Megavoltage CT-assisted stereotactic radiosurgery for thoracic tumors: original research in the treatment of thoracic neoplasms

Single-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy for primary and metastasic lung tumor: A new paradigm?

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective technique comparable to surgery in terms of local control and efficacy in early stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pulmonary metastasis. Several fractionation schemes have proven to be safe and effective, including the single fraction (SF) scheme. SF is an option cost-effectiveness, more convenience and comfortable for the patient and flexible in terms of its management combined with systemic treatments. The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has driven this not new but underutilized paradigm, recommending this option to minimize patients' visits to hospital. SF SABR already has a long experience, strong evidence and sufficient maturity to reliably evaluate outcomes in peripheral primary NSCLC and there are promising outcomes in pulmonary metastases, making it a valid treatment option; although its use in central locations, synchronous and recurrencies tumors requires more prospective safety and efficacy studies. The SABR radiobiology study, together with the combination with systemic therapies, (targeted therapies and immunotherapy) is a direction of research in both advanced disease and early stages whose future includes SF.

Local control rates in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung metastases associated with the biologically effective dose

Aim

To evaluate dose differences in lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and the correlation with local control, regarding the dose algorithm, target volume and tissue density.

Background

Several studies showed excellent local control rates in SBRT for lung metastases, with different fractionation schemes depending on the tumour location or size. These results depend on the dose distributions received by the lesions in terms of the tissue heterogeneity corrections performed by the dose algorithms.

Materials and methods

Forty-seven lung metastases treated with SBRT, using intrafraction control and respiratory gating with internal fiducial markers as surrogates (ExacTrac, BrainLAB AG), were calculated using Pencil Beam (PB) and Monte Carlo (MC) (iPlan, BrainLAB AG).Dose differences between both algorithms were obtained for the dose received by 99% (D _99%) and 50% (D _50%) of the planning treatment volume (PTV). The biologically effective dose delivered to 99% (BED_99%) and 50% (BED_50%) of the PTV were estimated from the MC results. Local control was evaluated after 24 months of median follow-up (range: 3-52 months).

Results

The greatest variations (40.0% in ΔD _99% and 38.4% in ΔD _50%) were found for the lower volume and density cases. The BED_99% and BED_50% were strongly correlated with observed local control rates: 100% and 61.5% for BED_99% > 85 Gy and <85 Gy (p < 0.0001), respectively, and 100% and 58.3% for BED_50% > 100 Gy and <100 Gy (p < 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions

Lung metastases treated with SBRT, with delivered BED_99% > 85 Gy and BED_50% > 100 Gy, present better local control rates than those treated with lower BED values (p = 0.001).

[Radiation-induced lung toxicity predictors after stereotactic radiation therapy for non-small cell lung carcinoma stage I]

In case of refusal or contraindication for surgical management of a stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma, the validated alternative therapy is stereotactic irradiation. This technique reaches an equivalent tumour control rate than surgery and significantly higher than conventional radiotherapy. One of the dreaded complications is radiation induced lung toxicity (radiation pneumonitis and lung fibrosis), especially when it is symptomatic, occurring in about 10 % of cases. This article is a literature review of this complication's predictive factors.

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Lung Metastases: Where is the Evidence and What are We Doing With It?

This review provides an overview of the use of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for pulmonary metastases. The local control rates after SABR are generally >90%. Whether this also translates into a significant improvement in overall survival is the subject of ongoing studies. New exciting opportunities including the integration of SABR with targeted and immune therapies as well as some competing treatment strategies are discussed.

Feasibility study of automated framework for estimating lung tumor locations for target-based patient positioning in stereotactic body radiotherapy

Objective. To investigate the feasibility of an automated framework for estimating the lung tumor locations for tumor-based patient positioning with megavolt-cone-beam computed tomography (MV-CBCT) during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods. A lung screening phantom and ten lung cancer cases with solid lung tumors, who were treated with SBRT, were employed to this study. The locations of tumors in MV-CBCT images were estimated using a tumor-template matching technique between a tumor template and the MV-CBCT. Tumor templates were produced by cropping the gross tumor volume (GTV) regions, which were enhanced by a Sobel filter or a blob structure enhancement (BSE) filter. Reference tumor locations (grand truth) were determined based on a consensus between a radiation oncologist and a medical physicist. Results. According to the results of the phantom study, the average Euclidean distances of the location errors in the original, Sobel-filtered, and BSE-filtered images were 2.0 ± 4.1 mm, 12.8 ± 9.4 mm, and 0.4 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. For clinical cases, these were 3.4 ± 7.1 mm, 7.2 ± 11.6 mm, and 1.6 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. Conclusion. The feasibility study suggests that our proposed framework based on the BSE filter may be a useful tool for tumor-based patient positioning in SBRT.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for small lung tumors in the University of Tokyo Hospital

Our work on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary and metastatic lung tumors will be described. The eligibility criteria for SBRT, our previous SBRT method, the definition of target volume, heterogeneity correction, the position adjustment using four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D CBCT) immediately before SBRT, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) method for SBRT, verifying of tumor position within internal target volume (ITV) using in-treatment 4D-CBCT during VMAT-SBRT, shortening of treatment time using flattening-filter-free (FFF) techniques, delivery of 4D dose calculation for lung-VMAT patients using in-treatment CBCT and LINAC log data with agility multileaf collimator, and SBRT method for centrally located lung tumors in our institution will be shown. In our institution, these efforts have been made with the goal of raising the local control rate and decreasing adverse effects after SBRT.

