Morbidity of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity and superficial trunk

Prognostic Factors in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treated with Radiotherapy: Systematic Review of the Literature

Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities are rare tumors with various prognostic factors. Their management is debatable due to their inconsistent results within the literature and the lack of large prospective studies. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the available scientific data on prognostic factors concerning the characteristics of the patients, the disease and the treatments performed, as well as their potential complications, on studies with a median follow-up of 5 years at minimum. A search of articles following the "PRISMA method" and using the PubMed search engine was conducted to select the most relevant studies. Twenty-five articles were selected, according to preestablished criteria. This review provides a better understanding of the prognosis and disease outcome of these tumors. Many factors were described comparing the frequency of occurrence according to the studies, which remain heterogeneous between them. Significant factors that could orient patients to radiotherapy were highlighted. These positive prognostic factors provide valuable insight to optimize radiotherapy treatments for patients treated for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.

Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities-A Current Concept and Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Evidence on the use of brachytherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is sparse. Therapy regimens are determined more by local interdisciplinary tumor conferences than by standardized protocols. Patient-specific factors complicate the standardized application of therapy protocols. The individuality of the treatment makes it difficult to compare results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, whereby the literature from a period of almost 44 years (1977-2021) was graded and included in this systematic review. For this purpose, PubMed was used as the primary database. Search string included "soft-tissue sarcoma", "brachytherapy", and "extremity." Four independent researchers reviewed the literature. Only full-text articles written in English or German were included.

RESULTS

Of the 175 identified studies, 70 were eligible for analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The key points to compare were local complications, recurrence rate and correlation with margins of resection, and the use of brachytherapy regarding tumor grading.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy represents an important subset of radiotherapy techniques used in STSs, whose indications and applications are constantly evolving, and for which a local control rate of 50% to 96% has been reported as monotherapy, depending on risk factors. However, the best benefit is seen in the combination of further resection and brachytherapy, and most authors at many other centers agree with this treatment strategy.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus statement for soft-tissue sarcoma brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Growing data supports the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Brachytherapy has been used for decades in the management of STS and can be utilized as monotherapy or as a boost to external beam radiation. We present updated guidelines from the American Brachytherapy Society regarding the utilization of brachytherapy in the management of STS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in STS and STS brachytherapy created an updated clinical practice guideline including step-by-step details for performing STS brachytherapy based on a literature review and clinical experience.

RESULTS

Brachytherapy monotherapy should be considered for lower-recurrence risk patients or after a local recurrence following previous external beam radiation; a brachytherapy boost can be considered in higher-risk patents meeting implant criteria. Multiple dose/fractionation regimens are available, with determination based on tumor location and treatment intent. Techniques to limit wound complications are based on the type of wound closure; wound complication can be mitigated with a delay in the start of brachytherapy with immediate wound closure or by utilizing a staged reconstruction technique, which allows an earlier treatment start with a delayed wound closure.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated guidelines provide clinicians with data on indications for STS brachytherapy as well as guidelines on how to perform and deliver high quality STS brachytherapy safely with minimal toxicity.

Femoral Fracture in Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with and Without Dose Constraints

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that the cumulative risk of femoral fracture in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for thigh and groin soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is low. In the current study, we sought to evaluate the effect of radiation dose constraints on the rate of femoral fracture in a more contemporary cohort.

METHODS

All patients treated with IMRT for STS of the thigh or groin from 2004 to 2016 were included (n = 145). Beginning in 2011, radiation dose was constrained to a mean dose of < 37 Gy, volume of bone receiving ≥ 40 Gy (V40Gy) < 64%, and maximum dose < 59 Gy to limit the dose to the femur.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were treated before dose constraints were implemented, and 84 patients were treated after. Median follow-up for patients treated before and after constraints were implemented was 6.1 and 5.7 years, respectively, and the two groups were demographically and clinically similar. On univariate analysis, the 5-year cumulative incidence of femoral fracture among patients treated with and without dose constraints was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-12.2%) versus 7.4% (95% CI 3.1-17.6%) [p = 0.11, p = non-significant, respectively]. On multivariable analysis, only age  ≥ 60 years was significantly associated with increased risk of fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of femoral fracture after IMRT for STS of the thigh/groin is low, and with the implementation of radiation dose constraints, the risk is < 2%. Although longer follow-up is needed, our results support the utilization of extremity sarcoma IMRT-specific dose constraints for fracture prevention.

Long-term results of Perioperative High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (PHDRB) and external beam radiation in adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and the superficial trunk: Final results of a prospective controlled study

BACKGROUND

To analyze toxicity, patterns of failure, and survival in 106 adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity and the superficial trunk treated in a prospective controlled trial of combined Perioperative High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (PHDRB) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS

Patients were treated with surgical resection and 16 Gy or 24 Gy of PHDRB for negative or close/positive margins, respectively. EBRT (45 Gy) was added postoperatively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to selected patients with high-grade tumors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 7.1 years (range, 0.6-16.0). Grade ≥3 adverse events were observed in 22 patients (20.8%), and grade ≥4 events in 14 patients (13.2%). No grade 5 events were noted. Multivariate analysis (p = 0.003) found that Grade ≥3 toxic events increased with increasing implant volume (TV₁₀₀). Local control, locoregional control, and distant control rates at 5 and 10 years were 89% and 87%, 82% and 80% and 75% and 69%, respectively. Multivariate analysis (p = 0.024) found that positive margins correlated with decreased local control. Disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 64% and 59% and 73% and 62%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, disease-free survival rates decreased with increasing tumor size (p = 0.0001) and inadequate margins (p = 0.024), and overall survival decreased with increasing tumor size (p = 0.001) and male gender (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of conservative surgery, high-dose PHDRB, and EBRT produces adequate function and local control in the majority of patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and the superficial trunk, including a substantial percentage of cases with positive margins. Patients with larger tumors are at a higher risk of complications, treatment failure, and cancer-related death and require an individualized treatment approach.

