The role of whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery on brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for inoperable patients with renal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to analyze the dose-dependent safety profiles of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with inoperable small renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIAL

This is a retrospective study from a single institution including patients with RCC treated between 2011 and 2020 with SBRT on the primary tumor or on a local recurrence after surgery. All patients had been declared inoperable or refused surgery. The patients were divided into two dose level groups: group 1 (BED10<60Gy) and group 2 (BED10≥60Gy). Acute and late toxicities, renal function and local control (LC) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients were analyzed with an average follow-up of 25.1 months. Nine patients (37%) and three patients (14%) reported grade 1-2 acute and late toxicities, respectively. No grade≥3 acute and late toxicities were observed. There was no significant difference in acute and late toxicities between the two groups (P=0.21 and P=0.27, respectively). There was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate in the 15 patients, eligible for renal toxicity analysis between the pre-radiation and the 12-month follow-up (P=0.1) and the last follow-up (P=0.06). LC at the last follow-up was noted in 19 out of 23 patients (83%) and was based on imaging acquisition. LC was 77.8% for group 1 and 85.7% for group 2 (P=1.95).

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation was not associated with an increase in acute and late grade≥2 toxicities. There appears to be a trend towards increased LC at higher doses.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Renal Cell Cancer: 24-Month Results of the RSR1 Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a new therapeutic option for primary renal cell carcinoma. However, treatment doses lack consistency in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for renal cancer SBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This phase 1 multicentric dose-escalation study assessed 4 dose levels: 8 Gy × 4, 8 Gy × 5, 10 Gy × 4, and 12 Gy × 4. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose, defined by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any acute side effect of grade ≥4 based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Averse Events, version 4.0.

RESULTS

From October 2010 to September 2017, 13 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 23 months. There was no dose-limiting toxicity in our study, and the highest dose was reached successfully. No acute or late toxic effects above grade 2 were seen. There was no significant alteration of renal function after treatment. At 24 months, 2 patients had partial response and the others had stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

After 24 months of follow-up, no dose-limiting toxicity was seen at any of the prescribed dose levels in our study. The findings suggest that our last dose level of 48 Gy in 4 12-Gy fractions can be considered safe and can be used in further studies.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with renal cell carcinoma

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of renal cell carcinoma was published in 2019 with an update planned for 2021. It was therefore decided by both the ESMO and the Singapore Society of Oncology (SSO) to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in May 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2019 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of renal cell carcinomas in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter were discussed when appropriate.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation (SAbR) for Oligometastatic RCC

A significant proportion of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients present with oligometastatic disease. Retrospective and limited prospective data suggests that a subgroup of patients with oligometastatic mRCC benefits from aggressive local therapy. With the emerging data of high local control efficacy with low toxicity of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) for both CNS and extra-cranial mRCC, SAbR may play a critical role in the multi-modality management of mRCC patients with oligometastatic disease. In addition to local control benefit, the benefit of SAbR in this patient population can range from longitudinal disease control, maintaining quality of life, deferring systemic therapy, immune-modulation and even improving survival. A review of the retrospective data suggests that SAbR benefits oligometastatic mRCC patients with metachronous metastases, and perhaps those with indolent biology. Large prospective trials are indicated to successfully integrate SAbR of oligometastatic mRCC with the available systemic therapies to harness the optimal benefit of SAbR for this patient population.

Impact of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Combined With Radiation Therapy for the Management of Brain Metastases From Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: Targeted therapy has transformed the outcome for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Their efficacy and safety have also been demonstrated in brain metastatic RCC. Preclinical evidence suggests synergism of radiation and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Consequently, several studies have compared their efficacy in the treatment of RCC brain metastases to the era of brain management with surgery/radiation only.

Objectives: We seek to systematically review and meta-analyze the results of those studies that involved comparative intervention groups of brain management; TKIs, and never used TKIs.

Methods and Materials: Online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for comparative studies. Overall survival as the primary outcome of interest, and local brain control, distant control, and adverse events as secondary outcomes of interest were recorded for meta-analysis. Hazard ratios were pooled together using Review Manager 5.3. Fixed effects or random effects model were adopted according to the level of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis included studies that involved SRS as the local treatment of management.

Results: Overall 7 studies (n = 897) were included for meta-analysis. TKI use was associated with better survival (HR 0.60 [0.52, 0.69], p < 0.00001) and local brain control (HR 0.34 [0.11, 0.98], p = 0.05). SRS subgroup also revealed significantly better survival (HR 0.61 [0.44, 0.83], p = 0.002) and local brain control (HR 0.19 [0.08, 0.45], p = 0.0002). Distant brain control (HR 0.95 [0.67, 1.35], p = 0.79) and brain progression free survival were unaffected (HR 0.94 [0.56, 1.56], p = 0.80). Only one study (n = 376) reported significantly greater 12-months cumulative incidence of radiation necrosis with TKI use within 30 days of SRS (10.9 vs. 6.4%, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: TKIs use in combination with SRS is safe and effective for treating RCC brain metastases. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the results.

Tumor Primary Site and Histology Subtypes Role in Radiotherapeutic Management of Brain Metastases

Randomized controlled trials have failed to report any survival advantage for WBRT combined with SRS in the management of brain metastases, despite the enhanced local and distant control in comparison to each treatment alone. Literature review have revealed important role of primary histology of the tumor when dealing with brain metastases. NSCLC responds better to combined approach even when there was only single brain metastasis present while breast cancer has registered better survival with SRS alone probably due to better response of primary tumor to advancement in surgical and chemotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, mutation status (EGFR/ALK) in lung cancer and receptor status (ER/PR/HER2) in breast cancer also exhibit diversity in their response to radiotherapy. Radioresistant tumors like renal cell carcinoma and melanoma brain metastases have achieved better results when treated with SRS alone. Secondly, single brain metastasis may benefit from local and distant brain control achieved with combined treatment. These diverse outcomes suggest a primary histology-based analysis of the radiotherapy regimens (WBRT, SRS, or their combination) would more ideally establish the role of radiotherapy in the management of brain metastases. Molecularly targeted therapeutic and immunotherapeutic agents have revealed synergism with radiation therapy particularly SRS in treating cancer patients with brain metastases. Clinical updates in this regard have also been reviewed.

Radiation Therapy for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have led to a resurgence of the use of radiotherapy in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These techniques provide excellent local control and palliation of metastatic sites of disease with minimal toxicity. Additionally, SBRT to the primary tumor may be efficacious and well tolerated in select patients that are not surgical candidates. Emerging data suggest that SBRT may potentiate the immune response, and current and future study will evaluate if SBRT can improve survival outcomes in patients with metastatic RCC.