Percutaneous fiducial marker placement under CT fluoroscopic guidance for stereotactic body radiotherapy of the lung: an initial experience

The aim of this study is to describe our initial experience with the VISICOIL, which is the first percutaneous fiducial marker approved for stereotactic body radiotherapy in Japan, and to evaluate its technical and clinical efficacy, and safety. Eight patients underwent this procedure under CT fluoroscopic guidance. One patient had two tumors, so the total number of procedures was nine. We evaluated the technical and clinical success rates of the procedure and the frequencies of complications. Technical success was defined as when the fiducial marker could be placed at the target site, and clinical success was defined as when stereotactic body radiotherapy could be performed without the marker dropping out of position. The technical success rate was 78% (7/9). In one of the two failed cases, we aimed to place the marker inside the tumor, but misplaced it beside the tumor. In the other failed case, we successfully placed the marker beside the tumor as planned; however, the marker migrated to near the pleura after the patient stopped holding their breath. None of the markers dropped out of place, so the clinical success rate was 100% (9/9). The complication rates were as follows: pneumothorax: 56% (5/9), pneumothorax necessitating chest tube placement: 44% (4/9), focal intrapulmonary hemorrhaging: 67% (6/9), hemoptysis: 11% (1/9), mild hemothorax 11% (1/9), air embolism 0% (0/9), and death 0% (0/9). In conclusion, this new percutaneous fiducial marker appears to be useful for stereotactic body radiotherapy due to its good stability.

Clinical outcomes of single dose stereotactic radiotherapy for lung metastases

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy is an emerging noninvasive technique for the treatment of oligometastatic cancer. The use of small numbers of large doses achieve a high percentage of local control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of SBRT for the treatment of lung metastases in a cohort of patients treated between 2008 and 2012 at our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 66 patients with oligometastatic lung tumors (single pulmonary nodules in 40 patients; 61%) were included in the study. SBRT was performed with a stereotactic body frame and a 3-D conformal technique. Forty-nine central tumors received 23 Gy in a single fraction and 54 peripheral tumors received a dose of 30 Gy in a single fraction. The primary end point was local control; secondary end points were survival and toxicity.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 15 months (range, 3-45 months). Local control rates at 1 and 2 years were 89.1% and 82.1%, overall survival rates were 76.4% and 31.2%, cancer-specific survival rates were 78.5% and 35.4%, and progression-free survival rates were 53.9% and 22%, respectively. Median survival time was 12 months, and median progression-free survival time was 10 months. Toxicity profiles were good, with 2 cases of Grade 3 toxicity (pneumonitis).

CONCLUSION

SBRT is an effective and safe local treatment option for patients with lung metastases, although it remains investigational; longer follow-up to confirm results is required.

Extracranial radiosurgery with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Feasibility evaluation of a phase I trial

The aim of this study was to report early clinical experience in stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRS) delivered using volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with primary or metastatic tumors in various extra-cranial body sites. Each enrolled subject was included in a different phase I study arm, depending on the tumor site and the disease stage (lung, liver, bone, metastatic), and sequentially assigned to a particular dose level. Technical feasibility and dosimetric results were investigated. The acute toxicity, tumor response and early local control were also studied. In total, 25 lesions in 20 consecutive patients (male/female, 11/9; median age, 67 years; age range, 47-86 years) were treated. Of these 25 lesions, 4 were primary or metastatic lung tumors, 6 were liver metastases, 8 were bone metastases and 7 were nodal metastases. The dose-volume constraints for organs at risk (OARs) were observed in 19 patients using a single-arc technique. Only in one patient were two arcs required. The treatment was performed without interruption or any other technical issues. The prescribed dose ranged from 12-26 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV). Delivery time ranged from 4 min to 9 min and 13 sec (median, 6 min and 6 sec). No incidence of grade 2-4 acute toxicity was recorded. The overall response rate was 48% (95% confidence interval (CI), 24.2-70.2) based on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 89% (95% CI, 58.6-98.7) based on the positron emission tomography (PET) scan. SBRS delivered by means of VMAT allowed the required target coverage to be achieved while remaining within the normal tissue dose-volume constraints in the 20 consecutive patients. VMAT-SBRS resulted in adequate technical feasibility; the maximum tolerable dose has not yet been reached in any study arm.

Image-guided hypofractionated small volume radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer - feasibility and clinical outcome

PURPOSE

Local hypofractionated stereotactic radiation treatment (hfSRT) of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a highly effective treatment alternative in medically inoperable patients.

