Beam intensity modulation using tissue compensators or dynamic multileaf collimation in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of primary cancers of the oropharynx and larynx, including the elective neck

Empirical estimation of beam-on time for prostate cancer patients treated on Tomotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study proposed a method to estimate the beam-on time for prostate cancer patients treated on Tomotherapy when FW (field width), PF (pitch factor), modulation factor (MF) and treatment length (TL) were given.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

THE STUDY WAS DIVIDED INTO TWO PARTS: building and verifying the model. To build a model, 160 treatment plans were created for 10 patients. The plans differed in combination of FW, PF and MF. For all plans a graph of beam-on time as a function of TL was created and a linear trend function was fitted. Equation for each trend line was determined and used in a correlation model. Finally, 62 plans verified the treatment time computation model - the real execution time was compared with our estimation and irradiation time calculated based on the equation provided by the manufacturer.

RESULTS

A linear trend function was drawn and the coefficient of determination R (2) and the Pearson correlation coefficient r were calculated for each of the 8 trend lines corresponding to the adequate treatment plan. An equation to correct the model was determined to estimate more accurately the beam-on time for different MFs. From 62 verification treatment plans, only 5 disagreed by more than 60 s with the real time from the HT software. Whereas, for the equation provided by the manufacturer the discrepancy was observed in 16 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the model can well predict the treatment time for a given TL, MF, FW and it can be used in clinical practice.

Optimization of treatment planning parameters used in tomotherapy for prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Tomotherapy treatment planning depends on parameters that are not used conventionally such as: field width (FW), pitch factor (PF) and modulation factor (MF). The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between these parameters and their influence on the quality of treatment plans and beam-on time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten prostate cancer patients were included in the study. For each patient, two cases of irradiation were considered depending on the target volume: PTV1 included the prostate gland, seminal vesicles, pelvic lymph nodes and a 1 cm margin, whereas PTV2 included only the prostate gland with a 1 cm margin. For each patient and each case of irradiation (PTV1 and PTV2) 8 treatment plans were created - all consisted of a different combination of planning parameters (FW = 1.05, 2.5, 5 cm; PF = 0.107, 0.215, 0.43; MF = 1.5, 2.5, 3.5). Default values used in this study were FW = 2.5 cm, PF = 0.215 and MF = 2.5. Hence, for plans with different FWs, parameters of PF and MF were 0.215 and 2.5, respectively; for different PFs, FW and MF were 2.5 and 2.5, respectively; finally for different MFs, FW and PF were 2.5 and 0.215, respectively. The reference plan was optimized for FW = 1.05 cm, PF = 0.107 and MF = 3.5, which was assumed to result in the best dose distribution and the longest treatment time. As a result, 160 plans were created. Each plan was analyzed for dose distribution and execution time.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

: Treatment plans with FW of 5 cm resulted in the shortest execution time compromising the dose distribution. Moreover, the dose fall off in the longitudinal direction was not sharp. FW of 1.05 cm and PF of 0.107 were not recommended for routine prostate plans due to long execution time, which was 3 times longer than for plans with FW = 5 cm. There was no substantial decrease of irradiation time when PF was increased from 0.215 to 0.43 for both cases (PTV1 and PTV2); however, the dose distribution was slightly compromised. Finally, decreasing MF from 2.5 to 1.5 was useless because it did not change the beam-on time; however, it did remarkably decrease the dose distribution. Nevertheless, increasing MF up to 3.5 could be considered. The lowest EUD for the rectum and intestines, could be observed for PF = 0.107. For the other plans the differences were rather small (the EUD was almost the same). By reducing PF from 0.43 to 0.107 or FW from 5 to 1.05 the EUD for bladder (in PTV1 case) decreased by 3.13% and 2.60%. When PTV2 was a target volume, the EUD for bladder decreased by 4.54% and 3.43% when FW was changed from 5 to 1.05 and MF from 1.5 to 3.5, respectively. For optimal balance between beam-on time and dose distribution in OARs for routine patients, the authors would suggest to use: FW = 2.5, PF = 0.215 and MF = 2.5.

Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency in inverse IMRT planning of one-step optimization with the step-and-shoot (SS) technique as compared to traditional two-step optimization using the sliding windows (SW) technique. The Pinnacle IMRT TPS allows both one-step and two-step approaches. The same beam setup for five head-and-neck tumor patients and dose-volume constraints were applied for all optimization methods. Two-step plans were produced converting the ideal fluence with or without a smoothing filter into the SW sequence. One-step plans, based on direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO), had the maximum number of segments per beam set at 8, 10, 12, producing a directly deliverable sequence. Moreover, the plans were generated whether a split-beam was used or not. Total monitor units (MUs), overall treatment time, cost function and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were estimated for each plan. PTV conformality and homogeneity indexes and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) that are the basis for improving therapeutic gain, as well as non-tumor integral dose (NTID), were evaluated. A two-sided t-test was used to compare quantitative variables. All plans showed similar target coverage. Compared to two-step SW optimization, the DMPO-SS plans resulted in lower MUs (20%), NTID (4%) as well as NTCP values. Differences of about 15-20% in the treatment delivery time were registered. DMPO generates less complex plans with identical PTV coverage, providing lower NTCP and NTID, which is expected to reduce the risk of secondary cancer. It is an effective and efficient method and, if available, it should be favored over the two-step IMRT planning.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with helical tomotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a preliminary result

PURPOSE

To review the experience with and evaluate the treatment plan for helical tomotherapy for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1, 2006 and January 31, 2009, 10 histologically confirmed oropharyngeal cancer patients were enrolled. All patients received definitive concurrent chemoradiation with helical tomotherapy. The prescription dose to the gross tumor planning target volume, the high-risk subclinical area, and the low-risk subclinical area was 70 Gy, 63 Gy, and 56 Gy, respectively. During radiotherapy, all patients were treated with cisplatin, 30 mg/m(2), plus 5-fluorouracil (425 mg/m(2))/leucovorin (30 mg/m(2)) intravenously weekly. Toxicity of treatment was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Several parameters, including maximal or median dose to critical organs, uniformity index, and conformal index, were evaluated from dose-volume histograms.

RESULTS

The mean survival was 18 months (range, 7-22 months). The actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, locoregional control, and distant metastasis-free rates at 18 months were 67%, 70%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. The average for uniformity index and conformal index was 1.05 and 1.26, respectively. The mean of median dose for right side and left side parotid glands was 23.5 and 23.9 Gy, respectively. No Grade 3 toxicity for dermatitis and body weight loss and only one instance of Grade 3 mucositis were noted.

CONCLUSION

Helical tomotherapy achieved encouraging clinical outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment toxicity was acceptable, even in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Radiotherapeutic management of laryngeal carcinoma

Authors discuss laryngeal lesions, metastases, and relevant anatomy. Outcome of surgical and radiotherapy in terms of voice preservation is discussed. Radiation techniques and outcomes for laryngeal cancer are presented along with discussion of interdisciplinary treatment. Authors review studies and quality of life outcomes of surviving laryngeal cancer patients.