Femoral Fracture in Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Thigh and Groin Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Observed versus Expected Risk

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the observed risk of femoral fracture in primary soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) of the thigh/groin treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to expected risk calculated using the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) nomogram.

METHODS

Expected femoral fracture risk was calculated by using the PMH nomogram. Cumulative risk of fracture was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Prognostic factors were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox's stepwise regression.

RESULTS

Between February 2002 and December 2010, 92 consecutive eligible patients were assessed. Median follow-up was 73 months (106 months in surviving patients). IMRT was delivered preoperatively (50 Gy) in 13 (14%) patients and postoperatively in 79 (86%) patients (median dose, 63 Gy; range, 59.4-66.6 Gy). The observed crude risk of fractures was 6.5% compared with 25.6% expected risk from the nomogram; the cumulative risk of fracture using IMRT at 5 years was 6.7% (95% CI 2.8-16.0%). The median time to fracture was 23 months (range, 6.9-88.6). Significant predictors of fracture on univariate analysis were age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.03), tumor location in the anterior thigh (p = 0.008), and periosteal stripping to > 20 cm (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 60 years and periosteal stripping > 20 cm retained significance (p = 0.04 and p = 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the cumulative risk of femur fracture in patients treated with IMRT (6.7%) is less than the expected risk using the PMH nomogram (25.6%). Established predictors of femur fracture, such as gender, tumor size, and dose of RT, seem to have less impact on fracture risk when using IMRT.

Does an Algorithmic Approach to Using Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiation Result in Good Function, Local Control Rates, and Low Morbidity in Patients With Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma?

BACKGROUND

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are two modalities used in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Previous work at our institution showed early complications and outcomes for patients treated with HDR-BT, EBRT, or a combination of both radiation therapy modalities. As the general indications for each of these approaches to radiation therapy differ, it is important to evaluate the use of each in an algorithmic way, reflecting how they are used in contemporary practice at sites that use these treatments. QUESTION/PURPOSES: (1) To determine the proportions of intermediate- and long-term complications associated with the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of primary high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas; (2), to characterize the long-term morbidity of the three radiation treatment groups using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme; (3) to determine whether treatment with HDR-BT, EBRT, and HDR-BT+EBRT therapy, in combination with limb-salvage surgery, results in acceptable local control in this high-risk group of sarcomas.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied data from 171 patients with a diagnosis of high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated with limb-sparing surgery and radiation therapy between 1990 and 2012 at our institution, with a mean followup of 72 months. Of the 171 patients, 33 (20%) were treated with HDR-BT, 128 (75%) with EBRT, and 10 (6%) with HDR-BT+EBRT. We excluded 265 patients with soft tissue sarcomas owing to axial tumor location, previous radiation to the affected extremity, incomplete patient records, patients receiving primary amputation, recurrent tumors, pediatric patients, low- and intermediate-grade tumors, and rhabdoid histology. Fifteen patients (9%) were lost to followup for any reason including died of disease or other causes during the first 12 months postoperatively. This included four patients who received HDR-BT (12%), 11 who received EBRT (9%), and none who received HDR-BT+EBRT (0%) with less than 12 months followup. Determination of radiation therapy technique for each patient was individualized in a multidisciplinary forum of sarcoma specialists. Anticipated close or positive surgical margins and a low likelihood of complex soft tissue procedures were factors that encouraged use of brachytherapy, whereas the anticipated need for secondary procedures and/or soft tissue coverage encouraged use of EBRT alone. Combination therapy was used when the treatment volume exceeded the treatment field of the brachytherapy catheters or when the catheters were used to boost a close or positive surgical margin. Local recurrence, complications, and morbidity outcomes scores (RTOG) were calculated based on chart review. Between-group comparisons pertaining to the proportion of patients experiencing complications, morbidity outcomes scores, and local recurrence rates were not performed because of dissimilarities among the patients in each group at baseline.

RESULTS

The HDR-BT treatment group showed a high incidence of intermediate-term complications, with the three most common being: deep infection (33%, 11 of 33); dehiscence and delayed wound healing (24%, eight of 33); and seroma and hematoma (21%, seven of 33). The EBRT group showed a high incidence of intermediate- and long-term complications with the three most common being: chronic radiation dermatitis (35%, 45 of 128); fibrosis (27%, 35 of 128); and chronic pain and neuritis (13%, 16 of 128). The RTOG scores for each treatment group were: HDR-BT 0.8 ± SD 1.2; EBRT 1.9 ± 2.0; and HDR-BT+EBRT 1.7 ± 1.7. Overall, 142 of 169 (84%) patients were free from local recurrence: 27 (82%) in the HDR-BT group, 108 (86%) in the EBRT group, and seven (70%) in the combination therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-institution study, an algorithmic approach to using HDR-BT and EBRT in the treatment of patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas can yield acceptable complication rates, good morbidity outcome scores, and a high degree of local control. Based on these results, we believe HDR-BT is best for patients with an anticipated close margin, a positive surgical margin, and for patients who are unlikely to receive a complex soft tissue procedure. Conversely, if a secondary procedure and/or soft tissue coverage are likely to be used, EBRT alone may be reasonable. Finally, combination therapy might be considered when the treatment volume exceeded the treatment field capacity for HDR-BT or when the catheters were used to boost a close or positive surgical margin.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Staged reconstruction brachytherapy has lower overall cost in recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma

Purpose

Adjuvant brachytherapy (AB) with immediate (IR) and staged reconstruction (SR) are distinct treatment modalities available for patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Although SR may offer local control and toxicity benefit, it requires additional upfront procedures, and there is no evidence that it improves overall survival. With the importance of value-based care, our goal is to identify which technique is more cost effective.