Overall survival and response to radiation and targeted therapies among patients with renal cell carcinoma brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

The object of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of targeted therapies on overall survival (OS), distant intracranial failure, local failure, and radiation necrosis among patients treated with radiation therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastases to the brain.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with RCC brain metastasis (BM) between 1998 and 2015 at a single institution were included in this study. The primary outcome was OS, and secondary outcomes included local failure, distant intracranial failure, and radiation necrosis. The timing of targeted therapies was recorded. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to model OS, while multivariate competing-risks regression was used to model local failure, distant intracranial failure, and radiation necrosis, with death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-six patients presented with 912 RCC BMs. Median OS was 9.7 months. Consistent with the previously validated diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) for RCC BM, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and number of BMs were the only factors prognostic for OS. One hundred forty-seven patients (39%) received vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Median OS was significantly greater among patients receiving TKIs (16.8 vs 7.3 months, p < 0.001). Following multivariate analysis, KPS, number of metastases, and TKI use remained significantly associated with OS.The crude incidence of local failure was 14.9%, with a 12-month cumulative incidence of 13.4%. TKIs did not significantly decrease the 12-month cumulative incidence of local failure (11.4% vs 14.5%, p = 0.11). Following multivariate analysis, age, number of BMs, and lesion size remained associated with local failure. The 12-month cumulative incidence of radiation necrosis was 8.0%. Use of TKIs within 30 days of SRS was associated with a significantly increased 12-month cumulative incidence of radiation necrosis (10.9% vs 6.4%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of targeted therapies in patients with RCC BM treated with intracranial SRS was associated with improved OS. However, the use of TKIs within 30 days of SRS increases the rate of radiation necrosis without improving local control or reducing distant intracranial failure. Prospective studies are warranted to determine the optimal timing to reduce the rate of necrosis without detracting from survival.

Evaluation of response to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with radioresistant brain metastases

PURPOSE

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and melanoma have been considered 'radioresistant' due to the fact that they do not respond to conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides high-dose radiation to a defined target volume and a limited number of studies have suggested the potential effectiveness of SRS in radioresistant histologies. We sought to determine the effectiveness of SRS for the treatment of patients with radioresistant brain metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify patients with RCC or melanoma brain metastases treated with SRS. Treatment response were determined in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

We identified 53 radioresistant brain metastases (28% RCC and 72% melanoma) treated in 18 patients. The mean target volume and coverage was 6.2 ± 9.5 mL and 95.5% ± 2.9%, respectively. The mean prescription dose was 20 ± 4.9 Gy. Forty lesions (75%) demonstrated a complete/partial response and 13 lesions (24%) with progressive/stable disease. Smaller target volume (p < 0.001), larger SRS dose (p < 0.001), and coverage (p = 0.008) were found to be positive predictors of complete response to SRS.

CONCLUSION

SRS is an effective management option with up to 75% response rate for radioresistant brain metastases. Tumor volume and radiation dose are predictors of response and can be used to guide the decision-making for patients with radioresistant brain metastases.

Les métastases cérébrales de cancer du rein, un défi clinique

BRAIN METASTASES IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMA, AN UNMET NEED

Brain metastases from renal cell carcinomas are associated with dismal prognosis and might be present in up to 10 % of metastatic patients. Biologically, the blood brain barrier might be disrupted in brain metastases and thus do not exclusively account for treatment resistance. Brain metastases often acquire additional molecular alterations that might provide aggressive features. They are also associated with high lymphocytic infiltration and expression of immune checkpoints PD-1/PD-L1. In clinical routine, scores based on metastatic volume and patients' performance status might help better predict survival. The cornerstone of brain metastases treatment is stereotactic radiation therapy if patients are eligible, while systemic treatments such as antiangiogenics and immune checkpoint inhibitors only provide limited disease control. Early identification of patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinomas and promotion of dedicated clinical trials will be important to try and improve current clinical management.

Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases From Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Targeted Therapy Era: The University of Rochester Experience

OBJECTIVES

Radiotherapy remains the standard approach for brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Kinase inhibitors (KI) have become standard of care for metastatic RCC. They also increase the radiosensitivity of various tumor types in preclinical models. Data are lacking regarding the effect of KIs among RCC patients undergoing radiotherapy for brain metastases. We report our experience of radiotherapy for brain metastatic RCC in the era of targeted therapy and analyzed effects of concurrent KI therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 25 consecutive patients who received radiotherapy for brain metastases from RCC with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or both. Kaplan-Meier rates of overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival (BPFS) were calculated and univariate analyses performed.

RESULTS

Lower diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) score and multiple intracranial metastases were associated with decreased OS and BPFS on univariate analysis; DS-GPA is also a prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in OS or BPFS for SRS compared with WBRT or WBRT and SRS combined. The concurrent use of KI was not associated with any change in OS or BPFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This hypothesis-generating analysis suggests among patients with brain metastatic RCC treated with the most current therapies, those selected to undergo SRS did not experience significantly different survival or control outcomes than those selected to undergo WBRT. From our experience to date, limited in patient numbers, there seems to be neither harm nor benefit in using concurrent KI therapy during radiotherapy. Given that most patients progress systemically, we would recommend considering KI use during brain radiotherapy in these patients.

Radiotherapy for renal cell carcinoma: renaissance of an overlooked approach

Conventional radiotherapy previously had a limited role in the definitive treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), owing to the disappointing outcomes of several trials and the perceived radioresistance of this type of cancer. In this context, radiotherapy has been relegated largely to the palliation of symptoms in patients with metastatic disease, with variable rates of response. Following the availability of newer technologies that enable safe delivery of high-dose radiotherapy, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become increasingly used in patients with RCC. Preclinical evidence demonstrates that RCC cells are sensitive to ablative doses of radiotherapy (≥8-10 Gy). Trials in the setting of intracranial and extracranial oligometastases, as well as primary RCC, have demonstrated excellent tumour control using this approach. Additionally, an awareness of the capacity of high-dose radiation to stimulate antitumour immunity has resulted in novel combinations of SABR with immunotherapies. Here we describe the historical application of conventional radiotherapy, the current biological understanding of the effects of radiation, and the clinical evidence supporting the use of ablative radiotherapy in RCC. We also explore emerging opportunities to combine systemic targeted agents or immunotherapies with radiation. Radiotherapy, although once an overlooked approach, is moving towards the forefront of RCC treatment.