Conformal therapy improves the therapeutic index of patients with anal canal cancer treated with combined chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in patients with anal canal cancer, in terms of local control (LC), freedom from relapse (FFR), and overall survival (OS) rates, and to estimate long-term toxicity data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty historical patients, treated with conventional radiation techniques (C-RT), were used as controls, and 62 consecutive patients were treated with 3D-CRT. Patients treated with 3D-CRT received 54 Gy in 30 fractions delivered continuously, compared with 45-58.9 Gy (median dose, 54 Gy) in a split course in patients treated with C-RT. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil with either mitomycin-C or cis-platinum given concurrently with radiation. Survival curves were performed using the Kaplan-Meier model, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis of risk factors.

RESULTS

No differences in stage and age distribution were observed between the two groups. Patients treated with 3D-CRT and C-RT had an actuarial 5-year LC rate of 85.1% and 61.1%, respectively (p = 0.0056); the FFR rate was 70.2% and 46.1% (p = 0.0166), and the OS rate was 80.7% and 53.9% (p = 0.0171). In multivariate analysis, factors of significance for LC were nodal (N) status (p < 0.001); for OS, 3D-CRT (p = 0.038), N status (p = 0.011), and T status (p = 0.012); and for FFR, 3D-CRT (p = 0.024) and N status (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of 3D-CRT allows patients with anal canal cancer to complete radiation and chemotherapy without interruption for toxicity, with significant improvements in LC, FFR, and OS.

Can dose reduction to one parotid gland prevent xerostomia?--A feasibility study for locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

AIMS

Dryness of the mouth is one of the most distressing chronic toxicities of radiation therapy in head and neck cancers. In this study, parotid function was assessed in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy. Parotid function was assessed with the help of a questionnaire and parotid scintigraphy, especially with regards to unilateral sparing of the parotid gland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 19 patients were treated with compensator-based IMRT between February 2003 and March 2004. The dose to the clinical target volume ranged between 66 and 70 Gy in 30-35 fractions to 95% of the isodose volume. Ipsilateral high-risk neck nodes received an average dose of 60 Gy and the contralateral low-risk neck received a dose of 54-56 Gy. Eight of 19 patients also received concomitant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Subjective toxicity to the parotid glands was assessed with the help of a questionnaire at 0, 3 and 6 months and objective toxicity was assessed with parotid scintigraphy at 0 and 3 months. The mean dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland ranged from 19.5 to 52.8 Gy (mean 33.14 Gy) and the mean dose to the contralateral gland was 11.1-46.6 Gy (mean 26.85 Gy). At a median follow-up of 13 months, 9/19 patients had no symptoms of dryness of the mouth (grade I), 8/19 had mild dryness of the mouth (grade II) and only 2/19 had grade III xerostomia, although the parotid gland could only be spared on one side in most of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimising the radiation dose to one of the parotid glands with the help of IMRT in patients with advanced head and neck cancers can prevent xerostomia in most patients and parotid scintigraphy is a useful method of documenting xerostomia.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: A comparison of IMRT planning systems

The treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma with forward planning can be technically difficult when the neck also requires radiotherapy. This difficulty arises because of the need to spare the contralateral face while treating the bilateral neck. There is considerable potential for error in clinical setup and treatment delivery. We evaluated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as an improvement on forward planning, and compared several inverse planning IMRT platforms. A composite dose-volume histogram (DVH) was generated from a complex forward planned case. We compared the results with those generated by sliding window fixed field dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) IMRT, using sets of coplanar beams. All setups included an anterior posterior (AP) beam, and 3-, 5-, 7-, and 9-field configurations were evaluated. The dose prescription and objective function priorities were invariant. We also evaluated 2 commercial tomotherapy IMRT delivery platforms. DVH results from all of the IMRT approaches compared favorably with the forward plan. Results for the various inverse planning approaches varied considerably across platforms, despite an attempt to prescribe the therapy similarly. The improvement seen with the addition of beams in the fixed beam sliding window case was modest. IMRT is an effective means of delivering radiotherapy reliably in the complex setting of maxillary sinus carcinoma with neck irradiation. Differences in objective function definition and optimization algorithms can lead to unexpected differences in the final dose distribution, and our evaluation suggests that these factors are more significant than the beam arrangement or number of beams.

Comparing step-and-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

The goal of this planning study was to compare step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with helical dynamic IMRT plans for oropharynx patients on the basis of dose distribution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five patients with oropharynx cancer had been previously treated by step-and-shoot IMRT at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands, applying five fields and approximately 60-90 segments. Inverse planning was carried out using Plato, version 2.6.2. For each patient, an inverse IMRT plan was also made using Tomotherapy Hi-Art System, version 2.0, and using the same targets and optimization goals. Statistical analysis was performed by a paired t test.

RESULTS

All tomotherapy plans compared favorably with the step-and-shoot plans regarding sparing of the organs at risk and keeping an equivalent target dose homogeneity. Tomotherapy plans in particular realized sharper dose gradients compared with the step-and-shoot plans. The mean dose to all parotid glands (n = 10) decreased on average 6.5 Gy (range, -4 to 14; p = 0.002). The theoretical reduction in normal tissue complication probabilities in favor of the tomotherapy plans depended on the parotid normal tissue complication probability model used (range, -3% to 32%).

CONCLUSION

Helical tomotherapy IMRT plans realized sharper dose gradients compared with the clinically applied step-and shoot plans. They are expected to be able to reduce the parotid normal tissue complication probability further, keeping a similar target dose homogeneity.

New Radiation Therapy Techniques for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

This article reviews the most recent technology used in the treatment of head and neck cancer. It discusses brachytherapy, new ways to mix radionuclides for enhanced radiobiologic effects, and different fractionation schemes that have grown in clinical importance. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy has become a mainstay in head and neck cancer treatment, and the authors discuss several popular and emerging approaches. Patient immobilization and imaging are also discussed.

A dose-volume-based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans

External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits the dose that can be delivered to the tumor. While intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows for the delivery of higher tumor doses and the sparing of proximal critical structures, multiple competing plans can be generated based on dosimetric and/or biological constraints that need to be considered/compared. In this work, an IMRT treatment plan evaluation and ranking tool, based on dosimetric criteria, is presented. The treatment plan with the highest uncomplicated target conformity index (TCI+) is ranked at the top. The TCI+ is a dose‐volume‐based index that considers both a target conformity index (TCI) and a normal tissue‐sparing index (NTSI). TCI+ is designed to assist in the process of judging the merit of a clinical treatment plan. To demonstrate the utility of this tool, several competing lung and prostate IMRT treatment plans are compared. Results show that the plan with the highest TCI+ values accomplished the competing goals of tumor coverage and critical structures sparing best, among rival treatment plans for both treatment sites. The study demonstrates, first, that dose‐volume‐based indices, which summarize complex dose distributions through a single index, can be used to automatically select the optimal plan among competing plans, and second, that this dose‐volume‐based index may be appropriate for ranking IMRT dose distributions.

PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Tf

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh

PURPOSE

Fracture of the femur is one of the late complications of adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the thigh, who receive external beam irradiation after limb-sparing surgery. When the target volume approximates the femur, it is often inevitable that a large segment of the femur will receive full prescription dose with conventional radiation techniques. We report the dosimetric feasibility of intensity- modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques to achieve adequate target coverage and bone sparing.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatment planning was performed using both three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and IMRT techniques for 10 patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh with tumor approaching the femur. None of the patients had bony involvement. For all patients, the gross total volume (GTV) and the femur were contoured. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the GTV with a 1.5-cm margin axially, except at the bone interface where the bone interface was used as CTV if the 1.5-cm axial margin extended beyond the bone interface. In the superior-inferior direction, the CTV margin placed around the GTV varied from 5 to 10 cm. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the CTV with 5-mm margin all around. The 3D conformal technique consisted primarily of two to three beams with wedges or partial transmission blocks as compensators. For the IMRT technique, five coplanar beams were used, chosen so as to spare much of the surrounding soft tissue and to clear the other extremity or groin areas. IMRT plans were designed to adequately treat the planning target volume and spare the femur as much as possible.

