A prospective comparison of three systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy

A comparison between two different immobilization devices for radiation therapy treatment of pelvic cancer using VMAT

OBJECTIVES

To assess setup reproducibility of low kneefix with feetfix (LKF-FF) system and its operator-reported convenience by reference to low dual leg positioner (LDLP), among patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective controlled trial was carried out at the radiotherapy unit. It included patients who underwent radical radiotherapy to the pelvis using VMAT, and who benefitted from LDLP (N = 30) or LKF-FF (N = 30) immobilization system. Average absolute shifts (AAS) and total vector errors (TVE) were computed and compared between the two systems, using translational (lateral, longitudinal and vertical) and rotational (X, Y and Z planes) directions. Accuracy rates were computed on pooled data including 1529 VMAT images, 819 in LDLP and 710 in LKF-FF groups, using different cutoffs. Radiotherapists' subjective assessment of the device's ease of setup, handling, cleaning, and storage, and patient comfort was carried out comparatively between the two devices.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed between the two systems in systematic settings, while LKF-FF outperformed LDLP in random settings; notably in vertical translation and X and Z rotational shifts. Analysis of TVEs showed significant decrease in rotational TVE in LKF-FF group (mean=1.38° versus 2.38, p = 0.003) by reference to LDLP, respectively; however, both systems had comparable translational TVE (p = 0.590). In pooled analysis, LKF-FF enabled an overall increase in setup accuracy rates in rotational directions by up to 15% and 19% at ±1° and ±2° accuracy levels, respectively (p<0.05). Subjective assessments showed that the two immobilization systems were comparable regarding all investigated dimensions; however, the overall radiotherapists' preference leaned toward LDLP.

CONCLUSION

The newly implemented LKF-FF system outperformed LDLP in terms of setup reproducibility, notably in rotational directions, where it enhanced setup accuracy rates by up to 19%. Long-term use of LKF-FF may improve the users' satisfaction.

Long-time clinical experience in patient setup for several particle therapy clinical indications: management of patient positioning and evaluation of setup reproducibility and stability

OBJECTIVE

Accurate patient positioning is crucial in particle therapy due to the geometrical selectivity of particles. We report and discuss the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) experience in positioning accuracy and stability achieved with solid thermoplastic masks fixed on index base plates and assessed by daily orthogonal X-ray imaging.

METHODS

Positioning data were retrospectively collected (between 2012 and 2018) and grouped according to the treated anatomical site. 19696 fractions of 1325 patients were evaluated.The study was designed to assess:(i) the number of fractions in which a single correction vector was applied(SCV);(ii) the number of fractions in which further setup verification was performed (SV);(iii) the number of fractions in which SV lead to an additional correction within (MCV<5min) or after (MCV>5min) 5 minutes from the first setup correction;(iv) the systematic (Σ) and random (σ) error components of the correction vectors applied.

RESULTS

A SCV was applied in 71.5% of fractions, otherwise SV was required. In 30.6% of fractions with SV, patient position was not further revised. In the remaining fractions, MCV<5min and MCV>5min were applied mainly in extracranial and cranial sites respectively.Interfraction Σ was ≤ 1.7 mm/0.7° and σ was ≤ 1.2 mm/0.6° in cranial sites while in extracranial sites Σ was ≤ 5.5 mm/0.9° and σ was ≤4.4 mm/0.9°. Setup residuals were submillimetric in all sites. In cranial patients, maximum intrafractional Σ was 0.8 mm/0.4°.

CONCLUSION

This report extensively quantifies inter- and intrafraction setup accuracy on an institutional basis and confirms the need of image guidance to fully benefit from the geometrical selectivity of particles.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The reported analysis provides a board institutional data set on the evaluation of patient immobilization and bony anatomy alignment for several particle therapy clinical indications.

Development and psychometric testing of an instrument to measure the patient's experience of external radiotherapy: The Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ)

•

A new instrument to measure the patient’s comfort and experiences during RT.

•

The instrument gains the patients’ perspectives of the RT procedures.

•

RTEQ has a possible application for evaluation of newly introduced techniques.

Background

The patient’s perception of external radiotherapy (RT) procedures and equipment is important to evaluate as a complement to endpoints such as treatment outcome and reproducibility. There is a lack of a proper, psychometrically robust instrument to evaluate the patient’s comfort and experience of the external RT procedure. Hence, this study aimed to develop and test an instrument to measure the patient’s experience during external RT.

Material and Methods

A preliminary 34-item questionnaire was generated from research literature, expert consultations and patient interviews, and it was distributed to patients (n = 825) at 8 RT units in Sweden. The answers were subjected to item analysis and reduction by using exploratory factor analysis. The reliability of the final questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. Mean scale scores were compared across gender, length of RT and treatment area.

Results

Most items were highly skewed towards positive responses. Scree plot analyses of the 34-item correlation matrix identified six underlying themes explaining 68% of the total variance. After item reduction, the 6 themes explained 73% of the variance in a 23-item questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha was satisfactory for all themes (between 0.79 and 0.9). Significant differences between treatment areas were found for two scales: situational unease and situational repose.

Conclusion

The RT Experience Questionnaire is a tentatively valid and reliable instrument to measure how patients experience the external RT session process and the environment in the treatment room.

A comparison of interfraction setup error, patient comfort, and therapist acceptance for 2 different prostate radiation therapy immobilization devices

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to investigate interfraction setup error of the immobilization device required to implement transperineal ultrasound compared with the current, standard immobilization device. Patient comfort and radiation therapist (RT) satisfaction were also assessed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Cone beam computed tomography images were acquired before 4069 fractions from 111 patients (control group, n = 56; intervention group, n = 55) were analyzed. The intervention group was immobilized using the Clarity Immobilization System (CIS), comprising a knee rest with autoscan probe kit and transperineal ultrasound probe (n = 55), and control group using a leg immobilizer (LI) (n = 56). Interfraction setup errors were compared for both groups. Weekly questionnaires using a 10-point visual analog scale were administered to both patient groups to measure and compare patient comfort. RT acceptance for both devices was also compared using a survey.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the magnitude of interfraction cone beam computed tomography-derived setup shifts in the lateral and anteroposterior direction between the LI and CIS (P = .878 and .690, respectively). However, a significant difference (P = .003) was observed in the superoinferior direction between the 2 groups of patients. Patient-reported level of comfort and stability demonstrated no significant difference between groups (P = .994 and .132). RT user acceptance measures for the LI and CIS were ease of handling (100% vs 53.7%), storage (100% vs 61.1%), and cleaning of the devices (100% vs 64.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CIS demonstrated stability and reproducibility in prostate treatment setup comparable to LI. The CIS device had no impact on patient comfort; however, RTs indicated a preference for LI over the CIS mainly because of its weight and bulkiness.