Material and methods

A retrospective review of 22 patients with recurrent extremity STS treated with resection followed by AB alone. Hospital charges were used to compare the cost between SR and IR at the time of initial treatment, at 6-month intervals following surgery, and cumulative cost comparisons at 18 months.

Results

Median follow-up was 31 months. Staged reconstruction (n = 12) was associated with an 18-month local control benefit (85% vs. 42%, p = 0.034), compared to IR (n = 10). Staged reconstruction had a longer hospital stay during initial treatment (10 vs. 3 days, p = 0.002), but at 18 months, the total hospital stay was no longer different (11 vs. 11 days). Initially, there was no difference in the cost of SR and IR. With longer follow-up, cost eventually favored SR, which was attributed primarily to the costs associated with local failure (LF). On multivariate analysis, cost of initial treatment was associated with length of hospital stay (~$4.5K per hospital day, p < 0.001), and at 18 months, the cumulative cost was ~175K lower with SR (p = 0.005) and $58K higher with LF (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

In recurrent STS, SR has a longer initial hospital stay when compared to IR. At 18 months, SR had lower rates of LF, translating to lower total costs for the patient. SR is the more cost-effective brachytherapy approach in the treatment of STS, and should be considered as healthcare transitions into value-based medicine.

[Brachytherapy for sarcomas]

The standard of care for local treatment for extremities soft tissue sarcomas relies on conservative surgery combined with external beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy can be realized instead of external beam radiotherapy in selected cases, or more often used as a boost dose on a limited volume on the area at major risk of relapse, especially if a microscopic positive resection is expected. Close interaction and communication between radiation oncologists and surgeons are mandatory at the time of implantation to limit the risk of side effects. Long-term results are available for low-dose rate brachytherapy. Nowadays, pulsed dose rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy are more often used. Brachytherapy for paediatric sarcomas is rare, and has to be managed in reference centres.

Implications of staged reconstruction and adjuvant brachytherapy in the treatment of recurrent soft tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

Prior studies illustrated a reduction in wound complications with the use of staged reconstruction (SR) and negative pressure wound therapy when treating soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with surgical resection followed by high-dose-rate adjuvant brachytherapy. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of SR and immediate reconstruction (IR) brachytherapy in recurrent STS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of 40 patients with recurrent STS of the local extremity and trunk treated with resection followed by adjuvant brachytherapy alone. Margin status was defined as positive (SM(+)) if there was microscopic involvement (R1) or ≤1 mm margin and negative (SM(-)) if >1 mm margin was obtained. SR and IR were compared regarding toxicity, local control, and limb preservation.

RESULTS

Median followup was 27 months. When comparing the SR (n = 22) and IR (n = 18) cohorts, there was a significantly lower final SM(+) rate in SR (32% vs. 83%, p < 0.01). A 2-year local control benefit seen with SR (80% vs. 34%; p = 0.012) and a final SM(-) (81% vs. 39%; p = 0.023). SR was associated with less toxicity on multivariate analysis, including a 90% decrease in persistent edema, an 80% decrease in wound dehiscence, and a 94% decrease in nonhealing wounds, when compared to IR. Ten of 31 (32%) extremity cases required eventual amputation from either chronic wound complications (n = 4) or local recurrence (n = 6). SR predicted for a benefit in 2-year limb preservation (88% vs. 50%; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

In our series, the treatment with SR brachytherapy resulted in less morbidity and an improved final SM(-) rate. This technique translated to an improvement in both local control and limb preservation of recurrent STS.

A Case of Myxofibrosarcoma in an Unusual Thoracic Location

Myxofibrosarcoma is a soft tissue neoplasm composed of malignant fibroblasts with a myxoid matrix. It is commonly found in patients during their 6th through 8th decades of life with a slight male predominance. Myxofibrosarcomas are classified as low- to high-grade tumors that are differentiated by hypercellularity, variation of mitotic activity and degree of necrosis. The most common sites are the extremities (77%) and trunk (12%), with the retroperitoneum and mediastinum being very rare. In this case report, we describe a patient presenting with myxofibrosarcoma of the mediastinum, a rare site for the development of myxofibrosarcoma. This case of primary mediastinal myxofibrosarcoma appears to be only the second described in the English-language literature.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus statement for sarcoma brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To present recommendations for the use of brachytherapy (BT) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

METHODS

A group of practitioners with expertise and experience in sarcoma BT formulated recommendations for BT in STS based on clinical experience and literature review.

RESULTS

The indications for adjuvant BT are discussed. There is no consensus on the use of BT alone or in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), but factors that influence the selection of this modality include tumor grade and size, prior surgeries, and tumor recurrence. Low-dose-rate, high-dose-rate, and pulsed-dose-rate radiation are all acceptable BT modalities to use for STS. Recommendations are made for patient selection, techniques, dose rates, and dosages. Outcome data and toxicity data are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

BT is a useful component of the treatment of STS. The advantages of BT are the targeted dose distribution, low integral dose, and short treatment times. Ultimately the clinician should select the modality or combination of modalities that are most familiar to the treatment team and suitable to the patient.

Early complications of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma: a comparison with traditional external-beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy and surgery are routinely utilized to treat extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Multiple radiation modalities have been described, each with advantages and disadvantages, without one modality demonstrating clear superiority over the others.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined the overall initial complication rate in patients receiving surgery and radiotherapy, which specific complications were found when comparing different modalities, and whether combination therapy increased the overall rate of complications compared with surgery and single-modality radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 190 patients who received external-beam radiotherapy (141 patients), high-dose-rate brachytherapy (37 patients), or both (12 patients). We evaluated 100 men and 90 women (mean age, 57 years; range, 18-94 years) for tumor size and subtype, comorbidities, stage, grade, margin of resection, type of adjuvant treatment, and complications. Minimum followup was 3 months (mean, 40 months; range, 3-155 months).

