Does the standardized helmet technique lead to adequate coverage of the cribriform plate? An analysis of current practice with respect to the ICRU 50 report

Differences in Parotid Dosimetry and Expected Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities in Whole Brain Radiation Plans Covering C1 Versus C2

Objectives

There is no consensus standard regarding the placement of the inferior field border in whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) plans, with most providers choosing to cover the first versus (vs.) second cervical vertebrae (C1 vs. C2). We hypothesize that extending coverage to C2 may increase predicted rates of xerostomia.

Methods

Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation; two WBRT plans were then produced, one covering C2 and the other covering C1. The plans were otherwise standard, and patients were prescribed doses of 25, 30 and 37.5 gray (Gy). Dose-volume statistics were obtained and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were estimated using the Lyman-Burman-Kutcher model. Mean parotid dose and predicted xerostomia rates were compared for plans covering C2 vs. C1 using a two-sided patient-matched t-test. Plans were also evaluated to determine whether extending the lower field border to cover C2 would result in a violation of commonly accepted dosimetric planning constraints.

Results

The mean dose to both parotid glands was significantly higher in WBRT plans covering C2 compared to plans covering C1 for all dose prescriptions (p<0.01). Normal tissue complication probabilities were also significantly higher when covering C2 vs. C1, for all prescribed doses (p<0.01). Predicted median rates of xerostomia ranged from <0.03%-21% for plans covering C2 vs. <0.001%-12% for patients treated with plans covering C1 (p<0.01), dependent on the treatment dose and NTCP model. Plans covering C2 were unable to constrain at least one parotid to <20 Gy in 31% of plans vs. 9% of plans when C1 was covered. A total parotid dose constraint of <25 Gy was violated in 13% of plans covering C2 vs. 0% of plans covering C1.

Conclusions

Coverage of C2 significantly increases the mean parotid dose and predicted NTCPs and results in more frequent violation of commonly accepted dosimetric planning constraints.

Comparison of a new noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique for craniospinal irradiation with 3 coplanar techniques

When standard conformal x-ray technique for craniospinal irradiation is used, it is a challenge to achieve satisfactory dose coverage of the target including the area of the cribriform plate, while sparing organs at risk. We present a new intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), noncoplanar technique, for delivering irradiation to the cranial part and compare it with 3 other techniques and previously published results. A total of 13 patients who had previously received craniospinal irradiation with standard conformal x-ray technique were reviewed. New treatment plans were generated for each patient using the noncoplanar IMRT-based technique, a coplanar IMRT-based technique, and a coplanar volumetric-modulated arch therapy (VMAT) technique. Dosimetry data for all patients were compared with the corresponding data from the conventional treatment plans. The new noncoplanar IMRT technique substantially reduced the mean dose to organs at risk compared with the standard radiation technique. The 2 other coplanar techniques also reduced the mean dose to some of the critical organs. However, this reduction was not as substantial as the reduction obtained by the noncoplanar technique. Furthermore, compared with the standard technique, the IMRT techniques reduced the total calculated radiation dose that was delivered to the normal tissue, whereas the VMAT technique increased this dose. Additionally, the coverage of the target was significantly improved by the noncoplanar IMRT technique. Compared with the standard technique, the coplanar IMRT and the VMAT technique did not improve the coverage of the target significantly. All the new planning techniques increased the number of monitor units (MU) used-the noncoplanar IMRT technique by 99%, the coplanar IMRT technique by 122%, and the VMAT technique by 26%-causing concern for leak radiation. The noncoplanar IMRT technique covered the target better and decreased doses to organs at risk compared with the other techniques. All the new techniques increased the number of MU compared with the standard technique.

Patterns of failure in children with medulloblastoma treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma is one of the most complex techniques employed in radiotherapy. Many reports stress the impact of irradiation quality on survival in these patients. Our report presents the outcome and patterns of failure for 95 patients treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1998 to 2003, 95 children with medulloblastoma received 3D conformal radiotherapy. All of them were previously treated with surgery and chemotherapy. The brain and upper spinal cord were treated with two lateral 6MV photon fields. In four patients, the cribriform plate was irradiated by the additional field. For primary tumour bed we applied two or three photon beams. Spinal cord was irradiated either with 18-20MeV electron fields or with a mixed beam.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 48 months, 32/95 patients suffered a multifocal (21) or isolated (11) recurrence. We evaluated every primary site of failure. In all patients, the recurrence appeared within the isodose level of 95-100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of failure in medulloblastoma patients treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy indicated that the relapse was mainly associated with poor response to pre-irradiation chemotherapy. We believe that 3D conformal radiotherapy allows avoiding failures, related to radiotherapy uncertainties.

Correlation of 3D-planned and measured dosimetry of photon and electron craniospinal radiation in a pediatric anthropomorphic phantom

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Improved radiotherapy techniques in pediatric craniospinal therapy (CSRT) strive to reduce risks of late morbidity. Using a pediatric anthropomorphic phantom, this research correlated measured target and normal tissue dose to that predicted from a 3D planning system (3D-RTP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A pediatric anthropomorphic phantom was planned following French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP) protocols. Thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) were used to perform dosimetric measurements during treatment. 4 and 6MV photon fields with multi leaf collimation (MLC) or custom blocks were compared to 3D-RTP computer (ADAC Pinnacle) predictions for cranial fields. Spinal dosimetry was studied using photons (4 and 6MV) and electrons (9 and 12MeV).