Pilot study on interfractional and intrafractional movements using surface infrared markers and EPID for patients with rectal cancer treated in the prone position

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate interfractional and intrafractional movement of patients with rectal cancer during radiotherapy with electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and surface infrared (IR) markers.

METHODS

20 patients undergoing radiotherapy for rectal cancer with body mass index ranging from 18.5 to 30 were enrolled. Patients were placed in the prone position on a couch with a leg pillow. Three IR markers were put on the surface of each patient and traced by two stereo cameras during radiotherapy on a twice-weekly basis. Interfractional isocentre movement was obtained with EPID images on a weekly basis. Movement of the IR markers was analysed in correlation with the isocentre movement obtained from the EPID images.

RESULTS

The maximum right-to-left (R-L) movement of the laterally located markers in the horizontal isocentre plane was correlated with isocentre translocation with statistical significance (p = 0.018 and 0.015, respectively). Movement of the surface markers was cyclical. For centrally located markers, the 95% confidence intervals for the average amplitude in the R-L, cranial-to-caudal (C-C) and anterior-to-posterior (A-P) directions were 0.86, 2.25 and 3.48 mm, respectively. In 10 patients, intrafractional movement exceeding 5 mm in at least one direction was observed. Time-dependent systematic movement of surface markers during treatment, which consisted of continuous movement towards the cranial direction and a sail back motion in the A-P direction, was also observed.

CONCLUSION

Intrafractional movement of surface markers has both cyclic components and time-dependent systematic components. Marker deviations exceeding 5 mm were mainly seen in the A-P direction. Pre- or post-treatment EPID images may not provide adequate information regarding intrafractional movement because of systematic movement in the A-P direction during radiotherapy.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This work uncovered a sail back motion of patients in the A-P direction during radiotherapy. Pre- or post-treatment EPID images may not provide accurate positioning of patients in the A-P direction because of this time-dependent intrafractional motion.

A comparison of two systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Reproducibility of different immobilization systems, which may affect set-up errors, remains uncertain. Immobilization systems and their corresponding set-up errors influence the clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins and thus may result in undesirable treatment outcomes. This study compared the reproducibility of patient positioning with Hipfix system and whole body alpha cradle with respect to localized prostate cancer and investigated the existing CTV-PTV margins in the clinical oncology departments of two hospitals.

METHODS

Forty sets of data of patients with localized T1-T3 prostate cancer were randomly selected from two regional hospitals, with 20 patients immobilized by a whole-body alpha cradle system and 20 by a thermoplastic Hipfix system. Seven sets of the anterior-posterior (AP), cranial-caudal (CC) and medial-lateral (ML) deviations were collected from each patient. The reproducibility of patient positioning within the two hospitals was compared using a total vector error (TVE) parameter. In addition, CTV-PTV margins were computed using van Herk's formula. The resulting values were compared to the current CTV-PTV margins in both hospitals.

RESULTS

The TVE values were 5.1 and 2.8 mm for the Hipfix and the whole-body alpha cradle systems respectively. TVE associated with the whole-body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly less than the Hipfix system (p < 0.05). The CC axis in the Hipfix system attained the highest frequency of large (23.6%) and serious (7.9%) set-up errors. The calculated CTV to PTV margin was 8.3, 1.9 and 2.3 mm for the Hipfix system, and 2.1, 3.4 and 1.8 mm for the whole body alpha cradle in CC, ML and AP axes respectively. All but one (CC axis using Hipfix) margin calculated did not exceed the corresponding hospital protocol. The whole body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly better than the Hipfix system in terms of reproducibility (p < 0.05), especially in the CC axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The whole body alpha cradle system was more reproducible than the Hipfix system. In particular, the difference in CC axis contributed most to the results and the current CC margin for the Hipfix system might be considered as inadequate.

Interfractional variability in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without thermoplastic pelvic immobilization

PURPOSE

To determine the variability of patient positioning errors associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and to assess the impact of thermoplastic pelvic immobilization on these errors using kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2012 to June 2012, the records of 314 IMRT sessions in 19 patients with prostate cancer, performed with or without immobilization at two different facilities in the Korea University Hospital were analyzed. The kV CBCT images were matched to simulation computed tomography (CT) images to determine the simulation-to-treatment variability. The shifts along the x (lateral)-, y (longitudinal)- and z (vertical)-axes were measured, as was the shift in the three dimensional (3D) vector.

RESULTS

The measured systematic errors in the immobilized group during treatment were 0.46 ± 1.75 mm along the x-axis, - 0.35 ± 3.83 mm along the y-axis, 0.20 ± 2.75 mm along the z-axis and 4.05 ± 3.02 mm in the 3D vector. Those of nonimmobilized group were - 1.45 ± 7.50 mm along the x-axis, 1.89 ± 5.07 mm along the y-axis, 0.28 ± 3.81 mm along the z-axis and 8.90 ± 4.79 mm in the 3D vector. The group immobilized with pelvic thermoplastics showed reduced interfractional variability along the x- and y-axes and in the 3D vector compared to the nonimmobilized group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

IMRT with thermoplastic pelvic immobilization in patients with prostate cancer appears to be useful in stabilizing interfractional variability during the planned treatment course.

Quality of care indicators and their related outcomes: a population-based study in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We describe variations across the regional cancer centres in Ontario, Canada for five prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT) quality indicators: incomplete pre-treatment assessment, follow-up care, leg immobilization, bladder filling, and portal film target localization. Along with cancer centre volume, we examined each indicator's association with relevant outcomes: long-term cause-specific survival, urinary incontinence, and gastrointestinal and genitourinary late morbidities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 924 prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 1990 and 1998 who received RT within 9 months of diagnosis. Data sources included treating charts and registry and administrative data. The associations between indicators and outcomes were analysed using regression techniques to control for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Practice patterns varied across the regional cancer centres for all indicators (p<0.0001). Incomplete pre-treatment assessment was associated with worse cause-specific survival although this result was not significant when adjusted for confounding (adjusted RR=1.78, 95% CI=0.79-3.98). Treatment without leg immobilization (adjusted RR=1.72, 95% CI=1.16-2.56) and with an empty bladder (adjusted RR=1.98, 95% CI=1.08-3.63) was associated with genitourinary late morbidities. Treatment without leg immobilization was also associated with urinary incontinence (adjusted RR=2.18, 95% CI=1.23-3.87).