Role of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Renal Cell Cancer: Updated and Critical Review

Purpose

The growing incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) raises many questions about the management of these patients. The late clinical presentation, the presence of locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis, the difficulty of radical surgical excision, and radioresistance make it one of the more challenging tumors to treat. The primary objective of this article is to propose an updated and critical review of the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of RCC.

Methods

This literature review is based on data from meta-analyses and randomized, prospective, and retrospective studies. We collected reports from 1970 to the present about preoperative RT, postoperative RT, stereotactic body RT, radiosurgery, and intraoperative RT in locally advanced renal cancer and in metastatic diseases.

Results

We emphasize the progress made in RT technology that allowed the creation of a more personalized and focused treatment with a minimum rate of complications.

Conclusions

In the coming years, new studies will be published to confirm and increase the indications for use of RT.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Renal Cancer Brain Metastasis: Prognostic Factors and the Role of Whole-Brain Radiation and Surgical Resection

Background. Renal cell carcinoma is a frequent source of brain metastasis. We present our consecutive series of patients treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and analyse prognostic factors and the interplay of WBRT and surgical resection. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 66 patients with 207 lesions treated with the Cyberknife radiosurgery system in our institution. The patients were followed up with imaging and clinical examination 1 month and 2-3 months thereafter for the brain metastasis. Patient, treatment, and outcomes characteristics were analysed. Results. 51 male (77.3%) and 15 female (22.7%) patients, with a mean age of 58.9 years (range of 31–85 years) and a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 90 (range of 60–100), were included in the study. The overall survival was 13.9 months, 21.9 months, and 5.9 months for the patients treated with SRS only, additional surgery, and WBRT, respectively. The actuarial 1-year Local Control rates were 84%, 94%, and 88% for SRS only, for surgery and SRS, and for WBRT and additional SRS, respectively. Conclusions. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment option in patients with brain metastases from RCC. In case of a limited number of brain metastases, surgery and SRS might be appropriate.

Control of brain metastases from radioresistant tumors treated by stereotactic radiosurgery

Renal cell carcinoma, sarcoma, and melanoma are considered to be "radioresistant" tumor histologies. Brain metastases (BM) from these tumors are considered unlikely to be controlled using the relatively low doses used in whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Our objective was to analyze the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on local control and overall survival of BM from radioresistant primary tumors. We reviewed all patients who received Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) for BM at Columbia University Medical Center between January 2009 and April 2014. All patients were treated using the Gamma Knife Perfexion System. Dosimetric data was collected from treatment plans and metastases were categorized as radioresistant or not. Response was assessed by reviewing follow-up brain imaging studies and classified according to RECIST. Local control and median overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In total, 373 tumors were analyzed from 126 patients. Of these tumors, 49 (13.1 %) originated from radioresistant cancers. The overall local control rate in the radioresistant cohort was 89.8 and 90.1 % in the non-radioresistant cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that radioresistance status of the primary tumor had no statistically significant effect on local control with hazard ratios of 1.0 (p = 1.0, 95 % CI 0.388-2.576) and 0.954 (p = 0.926, 95 % CI 0.349-2.603) respectively. Median overall survival for both radioresistant and non-radioresistant cohorts was 20.0 months, with a p value of 0.926. There was no significant difference in local control of BM from radioresistant and non-radioresistant primary tumors treated with GKRS. Both cohorts showed excellent response and local control, suggesting that SRS upfront or in addition to WBRT may be an appropriate strategy in the treatment of BM from radioresistant cancers. Median overall survival for both cohorts was equal, suggesting that improved local control may be associated with an improvement in long-term survival.

Outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for cranial and extracranial metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a non-invasive, ablative technique which may be particularly effective in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The study objective was to analyse outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in metastatic RCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of Medline was performed in March 2013. Exclusion criteria included mixed histology studies and case series. Local control, overall survival and toxicities were analysed.

RESULTS

From 148 publications identified, 16 and 10 publications for cranial and extracranial metastatic RCC met inclusion criteria, respectively. There were 810 intracranial patients and 2433 targets. The weighted local control was 92%. Overall survival ranged from 6.7 to 25.6 months. Significant Grade 3-4 toxicity ranged from 0% to 6%. The weighted rate of treatment-related mortality was 0.6%, all secondary to intratumoral haemorrhage. There were 389 extracranial patients and 730 targets. The weighted local control was 89%. Median overall survival ranged from 11.7 to 22 months. Grade 3-4 toxicity ranged from 0% to 4%. Treatment-related mortality was 0.5%.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic radiotherapy is associated with excellent local control and low rates of toxicity for intracranial and extracranial metastatic RCC. Future randomised studies are required to confirm the additional benefit of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) above standard conservative or palliative approaches.

Stereotactic radiosurgery with and without whole-brain radiotherapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases

Brain metastases develop in 20-40% of cancer patients and can cause significant morbidity. In selected patients with one to three lesions, stereotactic radiosurgery may be used to improve local control. However, it is unclear whether whole-brain radiotherapy is necessary for all patients who are candidates for stereotactic radiosurgery. While whole-brain radiotherapy may improve the locoregional control of brain metastases, it may cause long-term side effects and may not improve overall survival in some patients. Its benefits should be evaluated in the context of risks of neurocognitive deterioration, either from whole-brain radiotherapy or from uncontrolled brain metastases, and the possible need for salvage treatments with the omission of initial whole-brain radiotherapy. For certain radioresistant brain metastases, the benefit of whole-brain radiotherapy to patients who have stereotactic radiosurgery is uncertain.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases: the current evidence