METHOD

Between June 2007 and December 2010, 65 patients with NSCLC were treated with image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy. The Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stage distribution was: IA, n = 19; IB, n = 15; IIB, n = 5; IIIA, n = 10; IIIB, n = 6; and IV, n = 10. The fractionation schedule used was 3 × 12.5 Gy (n = 36) prescribed to the encompassing 67% isodose line for peripheral primary tumours, and 8 × 6 Gy (n = 26) or 8 × 5 Gy (n = 3) prescribed to the encompassing 80% isodose line for centrally located tumours.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 13.8 months (range 1-41 months). Until now 6 patients developed a local recurrence, 2 of them in combination with mediastinal lymph node failure. The 1-year actuarial local control rate was 93% and overall survival 79%. Pneumonitis was seen in 14 patients (21.5%) (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade I: n = 12, and II: n = 2) after a median time period of 9.5 months. No patient developed pneumonitis of CTCAE grade III or higher.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided hfSRT is effective and feasible in patients with non-operable NSCLC, even in higher stages, whenever local control is crucial and there are contraindications against systemic therapy.

4D digitally reconstructed radiography for verifying a lung tumor position during volumetric modulated arc therapy

We have proposed four dimensional (4D) digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) for verifying a lung tumor position during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). An internal target volume (ITV) was defined based on two clinical target volumes (CTVs) delineated on maximum exhalation and maximum inhalation images acquired by 4D planning computed tomography (CT). A planning target volume (PTV) was defined by adding a margin of 5 mm to the ITV on the maximum exhalation 3D CT images. A single-arc VMAT plan was created on the same CT data using Pinnacle SmartArc with a maximum multi-leaf collimator leaf speed of 1 mm/degree, thereby resulting in quasi-conformal field shapes while optimizing each beam intensity for each gantry angle. During VMAT delivery, cone-beam CT (CBCT) projection data were acquired by an on-board kilovoltage X-ray unit and a flat panel 2D detector. Four CBCT image sets with different respiratory phases were reconstructed using in-house software, where respiratory phases were extracted from the projection data. Subsequently a CTV was delineated on each of the 4D CBCT images by an oncologist. Using the resulting 4D CBCT data including the CTV contours, 4D DRRs during the VMAT delivery were calculated as a function of gantry angle. It was confirmed that the contoured CTV was within the radiation field during the four-fraction lung VMAT delivery. The proposed 4D DRR may facilitate the verification of the position of a respiratory moving lung tumor during VMAT delivery on each treatment day.

Optimal management of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

The incidence of colorectal cancers is rising worldwide and pulmonary metastases were seen in approximately 10-15% of all patients. Surgical metastasectomy is a widely accepted procedure in selected patients and is considered as the only curative option in patients with secondary pulmonary malignancy. But surgical resection remains controversial due to the lack of randomized trials, comparing pulmonary metastasectomy to control, either medical therapy, or observation. This article will discuss the differentiated therapeutic strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer, focusing on surgical resection, patient evaluation, prognostic factors, interdisciplinary therapeutic approaches and current trials.

Radiographic and metabolic response rates following image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for lung tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate radiographic and metabolic response after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early lung tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine tumors were treated prospectively with SBRT (dose=48-60 Gy, 4-5 Fx). Thirty-six cases were primary NSCLC (T1N0=67%; T2N0=25%); three cases were solitary metastases. Patients were followed using CT and PET at 6, 16, and 52 weeks post-SBRT, with CT follow-up thereafter. RECIST and EORTC criteria were used to evaluate CT and PET responses.

RESULTS

At median follow-up of 9 months (0.4-26), RECIST complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) rates were 3%, 43%, 54% at 6 weeks; 15%, 38%, 46% at 16 weeks; 27%, 64%, 9% at 52 weeks. Mean baseline tumor volume was reduced by 46%, 70%, 87%, and 96%, respectively at 6, 16, 52, and 72 weeks. Mean baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) was 8.3 (1.1-20.3) and reduced to 3.4, 3.0, and 3.7 at 6, 16, and 52 weeks after SBRT. EORTC metabolic CR/PR, SD, and progressive disease rates were 67%, 22%, 11% at 6 weeks; 86%, 10%, 3% at 16 weeks; 95%, 5%, 0% at 52 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT yields excellent RECIST and EORTC based response. Metabolic response is rapid however radiographic response occurs even after 1-year post treatment.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging noninvasive technique for the treatment of oligometastatic cancer. The use of small numbers of large doses, should in theory, achieve high rates of local control. The aim of this literature review is to critically assess the use of SBRT for the treatment of pulmonary metastases as judged by its effect on local control, survival, and toxicity.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed. Both single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (SBRT) were considered individually. Thirteen institutions reported results regarding SBRT and seven institutions regarding SRS (a total of 29 publications). Outcomes, techniques, radiobiology, and the scientific rigor of the reported studies were analyzed.

RESULTS

A wide range of techniques, doses, and dose fractionation schedules were found. Three hundred thirty-four patients with 564 targets were reported in the SBRT series. The 2-year weighted local control was 77.9%. The corresponding 2-year weighted overall survival was 53.7%, with a 4% rate of grade 3 or higher radiation toxicities. One hundred fifty-four patients with 174 targets were treated in the SRS series. The 2-year weighted local control was 78.6%. The corresponding weighted 2-year overall survival was 50.3%, with 2.6% rate of grade 3 or higher toxicities.