RESULTS

Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms were analyzed. PTV coverage was comparable with both IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. Dose distributions were more conformal with IMRT, however, especially for patients with large variations of contours. The volume of the femur receiving at least full prescription (63 Gy) V100 decreased on average by approximately 57%, from 44.7 +/- 16.8% with 3D-CRT to 18.6 +/- 9.2% with IMRT (p < 0.01). For 3 patients with a GTV surrounding <50% of the circumference of the femur, the reduction in the V100 to the femur ranged from 61% to 79%. The hot spots in the femur, as measured by D05 (the dose encompassing 5% of volume), reduced on average from 67.2 +/- 1.8 Gy with 3D-CRT to 65.0 +/- 1.2 Gy with IMRT (p < 0.01). The mean dose to the femur was on average 38.5 +/- 11.5 Gy with IMRT, compared with 40.9 +/- 12.7 Gy with 3D-CRT. The volume of the surrounding soft tissues, defined as the ipsilateral limb excluding the PTV and the femur, receiving at least prescription dose (63 Gy) was reduced on average by about 78%, from 997 +/- 660 cc with 3D-CRT to 201 +/- 144 cc with IMRT (p < 0.01). The D05 to the surrounding soft tissues was on average 58.7 +/- 4.7 Gy with IMRT, compared to 67.8 +/- 1.3 Gy with 3D-CRT (p < 0.01), a reduction of approximately 13%. The mean dose to the surrounding soft tissues was comparable in both plans. The volume of the skin (from surface to 5 mm depth) receiving prescription dose (63 Gy) declined by roughly 45%, from 115 +/- 40 cc with 3D-CRT to 61 +/- 20 cc with IMRT (p < 0.01), with IMRT providing full skin dose coverage to scars. The hot spots in the skin decreased from 68.0 +/- 1.7 Gy with 3D-CRT to 65.2 +/- 1.2 Gy with IMRT (p < 0.01). The mean dose to the skin lessened from 51.5 +/- 4.7 Gy with 3D- CRT to 44.0 +/- 4.2 Gy with IMRT (p < 0.01), a reduction of 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques can reduce the dose to the femur without compromising target coverage by achieving concave dose distributions around the interface of the PTV and the femur. At the same time, IMRT can reduce the hot spots significantly in the surrounding soft tissues and skin. Whether such dosimetric improvements can translate into reduction of complications and/or improving local control needs to be investigated.

A preliminary study of the role of modulated electron beams in intensity modulated radiotherapy, using automated beam orientation and modality selection

PURPOSE

To develop an algorithm for optimal beam arrangement selection in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of mixed photon and electron beams. To apply this algorithm to study the utility of modulated electron beams in the context of IMRT planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The optimization algorithm selects, for a user-specified number of beams, the optimal IMRT arrangement (beam orientations, and photon/electron modality for each orientation) using a novel fast heuristic intensity modulation procedure. The algorithm was employed to select optimal beam arrangements for breast (two, four, and six axial beams) and head-and-neck (three, four, five, and seven nonaxial beams) cases.

RESULTS

For the two cases, increasing the number of selected beams: (1) increased the number of electron beams for the breast case, but not more than one electron beam was selected for the head-and-neck case; (2) decreased critical structure doses for both cases; and (3) decreased target homogeneity for the breast case, but improved it for the head-and-neck case.

CONCLUSIONS

In the two cases analyzed using the selection algorithm, the primary role of modulated electrons differs based on treatment site-normal tissue dose reduction in breast and target homogeneity improvement in head and neck. Although this preliminary study with two cases appears to suggest that the role of intensity-modulated electrons differs based on treatment site, further investigation of large numbers of cases and varied treatment sites are required to establish a definitive conclusion.

A forward-planned treatment technique using multisegments in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

To describe in detail a forward-planned multisegment technique (FPMS) as an alternative treatment method for patients who are not suitable for inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IP-IMRT), or for situations where IP-IMRT is not available in a medical clinic.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1995 and February 2002, 38 primary head-and-neck patients were treated using the FPMS technique, which has evolved over the past 7 years at our medical center. In the most recent version of the FPMS technique, which includes 5 patients examined in this analysis, the primary tumor and the upper neck nodes were treated with 7 gantry angles, including an anterior, 2 lateral, 2 anterior oblique, and 2 posterior oblique beams with a total of 13 beam shapes formed by multileaf collimators (MLC), called MLC segments. The shape of each MLC segment was carefully designed, and the associated weights were optimized through manual iterations. The lower neck nodes and the supraclavicular nodes were treated with a split-beam anterior field, matched to the inferior border of the FPMS plan at the isocenter. With an autosequencing delivery system, all fields, including dynamic wedges, can be automatically treated. The dosimetric accuracy of this technique was verified with a phantom plan and measured with an ionization chamber, as well as film dosimetry. A sample FPMS plan is described in detail, and the average results for the 5 patients treated with FPMS are retrospectively compared to results for similar patients treated with IP-IMRT.

RESULTS

The gross tumor volume was prescribed to 70 Gy (2.12 Gy/fraction) at the 88% isodose line, whereas the clinical target volume received a dose of 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) at the 75% isodose line. The maximum dose to the brainstem and spinal cord was below 54 and 45 Gy, respectively, comparable to IP-IMRT. The mean dose to the parotid glands was 32 Gy with FPMS vs. 26 Gy with IP-IMRT. Average delivery time was shorter for FPMS (15 min) than IP-IMRT (30 min), whereas the planning time depended on the expertise of the planner. Dosimetric accuracy for FPMS and IP-IMRT plans using phantom measurements was similar, within 1% of the phantom plan. With a median follow-up of 31 months, there was no local-regional recurrence, and the incidence of xerostomia is reduced compared to conventional techniques.

CONCLUSION

FPMS achieved plans comparable to those for IP-IMRT and is an ideal alternative treatment technique for a center without the capabilities of IP-IMRT or for a patient who is not a suitable candidate, because of prolonged treatment time. The treatment outcomes from our clinical experience indicate that FPMS can achieve excellent local freedom from progression rates without causing excessive toxicity. Lastly, IP-IMRT plans should be comparable to, if not better than, FPMS plans in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer.

Level II lymph nodes and radiation-induced xerostomia

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of the cranial border of electively irradiated Level II lymph nodes on xerostomia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer using three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (3D-CRT and IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The target volumes and organs at risk were delineated on the planning CT scans of 12 patients. Two elective target volumes were delineated. The first had the transverse process of the C1 atlas and the second had the transverse process of the C2 axis as cranial border of the Level II lymph nodes. 3D-CRT and IMRT planning were performed for both elective volumes, resulting in two plans per patient and technique, called the C1 and C2 plans, respectively. Irradiation of the ipsilateral elective volume up to C1 and the contralateral up to C2 was also performed for IMRT. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for xerostomia 1 year after RT was calculated using the parotid mean dose.