Chemotherapy has made substantial progress in the therapy of systemic cancer, but the pharmacological efficacy is insufficient in the treatment of brain metastases. Fractionated whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been a standard treatment of brain metastases, but provides limited local tumor control and often unsatisfactory clinical results. Stereotactic radiosurgery using Gamma Knife, Linac or Cyberknife has overcome several of these limitations, which has influenced recent treatment recommendations. This present review summarizes the current literature of single session radiosurgery concerning survival and quality of life, specific responses, tumor volumes and numbers, about potential treatment combinations and radioresistant metastases. Gamma Knife and Linac based radiosurgery provide consistent results with a reproducible local tumor control in both single and multiple brain metastases. Ideally minimum doses of ≥18Gy are applied. Reported local control rates were 90-94% for breast cancer metastases and 81-98% for brain metastases of lung cancer. Local tumor control rates after radiosurgery of otherwise radioresistant brain metastases were 73-90% for melanoma and 83-96% for renal cell cancer. Currently, there is a tendency to treat a larger number of brain metastases in a single radiosurgical session, since numerous studies document high local tumor control after radiosurgical treatment of >3 brain metastases. New remote brain metastases are reported in 33-42% after WBRT and in 39-52% after radiosurgery, but while WBRT is generally applied only once, radiosurgery can be used repeatedly for remote recurrences or new metastases after WBRT. Larger metastases (>8-10cc) should be removed surgically, but for smaller metastases Gamma Knife radiosurgery appears to be equally effective as surgical tumor resection (level I evidence). Radiosurgery avoids the impairments in cognition and quality of life that can be a consequence of WBRT (level I evidence). High local efficacy, preservation of cerebral functions, short hospitalization and the option to continue a systemic chemotherapy are factors in favor of a minimally invasive approach with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Intraoperative EBRT and resection for renal cell carcinoma : twenty-year outcomes

PURPOSE

We report the outcomes of a multimodality treatment approach combining maximal surgical resection and intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with locoregionally (LR) recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after radical nephrectomy or LR advanced primary RCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1983 to 2008, 25 patients with LR recurrent (n = 10) or LR advanced primary (n = 15) RCC were treated with this approach. Median patient age was 60 years (range, 16-79 years). Fifteen patients (60%) received perioperative EBRT (median dose, 44 Gy). Surgical resection was R0 (negative margins) in 6 patients (24%) and R1 (residual microscopic disease) in 19 patients (76%). The median dose of IOERT was 14 Gy (range, 9-15). Overall survival (OS) and relapse patterns were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for surviving patients was 22.2 years (range, 3.6-26 years). OS and DFS at 5 and 10 years were 38% and 18% and 19% and 14%, respectively. LR control (tumor bed or regional lymph nodes) and distant metastases-free survival rates at 5 years were 80% and 22%, respectively. The death rate within 30 days of surgery and IOERT was 4% (n = 1). Six patients (24%) experienced acute or late toxicities of grade 3 or higher according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) v4.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LR recurrent or LR advanced primary RCC, a multimodality approach consisting of maximal surgical resection and IOERT with or without adjuvant EBRT yielded encouraging local control results, justifying further evaluation.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of melanoma and renal cell carcinoma brain metastases

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and melanoma brain metastases have traditionally been considered radioresistant lesions when treated with conventional radiotherapeutic modalities. Radiosurgery provides high-dose radiation to a defined target volume with steep fall off in dose at lesion margins. Recent evidence suggests that stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is effective in improving local control and overall survival for a number of tumor subtypes including RCC and melanoma brain metastases. The purpose of this study was to compare the response rate to SRS between RCC and melanoma patients and to identify predictors of response to SRS for these 2 specific subtypes of brain metastases. We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of all brain metastases treated with Gamma Knife SRS at the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario) between October 2007 and June 2010, studying RCC and melanoma patients. Demographics, treatment history and dosimetry data were collected; and MRIs were reviewed for treatment response. Log rank, Cox proportional hazard ratio and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using SPSS were performed. A total of 103 brain metastases patients (41 RCC; 62 melanoma) were included in the study. The median age, Karnofsky performance status score and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score was 52 years (range 27-81), 90 (range 70-100) and 1 (range 0-2), respectively. Thirty-four lesions received adjuvant chemotherapy and 56 received pre-SRS whole brain radiation therapy. The median follow-up, prescription dose, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conformity index, target volume and number of shots was 6 months (range 1-41 months), 21 Gy (range 15-25 Gy), 1.93 (range 1.04-9.76), 0.4 cm3 (range 0.005-13.36 cm3) and 2 (range 1-22), respectively. Smaller tumor volume (P=0.007) and RCC pathology (P=0.04) were found to be positive predictors of response. Actuarial local control rate for RCC and melanoma combined was 89% at 6 months, 84% at 12 months, 76% at 18 months and 61% at 24 months. Local control at 12 months was 91 and 75% for RCC and melanoma, respectively. SRS is a valuable treatment option for local control of RCC and melanoma brain metastases. Smaller tumor volume and RCC pathology, predictors of response, suggest distinct differences in tumor biology and the extent of radioresponse between RCC and melanoma.

Outcome predictors of gamma knife radiosurgery for renal cell carcinoma metastases

BACKGROUND

Although whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been a standard palliative management for brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma, its benefit has been elusive because of radiobiological resistance.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We reviewed records from 158 consecutive patients (men = 111, women = 47) who underwent SRS for 531 brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. The median patient age was 61 years (range, 38-83 years), and the median number of tumors per patient was 1 (range, 1-10). Seventy-nine patients (50%) had solitary brain metastasis. Fifty-seven patients (36%) underwent prior WBRT. The median total tumor volume for each patient was 3.0 cm3 (range, 0.09-47 cm).

RESULTS

The overall survival after SRS was 60%, 38%, and 19% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, with a median survival of 8.2 months. Factors associated with longer survival included younger age, longer interval between primary diagnosis and brain metastases, lower recursive partitioning analysis class, higher Karnofsky performance status, smaller number of brain metastases, and no prior WBRT. Median survival for patients with < 2 brain metastases, higher Karnofsky performance status (> 90), and no prior WBRT was 12 months after SRS. Sustained local tumor control was achieved in 92% of patients. Symptomatic adverse radiation effects occurred in 7%. Overall, 70% of patients improved or remained neurologically stable.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic radiosurgery is an especially valuable option for patients with higher Karnofsky performance status and smaller number of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

Early significant tumor volume reduction after radiosurgery in brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma results in long-term survival

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate survival of patients with brain metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after radiosurgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1998 and 2010, 46 patients were treated with radiosurgery, and the total number of lesions was 99. The mean age was 58.9 years (range, 33-78 years). Twenty-six patients (56.5%) had a single brain metastasis. The mean tumor volume was 3.0 cm(3) (range, 0.01-35.1 cm(3)), and the mean marginal dose prescribed was 20.8 Gy (range, 12-25 Gy) at the 50% isodose line. A patient was classified into the good-response group when the sum of the volume of the brain metastases decreased to less than 75% of the original volume at a 1-month follow-up evaluation using MRI.