CONCLUSION

There was insufficient evidence to recommend a consensus view for optimal tumor parameters, dose fractionation, and technical delivery of treatment. This indicates the need for further prospective studies. However, high local control rates that could potentially lead to a survival benefit justifies the consideration of stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with limited pulmonary oligometastases.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101

Task Group 101 of the AAPM has prepared this report for medical physicists, clinicians, and therapists in order to outline the best practice guidelines for the external-beam radiation therapy technique referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The task group report includes a review of the literature to identify reported clinical findings and expected outcomes for this treatment modality. Information is provided for establishing a SBRT program, including protocols, equipment, resources, and QA procedures. Additionally, suggestions for developing consistent documentation for prescribing, reporting, and recording SBRT treatment delivery is provided.

Prescreening based on the presence of CT-scan abnormalities and biomarkers (KL-6 and SP-D) may reduce severe radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic radiotherapy

Purpose

To determine the risk factors of severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary or secondary lung tumors.

Materials and methods

From January 2003 to March 2009, SBRT was performed on 117 patients (32 patients before 2005 and 85 patients after 2006) with lung tumors (primary = 74 patients and metastatic/recurrent = 43 patients) in our institution. In the current study, the results on cases with severe RP (grades 4-5) were evaluated. Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and serum Surfactant protein-D (SP-D) were used to predict the incidence of RP. A shadow of interstitial pneumonitis (IP) on the CT image before performing SBRT was also used as an indicator for RP. Since 2006, patients have been prescreened for biological markers (KL-6 & SP-D) as well as checking for an IP-shadow in CT.

Results

Grades 4-5 RP was observed in nine patients (7.7%) after SBRT and seven of these cases (6.0%) were grade 5 in our institution. A correlation was found between the incidence of RP and higher serum KL-6 & SP-D levels. IP-shadow in patient's CT was also found to correlate well with the severe RP. Severe RP was reduced from 18.8% before 2005 to 3.5% after 2006 (p = 0.042). There was no correlation between the dose volume histogram parameters and these severe RP patients.

Conclusion

Patients presenting with an IP shadow in the CT and a high value of the serum KL-6 & SP-D before SBRT treatment developed severe radiation pneumonitis at a high rate. The reduction of RP incidence in patients treated after 2006 may have been attributed to prescreening of the patients. Therefore, pre-screening before SBRT for an IP shadow in CT and serum KL-6 & SP-D is recommended in the management and treatment of patients with primary or secondary lung tumors.

The European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-European Institute of Radiotherapy (ESTRO-EIR) report on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance systems: a practical and technical review and guide

The past decade has provided many technological advances in radiotherapy. The European Institute of Radiotherapy (EIR) was established by the European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) to provide current consensus statement with evidence-based and pragmatic guidelines on topics of practical relevance for radiation oncology. This report focuses primarily on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance (3DCT-IGRT) systems. It will provide an overview and current standing of 3DCT-IGRT systems addressing the rationale, objectives, principles, applications, and process pathways, both clinical and technical for treatment delivery and quality assurance. These are reviewed for four categories of solutions; kV CT and kV CBCT (cone-beam CT) as well as MV CT and MV CBCT. It will also provide a framework and checklist to consider the capability and functionality of these systems as well as the resources needed for implementation. Two different but typical clinical cases (tonsillar and prostate cancer) using 3DCT-IGRT are illustrated with workflow processes via feedback questionnaires from several large clinical centres currently utilizing these systems. The feedback from these clinical centres demonstrates a wide variability based on local practices. This report whilst comprehensive is not exhaustive as this area of development remains a very active field for research and development. However, it should serve as a practical guide and framework for all professional groups within the field, focussed on clinicians, physicists and radiation therapy technologists interested in IGRT.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy: a novel treatment modality

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) involves the delivery of a small number of ultra-high doses of radiation to a target volume using very advanced technology and has emerged as a novel treatment modality for cancer. The role of SBRT is most important at two cancer stages-in early primary cancer and in oligometastatic disease. This modality has been used in the treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, renal-cell carcinoma, and liver cancer, and in the treatment of oligometastases in the lung, liver, and spine. A large body of evidence on the use of SBRT for the treatment of primary and metastatic tumors in various sites has accumulated over the past 10-15 years, and efficacy and safety have been demonstrated. Several prospective clinical trials of SBRT for various sites have been conducted, and several other trials are currently being planned. The results of these clinical trials will better define the role of SBRT in cancer management. This article will review the radiobiologic, technical, and clinical aspects of SBRT.