RESULTS

The average mean dose +/- standard deviation (SD) to the contralateral parotid gland was reduced from 33 +/- 5 Gy for the IMRT C1 plans to 26 +/- 4 Gy for the IMRT C2 plans and from 51 +/- 6 Gy to 49 +/- 7 Gy for the 3D-CRT C1 and C2 plans, respectively. The associated NTCP +/- SD for xerostomia was 38% +/- 10% for IMRT C1 plans and 24% +/- 6% for IMRT up to C2 on the contralateral side, regardless of which cranial border was irradiated on the ipsilateral side. For the 3D-CRT C1 and C2 plans, an NTCP value of 74% +/- 12% and 71% +/- 15% was obtained, respectively. The NTCP for xerostomia of the ipsilateral parotid gland was 53% +/- 17% and 45% +/- 20% for the IMRT C1 and C2 plans and 89% +/- 11% and 87% +/- 12% for the 3D-CRT C1 and C2 plans, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lowering the cranial border of the Level II lymph nodes from C1 to C2, in the case of bilateral elective neck irradiation, could be considered on the contralateral side when the risk of metastasis on that side is very low. This is especially true when IMRT is used, because the relative reduction of NTCP for xerostomia 1 year after RT could be up to 68% compared with conventional conformal RT up to C1.

Rotterdam and Brussels CT-based neck nodal delineation compared with the surgical levels as defined by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

Rotterdam and Brussels have independently published guidelines for the definition and delineation of CT-based neck nodal Levels I-VI. This paper first reports on the adequacy of contouring of the Rotterdam delineation protocol. Rotterdam and Brussels differed slightly in translating the original surgical level definitions as proposed by the 2002 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) to CT guidelines. To adapt to the surgical level definitions to come to a unifying concept, adjustments of both CT-based classifications are proposed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The clinical neck nodal target volumes of patients irradiated in Rotterdam by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) between December 1998 and March 2001 were reviewed. Thirty-four patients with N0 and 27 patients with N+ disease with primary tumors located in the oral cavity (n = 1) oropharynx (n = 24), hypopharynx (n = 7), and larynx (n = 29) were evaluated. Seven patients underwent unilateral (3 N0 patients, 4 N+ patients) and 54 underwent bilateral (31 N0 patients, 23 N+ patients) irradiation of the neck. In 11 N+ patients, 3D-CRT of the neck was followed by unilateral neck dissection. The dose to the primary and nonresected N+ necks was 70 Gy and to the N0 neck was 46 Gy. Neck levels were analyzed for adequacy of contouring, dose distribution, and patterns of relapse. The mean dose and the percentage of the volume receiving a minimum of 95% (V95) or >107% (V107) of the prescribed dose was computed.

RESULTS

In 4 patients treated with bilateral 3D-CRT, contouring was not in concordance with the guidelines of the protocol. The V95 and V107 in the 81 adequately contoured N0 necks (63 irradiated N0 necks from 33 N0 patients, 18 irradiated N0 necks from 24 N+ patients) was 95.6% and 6.3%, respectively. For the 26 N+ necks (15 N+ necks from 13 N+ RT-only patients, 11 N+ necks from 11 preoperatively irradiated patients), the V95 and V107 was 94.6% and 6.7%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 29 months, in 4 (8.6%) of 46 patients treated by 3D-CRT only, regional relapse was found. An actuarial regional and locoregional relapse-free survival and disease-free survival rate at 3 years of 90%, 78%, and 68%, respectively, was observed. All regional relapses were observed in the N0 necks of patients with supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma. Taking the surgical 2002 AAO-HNS classification as a reference, adjustments are proposed for the Rotterdam and Brussels delineation protocols to arrive at a unified CT-based neck nodal classification.

CONCLUSION

Adequate dose coverage for the Rotterdam CT-based contours of the neck nodal levels was found. In the RT-only patients, only four failures were observed: one regional and three locoregional relapses. As a next step in optimizing the current Rotterdam and Brussels CT-based delineation protocols, adaptations are proposed to resolve the discrepancies compared with the 2002 AAO-HNS surgical classification.

Segmental IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer in a clinical setting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To develop a segmental intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight patients previously treated for oropharyngeal cancer were replanned with segmental IMRT. The dose distribution was optimized using beam geometries consisting of 3, 5, 7 and 9 equiangular beams. The optimization procedure resulted in a theoretical fluence for each beam. In order to vary the number of segments, the optimized fluence was divided into four different equidistant levels. The final dose distribution was calculated using clinically deliverable segments obtained from optimized fluence.

RESULTS

For our segmental IMRT technique the dose homogeneity within the target volumes improved when the total number of segments increased and reached a saturation level at approximately 150 segments. Seven beams were sufficient to achieve the saturation level for dose homogeneity. The mean dose to the parotid glands depended on the beam geometry and tumor location and did not depend on the number of segments. On average the mean dose to the contralateral parotid gland was 35.7 Gy (27.1-39.9 Gy) for all seven beam plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven beams are sufficient to achieve an acceptable dose homogeneity within the target volumes and significant parotid sparing. These results will be used to introduce IMRT in routine clinical practice.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation

PURPOSE

To review the University of California-San Francisco (UCSF) experience of using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat head-and-neck cancer focusing on the importance of target volume delineation and adequate target volume coverage.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1995 and January 2002, 150 histologically confirmed patients underwent IMRT for their head-and-neck cancer at our institution. Sites included were nasopharynx 86, oropharynx 22, paranasal sinus 22, thyroid 6, oral tongue 3, nasal cavity 2, salivary 2, larynx 2, hypopharynx 1, lacrimal gland 1, skin 1, temporal bone 1, and trachea 1. One hundred seven patients were treated definitively with IMRT +/- concurrent platinum chemotherapy (92/107), whereas 43 patients underwent gross surgical resection followed by postoperative IMRT +/- concurrent platinum chemotherapy (15/43). IMRT was delivered using three different techniques: 1) manually cut partial transmission blocks, 2) computer-controlled auto-sequencing segmental multileaf collimator, and 3) sequential tomotherapy using dynamic multivane intensity-modulating collimator. Forty-two patients were treated with a forward plan, 102 patients with an inverse plan, and 6 patients with both forward and inverse plans. The gross target volume (GTV) was defined as tumor detected on physical examination or imaging studies. In postoperative cases, the GTV was defined as the preoperative gross tumor volume. The clinical target volume (CTV) included all potential areas at risk for microscopic tumor involvement by either direct extension or nodal spread including a margin for patient motion and setup errors. The average prescription doses to the GTV were 70 Gy and 66 Gy for the primary and the postoperative cases, respectively. The site of recurrence was determined by the diagnostic neuroradiologist to be either within the GTV or the CTV volume by comparison of the treatment planning computed tomography with posttreatment imaging studies.

RESULTS

For the primary definitive cases with a median follow-up of 25 months (range 6 to 78 months), 4 patients failed in the GTV. The 2- and 3-year local freedom from progression (LFFP) rates were 97% and 95%. With a median follow-up of 17 months (range 8 to 56 months), 7 patients failed in the postoperative setting. The 2-year LFFP rate was 83%. For the primary group, the average maximum, mean, and minimum doses delivered were 80 Gy, 74 Gy, 56 Gy to the GTV, and 80 Gy, 69 Gy, 33 Gy to the CTV. An average of only 3% of the GTV and 3% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. For the postoperative group, the average maximum, mean, and minimum doses delivered were 79 Gy, 71 Gy, 37 Gy to the GTV and 79 Gy, 66 Gy, 21 Gy to the CTV. An average of only 6% of the GTV and 6% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose.