RESULTS

The most frequent early complications in the high-dose-rate brachytherapy cohort were infection, cellulitis, and seroma and/or hematoma. In the external-beam radiotherapy cohort, chronic edema, fibrosis, and chronic radiation dermatitis were more frequently encountered. The total number of early complications and overall incidence of major complications requiring further surgery were similar among the three cohorts, but a larger number of patients in the high-dose-rate brachytherapy group required subsequent surgery for infection compared with the external-beam radiotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose-rate brachytherapy decreases radiation exposure and allows shorter duration of treatment compared with traditional external-beam radiotherapy but has a higher perioperative wound complication rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Image-guided percutaneous (125)I seed implantation as a salvage treatment for recurrent soft tissue sarcomas after surgery and radiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound guidance in the treatment of recurrent soft tissue malignancies after surgery and radiotherapy. From February 2002 to September 2009, 18 patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcomas were treated under ultrasound or CT guidance. The actuarial median number of (125)I seeds implanted was 35 (range, 6-129), and the actuarial D90 of the implanted (125)I seeds ranged from 107.9 to 204.4 Gy (median, 147.1 Gy). The activity of the seeds ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 mCi (median, 0.7 mCi). Follow-up times ranged from 4 to 78 months (median, 20 months). The median local control was 41 months (95% CI, 15.9-66.1 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year local controls were 78.8%, 78.8%, 78.8%, 26.3%, and 0%, respectively. The median survival was 32 months (95% CI, 16-48 months). The actuarial 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survivals were 76.6%, 61.3%, 39.4%, 39.4%, and 39.4%, respectively. Seven (7) patients (38.9%) experienced recurrence after seed implantation. Six (6) patients (33.3%) died of distant metastases and 1 died of stroke. Two (2) patients developed ulceration, 1 case caused by recurrence and another by a reaction of the skin to radiation. Percutaneous (125)I seed implantation for recurrent soft tissue malignancies under CT or ultrasound guidance is safe and is associated with high efficacy and low morbidity.

Treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: a European approach

This article discusses the treatment of adult soft tissue sarcoma (excluding gastrointestinal stromal tumor), analyzing the principles underlying treatment and the results of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The focus is on the European approach in particular, and ongoing studies are summarized.

Diagnosis and management of lipomatous tumors

Lipomatous tumors range from benign lipomas to high-grade liposarcomas. Liposarcomas are classified into five histologic subtypes: well-differentiated, dedifferentiated, myxoid, round cell, and pleomorphic, which differ in outcomes and patterns of recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of curative treatment; however, large, high grade liposarcomas may benefit from multimodality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation. A histologic-subtype specific nomogram provides accurate survival predictions. Prospective randomized clinical trials will continue to improve our care of patients with liposarcoma.

Perioperative Interstitial Brachytherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Prognostic Factors and Long-Term Results of 155 Patients

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of temporary interstitial brachytherapy (BRT) for patients undergoing combined modality management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

METHODS

From January 1990 to December 2003, 155 adults 18-88 years of age (median = 42 years) with STS who had received BRT as part of locoregional treatment were included in this review. Sixty-four percent were males. Sixty-nine percent had primary lesions. Sixty percent had lesions involving the lower extremities. Spindle cell sarcoma (28%) and synovial sarcoma (16%) were the most common histologic types and 51% had grade III lesions. Treatment included wide local excision of primary tumor with BRT with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

RESULTS

After a median followup of 45 months, the local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 71%, 57%, and 73%, respectively. DFS was superior for superficial tumors compared with that for deep tumors (96% vs. 54%, P =.02). Patients with a tumor less than 5 cm had superior OS (88% vs. 63%, P =.05). Cumulative radiotherapy dose greater than 60 Gy had a significant positive impact on LC (P = .003), DFS (P =.003), and OS (P =.048). Subcutaneous fibrosis (21%) was the major complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary perioperative iridium-192 interstitial BRT with or without EBRT after function-preserving surgery results in satisfactory outcome in patients with STS. Both low dose rate and high dose rate BRT are equivalent in terms of disease control and complications when used alone or in combination with EBRT. BRT results in fewer complications compared with the combination of BRT and EBRT.

Approche conservatrice et fonctionnelle dans les sarcomes des tissus mous des membres : place de la radiothérapie

Recent publications have permitted to quantify the benefit of radiotherapy in the conservative treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the limbs. The aim of this review is to focus on aspects of radiotherapy witch influence local control and functional outcome for early and late normal tissue damage. The evaluation of late effects is performed according to Soma-Lent (Subjective-Objective-Management-Analytic-Late Effects of Normal Tissues) classification. About complications, neurological complications are probably under estimated and are related to total dose of radiation therapy.

Adjuvant High Dose Rate Brachytherapy in the Management of Soft Tissue Sarcoma

OBJECTIVES

Although brachytherapy has been used in the management of soft tissue sarcoma for decades, there is little published data regarding dose and toxicity. We performed an interim analysis of our high dose-rate experience to establish dosing guidelines.

METHODS

We analyzed our first 12 soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy as tumor bed boost (in conjunction with beam therapy), seeking an association between treatment factors and wound-healing complications. In the process of our analysis, we devised a dosimetric method to retrospectively quantify delivered dose. Our findings were used to formulate dosing guidelines; the first 5 cases treated along these guidelines are also presented.