An overview of volumetric imaging technologies and their quality assurance for IGRT

Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) aims at frequent imaging in the treatment room during a course of radiotherapy, with decisions made on the basis of this information. The concept is not new, but recent developments and clinical implementations of IGRT drastically improved the quality of radiotherapy and broadened its possibilities as well as its indications. In general IGRT solutions can be classified in planar imaging, volumetric imaging using ionising radiation (kV- and MV- based CT) or non-radiographic techniques. This review will focus on volumetric imaging techniques applying ionising radiation with some comments on Quality Assurance (QA) specific for clinical implementation. By far the most important advantage of volumetric IGRT solutions is the ability to visualize soft tissue prior to treatment and defining the spatial relationship between target and organs at risk. A major challenge is imaging during treatment delivery. As some of these IGRT systems consist of peripheral equipment and others present fully integrated solutions, the QA requirements will differ considerably. It should be noted for instance that some systems correct for mechanical instabilities in the image reconstruction process whereas others aim at optimal mechanical stability, and the coincidence of imaging and treatment isocentre needs special attention. Some of the solutions that will be covered in detail are: (a) A dedicated CT-scanner inside the treatment room. (b) Peripheral systems mounted to the gantry of the treatment machine to acquire cone beam volumetric CT data (CBCT). Both kV-based solutions and MV-based solutions using EPIDs will be covered. (c) Integrated systems designed for both IGRT and treatment delivery. This overview will explain some of the technical features and clinical implementations of these technologies as well as providing an insight in the limitations and QA procedures required for each specific solution.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located lung lesions

Presentation of outcomes of patients treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung lesions located within or touching a 2 cm zone around major airways. Serial tomotherapeutic SBRT has been planned and delivered at our institution since August 2001. Of 108 patients treated for primary and secondary lung tumors, nine harbored tumors (8 metastases, 1 recurrent NSCLC) located in close proximity to carina, right and left main bronchi, right and left upper lobe bronchi, intermedius, right middle lobe, lingular, or right and left lower lobe bronchi. SBRT was delivered to total doses of 36 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 8) or 6 fractions (n = 1), using a serial tomotherapy system (Nomos Peacock). We assessed local tumor control, clinical toxicity, normal tissue imaging changes, and overall survival. Median tumor volume was 26 cm3 (range 1.7 to 135 cm3). Tumor locations were hilar (n = 3), and parenchymal in six cases. Hilar lesions accounted for the three largest tumor volumes in the series. During a median follow-up of 10.6 months (range 2.5 to 41.5 months), all lesions treated were locally controlled as confirmed by CT or CT/PET imaging. Parenchymal imaging changes included focal lung fibrosis and major airway wall thickening. One occurrence of major airway occlusion (right lower lobe bronchus) was observed. This event was diagnosed by chest x-ray at 36 months, following treatment of the second largest hilar lesion in the present series. Based on the outcomes observed in this small sample series, SBRT for centrally located lung lesions appears feasible, was associated with low incidence of toxicities, and provided sustained local tumor control. However, long-term survival may be associated with major airway injury. As long-term follow-up in larger numbers of patients is lacking at this time, exclusion of patients with centrally located lesions may be considered when patients are treated in curative intent.

Clinical results of stereotactic body frame based fractionated radiation therapy for primary or metastatic thoracic tumors

The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for treating primary or metastatic thoracic tumors using a stereotactic body frame. Between January 1998 and February 2004, 101 lesions from 91 patients with thoracic tumors were prospectively reviewed. A dose of 10-12 Gy per fraction was given three to four times over consecutive days to a total dose of 30-48 Gy (median 40 Gy). The overall response rate was 82%, with 20 (22%) complete responses and 55 (60%) partial responses. The one- and two-year local progression free survival rates were 90% and 81%, respectively. The patients who received 48 Gy showed a better local tumor control than those who received less than 48 Gy (Fisher exact test; p = 0.004). No pulmonary complications greater than a RTOG toxicity criteria grade 2 were observed. The experience of stereotactic body frame based radiation therapy appears to be a safe and promising treatment modality for the local management of primary or metastatic lung tumors. The optimal total dose, fractionation schedule and treatment volume need to be determined after a further follow-up of these results.

Respiration correlated cone-beam computed tomography and 4DCT for evaluating target motion in Stereotactic Lung Radiation Therapy

An image-guidance process for using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung lesions is presented. Respiration correlated CBCT on the treatment unit and four dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) from planning are evaluated for assessing respiration-induced target motion during planning and treatment fractions. Image-guided SBRT was performed for 12 patients (13 lesions) with inoperable early stage non-small cell lung carcinoma. Kilovoltage (kV) projections were acquired over a 360 degree gantry rotation and sorted based on the pixel value of an image-based aperture located at the air-tissue interface of the diaphragm. The sorted projections were reconstructed to provide volumetric respiration correlated CBCT image datasets at different phases of the respiratory cycle. The 4D volumetric datasets were directly compared with 4DCT datasets acquired at the time of planning. For ten of 12 patients treated, the lung tumour motion, as measured by respiration correlated CBCT on the treatment unit, was consistent with the tumour motion measured by 4DCT at the time of planning. However, in two patients, maximum discrepancies observed were 6 and 10 mm in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions, respectively. Respiration correlated CBCT acquired on the treatment unit allows target motion to be assessed for each treatment fraction, allows target localization based on different phases on the breathing cycle, and provides the facility for adaptive margin design in radiation therapy of lung malignancies. The current study has shown that the relative motion and position of the tumour at the time of treatment may not match that of the planning 4DCT scan. Therefore, application of breathing motion data acquired at simulation for tracking or gating radiation therapy may not be suitable for all patients - even those receiving short course treatment techniques such as SBRT.