CONCLUSION

Accurate target volume delineation in IMRT treatment for head-and-neck cancer is essential. Our multidisciplinary approach in target volume definition resulted in few recurrences with excellent LFFP rates and no marginal failures. Higher treatment failure rates were noted in the postoperative setting in which lower doses were prescribed. Potential dose escalation studies may further improve the local control rates in the postoperative setting.

A survey of intensity-modulated radiation therapy use in the United States

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the current level of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) use in the United States.

METHODS

Three-hundred thirty-three randomly selected radiation oncologists were sent a 13-question survey regarding IMRT use. IMRT users were asked about the number of patients and sites treated, their reasons for adopting IMRT, and future plans for its use. Physicians who did not use IMRT were asked about their reasons for not using IMRT; whether they intended to adopt it in the future; and, if so, their reasons.

RESULTS

One-hundred sixty-eight responses (50.5%) were received. Fifty-four respondents (32.1%) stated that they currently used IMRT. Most IMRT users (79.6%) had adopted IMRT since 2000. Academic physicians were more likely to use IMRT (P = 0.003) compared with private practitioners. The percent of physicians using IMRT in practices comprised of 1 physician, 2-4 physicians, or > 4 physicians were 15.4%, 28.4%, and 44.2%, respectively (P = 0.02). The most common sites treated were head and neck malignancies and genitourinary tumors. Of the 114 IMRT nonusers, 96.5% planned to use IMRT in the future, with 91.8% planning to use IMRT within 3 years. Among IMRT nonusers, the most common reason cited for not using IMRT was lack of necessary equipment. The most common reasons for adopting IMRT (users) or wanting to adopt IMRT (nonusers) were to improve delivery of conventional doses and to escalate dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of radiation oncologists in the United States use IMRT. However, this number appears to be growing rapidly. Efforts to ensure the safe and appropriate application of this new technology are warranted.

[Quality assurance program for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatments of head and neck carcinomas]

A new technique such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy needs a quality assurance program. A French cooperative group joined to define a common program for the use of this technique in the case of head and neck carcinomas. Specific controls are necessary and even mandatory, for example: leaves position, speed of the leaves and the linearity of the dose with the monitor unit number. Measurements in homogeneous phantoms will validate calculated treatment plans. Absolute and relative measurements need ionisation chambers and films. Measurements for each beam, gantry at 0 degrees, are basic measurements. If those are impossible due to the treatment planning software, they can be performed with the treatment angles, films of course positioned perpendicularly to the beam axis. A consensus must be established between members to reduce the frequency and the number of measurements. Nevertheless, it currently seems mandatory to maintain measurements for each beam. Moreover, incidents that happen during this kind of treatment have to be recorded and new verifications will have to be realised then. This program is a unique possibility to match the application of a new technique whatever the type of equipment.

Automatic feathering of split fields for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy

Due to leaf travel range limitations of the Varian Dynamic Multileaf Collimator (DMLC) system, an IMRT field width exceeding 14.5 cm is split into two or more adjacent abutting sub-fields. The abutting sub-fields are then delivered as separate treatment fields. The accuracy of the delivery is very sensitive to multileaf positioning accuracy. The uncertainties in leaf and carriage positions cause errors in the delivered dose (e.g., hot or cold spots) along the match line of abutting sub-fields. The dose errors are proportional to the penumbra slope at the edge of each sub-field. To alleviate this problem, we developed techniques that feather the split line of IMRT fields. Feathering of the split line was achieved by dividing IMRT fields into several sub-groups with different split line positions. A Varian 21EX accelerator with an 80-leaf DLMC was used for IMRT delivery. Cylindrical targets with varying widths (>14.5 cm) were created to study the split line positions. Seven coplanar 6 MV fields were selected for planning using the NOMOS-CORVUS system. The isocentre of the fields was positioned at the centre of the target volume. Verification was done in a 30 x 30 x 30 cm3 polystyrene phantom using film dosimetry. We investigated two techniques to move the split line from its original position or cause feathering of them: (1) varying the isocentre position along the target width and (2) introduction of a 'pseudo target' outside of the patient (phantom). The position of the 'pseudo target' was determined by analysing the divergence of IMRT fields. For target widths of 14-28 cm, IMRT fields were automatically split into two sub-fields, and the split line was positioned along the centre of the target by CORVUS. Measured dose distributions demonstrated that the dose to the critical structure was 10% higher than planned when the split line crossed through the centre of the target. Both methods of modifying the split line positions resulted in maximum shifts of approximately 1 cm from the original. Therefore, it was concluded that the feathering of the split line may be used for reducing the magnitude of hot/cold spots. This method was tested for an oesophageal cancer case. For a six-field arrangement, it was possible to create three field sub-groups with different split lines. The feathering technique developed in this work does not require any modifications of the radiation fields during the course of treatment because only one treatment plan is used to deliver the entire course of radiation treatments. In addition, this method may be more biologically effective because the split line feathering is achieved for every fraction of radiation.

Optimisation of conformal radiation therapy by intensity modulation: cancer of the larynx and salivary gland function

PURPOSE

Prevention of damage to critical normal tissues is of paramount importance for the quality of life of patients irradiated for cancers in the head and neck. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the parotid gland sparing 3D conformal radiation therapy technique (3DCRT) in a prospective study in node negative cancer of the larynx.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with node negative squamous cell cancer of the larynx were irradiated by a 3DCRT technique (class solution) to both sides of the neck (elective dose 46 Gy to levels II, III and IV) and primary tumour (70 Gy). Dose distributions of the major salivary glands were correlated with objective (stimulated whole saliva flow, WS) and subjective (questionnaire; visual analogue scale, VAS) salivary gland function. Apart from the clinically used 3DCRT technique, in order to optimise 3DCRT dose distributions, intensity modulated (IMRT) treatment plans were generated for the same patient population. Dose-volume histograms of 3DCRT and IMRT treatment plans were analysed and compared.

RESULTS

For the 26 patients irradiated with the 3DCRT class solution technique: VAS scores and questionnaires reached their nadir 3 months post-radiotherapy; WS reached its nadir 6 months post-radiotherapy. WS flow rates improved significantly, but never normalised; 2 years post-treatment WS measurements were 48% of the pre-treatment values. VAS scores deteriorated during ERT from 0 pre-treatment to 6.1 immediately post-treatment. Compared to pre-treatment, questionnaires were answered affirmative by increasing numbers of patients. For all patients, IMRT treatment plans resulted in a significant reduction of the dose delivered to the parotid glands compared to the 3DCRT-treatment technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The class solution for the 3DCRT salivary gland sparing technique is inadequate for fully preserving salivary gland function, given the dose distributions (DVHs) as well as the subjective- and objective salivary gland function assessments. The results can be optimised in the future, that is a further reduction of xerostomia can be achieved, by using IMRT techniques focused at sparing major and minor salivary glands.