CONCLUSIONS

We documented wide variations in practice patterns. We demonstrated that measures of quality of care can be shown to be associated with clinically relevant outcomes in a population-based sample of prostate cancer patients.

Comparison of geometric uncertainties between alpha cradle and thermoplastic ray cast immobilisation in abdominopelvic radiotherapy: a prospective study

Context: Setup error significantly affects the accuracy of treatment and outcome in high precision radiotherapy.

Aims: To determine total, systematic, random error and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin with alpha cradle (VL) and ray cast (RC) immobilisation in abdominopelvic region.

Methods and material: Setup error was compared by using digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) as reference image with electronic portal image (EPI) taken during the treatment. Statistical analysis used: The total errors in mediolateral (ML), craniocaudal (CC) and anteroposterior (AP) directions were compared by t-test. For systematic and random errors variance ratio test (F-statistics) was used. Margins were calculated using International Commission of Radiation Units (ICRU), Stroom’s and van Herk’s formula.

Results: A total number of 306 portal images were analysed with 144 images in RC group and 162 images in VL group. For VL, in ML, CC, AP directions systematic errors were, in cm, (0.45, 0.29, 0.41), random errors (0.48, 0.32, 0.58), CTV to PTV margins (1.24, 0.80, 1.25), respectively. For RC, systematic errors were (0.25, 0.37, 0.80), random error (0.46, 0.80, 0.33), CTV to PTV margins (0.82, 1.30, 1.08), respectively. The difference of random error in CC and AP directions were statistically significant.

Conclusions: Geometric errors and CTV to PTV margins are different in different directions. For abdomen and pelvis in VL immobilisation, the margin ranged from 8 mm to 12.4 mm and for RC it was 8.2 mm to 13 mm. Therefore, a margin of 10 mm with online correction would be adequate.

[Conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma--procedure description]

INTRODUCTION

Today, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is a standard way in the radical treatment of localized prostate cancer, and it is an alternative to the radical prostatectomy. This method of radiotherapy treatment is widely accepted in the treatment of prostate cancer patients, and provides irradiation of targeted volume (prostate, seminal vesicles) with dose escalation sparing the surrounding healthy tissues (rectum, bladder) at the same time. That is not possible with the conventional two dimension technique. PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION: Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is a volumetric, visual simulation according to the computed tomography slices; it defines the tumour and organ at risk individually in each patient. Results of several studies have shown that there is a significant decrease in the development of acute toxicity when prostate cancer patients are treated with conformal radiotherapy. High dose irradiation gives excellent results in treatment of localized prostate carcinoma and improves treatment results in the patients with locally advanced carcinoma of prostate.

DISCUSSION

Prostate carcinoma irradiation techniques have been changed dramatically during recent years. Data obtained by computed tomography are important since the size and shapes of the prostate as well as its anatomic relations towards the rectum and bladder are considerably different in individual patients. The three-dimension plan of irradiation can be designed for each patient individually by performing computed tomography technique when planning radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The advanced planning systems for conformal radiotherapy can reconstruct the anatomic structures of pelvis in three-dimension technique on the basis of computed tomography scans, which provides better conformality between the irradiation beam and geometrical shape of the tumour with minimal irradiation of the surrounding healthy tissue.

A Retrospective Review of the Effect of a Simple Foot Immobilization Device for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

The goal of radical radiation therapy is to eradicate tumor cells by delivering maximum dose to the target volume. This requires accurate daily positioning of the patient to minimize the chances of a geographical miss of the target and minimize dose to surrounding normal tissue. Numerous studies have been conducted to find the best immobilization device to improve reproducibility and setup of patient positioning for men with prostate cancer with inconclusive results.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively, the consistency and reproducibility of prostate patient positioning using a simple foot immobilization device compared with patients treated without any immobilization device.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis was completed on 40 patients with histopathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate between April 2007 and May 2007. Twenty charts were randomly selected for men treated without any immobilization device and 20 charts were randomly selected for men treated with the foot strap immobilization. Incidence and frequency of isocenter shifts were the primary end points of this study. Direction and magnitude of shifts were secondary end points.

RESULTS

The frequency of isocenter shifts were greater in the patients treated without immobilization (35%) than with patients treated with foot strap immobilization (10%). Required shifts were in either the superoinferior direction or in the right/left direction. No shifts were required in the anteroposterior direction. Magnitude of shifts greater than and equal to 1.0 cm in magnitude was seen only in those treated without immobilization.

CONCLUSION

The foot strap is a simple and inexpensive method of improving daily setup reliability and reducing the need for isocenter shifts.

A randomized crossover study evaluating two immobilization devices for prostate cancer treatment

Purpose: To compare the Combifix® immobilization device with a conventional double-leg cushion in terms of patient comfort, therapist feedback and systematic/random error outcomes.

Materials and Methods: This prospective block-randomised crossover study enrolled 18 high-risk prostate cancer patients who received whole pelvic plus prostate radiotherapy. Treatment consisted of a prostate boost with one immobilization device followed by whole pelvic radiation using the other device. Our primary endpoints were device ease-of-use and patient comfort. Secondary endpoints included treatment time and systematic/random error assessments.

Results: While our patients found both devices equally comfortable and easy to use, the therapists preferred the leg cushion for ease of set-up (p = 0.04). Patient treatment time was similar for the two devices. In terms of electronic portal imaging (EPID)-based isocentre shifts, statistically, but not clinically, significant differences in systematic and random errors between the two devices exist in the superior–inferior directions (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions: No clinically important advantage was seen with the Combifix® device versus our standard double-leg cushion in terms of patient/therapist preference, patient comfort, and bony pelvic immobilization. However, this research project confirmed the feasibility of mounting a small single-institution randomised crossover technology assessment related to a practical radiotherapy issue.

Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?

PURPOSE

To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set.

RESULTS

During one treatment fraction (21.4+/-5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p<0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm(3) of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p<0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients' prostates and eight patients' SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy (p<0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.