Helical tomotherapy for simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy for pulmonary metastasis

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate our experience with tomotherapy for simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy in patients with pulmonary metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-one patients were treated with tomotherapy for pulmonary metastases. We defined gross tumor volume (GTV) in computed tomography scans, and the margin of the planning target volume was 1 to 1.5 cm from the GTV. The median doses prescribed were 50 Gy and 40 Gy delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks to the 95% isodose volume of the GTV and planning target volume, respectively. Prior to each treatment, online corrections were made in the three axes, and rotation was done after registration of the megavoltage and simulation computed tomography scans. Survival was calculated from the completion of tomotherapy, using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate at 12 months was 60.5%, and the median survival time was 16.0 months. A rating of 1 or below on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale, a breast or colon cancer as the primary cancer, primary lesions that were completely controlled, and a response maintained at 3 months after tomotherapy were shown by univariate analysis to be statistically significant favorable prognostic factors. Progression-free survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 39.6% and 27.7%, respectively. The posttreatment failure rate was 64.5%, the local failure rate was 9.7%, the regional failure rate was 51.6%, and the synchronous local and regional failure rate was 3.2%. Grades I and II radiation-related toxicity levels were observed in 41.9% and 16.0% of patients, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Tomotherapy could be offered to patients as a safe and effective treatment in select patients with lung metastases. However, large-scale, prospective clinical trials should be done to confirm our results.

PET and Radiation Therapy Planning and Delivery for Prostate Cancer

PET imaging has become an integral component of the diagnosis and management of a substantial number of lymphatic and solid malignancies. One of the greatest dilemmas in prostate cancer remains the need for greater personalization of treatment recommendations based on the true extent of disease, so that patients with extraprostatic, micrometastatic disease can be identified early and managed accordingly. These sites currently remain under the level of detection with standard imaging and continue to confound clinicians. Novel PET tracers to complement anatomic data from CT and MR imaging can truly make a difference, and ongoing research holds the greatest promise.

The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75

Radiographic image guidance has emerged as the new paradigm for patient positioning, target localization, and external beam alignment in radiotherapy. Although widely varied in modality and method, all radiographic guidance techniques have one thing in common--they can give a significant radiation dose to the patient. As with all medical uses of ionizing radiation, the general view is that this exposure should be carefully managed. The philosophy for dose management adopted by the diagnostic imaging community is summarized by the acronym ALARA, i.e., as low as reasonably achievable. But unlike the general situation with diagnostic imaging and image-guided surgery, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) adds the imaging dose to an already high level of therapeutic radiation. There is furthermore an interplay between increased imaging and improved therapeutic dose conformity that suggests the possibility of optimizing rather than simply minimizing the imaging dose. For this reason, the management of imaging dose during radiotherapy is a different problem than its management during routine diagnostic or image-guided surgical procedures. The imaging dose received as part of a radiotherapy treatment has long been regarded as negligible and thus has been quantified in a fairly loose manner. On the other hand, radiation oncologists examine the therapy dose distribution in minute detail. The introduction of more intensive imaging procedures for IGRT now obligates the clinician to evaluate therapeutic and imaging doses in a more balanced manner. This task group is charged with addressing the issue of radiation dose delivered via image guidance techniques during radiotherapy. The group has developed this charge into three objectives: (1) Compile an overview of image-guidance techniques and their associated radiation dose levels, to provide the clinician using a particular set of image guidance techniques with enough data to estimate the total diagnostic dose for a specific treatment scenario, (2) identify ways to reduce the total imaging dose without sacrificing essential imaging information, and (3) recommend optimization strategies to trade off imaging dose with improvements in therapeutic dose delivery. The end goal is to enable the design of image guidance regimens that are as effective and efficient as possible.

Image-guided radiotherapy via daily online cone-beam CT substantially reduces margin requirements for stereotactic lung radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine treatment accuracy and margins for stereotactic lung radiotherapy with and without cone-beam CT (CBCT) image guidance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Acquired for the study were 308 CBCT of 24 patients with solitary peripheral lung tumors treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Patients were immobilized in a stereotactic body frame (SBF) or alpha-cradle and treated with image guidance using daily CBCT. Four (T1) or five (T2/metastatic) 12-Gy fractions were prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) edge. The PTV margin was >or=5 mm depending on a pretreatment estimate of tumor excursion. Initial daily setup was according to SBF coordinates or tattoos for alpha-cradle cases. A CBCT was performed and registered to the planning CT using soft tissue registration of the target. The initial setup error/precorrection position, was recorded for the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral directions. The couch was adjusted to correct the tumor positional error. A second CBCT verified tumor position after correction. Patients were treated in the corrected position after the residual errors were <or=2 mm. A final CBCT after treatment assessed intrafraction tumor displacement.

RESULTS

The precorrection systematic (Sigma) and random errors (sigma) for the population ranged from 2-3 mm for SBF and 2-6 mm for alpha-cradle patients; postcorrection errors ranged from 0.4-1.0 mm. Calculated population margins were 9 to 13 mm (SBF) and 10-14 mm (cradle) precorrection, 1-2 mm (SBF), and 2-3 mm (cradle) postcorrection, and 2-4 mm (SBF) and 2-5 mm (cradle) posttreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Setup for stereotactic lung radiotherapy using a SBF or alpha-cradle alone is suboptimal. CBCT image guidance significantly improves target positioning and substantially reduces required target margins and normal tissue irradiation.