RESULTS

Despite the small number of cases, we were able to demonstrate a correlation (P < 0.01) between wound healing and brachytherapy dose (fractional or total biologically equivalent dose). We found no relationship between wound healing and patient age, diabetes, width of excised skin, cross-sectional area of implant, sequencing of therapy, or surgery-to-brachytherapy interval.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be a relationship between dose and disturbed wound healing that should be respected to avoid unnecessary toxicity. An objective technique for defining target volume and quantifying dose is proposed for meaningful analysis of dose/effect relationships.

Perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity and superficial trunk in adults: initial results of a pilot study

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) as an alternative to standard low-dose-rate brachytherapy in adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities or the superficial trunk were treated with surgical resection and PHDRB (16, 24, or 32Gy) for negative, close/microscopically positive, or grossly involved surgical resection margins, respectively. External beam radiation therapy (45Gy) was added postoperatively. Adjuvant chemotherapy with ifosfamide and doxorubicin was given to patients with high-grade tumors.

RESULTS

Resection margins were negative in 6 patients (24.0%), close/microscopically positive in 18 (72.0%), and grossly involved in 1 (4.0%). One patient (4.0%) with wound dehiscence needed reoperation. Three patients failed in the anatomical region treated, but relapse sites were not adjacent to the area treated with PHDRB. After a median followup of 23.2 months (range 2.8-48.0), the 4-year local and regional control rates were 100% and 80.5%, respectively. Four-year overall survival was 78.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Locoregional control and survival results are encouraging for this high-risk patient population. PHDRB results seem to be similar to those obtained with low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Late treatment–related complications in 214 patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcoma treated by surgery and postoperative radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

We assessed the occurrence of long-bone fracture and other side effects in a group of 214 consecutive patients who underwent radical excision for soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb followed by postoperative irradiation.

METHODS

Two hundred fourteen patients underwent postoperative irradiation after radical excision of soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb; 156 (73%) received postoperative brachytherapy (BRT) plus external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and 58 (27%) underwent postoperative EBRT only. All patients were followed-up for a median time of 4.5 years (range 3 months to 10 years).

RESULTS

Seven patients developed bone fracture, which is considered severe morbidity; time between surgery and occurrence of fracture ranged between 10 and 72 months (average 31). Severe sclerosis with impairment of limb function was diagnosed in 5 and peripheral nerve damage in 3 patients. Wound complications were detected in 8 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, no statistically significant correlation between bone fracture and clinical features or "technical" parameters was found, but all of the patients who experienced bone fracture (7 of 7) were postmenopausal women >55 years old.

Low-dose intraoperative brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcomas involving neurovascular structure

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate intraoperative brachytherapy in the management of soft tissue sarcomas involving neurovascular structures, its impact on local control and complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 01/1989 and 12/2002, 98 patients received an intraoperative implant in conjunction with conservative surgery. Brachytherapy was part of the initial treatment (79 cases) or performed in recurrent disease (19 cases). We studied primary sarcomas involving neurovascular structures treated with conservative surgery and intraoperative brachytherapy (n = 6) or intraoperative brachytherapy and external irradiation (n = 73). Conservative surgery was performed as first treatment (51 cases), after chemotherapy (21 cases) and after primary external radiation (seven cases). Brachytherapy was performed according to Paris system rules. Patients were loaded with Iridium 192 (64 cases) or connected to a Microselectron PDR (15 cases). Mean dose given by brachytherapy was 20 Gy. Mean dose given of external radiotherapy was 46 Gy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 58 months, 5-year actuarial survival was 69% and local free disease at 5 years was 90%. Acute side-effects occurred in 22/79 requiring surgical repair in 10 patients. Late side-effects occurred in 35/79. No patient required amputation for complications. Prognostic factors were studied for the occurrence of acute and late side-effects and local control.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative brachytherapy is efficient with excellent local control rates in soft tissue sarcomas presenting with neurovascular involvement and offers an acceptable conservative option.

[Brachytherapy for soft tissue sarcomas. Technique and therapeutic indications]

The role of brachytherapy in the therapeutic strategy of soft tissue sarcomas has been difficult to assess due to the fact it has been during a long time institution-specific. However, the experience gained specially with low dose-rate treatments has allowed formulating guidelines for technical rules and patient selection. Brachytherapy used as an isolated treatment combined with surgery has proven to be effective in high-grade sarcomas, compared to surgery alone, in a unique randomized trial. Beside, a number of data have shown that the combination of brachytherapy and external beam irradiation could be superior to brachytherapy or external beam irradiation alone in the treatment of tumors with high-grade, or central location, locally advanced or on contact with neurovascular structures. Brachytherapy alone, combined with surgery, is of interest for conservative treatment of recurrent sarcomas occurring in previously irradiated areas. The occurrence of side effects remains acceptable if technical guidelines are followed, for surgery as well as for brachytherapy, using the most modern available treatment techniques. Brachytherapy should be at the moment an integrated part of the multidisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.

Nerve tolerance to high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study

Background

Brachytherapy, interstitial tumor bed irradiation, following conservative surgery has been shown to provide excellent local control and limb preservation in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), whereas little is known about the tolerance of peripheral nerves to brachytherapy. In particular, nerve tolerance to high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has never been properly evaluated. In this study, we examined the efficacy and radiation neurotoxicity of HDR brachytherapy in patients with STS in contact with neurovascular structures.

Methods

Between 1995 and 2000, seven patients with STS involving the neurovascular bundle were treated in our institute with limb-preserving surgery, followed by fractionated HDR brachytherapy. Pathological examination demonstrated that 6 patients had high-grade lesions with five cases of negative margins and one case with positive margins, and one patient had a low-grade lesion with a negative margin. Afterloading catheters placed within the tumor bed directly upon the preserved neurovascular structures were postoperatively loaded with Iridium-192 with a total dose of 50 Gy in 6 patients. One patient received 30 Gy of HDR brachytherapy combined with 20 Gy of adjuvant external beam radiation.