Clinical aspects of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer

The tightly conformal doses produced by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the existence of many critical structures in close proximity to the target, and the lack of internal organ motion in the head and neck, provide the potential for organ sparing and improved tumor irradiation. Many studies of treatment planning for head-and-neck cancer have demonstrated the dosimetric superiority of IMRT over conventional techniques in these respects. The initial results of clinical studies demonstrate reduced xerostomia. They suggest an improvement in tumor control, which needs to be verified in larger studies and longer follow-up.

Influence of dose calculation model on treatment plan evaluation in conformal radiotherapy: a three-case study

In modern conformal radiotherapy (CRT), we attempt to increase its therapeutic ratio, thus improving the survival chances and/or quality of life for patients. It is common to acknowledge that poor local tumor control or increased normal tissue complications may arise from inaccurate targeting of the tumor, failure to conform the high-dose distribution to the target volume, and inaccurately delivered radiation doses. A further cause for concern is the influence that errors or inaccuracies in the dose calculation may have on the management of radiation therapy. Such errors arise from inherent limitations in the calculation algorithm used, which are more significant in some anatomical sites than others. Furthermore, an estimate of the therapeutic ratio is given by the ratio of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). The effectiveness of these predictive indicators also depends on the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions in the target and surrounding normal structures. In this work, we compared CRT dose distributions of plans for the treatment of prostate, head-and-neck, and lung tumors using the measurement-based Clarkson and model-based Superposition dose calculation algorithms. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the planning target volume (PTV) and sensitive structures, as well as NTCP and TCP, were compared. Dose distributions, observed in the lung and head-and-neck plans, vary significantly with respect to dose conformity as a function of algorithm used. Differences in the calculated maximum dose of up to 14% were observed in the PTV and sensitive structures for the lung and head-and-neck Clarkson-based plans, respectively, compared to the Superposition-based plans. Furthermore, a difference in the biological outcomes of up to 14% in the NTCP and 4% in the TCP was noticed. The CRT plans show the importance of accurate modeling of the effect of tissue inhomogeneities on dose distributions in the target and critical structures for lung and head-and-neck treatments.

[Upper aerodigestive tract cancers: clinical benefits of conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulation]

The conformal radiotherapy approach, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), is based on modern imaging modalities, efficient 3D treatment planning systems, sophisticated immobilization systems and rigorous quality assurance and treatment verification. The central objective of conformal radiotherapy is to ensure a high dose distribution tailored to the limits of the target volume while reducing exposure of normal tissues. These techniques would then allow further tumor dose escalation. Head-and-neck tumors are some of the most attractive localizations to test conformal radiotherapy. They combine ballistic difficulties due to particularly complex shapes (nasopharynx, ethmoid) and problems due to the number and low tolerance of neighbouring organs like parotids, eyes, brainstem and spinal cord. The therapeutic irradiation of head-and-neck tumors thus remains a challenge for the radiation oncologist. Conformal radiotherapy does have a significant potential for improving local control and reducing toxicity when compared to standard radiotherapy. However, in the absence of prospective randomized trials, it is somewhat difficult at present to evaluate the real benefits drawn from 3DCRT and IMRT. The published clinical reports on the use of conformal radiotherapy are essentially dealing with dosimetric comparisons on relatively small numbers of patients. Recently, a few publications have emphasized the clinical experience of several precursor teams with a suitable follow-up. This paper describes the current state-of-the-art of 3DCRT and IMRT in order to evaluate the impact of these techniques on head-and-neck cancers irradiation.

Definitive radiotherapy for squamous carcinoma of the larynx

Definitive radiotherapy for T1 or T2 laryngeal carcinoma offers good local control and quality of voice. Recent clinical trials with hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy demonstrated improved rates of local control for advanced laryngeal cancer treated with primary radiotherapy and provides the opportunity for organ preservation. The use of amifostine and pilocarpine may prevent or ameliorate radiation-induced xerostomia. Recent advances in 3-D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT lead to a better dose distribution for sparing normal organs while treating target volumes with full dose.

IMRT of large fields: whole-abdomen irradiation

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of inverse planning for whole-abdomen intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with bone marrow and kidney sparing and to develop approaches to circumventing field size restrictions in the application of whole-abdomen IMRT using dynamic multileaf collimators (DMLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The entire peritoneal cavity as derived from serial computerized tomography scans was defined as the gross target volume, whereas the planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the gross target volume plus a 5-mm margin extending 1 cm superiorly and inferiorly. In 10 randomly selected patients, the PTV ranged from 5629 to 12578 cc (median 7935 cc), and the superior-inferior, lateral, and anterior-posterior dimensions of the PTV ranged from 37 to 46 cm (median 42.5 cm), 27 to 33 cm (median 29 cm), and 18 to 23 cm (median 20 cm), respectively. A single isocenter was defined for patients with field length <40 cm. For patients with fields >40 cm, two isocenters were defined: one in the abdominal region, and the other in the pelvis. For IMRT planning, five 15-MV intensity-modulated beams at gantry angles of 180 degrees, 105 degrees, 35 degrees, 325 degrees, and 255 degrees were used. Optimization was designed to spare kidneys and bones. To fully account for the significant scattered dose contributions, an iterative process for dose calculations was implemented in the optimization. To overcome the 15-cm field width limit of our DMLC delivery system, fields with a width >15 cm were split into two or more subfields. To minimize field match errors, adjacent subfields overlapped by at least 2 cm, with intensity "feathering" in the overlap region. For patients with two isocenters, fields were overlapped and feathered in the cephalad-caudad direction by at least 3 cm. For comparison, conventional anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior 6-MV photon beams with posterior kidney blocks at extended distance were also generated for each patient.

RESULTS

Treatment plan optimization calculations required 20-80 min on a 500-MHz DEC alpha workstation. Including beam splitting, an average of 16 DMLC beams was used per patient. Delivery of 150 cGy required, on average, 1442 monitor units. For the same dose constraints on the kidneys, whole-abdomen IMRT resulted in significant dose reduction to the bones and improved PTV coverage as compared to conventional treatment. For a prescription dose of 30 Gy, the volume of the pelvic bones receiving more than 21 Gy was reduced on average by almost 60% with IMRT, and the mean dose to all bones was reduced from 24.0 +/- 1.5 Gy to 18.5 +/- 1.0 Gy (p = 0.002). PTV coverage, as measured by V95 (the volume receiving 95% of the prescription dose), improved from 71.7 +/- 4.8% with conventional treatment to 83.5 +/- 3.9% with IMRT (p = 0.002), although small regions of underdose in areas near the kidneys could not be avoided completely. The high-dose regions within the PTV, as measured by D05 (the dose covering 5% of PTV volume), increased slightly from 31.2 +/- 0.6 Gy with conventional treatment to 32.8 +/- 0.2 Gy with IMRT.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a process to plan and deliver whole-abdomen IMRT using standard linear accelerators and DMLC. IMRT can achieve better PTV coverage with the same level of kidney sparing and improved sparing of the bone marrow. These methods may be applicable also to other sites requiring large-field irradiation.