Radiographic Response and Clinical Toxicity Following SBRT for Stage I Lung Cancer

Clinical outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are excellent, with local control rates ranging from 80% to 95% in medically inoperable patients. Toxicity following SBRT has been lower than expected, with exception for grade 3 to 5 events occurring in patients treated with high doses to mediastinal structures. In considering a randomized head-to-head comparison of SBRT versus surgery for stage I lung cancer, the interpretation of clinical response based on imaging is of great importance. This is because of the opportunity to salvage SBRT local failure with surgery in operable patients. The current literature is reviewed with respect to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) with respect to response following SBRT. The reported toxicities following SBRT for both peripheral and central lung cancers are also reviewed.

Exceptionally high incidence of symptomatic grade 2-5 radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic radiation therapy for lung tumors

BACKGROUND

To determine the usefulness of dose volume histogram (DVH) factors for predicting the occurrence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after application of stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) for lung tumors, DVH factors were measured before irradiation.

METHODS

From May 2004 to April 2006, 25 patients were treated with SRT at the University of Tokyo Hospital. Eighteen patients had primary lung cancer and seven had metastatic lung cancer. SRT was given in 6-7 fields with an isocenter dose of 48 Gy in four fractions over 5-8 days by linear accelerator.

RESULTS

Seven of the 25 patients suffered from RP of symptomatic grade 2-5 according to the NCI-CTC version 3.0. The overall incidence rate of RP grade2 or more was 29% at 18 months after completing SRT and three patients died from RP. RP occurred at significantly increased frequencies in patients with higher conformity index (CI) (p = 0.0394). Mean lung dose (MLD) showed a significant correlation with V5-V20 (irradiated lung volume) (p < 0.001) but showed no correlation with CI. RP did not statistically correlate with MLD. MLD had the strongest correlation with V5.

CONCLUSION

Even in SRT, when large volumes of lung parenchyma are irradiated to such high doses as the minimum dose within planning target volume, the incidence of lung toxicity can become high.

Prediction of radiation-induced changes in the lung after stereotactic body radiation therapy of non–small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To estimate the risk of radiation-induced changes in the lung before single-dose treatment (stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT]) of lung cancer, the quantitative dose-response and volume-response relations must be known.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 64 patients treated for non-small-cell lung cancer with single doses of 20-30 Gy were classified according to the occurrence or nonoccurrence of perifocal changes in the lung detected by CT. Patients without toxic events in the lung were required to have >or=6 months of follow-up. The mean dose (D(mean)) in the ipsilateral lung and the volume receiving >7 or 10 Gy (V7 and V10, respectively) were used to calculate the dose-response and volume-response curves. The predictive value of additional variables was also investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 64 patients, 83% exhibited the selected endpoint. The tolerance values at a 50% probability of toxic events were 1.2 +/- 0.7 Gy for the D(mean) and 5.8 +/- 3.0% and 3.1 +/- 2.0% for V7 and V10, respectively. A nonsignificant shift to higher doses was seen for the dose-response curve for the upper compared with the lower part of the lung.

CONCLUSION

The D(mean), V7, and V10 can be used to predict the risk of lung toxicity after SBRT treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Because of the lack of patients with low prescribed doses, however, the related uncertainty of this prediction is still relatively large. The D(mean), V7, and V10 are equally well suited. The additional investigated variables did not provide significant advantages. The lower part of the lung appears to be more radiosensitive than the upper.

Cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image guidance of lung stereotactic radiotherapy: localization, verification, and intrafraction tumor position

PURPOSE

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in-room imaging allows accurate inter- and intrafraction target localization in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy was performed in 28 patients (89 fractions) with medically inoperable Stage T1-T2 non-small-cell lung carcinoma. The targets from the CBCT and planning data set (helical or four-dimensional CT) were matched on-line to determine the couch shift required for target localization. Matching based on the bony anatomy was also performed retrospectively. Verification of target localization was done using either megavoltage portal imaging or CBCT imaging; repeat CBCT imaging was used to assess the intrafraction tumor position.

RESULTS

The mean three-dimensional tumor motion for patients with upper lesions (n = 21) and mid-lobe or lower lobe lesions (n = 7) was 4.2 and 6.7 mm, respectively. The mean difference between the target and bony anatomy matching using CBCT was 6.8 mm (SD, 4.9, maximum, 30.3); the difference exceeded 13.9 mm in 10% of the treatment fractions. The mean residual error after target localization using CBCT imaging was 1.9 mm (SD, 1.1, maximum, 4.4). The mean intrafraction tumor deviation was significantly greater (5.3 mm vs. 2.2 mm) when the interval between localization and repeat CBCT imaging (n = 8) exceeded 34 min.