RESULTS

As of December 28, 2010, 39 patients (84.8%) had died, and 7 (15.2%) survived. The overall median survival time was 10.0 ± 0.4 months (95% confidence interval, 9.1-10.8). After treatment, local tumor control was achieved in 72 (84.7%) of the 85 tumors assessed using MRI after radiosurgery. The good-response group survived significantly longer than the poor-response group (median survival times of 18.0 and 9.0 months, respectively; p = 0.025). In a multivariate analysis, classification in the good-response group was the only independent prognostic factor for longer survival (p = 0.037; hazard ratio = 0.447; 95% confidence interval, 0.209-0.953).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiosurgery seems to be an effective treatment modality for patients with brain metastases from RCC. The early significant tumor volume reduction observed after radiosurgery seems to result in long-term survival in RCC patients with brain metastases.

Tumor control outcomes after hypofractionated and single-dose stereotactic image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for extracranial metastases from renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To report tumor local progression-free outcomes after treatment with single-dose, image-guided, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and hypofractionated regimens for extracranial metastases from renal cell primary tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2010, 105 lesions from renal cell carcinoma were treated with either single-dose, image-guided, intensity-modulated radiotherapy to a prescription dose of 18-24 Gy (median, 24) or hypofractionation (three or five fractions) with a prescription dose of 20-30 Gy. The median follow-up was 12 months (range, 1-48).

RESULTS

The overall 3-year actuarial local progression-free survival for all lesions was 44%. The 3-year local progression-free survival for those who received a high single-dose (24 Gy; n = 45), a low single-dose (<24 Gy; n = 14), or hypofractionation regimens (n = 46) was 88%, 21%, and 17%, respectively (high single dose vs. low single dose, p = .001; high single dose vs. hypofractionation, p < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed the following variables were significant predictors of improved local progression-free survival: 24 Gy dose compared with a lower dose (p = .009) and a single dose vs. hypofractionation (p = .008).

CONCLUSION

High single-dose, image-guided, intensity-modulated radiotherapy is a noninvasive procedure resulting in high probability of local tumor control for metastatic renal cell cancer generally considered radioresistant according to the classic radiobiologic ranking.

A contemporary review of stereotactic radiotherapy: inherent dosimetric complexities and the potential for detriment

OBJECTIVE

The advantages of highly localised, conformal treatments achievable with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) are increasingly being extended to extracranial sites as stereotactic body radiotherapy with advancements in imaging and beam collimation. One of the challenges in stereotactic treatment lies in the significant complexities associated with small field dosimetry and dose calculation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the complexities associated with stereotactic radiotherapy and the potential for detriment.

METHODS

This study is based on a comprehensive review of literature accessible via PubMed and other sources, covering stereotactic radiotherapy, small-field dosimetry and dose calculation.

FINDINGS

Several key issues were identified in the literature. They pertain to dose prescription, dose measurement and dose calculation within and beyond the treatment field. Field-edge regions and penumbrae occupy a significant portion of the total field size. Spectral and dosimetric characteristics are difficult to determine and are compounded by effects of tissue inhomogeneity. Measurement of small-fields is made difficult by detector volume averaging and energy response. Available dosimeters are compared, and emphasis is given to gel dosimetry which offers the greatest potential for three-dimensional small-field dosimetry. The limitations of treatment planning system algorithms as applied to small-fields (particularly in the presence of heterogeneities) is explained, and a review of Monte Carlo dose calculation is provided, including simplified treatment planning implementations. Not incorporated into treatment planning, there is evidence that far from the primary field, doses to patients (and corresponding risks of radiocarcinogenesis) from leakage/scatter in SRT are similar to large fields.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved knowledge of dosimetric issues is essential to the accurate measurement and calculation of dose as well as the interpretation and assessment of planned and delivered treatments. This review highlights such issues and the potential benefit that may be gained from Monte Carlo dose calculation and verification via three-dimensional dosimetric methods (such as gel dosimetry) being introduced into routine clinical practice.

Do patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma benefit from escalation of the radiation dose?

PURPOSE

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the most common treatment for brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Most patients cannot receive more aggressive therapies including surgery or radiosurgery. The standard WBRT regimen, 30 Gy/10 fractions (10 × 3 Gy), has resulted in poor survival (OS). This study investigates whether escalation of the WBRT dose improves treatment outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from 60 patients receiving WBRT for brain metastases from RCC were retrospectively analyzed. A dose of 10 × 3 Gy (n = 31) was compared with higher doses (40 Gy/20 fractions or 45 Gy/15 fractions; n = 29) for OS and local control (LC). Additional factors evaluated were patient age, sex, performance status, number of metastases, interval from diagnosis of RCC to WBRT, extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, and year of WBRT.

RESULTS

The OS at 6 months was 29% after 10 × 3 Gy and 52% after higher doses (p = 0.003). The OS at 12 months was 13% and 47%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, higher WBRT doses (p = 0.022), Karnofsky performance status score ≥70 (p = 0.017), fewer than four brain metastases (p = 0.035), and RPA Class 1 (p = 0.003) resulted in better OS. The LC at 6 months was 21% after 10 × 3 Gy and 57% after higher doses (p = 0.013). The LC at 12 months was 7% and 35%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, fewer than four brain metastases (p < 0.001) were associated with LC. A trend was found for WBRT regimen (p = 0.06) and RPA class (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that escalation of the WBRT dose beyond 10 × 3 Gy improves outcomes in patients with brain metastases from RCC. The results should be confirmed in a randomized trial stratifying for significant prognostic factors.

Treatment strategy for metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma: selection of gamma knife surgery or craniotomy for control of growth and peritumoral edema

We retrospectively studied the efficacy of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To evaluate the efficacy of GKS for control of peritumoral edema, we retrospectively studied 280 consecutive metastatic brain tumors (100 from lung cancers, 100 from breast cancers, and 80 from RCC) associated with peritumoral edema. In addition, this study included 11 patients with metastatic brain tumors from RCC who underwent direct surgery. The tumor growth control rate of GKS was 84.3%. The extent of edema of RCC metastases was significantly larger than those from lung and breast cancer. Primary site (renal or not renal) and delivered marginal dose (25 Gy or more) were significantly correlated with control of peritumoral edema. All tumors treated by direct surgery were more than 2 cm in maximum diameter. Peritumoral edema at surgery was extensive but disappeared within 1-3 months, and neurological symptoms also improved in many cases. Total removal of brain metastases from RCC was easy with little bleeding in most cases. Our results suggest that GKS is effective for growth control of metastatic brain tumors from RCC. Higher marginal dose such as 25 Gy or more is desirable to obtain peritumoral edema control, so GKS is not suitable for control of symptomatic peritumoral edema associated with relatively large tumors. Tumor removal of RCC metastases is relatively easy and rapidly reduces peritumoral edema. Treatment strategy for metastatic brain tumors from RCC depends on tumor size, number of tumors, and presence of symptomatic peritumoral edema.

Stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole brain radiotherapy for patients with a single radioresistant brain metastasis

PURPOSE

To examine the outcomes of patients with a single brain metastasis from radioresistant histologies (renal cell carcinoma and melanoma) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed the medical records of 27 patients treated at our institution between 2000 and 2007 with a single radioresistant brain metastasis. Patients were treated with Gamma Knife based SRS. Tumor histologies included renal cell carcinoma and melanoma.

RESULTS

Patients were treated to a median marginal dose was 20 Gy (range, 15-22 Gy). At follow-up intervals ranging from 1.8 to 23.2 months, the radiographic responses were as follows: progression in 7 patients; stable in 5 patients; and shrinkage in 15 patients. Fifteen patients (56%) developed distant brain failure. Seven of the 27 patients were alive at last follow-up. The 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 18-months after SRS local control rates were 82.8%, 77.9%, 69.3%, 69.3%, and 55.4%, respectively. None of the 5 patients who received WBRT developed distant brain failure although the follow-up intervals were short (range, 3.5-13.7 months; median, 5.1 months). WBRT did not appear to affect local control, progression free survival, and overall survival (P = 0.32, 0.87, 0.69). One patient developed worsening of symptoms attributable to SRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma Knife SRS is a safe and feasible strategy for treatment of patients with a single radioresistant brain metastasis. Radiosurgery alone is a reasonable treatment option, but may carry a greater likelihood of distant brain recurrence.

Gamma Knife surgery in the management of radioresistant brain metastases in high-risk patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma

OBJECT

The purpose of this study was to examine the results of using Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for brain metastases from classically radioresistant malignancies.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 76 patients with melanoma (50 patients), renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 23 patients), or sarcoma (3 patients) who underwent GKS between August 1998 and July 2007. Overall patient survival, intracranial progression, and local progression of individual lesions were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 57 years (range 18-85 years) and median Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score was 80 (range 20-100). Sixty-two patients (81.6%) had uncontrolled extracranial disease. A total of 303 intracranial lesions (average 3.97 per patient, range 1-27 lesions) were treated using GKS. More than 3 lesions were treated in 30 patients (39.5%). Median GKS tumor margin dose was 18 Gy (range 8-30 Gy). Thirty-seven patients (48.7%) underwent whole brain radiation therapy. The actuarial 12-month rate for freedom from local progression for individual lesions was 77.7% and was significantly higher for RCC compared with melanoma (93.6 vs 63.0%; p = 0.001). The percentage of coverage of the prescribed dose to target volume was the only treatment-related variable associated with local control: 12-month actuarial rate of freedom from local progression was 71.4% for lesions receiving >or= 90% coverage versus 0.0% for lesions receiving < 90% (p = 0.00048). Median overall survival was 5.1 months after GKS and 8.4 months after the discovery of brain metastases. Univariate analysis revealed that KPS score (p = 0.000004), recursive partitioning analysis class (p = 0.00043), and single metastases (p = 0.028), but not more than 3 metastases, to be prognostic factors of overall survival. The KPS score remained significant after multivariate analysis. Overall survival for patients with a KPS score >or= 70 was 7.1 months compared with 1.3 months for a KPS score <or= 60 (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma Knife surgery is an effective treatment option for patients with radioresistant brain metastases. In this setting, KPS score appeared to be a more important factor in predicting survival than having > 3 metastases. Higher rates of local tumor control were achieved for RCC in comparison with melanoma, and this may have an effect on survival in some patients. Although outcomes generally remained poor in this study population, these results suggest that GKS can be considered as a treatment option for many patients with radioresistant brain metastases, even if these patients have multiple lesions.

Multidisciplinary treatment of brain metastases derived from clear cell renal cancer incorporating stereotactic radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are a frequent complication in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cancer. Survival after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is disappointing. A retrospective analysis of multimodality treatment was performed in patients who had received linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients underwent SRS-based treatment for 71 metastatic foci between 2000 and 2006. All patients had a Karnofsky performance status >or=70 and all 32 patients had extracranial metastatic disease (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis [RPA] Class 2). Survival was calculated from the time of diagnosis of brain metastases. The minimum potential follow-up was 1 year after SRS. Univariate and multivariate analysis of potential prognostic factors affecting survival was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients required only 1 SRS treatment (84%) to achieve central nervous system (CNS) control, whereas 5 patients received 2 to 3 treatments (16%). The median survival of renal cancer patients from the diagnosis of brain metastases was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval, 6.4-14.8 months). One-year and 3-year survival rates were 43% and 16%, respectively. The addition of surgery or WBRT did not appear to prolong survival. Immunotherapy after control of brain metastases with SRS appeared to result in significantly improved survival. Survival was also found to be strongly influenced by prognostic stratification of metastatic disease using Motzer or modified risk criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrated that SRS-based treatment of patients with up to 5 brain metastases from clear cell renal cancer is feasible and results in excellent CNS control. Survival beyond 3 years from the time of diagnosis of brain metastases was achievable in 16% of patients and was associated with the use of systemic immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and interferon but not antiangiogenic agents.

Gamma Knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma

Object

The authors evaluated the results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective review of the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in 69 patients with metastatic brain tumors from RCC who underwent GKS at the authors’ institution. Fifty-one patients were men, and 18 were women. The mean patient age was 64.2 years (range 45–85 years).

The 69 patients underwent a total of 104 GKS procedures for treatment of 314 tumors. Eighteen patients received repeated GKS. Follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used at a mean of 7.1 months after GKS to evaluate the change in 132 tumors after treatment. The mean prescription dose at the tumor margin was 21.8 Gy. The tumor growth control rate was 82.6%. Tumor volume and the delivered peripheral dose were significantly correlated with tumor growth control on univariate and multivariate analyses. Sixty (45.5%) of the 132 tumors assessed with MR imaging were associated with apparent peritumoral edema at the time of GKS. After treatment, peritumoral edema disappeared in 27 tumors, decreased in 13, was unchanged in 16, and progressed in four. Newly developed peritumoral edema after GKS was rare. The delivered peripheral dose was significantly correlated with control of peritumoral edema. The overall median survival time after GKS was 9.5 months. In this study, 34 patients died of systemic disease and 10 died of progressive brain metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of lesions at the first GKS, the Karnofsky Performance Scale score at the first GKS, the recursive partitioning analysis classification, and the interval from diagnosis of RCC to brain metastasis were significantly correlated with survival time.

