To move or not to move: measurements of prostate motion by urethrography using MRI

The Utility of Penile Bulb Contouring to Localise the Prostate Apex as Compared to Urethrography

PURPOSE

High-precision radiotherapy relies on accurate anatomic localisation. Urethrography is often used to localise the prostatic apex. However, urethrography is an invasive localisation procedure and may introduce a systemic error. The penile bulb (PB) is contoured to minimise the risk of erectile dysfunction. The purpose of this study is to assess the value of using the PB, as an alternative to urethrography, to localise the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The PB was localised on 10 patients treated with simplified intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy at computed tomography simulation during treatment weeks 1 and 7. All patients underwent placement of fiducial markers. Urethrography was used only at simulation. Distances from the superior PB contour to the inferior prostate contour, the apex fiducial marker, and to the inferior prostate contour were obtained as well. The PB was contoured by two observers independently. Agreement coefficients and analysis of variance were used to assess reliability between rates and consistency of measurements over time.

RESULTS

The PB-apex distance was greater than or equal to the urethrogram-apex distance in 24/30 (80%) measurements, and the median difference was 3 mm and was consistent between raters. The greatest variation in PB-IM distance between weeks was 6 mm, the median was 3 mm, and the agreements of measurements between weeks for raters 1 and 2 were 0.79 and 0.69, respectively. These differences were not statistically different and were consistent with the computed tomography slice thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

The PB can be used to identify the prostate apex and can be reliably contoured between observers. Measurements are consistent between patients and through the duration of treatment. The PB distance measurements support studies indicating that urethrography causes a shift of the prostate superiorly. The distance from the PB to prostate apex remains stable during treatment for individual patients but varies between patients.

Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image-guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation

In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image-guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior-posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior-inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system.

Radiothérapie pelvienne pour récidive biochimique isolée après prostatectomie pour cancer de prostate : quels volumes ?

After prostatectomy, radiotherapy is a potential curable treatment. From the surgery series, it is possible to identify all the localization at risk in case of biochemical relapse after prostatectomy. The target volume of irradiation has to be defined according to the pathological findings. The CTV is limited to the pelvic fascia laterally, to the anterior wall of the rectum behind. The inferior limit includes the anastomosis, and the superior is easier to define with the length of the prostatic gland. The inclusion of area of seminal vesicles and pelvic node areas should be discussed. The use of surgical clips on the anastomosis and image fusionning techniques including the preoperative imaging would help physicians to define the CTV's limits.

Prostate movement during simulation resulting from retrograde urethrogram compared with “natural” prostate movement

PURPOSE

Retrograde urethrography (UG) is commonly used at the time of simulation to assist in defining the prostate apex. Some investigators have reported that performing the UG introduces error by causing prostate displacement. We investigate the movement of the prostate caused by the retrograde UG.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-four patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer who had gold marker seeds placed into their prostates were studied. Marker seed locations at the time of simulation and on the portal images acquired just before the treatment were compared with the locations on digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR). Movement in the superior-inferior and anteroposterior directions as seen on lateral images was measured from 402 portal images by offline customized imaging software and evaluated using analysis of variance methods for continuous variables and chi-square statistics for categoric variables.

RESULTS

"Natural" nonrandom movement of the prostate around an "origin" as defined by markers on DRR was observed. This movement tends to be in a superior and anterior direction, with the average shift being 1 mm and 0.82 mm, respectively. The magnitude of movement in the superior direction averaged 2.88 mm compared with 1.64 mm in the inferior direction (p = 0.04). There was slightly greater movement after the UG compared with mean "natural" movement but the difference was less than 3 mm in either direction on average (difference: superior-inferior = 2.64 mm, p = 0.004; anteroposterior = 2.24, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the UG induces a small but clinically insignificant displacement of the prostate when "natural" movement is taken into account.