Results

With a median follow-up of 4 years, the 5-year actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were 83.3, 68.6, and 83.3%, respectively. None of the 7 patients developed HDR brachytherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Of 5 survivors, 3 evaluable patients had values of motor nerve conduction velocity of the preserved peripheral nerve in the normal range.

Conclusion

In this study, there were no practical and electrophysiological findings of neurotoxicity of HDR brachytherapy. Despite the small number of patients, our encouraging results are valuable for limb-preserving surgery of unmanageable STS involving critical neurovascular structures.

Optimizing radiation therapy and post-treatment function in the management of extremity soft tissue sarcoma

When treating soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities, the major therapeutic goals are survival, local tumor control, optimal function, and minimal morbidity. Surgical resection of the primary tumor is the essential component of treatment for virtually all patients. However, local control by surgery alone is poor for the majority of patients with extremity lesions unless the procedure removes large volumes of grossly normal tissue (ie, widely negative margins are attained, because sarcomas tend to infiltrate normal tissue adjacent to the evident lesion). Thus, removal of the gross lesion by a simple excision alone is followed by local recurrence in 60% to 90% of patients. Radical resections reduce the local recurrence rate to 10% to 30%, but may compromise limb function. The combination of function-sparing surgery and radiation achieves better outcomes than either treatment alone for nearly all patients with STS. Because both surgical and radiation technique are critically important for optimizing local control of tumor and functional outcome, it is important to manage these patients in dedicated multispecialty clinics comprised of physicians with expertise in sarcomas, including orthopedic and general oncologic surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, sarcoma pathologists, and bone and soft tissue diagnostic radiologists. Radiation therapy can be given by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy (BRT) or combination thereof. External beam radiation can be given either preoperatively or postoperatively. The clinical considerations and the outcome data that must be considered in choosing the most appropriate treatment technique for the individual patient are discussed.

Reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection in the setting of brachytherapy: a 10-year experience

Management of recurrent soft tissue sarcomas often involves surgical resection and adjuvant brachytherapy. This study reviews our experience in the management of these patients and proposes a logical approach toward reconstruction. All patients who underwent soft tissue sarcoma resection, adjuvant brachytherapy, and soft tissue flap reconstruction (pedicled or free) during the 10-year period from 1991 to 2000 were included in this study. There were 17 patients (14 male, 3 female) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 16-80 years). Soft tissue sarcomas were distributed in the lower extremity (n = 9), upper extremity (n = 5), and trunk (n = 3). Reconstruction was accomplished by regional transposition flaps (n = 10) and free tissue transfer (n = 7). The average defect size was 143 cm. Patients received 5 to 12 (mean, 8) brachytherapy catheters. The brachytherapy dose delivered ranged from 1600 to 4500 cGy (mean, 3773 cGy). Brachytherapy catheters were loaded with radioactive sources between 5 and 7 days postoperatively. All flaps in this series survived. One patient required return to the operating room for revision of a venous thrombosis with flap salvage. Closed suction drainage tubes were left in place until after the brachytherapy catheters were removed to avoid dislodging the catheters. Two patients developed postradiation partial-thickness skin necrosis with delayed secondary wound healing. This study demonstrates that soft tissue reconstruction in the setting of sarcoma resection and brachytherapy catheter placement is safe and efficacious. Postoperative wound healing complications can be minimized through coordination among the ablative surgeon, reconstructive surgeon, and radiation oncologist. Specifically, placement of microvascular anastomoses well away from the radiation target area is indicated whenever possible. Finally, removal of closed suction drainage tubes should be deferred until after the brachytherapy catheters are removed to minimize complications resulting from catheter dislodgement.

Valgus and varus deformity after wide-local excision, brachytherapy and external beam irradiation in two children with lower extremity synovial cell sarcoma: case report

BACKGROUND

Limb-salvage is a primary objective in the management of extremity soft-tissue sarcoma in adults and children. Wide-local excision combined with radiation therapy is effective in achieving local tumor control with acceptable morbidity and good functional outcomes for most patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

Two cases of deformity after wide-local excision, brachytherapy and external beam irradiation for lower-extremity synovial cell sarcoma are presented and discussed to highlight contributing factors, time course of radiation effects and orthopedic management. In an effort to spare normal tissues from the long-term effects of radiation therapy, more focal irradiation techniques have been applied to patients with musculoskeletal tumors including brachytherapy and conformal radiation therapy. As illustrated in this report, the use of these techniques results in the asymmetric irradiation of growth plates and contributes to the development of valgus or varus deformity and leg-length discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite good functional outcomes, progressive deformity in both patients required epiphysiodesis more than 3 years after initial management. There is a dearth of information related to the effects of radiation therapy on the musculoskeletal system in children. Because limb-sparing approaches are to be highlighted in the next generation of cooperative group protocols for children with musculoskeletal tumors, documentation of the effects of surgery and radiation therapy will lead to improved decision making in the selection of the best treatment approach and in the follow-up of these patients.

Soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity

Soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremities are rare and hand surgeons typically encounter only one or two undiagnosed soft tissue sarcomas during their careers. It is incumbent on the physician to review repeatedly the characteristics of these tumors and remain suspicious, because these lesions typically are misdiagnosed and treatment is delayed. The most common soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity are the epithelioid sarcoma, synovial cell sarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Limb salvage surgery is the treatment of choice for soft tissue sarcomas to preserve upper extremity function. Following wide tumor resection, adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and brachytherapy may lessen local recurrence rates, but their effect on overall survival remains unclear.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh

PURPOSE

Fracture of the femur is one of the late complications of adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the thigh, who receive external beam irradiation after limb-sparing surgery. When the target volume approximates the femur, it is often inevitable that a large segment of the femur will receive full prescription dose with conventional radiation techniques. We report the dosimetric feasibility of intensity- modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques to achieve adequate target coverage and bone sparing.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatment planning was performed using both three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and IMRT techniques for 10 patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh with tumor approaching the femur. None of the patients had bony involvement. For all patients, the gross total volume (GTV) and the femur were contoured. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the GTV with a 1.5-cm margin axially, except at the bone interface where the bone interface was used as CTV if the 1.5-cm axial margin extended beyond the bone interface. In the superior-inferior direction, the CTV margin placed around the GTV varied from 5 to 10 cm. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the CTV with 5-mm margin all around. The 3D conformal technique consisted primarily of two to three beams with wedges or partial transmission blocks as compensators. For the IMRT technique, five coplanar beams were used, chosen so as to spare much of the surrounding soft tissue and to clear the other extremity or groin areas. IMRT plans were designed to adequately treat the planning target volume and spare the femur as much as possible.