Investigation into the impact of couch sag on delivered dose

The effect of couch sag on treatment delivery accuracy has been investigated by modelling the variation of delivered dose from planned dose due to the difference between the treatment and simulation couches. The couch sag of the Siemens (Concord, USA) Primus linac was determined relative to the couch sag of the Siemens (Germany) Sensation 4 CT Scanner. A phantom planning study was then undertaken to evaluate the likely clinical impact of the couch sag through an evaluation of changes in dose distribution, dose volume histograms and monitor units. The couch sag was simulated by altering the angle of the CT gantry when obtaining image studysets. A second investigation into the effects of couch sag was undertaken using an existing patient CT studyset. For this investigation, the couch sag was simulated by appropriate rotation of the gantry and collimator angles. The effect of couch sag on calculated monitor units (MU) was found to be statistically insignificant. The small monitor unit changes observed were likely to result from differences in the average linear attenuation coefficient along the beam path to the isocentre. The major differences seen however were in the regions away from the central axis. The dose volume histograms showed that both the bladder and rectum were further spared with increasing tilt angle whilst the PTV dose was unchanged. The only issue at South West Sydney Cancer Services (SWSCS) in terms of patient position variation arises from the angle induced by the couch sag (or more precisely, the difference in couch sag angle between the CT and Linac couches). Due to the relatively uniform structures (of PTV, bladder and rectum), and the proximity of these critical structures to the isocentre, this angular rotation about the isocentre did not cause any major variations to the DVH, MU and isodoses for realistic levels of couch sag (i.e. less than 20mm).

Qualitative estimation of pelvic organ interactions and their consequences on prostate motion: Study on a deceased person

In an attempt to have better targeting of the prostate during radiotherapy it is necessary to understand the mechanical interactions between bladder, rectum, and prostate and estimate their consequences on prostate motion. For this, the volumes of bladder, rectum, and lungs were modified concomitantly on a deceased person. A CT acquisition was performed for each of these different pelvic configurations (36 acquisitions). An increase in the volume of the bladder or lungs induces a compression of tissues of the pelvic area from its supero-anterior (S-A) to infero-posterior (I-P) side. Conversely, an increase of rectum volume induces a compression from the I-P to the S-A side of the pelvic region. These compressive actions can be added or subtracted from each other, depending on their amplitudes and directions. Prostate motion occurs when a movement of the rectum is observed (this movement depends, itself, on lungs and bladder volume). The maximum movement of prostate is 9 mm considering maximal bladder or rectal action, and 11 mm considering maximum lung action. In some other cases, opposition of compressive effects can lead to stasis of the prostate. Based on the volumes of bladder, rectum, and lungs, it is possible to qualitatively estimate the movement of organs of the pelvic area. The best way to reduce prostate movement is to recommend the patient to have an empty rectum, with either full bladder and/or full lungs.

Radiotherapy in the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Evolving Standards, Consensus, Controversies and New Directions

Major advances have been made in the definitive use of various forms of radiotherapy (RT) in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Despite tremendous gains, the radiation oncology community continues to struggle with several key questions. In general, the areas of controversy pertain to how to improve the therapeutic ratio of RT. Specifically, key issues include dose escalation; the relative benefit of alternative forms of RT (ie, brachytherapy and protons); target localization; the use, timing, and duration of androgen deprivation; and the need for pelvic nodal irradiation. Multiple efforts have been made to address each of these issues; however, there is no consensus on how to resolve them. This review is an evidence-based critique of the available treatment approaches considered for the optimal use of radiotherapy as definitive management of clinically localized PCa.

Immobilization effect of air-injected blanket (AIB) for abdomen fixation

A new device for reducing the amplitude of breathing motion by pressing a patient's abdomen using an air-injected blanket (AIB) for external beam radiation treatments has been designed and tested. The blanket has two layers sealed in all four sides similar to an empty pillow made of urethane. The blanket is spread over the patient's abdomen with both ends of the blanket fixed to the sides of the treatment couch or a baseboard. The inner side, or patient side, of the blanket is thinner and expands more than the outer side. When inflated, the blanket balloons and effectively puts an even pressure on the patient's abdomen. Fluoroscopic observation was performed to verify the usefulness of AIB for patients with lung, breast cancer, or abdominal cancers. Internal organ movement due to breathing was monitored and measured with and without AIB. With the help of AIB, the average range of diaphragm motion was reduced from 2.6 to 0.7 cm in the anterior-to-posterior direction and from 2.7 to 1.3 cm in the superior-to-inferior direction. The motion range in the right-to-left direction was negligible, for it was less than 0.5 cm. These initial testing demonstrated that AIB is useful for reducing patients' breathing motion in the thoracic and abdominal regions comfortably and consistently.

Theoretical foundation for real-time prostate localization using an inductively coupled transmitter and a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer system

Real‐time, 3D localization of the prostate for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy can be accomplished with passively charged radio frequency transmitters and superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometers. The overall system design consists of an external dipole antenna as a power source for charging a microchip implant transmitter and SQUID magnetometers for signal detection. An external dipole antenna charges an on‐chip capacitor through inductive coupling in the near field region through a small implant inductor. The charge and discharge sequence between the external antenna and the implant circuit can be defined by half duplex, full duplex, or sequential operations. The resulting implant discharge current creates an alternating magnetic field through the inductor. The field is detected by the surrounding magnetometers, and the location of the implant transmitter can be calculated. Problems associated with this system design are interrelated with the signal strength at the detectors, detector sensitivity, and charge time of the implant capacitor. The physical parameters required for optimizing the system for real‐time applications are the operating frequency, implant inductance and capacitance, the external dipole current and loop radius, the detector distance, and mutual inductance. Consequently, the sequential operating mode is the best choice for real‐time localization for constraints requiring positioning within 1 s due to the mutual inductance and detector sensitivity. We present the theoretical foundation for designing a real‐time, 3D prostate localization system including the associated physical parameters and demonstrate the feasibility and physical limitations for such a system.

