimuli.

Distinct mechanisms for top-down control of neural gain and sensitivity in the owl optic tectum

We demonstrate that distinct mechanisms of top-down control regulate, respectively, the sensitivity and gain of sensory responses in the owl's optic tectum (OT). Electrical microstimulation in the forebrain gaze control area, the arcopallial gaze field (AGF), results in a space-specific regulation of sensory responses in the OT. AGF microstimulation increases the responsiveness of OT neurons representing stimuli at the same location as that represented at the AGF site. We show that the mechanism that underlies this effect operates focally to enhance neuronal sensitivity and improve tuning consistency and spatial resolution. At the same time, AGF microstimulation decreases the responsiveness of OT neurons representing stimuli at all other locations. The mechanism that underlies this effect operates globally to modulate neuronal gain. The coordinated action of these different mechanisms can account for many of the reported effects of spatial attention on neural responses in monkeys and on behavioral performance in humans.

Nicotine exposure refines visual map topography through an NMDA receptor-mediated pathway

The precise mapping of one surface onto another is fundamental to visual system organization and depends upon adequate stimulation of postsynaptic targets to stabilize correctly placed synapses. As exogenous nicotine alters neuronal activity, we investigated whether it would affect the visual map created by retinal ganglion cell terminals in the frog optic tectum. Chronic exposure of the tectum to nicotine decreased the retinal area from which cells project to a given tectal site. This map refinement was also produced by exposure to either the alpha-bungarotoxin sensitive nicotinic receptor agonist, anatoxin-a or the alpha-bungarotoxin-insensitive nicotinic receptor agonist epiboxidine. Immunocytochemical studies using mAb306 and mAb22 demonstrated that alpha-bungarotoxin-sensitive and -insensitive nicotinic receptors, respectively, occupied different tectal sites. Choline acetyltransferase immunoreactivity overlapped with mAb306, but not mAb22, staining. The developing optic tectum was more sensitive to nicotine than the adult tectum and nicotine induced both map refinements and map disruptions in a concentration-dependent manner. Blockade of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor with D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (D-APV) prevented nicotine from refining the map in the adult tectum. Exposure to the use-dependent NMDA antagonist MK801 alone had no effect on retinotectal topography but in combination with either NMDA or nicotine it disrupted the map. Exposure to NMDA alone produced refinement. We conclude that the map refinement induced by chronic nicotine treatment has as its basis an increase in the level of NMDA receptor activity. The data are consistent with a model whereby map topography can be bidirectionally affected by either increasing or decreasing NMDA receptor activity.

Bidirectional modulation of visual plasticity by cholinergic receptor subtypes in the frog optic tectum

Cholinergic input to the optic tectum is necessary for visual map maintenance. To understand why, we examined the effects of activation of the different cholinergic receptor subtypes in tectal brain slices and determined whether the retinotectal map was affected by manipulations of their activity in vivo. Both alpha-bungarotoxin sensitive and insensitive nicotinic receptor agonists increased spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSCs) in a subpopulation of patch-clamped tectal cells; application of subtype selective receptor antagonists reduced nicotine-induced increases in sPSCs. Activation of alpha-bungarotoxin insensitive nicotinic receptors also induced substantial inward current in some cells. Muscarinic receptor mediated outward current responses were blocked by the M2-like muscarinic receptor antagonists himbacine or AF-DX 384 and mimicked by application of the M2-like agonist oxotremorine. A less frequently observed muscarinic response involving a change in sPSC frequency appeared to be mediated by M1-like muscarinic receptors. In separate experiments, pharmacological manipulation of cholinergic receptor subtype activation led to changes in the activity-dependent visual map created in the tectum by retinal ganglion cell terminals. Chronic exposure of the tectum to either alpha-bungarotoxin insensitive, alpha-bungarotoxin sensitive or M1-like receptor antagonists resulted in map disruption. However, treatment with the M2-like receptor antagonist, AF-DX 384, compressed the map. We conclude that nicotinic or M1-like muscarinic receptors control input to tectal cells while alpha-bungarotoxin insensitive nicotinic receptors and M2-like muscarinic receptors change tectal cell responses to that input. Blockade of the different cholinergic receptor subtypes can have opposing effects on map topography that are consistent with expected effects on tectal cell activity levels.