RESULTS

Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms were analyzed. PTV coverage was comparable with both IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. Dose distributions were more conformal with IMRT, however, especially for patients with large variations of contours. The volume of the femur receiving at least full prescription (63 Gy) V100 decreased on average by approximately 57%, from 44.7 +/- 16.8% with 3D-CRT to 18.6 +/- 9.2% with IMRT (p < 0.01). For 3 patients with a GTV surrounding <50% of the circumference of the femur, the reduction in the V100 to the femur ranged from 61% to 79%. The hot spots in the femur, as measured by D05 (the dose encompassing 5% of volume), reduced on average from 67.2 +/- 1.8 Gy with 3D-CRT to 65.0 +/- 1.2 Gy with IMRT (p < 0.01). The mean dose to the femur was on average 38.5 +/- 11.5 Gy with IMRT, compared with 40.9 +/- 12.7 Gy with 3D-CRT. The volume of the surrounding soft tissues, defined as the ipsilateral limb excluding the PTV and the femur, receiving at least prescription dose (63 Gy) was reduced on average by about 78%, from 997 +/- 660 cc with 3D-CRT to 201 +/- 144 cc with IMRT (p < 0.01). The D05 to the surrounding soft tissues was on average 58.7 +/- 4.7 Gy with IMRT, compared to 67.8 +/- 1.3 Gy with 3D-CRT (p < 0.01), a reduction of approximately 13%. The mean dose to the surrounding soft tissues was comparable in both plans. The volume of the skin (from surface to 5 mm depth) receiving prescription dose (63 Gy) declined by roughly 45%, from 115 +/- 40 cc with 3D-CRT to 61 +/- 20 cc with IMRT (p < 0.01), with IMRT providing full skin dose coverage to scars. The hot spots in the skin decreased from 68.0 +/- 1.7 Gy with 3D-CRT to 65.2 +/- 1.2 Gy with IMRT (p < 0.01). The mean dose to the skin lessened from 51.5 +/- 4.7 Gy with 3D- CRT to 44.0 +/- 4.2 Gy with IMRT (p < 0.01), a reduction of 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques can reduce the dose to the femur without compromising target coverage by achieving concave dose distributions around the interface of the PTV and the femur. At the same time, IMRT can reduce the hot spots significantly in the surrounding soft tissues and skin. Whether such dosimetric improvements can translate into reduction of complications and/or improving local control needs to be investigated.

Current results of brachytherapy for soft tissue sarcoma

Perioperative brachytherapy results in a better local control rate than surgery alone for extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Brachytherapy enables the delivery of a high radiation dose to a limited volume of tissue, allows the reduction of radiation treatment time, enables direct visualization of the tumor bed and surrounding critical structures, and costs less than external beam radiotherapy. The literature seems to regard the effectiveness of brachytherapy as comparable to that of external beam radiotherapy, and the side effect profile is acceptable. Traditional low-dose-rate brachytherapy methods require extended periods of patient isolation, but recent technologic advances may obviate this necessity. Newer high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy delivery methods allow for the fractionation of radiation delivery and outpatient treatment in some cases. Furthermore, with HDR brachytherapy, the radiation dose distribution can be tailored around critical anatomic structures. Although the application of HDR brachytherapy to soft tissue sarcoma is relatively new, it seems to result in a satisfactory local control rate and may replace traditional low-dose-rate techniques.

[Brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcomas]

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors with a high risk or local recurrence and a risk of distant metastases. Standard treatment advocated is the combination of conservative resection and external radiotherapy. Brachytherapy is an integrated part of the multidisciplinary treatment. Brachytherapy can increase local control with good functional results. Primary exclusive brachytherapy has been used and is effective and safe in high grade sarcomas (randomized trial of MSKCC). Brachytherapy seems to be important as part of the treatment of central localization (shoulder, groin) and sarcomas with positive resection margins, but its relation with external radiotherapy has to be defined. Brachytherapy used with special guidelines allows to obtain an improved local control with an acceptable level of complication.