PACS number: 87.53.‐j

Impact of knee support and shape of tabletop on rectum and prostate position

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of different tabletops with or without a knee support on the position of the rectum, prostate, and bulb of the penis; and to evaluate the effect of these patient-positioning devices on treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 10 male volunteers, five MRI scans were made in four different positions: on a flat tabletop with knee support, on a flat tabletop without knee support, on a rounded tabletop with knee support, and on a rounded tabletop without knee support. The fifth scan was in the same position as the first. With image registration, the position differences of the rectum, prostate, and bulb of the penis were measured at several points in a sagittal plane through the central axis of the prostate. A planning target volume was generated from the delineated prostates with a margin of 10 mm in three dimensions. A three-field treatment plan with a prescribed dose of 78 Gy to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements point was automatically generated from each planning target volume. Dose-volume histograms were calculated for all rectal walls.

RESULTS

The shape of the tabletop did not affect the rectum and prostate position. Addition of a knee support shifted the anterior and posterior rectal walls dorsally. For the anterior rectal wall, the maximum dorsal shift was 9.9 mm (standard error of the mean [SEM] 1.7 mm) at the top of the prostate. For the posterior rectal wall, the maximum dorsal shift was 10.2 mm (SEM 1.5 mm) at the middle of the prostate. Therefore, the rectal filling was pushed caudally when a knee support was added. The knee support caused a rotation of the prostate around the left-right axis at the apex (i.e., a dorsal rotation) by 5.6 degrees (SEM 0.8 degrees ) and shifts in the caudal and dorsal directions of 2.6 mm (SEM 0.4 cm) and 1.4 mm (SEM 0.6 mm), respectively. The position of the bulb of the penis was not influenced by the use of a knee support or rounded tabletop. The volume of the rectal wall receiving the same dose range (e.g., 40-75 Gy) was reduced by 3.5% (SEM 0.9%) when a knee support was added. No significant differences were observed between the first and fifth scan (flat tabletop with knee support) for all measured points, thereby excluding time trends.

CONCLUSIONS

The rectum and prostate were significantly shifted dorsally by the use of a knee support. The rectum shifted more than the prostate, resulting in a dose benefit compared with irradiation without knee support. The shape of the tabletop did not influence the rectum or prostate position.

Australian and New Zealand three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy consensus guidelines for prostate cancer

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) has been shown to reduce normal tissue toxicity and allow dose escalation in the curative treatment of prostate cancer. The Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group initiated a consensus process to generate evidence-based guidelines for the safe and effective implementation of 3DCRT. All radiation oncology departments in Australia and New Zealand were invited to complete a survey of their prostate practice and to send representatives to a consensus workshop. After a review of the evidence, key issues were identified and debated. If agreement was not reached, working parties were formed to make recommendations. Draft guidelines were circulated to workshop participants for approval prior to publication. Where possible, evidence-based recommendations have been made with regard to patient selection, risk stratification, simulation, planning, treatment delivery and toxicity reporting. This is the first time a group of radiation therapists, physicists and oncologists representing professional radiotherapy practice across Australia and New Zealand have worked together to develop best-practice guidelines. These guidelines should serve as a baseline for prospective clinical trials, outcome research and quality assurance.

A comparison of forward and inverse planned conformal, multi segment and intensity modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate and pelvic nodes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Full inverse planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may be indicated to treat concave targets like prostate and pelvic nodes, because concave dose distributions cannot be generated with conformal radiotherapy (CRT). We investigated whether this concave dose distribution can be produced using simplified forward planned multi segment radiotherapy (MSRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CRT, MSRT and IMRT dose distributions were calculated and compared for five patients treated in our current IMRT prostate and pelvic node dose escalation trial. The same beam arrangement was used for CRT, MSRT and IMRT, increasing the number of segments. The MSRT concave dose distribution was realised regarding left and right pelvic nodes as two separate targets. The IMRT dose distribution had been used to treat the patients using a step and shoot delivery.

RESULTS

Contrary to CRT, forward planned MSRT concave dose distributions had improved target coverage at lower or equivalent bowel doses than inverse planned IMRT. The five MSRT beams had a maximum of three segments per beam. Both lateral beams had two segments to deliver the two dose levels to prostate and nodes. The posterior field needed a third segment to avoid using a central block. The two anterior oblique beams needed a third segment to account for the different beam weighting because the nodes were irradiated partially using four and partially using five beams. Inverse planned IMRT used up to 15 segments in any one beam, with an average of 11.4 per beam.

CONCLUSIONS

Concave dose distributions for prostate and pelvic node treatment were generated using forward planned multi segment techniques. The plans met clinical constraints used in our IMRT protocol. MSRT presented a significant advantage over both CRT and IMRT.

An immobilization system for claustrophobic patients in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of an immobilization treatment system used for claustrophobic patients in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Instead of the thermoplastic facemask, the Vac Fix (S & S Par Scientific, Odense, Denmark) mold is used for immobilization of claustrophobic patients at the University of Florida in head-and-neck IMRT. The immobilization procedure combines the use of commercial stereotactic infrared (IR) ExacTrac camera system (BrainLAB, Inc., Westchester, IL) for patient setup and monitoring. The Vac Fix mold is placed on the headrest and folded up as needed to provide support before the mold is hardened. For the camera system, a frame referred to as a "tattoo-free immobilization accessory" is fabricated, on which the IR markers can be placed. A patient-specific dental impression is made with the bite tray. The movement of the markers, connected through the dental impression of the patient, accurately represents the overall patient motion. Patient movement is continuously monitored and repositioning is performed whenever patient movement exceeds the predefined tolerance limit. Monitored patient movements are recorded at a certain frequency. Recorded data are analyzed and compared with those of patients immobilized with the thermoplastic facemask plus the camera system that is the standard immobilization system in our clinic.

RESULTS

For three patients treated with the Vac Fix mold plus the camera system, on average, the histogram-based uncertainties, U(95)(5), U(95)(20), and mean displacement, R(mean) (mm) were 1.03, 1.08, and 0.60, respectively. These values are close to those obtained with the mask plus the camera system. The Vac Fix mold plus the camera system often requires more beam interruptions because of repositioning than the mask plus the camera system (on average, the Vac Fix mold plus the camera system required repositioning 7.7 times and the mask plus the camera system required repositioning 1.8 times during 20 treatments).

CONCLUSION

The Vac Fix mold immobilization procedure plus the camera monitoring system has been set up for patients who are claustrophobic or cannot tolerate a mask during head-and-neck IMRT. Although this system causes more frequent beam delivery interruptions, it is as effective as the mask plus the camera system in immobilizing patients within the tolerance limit.