Conclusions

Gamma Knife surgery is effective for metastatic brain tumors from RCC. The disappearance rate of tumors is relatively low, but growth control is high. The delivered dose to the tumor margin is significantly correlated with the control of peritumoral edema. Gamma Knife surgery should be used as the initial treatment modality, if possible, even in patients with multiple metastases. Repeated GKS is recommended for newly developed brain metastases because of the low sensitivity of RCC to conventional radiation therapy.

Linac stereotactic radiosurgery: An effective and safe treatment for elderly patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of radiosurgery for brain metastases in patients 65 years or older.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1994 and January 2003, 117 patients (47 women, 70 men), median age 71 years (range, 65-86 years), received radiosurgery for 227 metastases. Sixty-one patients (55%) presented symptoms in relation to the brain metastases. Thirty-eight patients (32%) received whole-brain radiotherapy. Median metastasis diameter and volume were 21 mm (range, 0.5-75 mm) and 1.7 cc (range, 0.02-71 cc), respectively.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 7 months (range, 1-45 months), 9.5 months for alive patients (range, 1-45 months). Median minimum and maximum doses were 14.5 Gy (6.5 Gy, 19.5 Gy), and 20.4 Gy (13.2 Gy, 41.9 Gy), respectively. Median survival was 8 months from the date of radiosurgery. Overall survival rates at 6 and 24 months were 58% +/- 5% and 13% +/- 4%, respectively. According to multivariate analysis, a low Karnofsky performance status was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for overall survival (p = 0.003; odds ratio [OR] = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.56). Median brain disease-free survival was 10 months. Brain disease-free survival rates at 6 and 24 months were 67% +/- 6% and 40% +/- 7%, respectively. According to multivariate analysis, a radiosensitive lesion was an independent favorable factor (p = 0.038; OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.95); more than two metastases and a low Karnofsky performance status were independent unfavorable factors for brain disease-free survival (p = 0.046; OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.01-4.58 and p = 0.003; OR = 30.4; 95% CI, 3.1-296, respectively). Local control rates were 98% +/- 2% and 91% +/- 8.5% at 6 and 24 months. Out of the 61 patients presenting symptoms before radiosurgery, complete symptomatic response was achieved in 12 patients (20%), partial improvement in 25 (41%), stabilization in 7 (11%), and worsening in 4 (6%) related to a progression of the irradiated metastasis. Seven cases of radionecrosis were described and were related to the margin dose (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery for elderly patients was effective and safe. Age alone should not be a criterion for denying radiosurgery to any patient with brain metastases.

A phase II trial of palliative radiotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has previously been described as being less responsive to radiotherapy (RT) than other tumor types. The authors conducted a prospective study to assess the effect of RT on symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with metastatic RCC.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2002, patients with symptomatic metastatic RCC were entered into a prospective study in two cancer centers. Symptomatic sites of disease were treated with 30 grays (Gy) in 10 fractions. Patients reported pain, analgesic use, symptoms, and QOL using validated questionnaires before RT, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, and every 3 months to 1 year thereafter.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (19 males and 12 females) were entered into the trial. The median age of the patients was 61 years (range, 35-81 yrs). The most common indication for RT was bone pain (n = 24). The median duration of follow-up was 4.3 months (range, 1-15 mos). Of 23 evaluable patients treated for pain, 83% (n = 19) experienced site-specific pain relief after RT, and 48% (n = 11) did not have an associated increase in analgesic medication use. The median duration of site-specific pain response was 3 months (range, 1-15 mos). The global pain response rate was only 15% (n = 3) because many patients developed other painful metastases. Global QOL was found to improve in 33% (n = 8) of the evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A palliative radiotherapy dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions can result in a significant response rate and the relief of local symptoms in patients with bone metastases from RCC. Improvements in global pain and QOL appear to be limited by the effects of progressive systemic disease.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma

Object. The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastases to the spine has previously been limited. In this study the authors evaluated the clinical outcome in patients with spinal RCC who underwent single-fraction radiosurgery.

Methods. Forty-eight patients with 60 RCC metastases to the spine (six cervical, 26 thoracic, 18 lumbar, and 10 sacral) were treated with a single-fraction radiosurgery technique and were followed for a period of 14 to 48 months (median 37 months).

All patients were successfully treated in an outpatient setting. The tumor volume ranged from 5.5 to 203 cm3 (mean 61.9 cm3). Forty-two of the total 60 lesions had been previously treated with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The maximum tumor dose was maintained at 17.5 to 25 Gy (mean 20 Gy). The volume of the spinal cord exposed to greater than 8 Gy ranged from 0.01 to 3 cm3 (mean 0.64 cm3); the volume of the spinal canal at the cauda equina level exposed to greater than 8 Gy ranged from 0.01 to 2.2 cm3 (mean 0.65 cm3). No radiation-induced toxicity occurred during the follow-up period. Axial and radicular pain improved in 34 (89%) of 38 patients who were treated primarily for pain. Tumor control was demonstrated in seven of eight patients treated primarily for radiographically documented tumor progression. In time six patients required open surgical intervention for tumor progression that had caused neurological dysfunction after radiosurgery.

Conclusions. Spinal radiosurgery can be a successful therapeutic modality for the delivery of large-dose single-fraction radiation to RCC spinal metastases that are often poorly controlled with conventional EBRT modalities.

Brain metastases in renal cell cancer: diagnostic and therapeutic aspects

A 67-year-old patient with metastatic renal cell cancer was treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to a hemorrhagic pons metastasis. He then developed multiple cystic brain lesions, suggestive of diffuse metastatic spread. However, further work-up revealed abscesses from bronchopneumonia. Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects as well as potential pitfalls in the management of patients with brain metastases are discussed.

Treatment of brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma: radiotherapy, radiosurgery, or surgery?

Metastases from renal cell carcinoma raise specific therapeutic problems because they are relatively unresponsive to whole brain radiation therapy and tend to bleed. Recently, stereotactically guided high-precision irradiation as a single dose application (radiosurgery) showed promising treatment results for selected patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Radiosurgery appears attractive due to its low risk and minimal invasiveness. Multiple lesions can be treated at the same time and retreatments can be performed for local or distant recurrences.