Fast and accurate leaf verification for dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device

A prerequisite for accurate dose delivery of IMRT profiles produced with dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC) is highly accurate leaf positioning. In our institution, leaf verification for DMLC was initially done with film and ionization chamber. To overcome the limitations of these methods, a fast, accurate and two-dimensional method for daily leaf verification, using our CCD-camera based electronic portal imaging device (EPID), has been developed. This method is based on a flat field produced with a 0.5 cm wide sliding gap for each leaf pair. Deviations in gap widths are detected as deviations in gray scale value profiles derived from the EPID images, and not by directly assessing leaf positions in the images. Dedicated software was developed to reduce the noise level in the low signal images produced with the narrow gaps. The accuracy of this quality assurance procedure was tested by introducing known leaf position errors. It was shown that errors in leaf gap as small as 0.01-0.02 cm could be detected, which is certainly adequate to guarantee accurate dose delivery of DMLC treatments, even for strongly modulated beam profiles. Using this method, it was demonstrated that both short and long term reproducibility in leaf positioning were within 0.01 cm (1sigma) for all gantry angles, and that the effect of gravity was negligible.

Patients with head and neck cancer cured by radiation therapy: a survey of the dry mouth syndrome in long-term survivors

BACKGROUND

Xerostomia can have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients treated by radiation therapy (RT) for cancer in the head and neck. The first aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of xerostomia in 39 long-term survivors treated between 1965-1995 by conventional two-dimensional radiation therapy and currently without evidence of disease. The second aim was to develop a concise instrument to evaluate the subjective aspects of xerostomia.

METHODS

A newly developed questionnaire and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used in analyzing the degree of dry mouth and xerostomia-related problems. The radiation dose received by the major salivary glands was estimated by analyzing two-dimensional simulation films.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of the patients experienced a moderate to severe degree of xerostomia. In the multivariate analysis, three questions regarding dry mouth, eating, and speech were particularly discriminatory for establishing the degree of xerostomia as expressed by the VAS score.

CONCLUSIONS

In this survey, 64% of the long-term survivors, after treatment by conventional two-dimensional radiation therapy for a malignancy in the head and neck region, still experienced a moderate to severe degree of permanent xerostomia. A simplified instrument to evaluate xerostomia subjectively can consist of the VAS score and three graded questions.

The dose to the parotid glands with IMRT for oropharyngeal tumors: the effect of reduction of positioning margins

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to quantify the importance of the reduction of positioning margins applied to the clinical target volume (CTV) on the dose distribution of the parotid gland for different intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) strategies for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

CTVs and organs at risk were delineated in the planning computed tomographic (CT) scans of three patients. Margins of 0, 3, 6 and 9mm were applied to the CTVs in order to obtain the planning target volumes (PTVs). Three IMRT strategies were used to optimize the dose distribution.

RESULTS

The analysis of the three IMRT strategies resulted in: (1) an optimal dose distribution in the PTV; (2) optimal dose distribution in the PTV while sparing the parotid gland and (3) more parotid gland sparing but at expense of the dose homogeneity in the PTV. The mean parotid dose increased linearly with increasing margin by approximately 1.3Gy per mm. As a result, the normal complication probability (NTCP) for xerostomia decreased when smaller margins were applied. Reducing the margin from 6 to 3mm resulted in an NTCP reduction of approximately 20%.

CONCLUSION

Reducing the CTV-PTV margin by improving the patient position accuracy may lead to a significant reduction of NTCP for the IMRT treatment of the oropharyngeal tumors and lymph nodes level II.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: emphasis on the selection and delineation of the targets

The head and neck contain many critical, noninvolved structures in close vicinity to the targets. The tightly conformal doses produced by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and the lack of internal organ motion in the head and neck, provide the potential for organ sparing and improved tumor irradiation. Many studies of treatment planning for head and neck cancer have demonstrated the dosimetric superiority of IMRT over conventional techniques in these respects. The initial results of clinical studies demonstrate reduced xerostomia. They suggest an improvement in tumor control, which needs to be verified in larger studies and longer follow-up. Critical issues for successful outcome of head and neck IMRT are accurate selection of the neck lymph nodes that require adjuvant treatment, and accurate delineation on the planning computed tomography (CT) of the lymph-node bearing areas and subclinical disease adjoining the gross tumor. This review emphasizes these topics and provides some guidelines.

IMRT in the treatment of head and neck cancer: is the present already the future?

Disease outcome in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients is far from satisfactory. The main causes of failure remain linked to locoregional recurrences, which are due to incomplete eradication of clonogenic cells. Conventional radiation therapy or 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy are currently carried out at their extreme possibilities due to their intrinsic limitation--namely the impossibility to generate concave dose distributions without compromising tumor irradiation. Approximately a third of patients treated with radiotherapy and most head and neck cancer cases present concave shapes of the target volumes. With the advent of intensity modulated radiation therapy--clinically available for only few years--head and neck patients can now benefit from strategies based on highly conformal techniques. It is possible to exploit efficiently dose-escalation protocols to increase probabilities to eradicate clonogens, to reduce overall treatment time, to control repopulation problems and to keep as low as reasonably necessary the irradiation of healthy tissues minimizing acute and late complications. Today, both planning and clinical studies demonstrate these advantages but larger controlled trials are necessary to assess the true potentialities of techniques based on intensity modulation for head and neck cancers. In a speculative view, proton therapy, possibly with intensity modulation, or light ion therapy should be considered for selected cases or for reirradiation due to their higher biological efficacy and their degree of dose-conformation to target volumes.

Is uniform target dose possible in IMRT plans in the head and neck?

PURPOSE

Various published reports involving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans developed using automated optimization (inverse planning) have demonstrated highly conformal plans. These reported conformal IMRT plans involve significant target dose inhomogeneity, including both overdosage and underdosage within the target volume. In this study, we demonstrate the development of optimized beamlet IMRT plans that satisfy rigorous dose homogeneity requirements for all target volumes (e.g., +/-5%), while also sparing the parotids and other normal structures.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The treatment plans of 15 patients with oropharyngeal cancer who were previously treated with forward-planned multisegmental IMRT were planned again using an automated optimization system developed in-house. The optimization system allows for variable sized beamlets computed using a three-dimensional convolution/superposition dose calculation and flexible cost functions derived from combinations of clinically relevant factors (costlets) that can include dose, dose-volume, and biologic model-based costlets. The current study compared optimized IMRT plans designed to treat the various planning target volumes to doses of 66, 60, and 54 Gy with varying target dose homogeneity while using a flexible optimization cost function to minimize the dose to the parotids, spinal cord, oral cavity, brainstem, submandibular nodes, and other structures.

RESULTS

In all cases, target dose uniformity was achieved through steeply varying dose-based costs. Differences in clinical plan evaluation metrics were evaluated for individual cases (eight different target homogeneity costlets), and for the entire cohort of plans. Highly conformal plans were achieved, with significant sparing of both the contralateral and ipsilateral parotid glands. As the homogeneity of the target dose distributions was allowed to decrease, increased sparing of the parotids (and other normal tissues) may be achieved. However, it was shown that relatively few patients would benefit from the use of increased target inhomogeneity, because the range of improvement in the parotid dose is relatively limited. Hot spots in the target volumes are shown to be unnecessary and do not assist in normal tissue sparing.

CONCLUSION

Sparing of both parotids in patients receiving bilateral neck radiation can be achieved without compromising strict target dose homogeneity criteria. The geometry of the normal tissue and target anatomy are shown to be the major factor necessary to predict the parotid sparing that will be possible for any particular case.