A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The optimal treatment position for patients receiving radical radiation therapy for prostate cancer has been a source of controversy. To resolve this issue, we conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the effects of supine and prone positioning on organ motion, positioning errors, and dose to critical organs during escalated dose conformal irradiation for localized prostate cancer and patient and therapist satisfaction with setup technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty eight patients were randomized to commence treatment immobilized in the supine or prone position and were subsequently changed to the alternate positioning for the latter half of their treatment. Patients underwent CT simulation and conformal radiotherapy planning and treatment in both positions. The clinical target volume encompassed the prostate gland. Alternate day lateral port films were compared to corresponding simulator radiographs to measure the isocentre positioning errors (IPE). Prostate motion (PM) and total positioning error (TPE) were measured from the same films by the displacements of three implanted fiducial markers. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) for the two treatment positions were compared at the 95, 80 and 50% dose (D%) levels. The patients and radiation therapists completed weekly questionnaires regarding patient comfort and ease of setup.

RESULTS

Seven patients, who started in the supine position, subsequently refused prone position and received their whole treatment supine. Small bowel in the treatment volume, not present in the supine position, prevented one patient from being treated prone. PM in anterior posterior direction was statistically significantly less in the supine position (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in superior inferior PM for the two treatment positions. No statistically significant difference between supine and prone positioning was observed in isocentre positioning error (IPE) or total positioning error (TPE) due to a policy of daily pre-treatment correction. However, more pre-treatment corrections were required for patients in the prone position. The DVH analysis demonstrated larger volumes of the bladder wall, rectal wall and small bowel within the D95, D80 and D50% when comparing the planning target volumes (PTVs) actually treated for prone positioning. When the prone PTV was expanded to account for the greater PM encountered in that position, a statistically significant difference (P<0.007) was observed in favour of the supine position at all dose levels. In the prone position, four patients had small bowel within the 60 Gray (Gy) isodose and in the supine position, no patients had small bowel in the 60 or 38Gy volumes. Supine position was significantly more comfortable for the patients and setup was significantly easier for the radiation therapists. The median patient comfort score was 0.79 (Standard deviation (SD) 0.03) supine and 0.45 (SD 0.05) prone (P<0.001) The therapist convenience of setup was 0.80 (SD 0.016) supine and 0.54 (SD 0.025) prone (P<0.005). No statistically significant difference was seen for the other parameters studied.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated significantly less PM in the supine treatment position. There was no difference for either treatment position in IPE or TPE, however, more pre-treatment corrections were required in the prone position. Prone position required a larger PTV with resulting increased dose to critical organs. There were statistically significant improvements at all dose levels for small bowel, rectal wall and bladder wall doses in the supine position once corrections were made for differences in organ motion. Linear analogue scores of patient comfort and radiation therapist convenience demonstrated statistically significant improvement in favour of the supine position. Supine positioning has been adopted as the standard for conformal prostatic irradiation at our centre.

Evaluation of intrafraction patient movement for CNS and head & neck IMRT

Intrafraction patient motion is much more likely in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) than in conventional radiotherapy primarily due to longer beam delivery times in IMRT treatment. In this study, we evaluated the uncertainty of intrafraction patient displacement in CNS and head and neck IMRT patients. Immobilization is performed in three steps: (1) the patient is immobilized with thermoplastic facemask, (2) the patient displacement is monitored using a commercial stereotactic infrared IR camera (ExacTrac, BrainLab) during treatment, and (3) repositioning is carried out as needed. The displacement data were recorded during beam-on time for the entire treatment duration for 5 patients using the camera system. We used the concept of cumulative time versus patient position uncertainty, referred to as an uncertainty time histogram (UTH), to analyze the data. UTH is a plot of the accumulated time during which a patient stays within the corresponding movement uncertainty. The University of Florida immobilization procedure showed an effective immobilization capability for CNS and head and neck IMRT patients by keeping the patient displacement less than 1.5 mm for 95% of treatment time (1.43 mm for 1, and 1.02 mm for 1, and less than 1.0 mm for 3 patients). The maximum displacement was 2.0 mm.

Contemporary management of prostate cancer: a practice survey of Ontario genitourinary radiation oncologists

OBJECTIVE

To survey radiation oncology practice in the utilization of hormonal and radiation therapy in the primary, adjuvant and salvage treatment of localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genitourinary radiation oncologists practicing in Ontario were invited to participate in a practice survey examining staging, hormonal and radiation management, and radiation technique for a variety of common clinical scenarios. Background demographic information was collected on all respondents. The survey consisted of three cases relating to the hormonal/radiation management of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer as well as two adjuvant and one salvage post-prostatectomy scenarios. The survey response rate was 70% (26/37).

RESULTS

Clinicians were more likely to utilize laboratory and imaging studies for staging as the risk categorization increased. Low-risk disease was managed with radiation alone in 26/26 (70 Gy in 65%, 74-79.8 Gy in 35%). Intermediate-risk disease was managed with radiation (70 Gy in 46%, 74-79.8 Gy in 54%) with neoadjuvant hormones in 58%. All respondents managed high-risk disease with adjuvant hormones in addition to radiation therapy (70-71 Gy in 85%, and 76 Gy in 15%). In the pT3a, margin negative (PSA undetectable) scenario, most individuals would not recommend adjuvant radiation (73%). If margins were positive, 30% would still not recommend adjuvant radiation. In the salvage scenario (slowly rising PSA 4 years post-prostatectomy for pT2a close margin disease), all respondents would manage with radiation therapy. Hormones were not routinely recommended in the initial management of the adjuvant and salvage scenarios. Radiation doses utilized for both adjuvant and salvage treatment ranged from 60-70 Gy (median 66 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

General agreement exists for the management of low- and high-risk disease and in the post-prostatectomy salvage setting. Use of dose-escalation and neoadjuvant hormones in the intermediate-risk setting and use of post-prostatectomy adjuvant radiation in the pT3a scenarios varied among radiation oncologists. Current clinical practice in localized prostate cancer reflects the evolving information in the published medical literature.

A randomized trial evaluating rigid immobilization for pelvic irradiation

BACKGROUND

Accuracy and reproducibility of the patient's position is fundamental to the successful delivery of radiation therapy. In recent years, a number of pelvic immobilization techniques have been developed. Few have been evaluated in randomized trials, and many of these studies have produced contradictory and inconclusive results.