Outcome of primary soft tissue sarcoma of the knee and elbow

PURPOSE

Concern is frequently raised regarding the tolerance of irradiation over a joint space. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome in terms of relapse and potential complications in patients with knee and elbow soft tissue sarcoma treated with limb-sparing surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A review of our prospective database between June 1982 and December 1999 identified 86 adult patients with primary soft tissue sarcoma arising from the knee (n = 65; 76%) or elbow (n = 21; 24%) treated with limb-sparing surgery. Tumors had high-grade histologic features in 72% and were >5 cm in 48% of patients. Adjuvant RT was given to 46 (54%) of 86 patients. The type of RT was postoperative external beam RT in 63% and brachytherapy in 37%. Of the 46 patients who received RT, 85% (n = 39) had deep, 78% (n = 36) high-grade, and 54% (n = 25) >5-cm tumors. Complications were assessed in terms of wound complications requiring repeated surgery, bone fracture, nerve damage, and joint stiffness.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 48 months (range 4-175), the 5-year actuarial rate of local control, distant control, and overall survival was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64-85%), 82% (95% CI 73-91%), and 81% (95% CI 71-91%), respectively. The 5-year local control rate for patients who received RT was 80% vs. 71% for those who did not (p = 0.3). The type of RT did not significantly influence the local control rate. Patients treated with external beam RT had a 5-year local control rate of 84% compared with 73% for those treated with brachytherapy (p = 0.4). On multivariate analysis, tumor size >5 cm retained its significance as an independent predictor of poor local control (p = 0.04; relative risk 3; 95% CI 1-6). In addition, high-grade histologic features emerged as an independent predictor of local recurrence (p = 0.02; relative risk 4; 95% CI 1-20). No statistically significant difference was found between the RT and no-RT group in terms of the 5-year actuarial rate of wound reoperation (10% vs. 3%, p = 0.1), bone fracture (3% vs. 5%, p = 0.5), or nerve damage (6% vs. 3%, p = 0.5). Joint stiffness was significantly higher in the RT group (24% vs. 0%, p = 0.001), but this stiffness was severe to moderate in only 2 patients.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the findings of this retrospective review, adjuvant RT seems to be relatively well tolerated despite the inclusion of part of the joint space in the irradiation portal. Joint stiffness was seen more frequently with adjuvant RT, but it was moderate to severe in only a small number of patients.

Radiation therapy for low-grade soft tissue sarcoma

One hundred eight patients with low-grade soft tissue sarcoma treated at the authors' institution from 1984 to 1999 were reviewed retrospectively. Low-grade sarcomas were defined as those designated as Grade I of III or Grade I or II of IV. Patients who presented with recurrent tumors or who had multiple procedures at outside institutions were excluded. The patient's gender, age at diagnosis, histologic diagnosis, site and depth of primary involvement, and specimen size at resection were noted. Involvement of periosteum, bone, and neurovascular structures also was recorded. The decision to use radiation therapy was made case-by-case. Indications for preoperative radiation therapy included tumor adjacent to the neurovascular bundle or bone where a marginal surgical margin was anticipated. Indications for postoperative radiation therapy included followup resection of an unsuspected malignancy. Patients were evaluated according to treatment rendered. Sixty-six patients were treated with surgery alone, whereas 42 patients had excision of the tumor in conjunction with radiation therapy. The overall local control rate was 97.2% (105 of 108). There were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence, wound complication, fibrosis, or survival between the two groups. Patients treated with radiation therapy had an increased incidence of postoperative lymphedema. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival rates were approximately 90% for both groups.

Adjuvant brachytherapy for primary high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity

BACKGROUND

We reviewed single-institution experience using brachytherapy alone for primary high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity.

METHODS

Between July 1982 and September 1997, 202 adult patients with primary high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity were treated with limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant brachytherapy. All patients underwent complete gross resection, but the margin of resection was microscopically positive in 18% of patients. The median dose of brachytherapy was 45 Gy delivered over 5 days. Tumors located in the shoulder or groin were defined as central location. Complications were assessed in terms of wound complications, bone fracture, and peripheral nerve damage.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year local control, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates were 84%, 63%, and 70%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, poor local control correlated with shoulder location, positive microscopic margins of resection, and nonshoulder upper extremity site. The 5-year actuarial rates of wound complications requiring reoperation, bone fracture, and grade > or = 3 nerve damage were 12%, 3%, and 5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant brachytherapy provides adequate local control and acceptable morbidity that compares favorably with data reported for external beam radiation. Shoulder tumor location was identified as an independent prognostic factor for poor local control, mandating further improvement in the local management of these tumors.

The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for brachytherapy of soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

This report presents the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines for the use of brachytherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the ABS with expertise in soft tissue sarcoma formulated brachytherapy guidelines based upon their clinical experience and a review of the literature. The Board of Directors of the ABS approved the final report.

RESULTS

Brachytherapy used alone or in combination with external beam irradiation is an established means of safely providing adjuvant local treatment after resection for soft tissue sarcomas in adults and in children. Brachytherapy options include low dose rate techniques with iridium 192 or iodine 125, fractionated high dose rate brachytherapy, or intraoperative high dose rate therapy. Recommendations are made for patient selection, techniques, dose rates, and dosages. Complications and possible interventions to minimize their occurrence and severity are reviewed.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy represents an effective means of enhancing the therapeutic ratio, offering both biologic and dosimetric advantage in the treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcoma. The treatment approach used depends upon the institution, physician expertise, and the clinical situation. Guidelines are established for the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas in adults and in children. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use these guidelines to formulate their treatment and dose-reporting policies. These guidelines will be modified, as further clinical results become available.

Management of soft-tissue sarcomas: an overview and update

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are relatively uncommon, especially when considered as individual histological subtypes (of which there are more than 50). Their incidence increases with age, although they are disproportionately common among children. When diagnosed and managed in a non-specialist environment, outcome is generally significantly poorer than if patients are managed by a multidisciplinary team in a tertiary centre of excellence. Prompt referral of patients with clinically suspicious masses is strongly advocated, before any type of intervention is attempted. This brief, opinion-based overview emphasises the team approach and provides a synopsis of the strategies used at our institution for pre-operative assessment and biopsy, surgical management, and the delivery of radiation therapy when appropriate (focusing on limb preservation and optimisation of function). Predictable variations in the natural history of these tumours, based on accurate histological subclassification, merit wider recognition. The role of systemic chemotherapy for soft-tissue sarcoma is still evolving, but at present the main aims are improved local control, disease-free survival, and quality of life. There are overall survival benefits for specific histological types, but this is a relatively small subgroup. Novel therapies, based on disease mechanisms at the molecular level, show promise for future advances.