Hypopharyngeal carcinoma

For more than 20 years, the policy at the University of Florida has been to treat patients with favorable stage T1-T2 pyriform sinus carcinoma by using radiation therapy alone, or with a planned neck dissection if advanced nodal disease is present. This approach usually leaves the patient with nearly normal swallowing and speech, and provides bilateral coverage of the regional neck and retropharyngeal lymphatics. More advanced lesions often are not controlled with radiation alone and are usually considered for partial or total laryngopharyngectomy if the patient is medically operable. Radiation is usually administered postoperatively in this setting, unless the neck disease is thought to be unresectable, in which case preoperative radiation is given. Recent data have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy administered concomitantly with radiotherapy results in improved cure rates for patients with advanced disease compared with irradiation alone. Time-honored established guidelines are still used, although the edges have become blurred. Therefore, patients with larger primary tumors now may be considered for organ preservation treatment with irradiation and chemotherapy, reserving surgery for salvage situations. The subset of patients with advanced T4 pyriform sinus cancers (in whom cure with chemoradiation would likely result in tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy dependence) may be better served with elective surgery and postoperative irradiation. The definition of this subset of patients is unclear but probably includes patients with significant cartilage destruction and those who require pretreatment tracheostomy. The policy at the University of Florida is to treat essentially all pharyngeal wall cancers with external-beam irradiation alone.

Modern radiotherapy for modern surgeons: an update on radiation oncology

Changes in the practice of radiation oncology have been significant over the last decade and continue to develop at an exciting rate. These advances range from our understanding of the increasingly important role of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and definitive settings to huge technological progress in the areas of tumour delineation, treatment planning, delivery and verification. In many cases, benefits have resulted from the ability of modern radiotherapy to deliver high doses with great accuracy and increasing safety in a highly individualized manner. This has impacted favourably on the management of all major malignancies as discussed in this paper. A good understanding of what can be achieved with modern radiotherapy has never been more important in ensuring an effective multidisciplinary approach to cancer management.

Electronic portal image assisted reduction of systematic set-up errors in head and neck irradiation

PURPOSE

To quantify systematic and random patient set-up errors in head and neck irradiation and to investigate the impact of an off-line correction protocol on the systematic errors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic portal images were obtained for 31 patients treated for primary supra-glottic larynx carcinoma who were immobilised using a polyvinyl chloride cast. The observed patient set-up errors were input to the shrinking action level (SAL) off-line decision protocol and appropriate set-up corrections were applied. To assess the impact of the protocol, the positioning accuracy without application of set-up corrections was reconstructed.

RESULTS

The set-up errors obtained without set-up corrections (1 standard deviation (SD)=1.5-2mm for random and systematic errors) were comparable to those reported in other studies on similar fixation devices. On an average, six fractions per patient were imaged and the set-up of half the patients was changed due to the decision protocol. Most changes were detected during weekly check measurements, not during the first days of treatment. The application of the SAL protocol reduced the width of the distribution of systematic errors to 1mm (1 SD), as expected from simulations. A retrospective analysis showed that this accuracy should be attainable with only two measurements per patient using a different off-line correction protocol, which does not apply action levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-line verification protocols can be particularly effective in head and neck patients due to the smallness of the random set-up errors. The excellent set-up reproducibility that can be achieved with such protocols enables accurate dose delivery in conformal treatments.

Commissioning of a commercially available system for intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose delivery with dynamic multileaf collimation

PURPOSE

To commission commercially available equipment for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, the stability in leaf positioning and in realized IMRT profiles on a Varian 2300 C/D machine were determined as a function of time and gantry angle, and as a result of treatment interrupts. Second, dose distributions calculated with the CadPlan (Varian) treatment planning system, using leaf trajectories calculated with the leaf motion calculator (LMC) algorithm, were compared with distributions realized at the 2300 C/D unit.

RESULTS

Day-to-day and gantry angle variations in leaf positioning and dose delivery were very small (less than 0.1-0.2 mm and 2%). The effect of treatment interrupts on measured dose distributions was less than 2%. The agreement between the final dose distribution calculated by CadPlan and the measured dose was generally within 2%, or 2 mm at steep dose gradients, using a leaf transmission value of 1.8% and a leaf separation value of 2 mm in LMC. For narrow peaks, deviations of up to 6% were observed. LMC does not synchronize adjacent leaf trajectories resulting in tongue-and-groove underdosages of up to 29% for extreme cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2300 C/D machine is suitable for accurate and reproducible DMLC treatments. The agreement between dose predictions with LMC and CadPlan, and realized doses at this unit is clinically acceptable for most cases. However, differences between calculated and actual dose values may exist in peaked fluences or due to tongue-and-groove effects. Therefore, pretreatment dosimetric verification for each patient is recommended.

Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

To assess long-term xerostomia in patients receiving parotid-sparing radiation therapy (RT) for head-and-neck cancer, and to find the patient and therapy-related factors that affect its severity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 1994 through January 2000, 84 patients received comprehensive bilateral neck RT using conformal and multisegmental intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) aiming to spare the major salivary glands. Before RT and periodically through 2 years after the completion of RT, salivary flow rates from each of the major salivary glands were selectively measured. At the same time intervals, each patient completed an 8-item self-reported xerostomia-specific questionnaire (XQ). To gain a relative measure of the effect of RT on the minor salivary glands, whose output could not be measured, the surfaces of the oral cavity (extending to include the surface of the base of tongue) were outlined in the planning CT scans. The mean doses to the new organ ("oral cavity") were recorded. Forty-eight patients receiving unilateral neck RT were similarly studied and served as a benchmark for comparison. Factors predicting the XQ scores were analyzed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The XQ was found to be reliable and valid in measuring patient-reported xerostomia. The spared salivary glands which had received moderate doses in the bilateral RT group recovered to their baseline salivary flow rates during the second year after RT, and the spared glands in the unilateral RT group, which had received very low doses, demonstrated increased salivary production beyond their pre-RT levels. The increase in the salivary flow rates during the second year after RT paralleled an improvement in xerostomia in both patient groups. The improvement in xerostomia was faster in the unilateral compared with the bilateral RT group, but the difference narrowed at 2 years. The major salivary gland flow rates had only a weak correlation with the xerostomia scores. Factors found to be independently associated with the xerostomia scores were the pre-RT baseline scores, the time since RT, and the mean doses to the major salivary glands (notably to the submandibular glands) and to the oral cavity.

CONCLUSION

An improvement over time in xerostomia, occurring in tandem with rising salivary production from the spared major salivary glands, suggests a long-term clinical benefit from their sparing. The oral cavity mean dose, representing RT effect on the minor salivary glands, was found to be a significant, independent predictor of xerostomia. Thus, in addition to the major salivary glands, sparing the uninvolved oral cavity should be considered as a planning objective to further reduce xerostomia.

Partial irradiation of the parotid gland

Recent efforts to reduce xerostomia associated with irradiation (RT) of head and neck cancer include the use of conformal and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) to partly spare the major salivary glands, notably the parotid glands, from a high radiation dose while treating adequately all the targets at risk of disease. Knowledge of the dose-volume-response relationships in the salivary glands would determine treatment planning goals and facilitate optimization of the RT plans. Recent prospective studies of salivary flows following inhomogeneous irradiation of the parotid glands have utilized dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and various models to assess these relationships. These studies found that the mean dose to the gland is correlated with the reduction of the salivary output. This is consistent with a pure parallel architecture of the functional subunits (FSUs) of the salivary glands. The range of the mean doses, which have been found in these studies to cause significant salivary flow reduction is 26 to 39 Gy.