PURPOSE

To assess whether the use of rigid immobilization devices improve the accuracy and reproducibility of prostate irradiation to a clinically useful degree.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 100 patients receiving radical irradiation for either prostate or bladder cancer were randomized to be treated with or without the use of rigid immobilization (RI) devices. Of these, 96 patients were suitable for analysis. The control group consisted of the patients being simulated and treated in the prone position with no immobilization devices. Patients randomized to the immobilized arm were simulated and treated prone using a customized Uvex cast of the pelvis as well as ankle- and shoulder-stabilizing devices. Weekly orthogonal port films (PFs) were obtained for each patient. Using previously specified bone landmarks, we measured variations in the isocenter position on each PF compared with the simulation film. The assessors were unaware of the treatment assignment. Patient comfort, skin toxicity, and treatment times were recorded.

RESULTS

The average simulation-to-treatment deviation of the isocenter position was 8.5 mm in the control group and 6.2 mm in the immobilization group (p < 0.001). In the control arm, 30.9% of port films had isocenter deviations >10 mm compared with 10.6% in the immobilized arm (p = 0.001). For the control group, average deviations in the anteroposterior, right-left, and superior-inferior directions were 5.2 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.3 mm, respectively, compared with 2.9 mm, 2.1 mm, and 3.9 mm for the immobilized group (p = <0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.55). The RTOG skin reaction was greater with in patients with a cast (28% having Grade 2 toxicity vs. 10% in the control arm), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). Patients in both groups found the treatment position comfortable: 90% in the immobilized group and 87% in the control group scored the treatment position either reasonably or very comfortable. Treatment times were very similar between the two groups: the average treatment time was 15.5 min in the control group vs. 16.1 min in the immobilized group (p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of rigid immobilization improves the accuracy of treatment delivery for the prone position, especially in the anteroposterior direction. Of clinical importance, the number of major deviations >10 mm (that is, that would result in a geographic miss) was reduced from 31% to 11%.

[Target-volume and critical-organ delineation for conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer: experience of French dose-escalation trials]

The delineation of target volume and organs at risk depends on the organs definition, and on the modalities for the CT-scan acquisition. Inter-observer variability in the delineation may be large, especially when patient's anatomy is unusual. During the two french multicentric studies of conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, it was made an effort to harmonize the delineation of the target volumes and organs at risk. Two cases were proposed for delineation during two workshops. In the first case, the mean prostate volume was 46.5 mL (extreme: 31.7-61.3), the mean prostate and seminal vesicles volume was 74.7 mL (extreme: 59.6-80.3), the rectal and bladder walls varied respectively in proportion from 1 to 1.45 and from 1 to 1.16; in the second case, the mean prostate volume was 53.1 mL (extreme: 40.8-73.1), the volume of prostate plus seminal vesicles was 65.1 mL (extreme: 53.2-89), the rectal wall varied proportionally from 1 to 1, 24 and the vesical wall varied from 1 to 1.67. For participating centers to the french studies of dose escalation, a quality control of contours was performed to decrease the inter-observer variability. The ways to reduce the discrepancies of volumes delineation, between different observers, are discussed. A better quality of the CT images, use of urethral opacification, and consensual definition of clinical target volumes and organs at risk may contribute to that improvement.

Calculation of rotational setup error using the real-time tracking radiation therapy (RTRT) system and its application to the treatment of spinal schwannoma

PURPOSE

The efficacy of a prototypic fluoroscopic real-time tracking radiation therapy (RTRT) system using three gold markers (2 mm in diameter) for estimating translational error, rotational setup error, and the dose to normal structures was tested in 5 patients with spinal schwannoma and a phantom.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Translational error was calculated by comparing the actual position of the marker closest to the tumor to its planned position, and the rotational setup error was calculated using the three markers around the target. Theoretically, the actual coordinates can be adjusted to the planning coordinates by sequential rotation of gamma degrees around the z axis, beta degrees around the y axis, and alpha degrees around the x axis, in this order. We measured the accuracy of the rotational calculation using a phantom. Five patients with spinal schwannoma located at a minimum of 1-5 mm from the spinal cord were treated with RTRT. Three markers were inserted percutaneously into the paravertebral deep muscle in 3 patients and surgically into two consecutive vertebral bones in two other patients.

RESULTS

In the phantom study, the discrepancies between the actual and calculated rotational error were -0.1 +/- 0.5 degrees. The random error of rotation was 5.9, 4.6, and 3.1 degrees for alpha, beta, and gamma, respectively. The systematic error was 7.1, 6.6, and 3.0 degrees for alpha, beta, and gamma, respectively. The mean rotational setup error (0.2 +/- 2.2, -1.3 +/- 2.9, and -1.3 +/- 1.7 degrees for alpha, beta, and gamma, respectively) in 2 patients for whom surgical marker implantation was used was significantly smaller than that in 3 patients for whom percutaneous insertion was used (6.0 +/- 8.2, 2.7 +/- 5.9, and -2.1 +/- 4.6 degrees for alpha, beta, and gamma). Random translational setup error was significantly reduced by the RTRT setup (p < 0.0001). Systematic setup error was significantly reduced by the RTRT setup only in patients who received surgical implantation of the marker (p < 0.0001). The maximum dose to the spinal cord was estimated to be 40.6-50.3 Gy after consideration of the rotational setup error, vs. a planned maximum dose of 22.4-51.6 Gy.

CONCLUSION

The RTRT system employing three internal fiducial markers is useful to reduce translational setup error and to estimate the dose to the normal structures in consideration of the rotational setup error. Surgical implantation of the marker to the vertebral bone was shown to be sufficiently rigid for the calculation of the rotational setup error. Fractionated radiotherapy for spinal schwannoma using the RTRT system may well be an alternative or supplement to surgical treatment.

Clinical use of stereoscopic X-ray positioning of patients treated with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate accuracy and time requirements of a stereoscopic X-ray-based positioning system in patients receiving conformal radiotherapy to the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Setup errors of the isocenter with regard to the bony pelvis were measured by means of orthogonal verification films and compared to conventional positioning (using skin drawings and lasers) and infrared marker (IR) based positioning in each of 261 treatments. In each direction, the random error represents the standard deviation and the systematic error the absolute value of the mean position. Time measurements were done in 75 treatments.