Practice and progress in kidney cancer: methodology for novel drug development

PURPOSE

The minimal efficacy of standard therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has resulted in the evaluation of numerous novel agents. Some agents have shown promise in phase II trials and yet none have improved survival over standard therapy in phase III trials. We examined existing data relevant to standard therapy and clinical trial methodology in RCC to understand patient, disease and trial design factors that have impacted clinical trial outcome and drug evaluation. Furthermore, we describe new paradigms for the evaluation of novel agents to optimize the yield of clinical research in RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive review of published retrospective analyses and phase II/phase III trials in patients with metastatic RCC was undertaken. Publications with patient selection and/or therapeutic implications in our judgment are presented and evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with good performance status and access to centers with experienced staff may appropriately receive high dose interleukin-2 after consideration of the relative risks and benefits. Alternatively low dose, single agent cytokine regimens are acceptable. Novel agents may be tested in untreated and refractory RCC. Consideration of the prognostic factors of a given phase II cohort is essential when interpreting single arm clinical trial results. RCC histological subtypes continue to be distinguished biologically and treatment relevant to the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway is most appropriately targeted to clear cell RCC. Nephrectomy in metastatic RCC may impact evaluation of the tumor response and survival in metastatic RCC. Thus, consideration of nephrectomy status in phase II trials and stratification in phase III trials is warranted. Clinical trials that include patients with central nervous system metastases should have standardized treatment of these metastases prior to systemic therapy. Objective response rate as an end point should be used with caution, given its unreliable history in metastatic RCC. Novel trial designs using time to disease progression may allow for interpretation of the antitumor effect in the absence of tumor shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastatic renal carcinoma is a model disease for the design of clinical trials and testing of novel agents. Novel trial designs and end points should be considered to evaluate new agents in RCC. Phase III trials must be carefully performed with the most promising agents to impact survival in this disease.

Metastatic pituitary tumor from renal cell carcinoma treated by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy--case report

A 63-year-old man presented with rapidly progressive visual field deficit and hypopituitarism including diabetes insipidus, 8 years after treatment for a renal cell carcinoma. Neuroimaging studies revealed a dumbbell-shaped pituitary mass that had destroyed the sellar floor and abutted against the optic apparatus. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), employing computer-image integration techniques and a frame that could be relocated to facilitate a fractionated dosing scheme, was carried out under a plan for reducing the treatment risk to the optic apparatus. Three months later, the patient exhibited marked improvement in the visual field deficit and visual acuity concomitant with a reduction in tumor volume. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sellar region confirmed striking shrinkage of the metastasis. His neurological status remained stable at 12 months after the SRT with no complications. Fractionated SRT appears to be effective for preserving or improving the residual vision in patients with visual loss secondary to metastatic tumor of the pituitary gland, and may result in a longer and better quality of life.

Irradiation stéréotaxique de première intention des métastases cérébrales

BACKGROUND

The minimal radiosurgical dose required to control cerebral metastases remains unknown. The aim of this study was to test whether a lower peripheral dose than usually delivered could effectively control these lesions or not.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty patients presenting 356 lesions were give first-line radiosurgery between 1995 and 2001 in Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital using a 10 MV LINAC. Mean age was 59 years, sex-ratio was 1.65, mean KI was 70. The lung was the most frequent primary site (n=85), followed by melanoma (n=29), kidney (n=21), digestive tract (n=14), breast (n=11), and others (n=20). Seventy-six percent of the patients presented 1 or 2 lesions. Mean tumor Volume was 5.5 cm3. Mean peripheral dose was 14.8Gy, mean isocenter dose was 21.6Gy.

RESULTS

Median survival was 7.6 months, local control rate was 90% at 6 months, 76% at 1 Year and 70% at 2 years. Median "neurological disease free" survival was 15 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the influence of two parameters on survival: number of lesions (p=0.001) and KI (p=0.04). The only parameter significantly correlated with disease-free survival was the number of isocenters (p=0.005). Morbidity (grade 2 RTOG) was 7.2% with no perimortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Low peripheral doses delivered by radiosurgery may control brain metastases with the same efficacy and fewer side-effects as the doses usually reported in the literature.

The effect of biological effective dose on time to symptom progression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

AIMS

Renal cell carcinoma is commonly thought to be a radioresistant malignancy. Retrospective studies report conflicting results on the effect of radiotherapy dose escalation on response and time to progression in symptomatic metastatic disease; studies using the linear quadratic model have used alpha/beta ratios that are inappropriate for slow growing tumours. We aim to describe our experience with palliative radiotherapy in this context, relating Biological Effective Dose to outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 1995 to April 2001, 143 independent palliative radiotherapy treatments were delivered to 78 patients in a single institution. Retrospective data was obtained on the radiotherapy schedule used, symptom response and time to symptom progression. The biological effective dose (BED) was calculated using alpha/beta ratios of 3 and 7 Gy (BED3 and BED7). The Log-Rank test was used to assess any differences in time to progression, and the Cox Proportional Hazards analysis to determine prognostic factors of time to progression.

RESULTS

Overall symptomatic response rate was 73%, with most responses being partial (67%). Forty-three (38%) patients had symptomatic progression after a median follow-up of 425 days. BED (BED3 or BED7) was not significantly different across response types (complete, partial or no response; P=0.90 and 0.88, respectively) and was not predictive for time to symptomatic progression (P=0.99 for BED3 and P=0.70 for BED7). Patients with bone metastases received less total dose (P=0.001), less BED (BED3, P=0.0013, and BED7, P=0.0005) and had a significantly longer time to progression than other sites of metastases (hazard ratio (HR) 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.7; P=0.004). Initial treatment with interferon-alpha alone in patients presenting with metastatic disease, before palliative radiotherapy, was also associated with a shorter time to symptom progression (HR 4.6; 95% CI 1.5-14.1; P=0.007). On removal of these criteria, brain metastases became a significant predictor of progression time, with an HR of 2.5 (95% CI 1.0-5.9; P=0.05), showing an increased risk of progression with brain metastases compared with metastases elsewhere. Time from primary diagnosis to development of metastatic disease was not predictive of time to symptom progression (P=0.29).

CONCLUSION

Despite the widespread assumption that renal cell carcinoma is radioresistant, retrospective assessment showed high response rates to palliative radiotherapy. On the basis of our data, higher BED does not seem to be a predictor of response or of duration of response in the palliative treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Palliation of bone pain seems to be particularly durable compared with the palliation of symptoms at other sites of metastases. A trend for shorter duration of palliative effect of whole-brain radiotherapy was noted.