RESULTS

3D-RTP predictions generally concurred with dose received in cranial and spinal sites. The measured dose was over-predicted significantly by the 3D-RTP in the anterior cranial fossa. Normal tissue doses were reduced when treating the spine using megavoltage electron beams instead of photons.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating the spinal field with electrons minimises the risk of pulmonary sequelae, however electron energy selection is critical to achieve adequate spinal field coverage. Despite adhering to a major trial protocol guideline, dose at the floor of the anterior cranial fossa remains a potential clinical problem and 3D-RTP do not predict this well.

Coverage of anterior fossa in whole-brain irradiation

PURPOSE

Whole-brain irradiation is indispensable in the treatment of several brain tumors and requires coverage of the entire subarachnoid space. Retrospective studies have revealed frequent recurrences in the frontobasal fossa above the cribriform plate (CP). We sought to determine how accurately the latter could actually be identified on lateral radiographs such as those used for radiotherapy planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The CP was localized by five radiation oncologists and five radiologists on lateral radiographs of 30 human skulls from an anatomic collection. Reference radiographs were acquired under identical conditions except for lead markers pointing to the CP and the ethmoid cells. The targeting accuracy was analyzed.

RESULTS

In 39% (n = 116), the location of the CP was correctly estimated within 2 mm. Mislocations of 2-5, 5-10, and >10 mm were noted in 34% (n = 102), 20% (n = 61), and 7% (n = 21), respectively. Neither specialty nor experience (years of training) exerted a significant influence on targeting accuracy. If the roofs of the ethmoid cells formed prominent bony edges, they were mistaken for the CP in 37%.

CONCLUSION

Lateral radiographs provide insufficient information to locate the CP accurately in whole brain irradiation. Additionally, localization was significantly impaired by prominent ethmoid cells.

Medulloblastoma in childhood: Impact of radiation technique upon the outcome of treatment

BACKGROUND

Medulloblastoma is an infratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumour, diagnosed in paediatric population. The radiotherapy is an essential method of treatment for these tumours. The impact of technical quality of radiation therapy on survival was recently considered. In this study treatment-related variables are analysed with a special focus on radiotherapy technical factors.

PROCEDURE

The population of 158 children with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma had been undergoing postoperative radiotherapy at MCMCC in Warsaw in the period 1983-1997. The medical data of these patients were analysed. Simulation films of the whole-brain irradiation fields were retrospectively reviewed at 112 patients. The distance from the field margin to the cribriform plate and to the floor of the temporal fossa was assessed and correlated with supratentorial relapse.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease free survival (DFS) were 46% and 40%, respectively. In multivariate analysis gender (P = 0.008), neurological status before radiotherapy (P = 0.029), M-stage (P < 0.001) and sequence of craniospinal irradiation (P = 0.019) were significant prognostic factors for OS. For DFS significant factors were M-stage (P < 0.001) and neurological status (P < 0.001). The cranial fields were not fully correctly covered at 43% patients. The field incorrectness was correlated with isolated supratentorial failure (P = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are similar to those published in literature. M0-stage was the most powerful favourable prognostic factor. Male gender and neurological status before radiation treatment were associated with poor survival. Also protracted radiotherapy and quality of radiation technique may have an impact on the outcome.

An evaluation of the relationship between the quality of prophylactic cranial radiotherapy in childhood acute leukemia and institutional experience: a Quality Assurance Review Center-Pediatric Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

The Pediatric Oncology Group Protocol 9404 was a prospective clinical trial of two forms of chemotherapy in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and advanced stage T-cell lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The protocol called for prophylactic C1 whole brain external beam irradiation, 18 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction for 9 fractions. We hypothesized that a correlation would be found between the number of children irradiated on protocol by an institution and the compliance rate of that institution with radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) guidelines. We also hypothesized that QA compliance would improve as the study progressed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We scored the radiation dose as a minor deviation from protocol guidelines if the dose to the prescription point differed from the protocol by 6-10%, and a major deviation if it differed from protocol by > 10%. Treatment volumes were scored as a minor deviation if the margins were less than specified or the fields were excessively large. A major deviation was defined as the transection of a potential leukemia-bearing volume such as would be caused by blocking the cribriform plate, optic nerve, or temporal lobe. When the treating physician submitted a treatment plan and simulator film at the initiation of therapy to the Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC), a rapid turn-around review of the plan and suggestions for improvement was provided. At the end of therapy, all simulator and port films were reviewed at the QARC.

RESULTS

We reviewed the data from 353 patients treated at 73 institutions in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Of these patients, 2% (n = 7) were not assessable for QA because of incomplete information. Minor quality deviations were found in 27.7% of patients (n = 98) and major deviations in 7.9% (n = 28). The frequency of major deviations for institutions placing 1-4 patients on study was 11% vs. 5.5% for institutions placing > or =5 patients (p < 0.09). The frequency of minor deviations was 28.6% for institutions placing 1-4 patients on study vs. 27.1% for institutions placing >5 patients (p not significant). The frequency of major deviations fell over time (1996-1997, 15.5% vs. 1998-2001, 4.7%, p < 0.001). The frequency of minor deviations did not (1996-1997, 29.9% vs. 1998-2001, 26.9%, p not significant).

CONCLUSION

For a relatively simple radiotherapy field, with clearly written protocol guidelines and rapid turn-around corrections from QARC, the rate of minor deviations was no different between institutions placing 1-4 patients on study and those placing > or =5. A trend (p < 0.09) was noted, however, for major deviations to decrease as a function of institutional experience, as well as over time (p < 0.001), supporting the validity of the hypothesis that pediatric clinical experience matters in QA for C1 whole brain leukemia radiotherapy.