RESULTS

Random errors with the X-ray positioning system in the anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and longitudinal direction were (average +/- 1 standard deviation) 2 +/- 0.6 mm, 1.7 +/- 0.6 mm, and 2.4 +/- 0.7 mm. The corresponding values of conventional as well as IR positioning were significantly higher (p < 0.01). Systematic errors for X-ray positioning were 1.1 +/- 1.2 mm AP, 0.6 +/- 0.5 mm laterally, and 1.5 +/- 1.6 mm longitudinally. Conventional and IR marker-based positioning showed significantly larger systematic errors AP and laterally, but longitudinally, the difference was not significant. Depending on the axis looked at, errors of >or=5 mm occurred in 2%-14% of treatments after X-ray positioning, 13%-29% using IR markers, and 28%-53% with conventional positioning. Total linac time for one treatment session was 14 min 51 s +/- 4 min 18 s, half of which was used for the X-ray-assisted positioning procedure.

CONCLUSION

X-ray-assisted patient positioning significantly improves setup accuracy, at the cost of an increased treatment time.

The use of a leg holder immobilisation device in 3D-conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a leg holder immobilisation device on patient positioning accuracy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients of similar age and stage of disease treated with curative external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer were included prospectively. Ten patients were sequentially allocated to one of the two groups, and treated either with or without a leg holder. Treatment set-up alignment accuracy was assessed with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).

RESULTS

Set-up accuracy was 0.3, 0.3 and 0.2 cm for patients with a leg holder, and 0.3, 0.4 and 0.2 cm for patients without a leg holder in the cranio-caudal, anterior-posterior and in the lateral positions, respectively. The difference is not significant. The repositioning accuracy of combined (sagittal and lateral) in-plane rotations on the other hand, was significantly improved with a leg holder device (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Set-up accuracy can be improved using a leg holder immobilisation device in terms of rotational movement accuracy, thus making on-line corrections more accurate using EPID in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Prostate gland motion and deformation caused by needle placement during brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the extent of edge and gland position changes caused by needle insertion in patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nineteen patients with T1-T3 prostate cancer were implanted with the real-time method by using a two-phase peripheral loading technique. Serial contours of the prostate at 5-mm intervals were acquired by the dose-planning system. All of the peripheral needles were then placed and spaced 5-10 mm apart by using the largest transverse ultrasound image as the reference plane. The position of the probe was relocated at the zero plane, and the difference between the preneedle and postneedle zero plane was recorded as the difference in the z axis. Axial ultrasound images were again acquired. The second set of captured images, which matched in number the first set, was contoured over the previously contoured preneedle images. Prostate gland deformation and displacement were determined by comparing the preneedle contoured image with the images captured after needle placement. Deformation was determined by calculating the differences between the edges of the gland as measured at the major axis of the gland (x and y planes). Displacement was determined by measuring the differences between the center positions of the two contoured structures. Deformation and displacement were determined on each acquired 5-mm image. Differences were compared by student's t test.

RESULTS

The mean preneedle prostate volume was 47 ml (range, 21.5-68.7 ml), compared with 48.1 ml (range, 19.4-80.3 ml; p = 0.228) after peripheral needle placement. A median of 16 (range, 12-19) peripheral needles were placed. The median change in the base position of the prostate was 1.5 cm (range of 0 to 3.0 cm; p = 0.0034). The mean x and y deformation was 6.8 mm (median, 7.9 mm; range, 4.3-8.1 mm) and 3.6 mm (median, 3.3 mm; range, 1.0-5.5 mm), respectively. The greatest deformation for any individual slice for x was 21.6 mm and for y was 15.3 mm. The mean number of slices that were found with a >2-, 5-, and 10-mm deformation in the x axis was 7 (range, 3-10), 4 (range, 1-3), and 1 (range, 0-4), respectively. Similar deformation in the y axis was found in 6 (range, 3-10), 2.5 (range, 0-6), and 0.3 (range, 0-2) slices. The mean x and y displacement was 1.9 mm (median, 1.8 mm; range, 0.3-6.6 mm) and 2.8 mm (median, 1.9 mm; range, 2-5.8 mm). The greatest displacement for any individual slice for x was 7 mm and for y was 10 mm. The mean number of slices with a displacement >2, 5, and 10 mm in the x axis was 5 (range, 1-10), 0.8 (range, 0-5), and 0, respectively. Similar displacement in the y axis was found in 5 (range, 0-9), 1.7 (range, 0-7), and 0 slices, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Placing most needles in the periphery results in a minimal prostate volume increase, suggesting little need to overplan the implant when this method is used. However, significant edge and gland position changes caused by the needle insertion did occur. These changes may explain some of the difficulty in reproducing the preplan and should be taken into consideration for all types of prostate brachytherapy planning.

IMRT clinical implementation: prostate and pelvic node irradiation using Helios and a 120-leaf multileaf collimator

Dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat prostate and pelvic nodes using the Varian 120-leaf Millennium multileaf collimator (MLC) has been implemented in our clinic. This paper describes the procedures that have been undertaken to achieve this, including some of the commissioning aspects of Helios, verification of the dynamic dose delivery, and quality assurance (QA) of the dose delivered to the patient. Commissioning of Helios included measurements of transmission through the 120-leaf MLC, which were found to be 1.7% for 6 mV and 1.8% for 10 MV. The rounded leaf edge effect, known as the dosimetric separation, was also determined using two independent methods. Values of 1.05 and 1.65 mm were obtained for 6 and 10 MV beams. Five test patients were planned for prostate and pelvic node irradiation to 70 and 50 Gy, respectively. Dose and fluence verification were carried out on specially designed phantoms and dose points in the prostate were measured to be within 2.0% (mean 0.9%, s.d. 0.6%) of the calculated dose and in the nodes within 3.0% (mean 1.6%, s.d. 1.1%). Following the results of this commissioning and implementation study, we have started to treat men with a target Volume including the prostate and pelvic nodes using Helios optimized dynamic IMRT delivery in a dose escalation protocol.

Immobilization devices for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans show radiation dose distribution that is highly conformal to the target volume. The successful clinical implementation of these radiotherapy modalities requires precise positioning of the target to avoid a geographical miss. Effective reduction in target positional inaccuracies can be achieved with the proper use of immobilization devices. This paper reviews some of the immobilization devices that have been used and/or have the potential of being used for IMRT. The immobilization devices being reviewed include stereotactic frame, Talon system, thermoplastic molds, Alpha Cradles, and Vac-Lok system. The implementation of these devices at various anatomical sites is discussed.