CONCLUSION

In-room volumetric imaging, such as CBCT, is essential for target localization accuracy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. Imaging that relies on bony anatomy as a surrogate of the target may provide erroneous results in both localization and verification.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for lung metastases

The curative treatment of oligometastases with radiotherapy remains an area of active investigation. We hypothesise that treating oligometastases with SBRT can prolong life and potentially cure patients, while in patients with multiple lung metastases SBRT can improve quality of life. Fifty patients with lung metastases were treated on this study. Individuals with five or fewer total lesions were treated with curative intent. Individuals with > five metastases were treated palliatively. Most patients (62%) received 5 Gy/fraction for a total of 50 Gy. The number of targets treated per patient ranged from one to five (mean 2.6). Tumor sizes ranged from 0.3-7.7 cm in maximal diameter (median 2.1 cm). Mean follow-up was 18.7 months. Local control of treated lesions was obtained in 42 of 49 evaluable patients (83%). Of the 125 total lesions treated, eight progressed after treatment (94% crude local control). The median overall survival time from time of treatment completion of the curatively treated patients was 23.4 months. The progression-free survival of the same group of patients was 25% and 16% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Grade 1 toxicity occurred in 35% of all the patients, 6.1% had grade 2 toxicity, and 2% had grade 3 toxicity. Excellent local tumor control rates with low toxicity are seen with SBRT. Median survival time and progression-free survival both appear better than that achieved with standard care alone. Long-term progression-free survival can be seen in a subset of patients when all tumors are targeted.

Complications of Thoracic Computed Tomography–Guided Fiducial Placement for the Purpose of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

This study examined the complication rates associated with percutaneous fiducial placement for the purpose of stereotactic body radiation therapy of primary and metastatic lung neoplasms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of computed tomography (CT) scans and follow-up chest radiographs of 48 consecutive patients who underwent CT-guided percutaneous fiducial placement. The effect of age, sex, number of fiducials placed, and performance of a concomitant biopsy on the complication rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 48 patients with a total of 221 fiducials placed, 16 (33%) had a procedure-related pneumothorax. There was no significant difference in pneumothorax rate based on age (P = 0.16), sex (P > 0.99), and number of fiducials placed (P = 0.21). Overall, 6 of 48 patients (12.5%) required a thoracostomy tube. Performance of a concomitant core needle biopsy at the time of fiducial placement was associated with pneumothorax rates of 64% compared with 26% without biopsies (P = 0.03). Postprocedural CT demonstrated hemorrhage in 9 patients (19%). Two patients had hemoptysis; one required admission. Patients' age, sex, number of fiducials placed, and performance of concomitant biopsy had no statistically significant implications on parenchymal hemorrhage incidence.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one third of the patients develop a pneumothorax during CT-guided fiducial placement. Most are asymptomatic and do not require a thoracostomy. A concurrent biopsy at the time of fiducial placement is associated with an increased risk of pneumothorax. Hemorrhage occurs but is usually clinically insignificant.

Dynamic targeting image-guided radiotherapy

Volumetric imaging and planning for 3-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) have highlighted the need to the oncology community to better understand the geometric uncertainties inherent in the radiotherapy delivery process, including setup error (interfraction) as well as organ motion during treatment (intrafraction). This has ushered in the development of emerging technologies and clinical processes, collectively referred to as image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The goal of IGRT is to provide the tools needed to manage both inter- and intrafraction motion to improve the accuracy of treatment delivery. Like IMRT, IGRT is a process involving all steps in the radiotherapy treatment process, including patient immobilization, computed tomography (CT) simulation, treatment planning, plan verification, patient setup verification and correction, delivery, and quality assurance. The technology and capability of the Dynamic Targeting IGRT system developed by Varian Medical Systems is presented. The core of this system is a Clinac or Trilogy accelerator equipped with a gantry-mounted imaging system known as the On-Board Imager (OBI). This includes a kilovoltage (kV) x-ray source, an amorphous silicon kV digital image detector, and 2 robotic arms that independently position the kV source and imager orthogonal to the treatment beam. A similar robotic arm positions the PortalVision megavoltage (MV) portal digital image detector, allowing both to be used in concert. The system is designed to support a variety of imaging modalities. The following applications and how they fit in the overall clinical process are described: kV and MV planar radiographic imaging for patient repositioning, kV volumetric cone beam CT imaging for patient repositioning, and kV planar fluoroscopic imaging for gating verification. Achieving image-guided motion management throughout the radiation oncology process requires not just a single product, but a suite of integrated products to manipulate all patient data, including images, efficiently and effectively.

Dosimetric verification in participating institutions in a stereotactic body radiotherapy trial for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Japan clinical oncology group trial (JCOG0403)

A multicentre phase II trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy for T1N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer was initiated in Japan as the Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG0403). Before starting the trial, a decision was made to evaluate the treatment machine and treatment planning in participating institutions to minimize the variations of the prescription dose between the institutions. We visited the 16 participating institutions and examined the absolute dose at the centre of a simulated spherical tumour of 3.0 cm diameter in the lung using the radiation treatment planning systems in each institution. A lung phantom for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was developed and used for the treatment planning and film dosimetry. In the JCOG radiotherapy study group, the no model-based calculation algorithm or the model-based calculation algorithm with a dose kernel unscaled for heterogeneities were selected for use in the initial SBRT trials started in 2004, and the model-based calculation algorithm with a dose kernel scaled for heterogeneities was selected for the coming trial. The findings of this study suggest that the clinical results of lung SBRT trials should be carefully evaluated in comparison with the actual dose given to patients.