An Evaluation of Beam Cath®in the Verification Process for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy

AIMS

As the trend towards more conformal treatment continues, the accuracy of treatment delivery becomes more important. Conventionally, treatment set-up for prostate cancer patients is verified in relation to the bony anatomy. However, there can be prostate movement independent of bony anatomy. This study tested the feasibility of using Beam cath to enable online correction of treatment set-up in relation to the prostate position, and to assess inter-fraction and intra-fraction prostate movement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Beam cath is a urethral catheter containing radio-opaque markers, which can be seen on electronic portal imaging, enabling verification of prostate rather than bony anatomy position. The Beam cath was used for planning and treatment of a boost phase of 10 Gy in 5 fractions, delivered before the conventional conformal plan of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Patients were scanned by computed tomgography (CT), with and without the catheter, and a radio-opaque marker in the catheter was used as the isocentre of the boost phase to enable accurate and rapid pre-treatment isocentre adjustment. The set-up errors between the Beam Cath and bony images were compared to identify the magnitude of prostate movement, independent of bony anatomy. Post-treatment portal images were taken to assess intra-fraction prostate movement.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients approached to take part in the study, 18 patients gave informed consent, but only five completed the intended 5 fractions of the boost phase using Beam cath. Pre- and post-treatment portal images were obtained for a total of 29 fractions in six patients. Inter-fraction prostate movement, independent of bony anatomy, was identified. The mean movements were 0.2 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.2 mm), 2.9 mm (SD 3.1 mm) and 0.7 mm (SD 2.3 mm) in the right left (RL), cranio-caudal (CC) and anterior posterior (AP) direction, respectively. The mean intra-fraction movement was 0.2 mm (SD 1.2 mm), 2.9 mm (SD 3.1 mm) and 0.7 mm (SD 2.3 mm) in the RL, CC and AP direction, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although independent prostate movement was identified, the use of Beam cath was poorly tolerated. Alternative methods of identifying and correcting for prostate movement should be investigated.

Bulb of penis as a marker for prostatic apex in external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between the bulb of the penis and the peak of the urethrogram, and to compare this measurement with the ischial tuberosities (ITs) to peak distance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Pelvic CT scans from 50 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer were analyzed to identify the penile bulb. Each patient was required to undergo retrograde urethrography during CT-based treatment planning with 3-mm slices. The peak of the urethrogram was defined as the last CT slice in which the contrast dye in the urethra could be visualized. Measurements were taken from the slice containing the most superior aspect of the penile bulb to the last slice of the urethrogram peak. The superior aspect of the penile bulb was defined as the CT slice nearest the peak that contained a bulbous structure at the base of the penis. This distance was defined as the bulb-peak distance. Similarly, the IT-peak distance was recorded for comparison.

RESULTS

The mean bulb-peak and IT-peak distances were calculated for 47 of 50 patients. The peak of the urethrogram was unable to be evaluated in 3 patients. The mean, median, and range bulb-peak distance was 2.4 mm (SD 1.8), 3 mm, and 0-6 mm, respectively. The mean, median, and range IT-peak distance was 20.1 mm (SD 6.6), 21 mm, and 6-33 mm, respectively. No patient had the bulb located above the apex of the urethrogram.

CONCLUSION

The bulb of the penis is a relatively consistent soft-tissue landmark compared with the ITs and is located an average of 3 mm below the peak of the urethrogram. Therefore, the bulb of the penis is another landmark for the identification of the prostatic apex and is less invasive than retrograde urethrography.

[Target-volume and critical-organ delineation for conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer: experience of French dose-escalation trials]

The delineation of target volume and organs at risk depends on the organs definition, and on the modalities for the CT-scan acquisition. Inter-observer variability in the delineation may be large, especially when patient's anatomy is unusual. During the two french multicentric studies of conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, it was made an effort to harmonize the delineation of the target volumes and organs at risk. Two cases were proposed for delineation during two workshops. In the first case, the mean prostate volume was 46.5 mL (extreme: 31.7-61.3), the mean prostate and seminal vesicles volume was 74.7 mL (extreme: 59.6-80.3), the rectal and bladder walls varied respectively in proportion from 1 to 1.45 and from 1 to 1.16; in the second case, the mean prostate volume was 53.1 mL (extreme: 40.8-73.1), the volume of prostate plus seminal vesicles was 65.1 mL (extreme: 53.2-89), the rectal wall varied proportionally from 1 to 1, 24 and the vesical wall varied from 1 to 1.67. For participating centers to the french studies of dose escalation, a quality control of contours was performed to decrease the inter-observer variability. The ways to reduce the discrepancies of volumes delineation, between different observers, are discussed. A better quality of the CT images, use of urethral opacification, and consensual definition of clinical target volumes and organs at risk may contribute to that improvement.

[Conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: for whom and how?]

External radiotherapy is one of the modalities used to cure localized prostate carcinoma. Most of localized prostate carcinomas, specially those of the intermediate prognostic group, may benefit from escalated dose above 70 Gy at least as regard biochemical and clinical relapse free survival. 3D-CRT allows a reduction of the dose received by organs at risk and an increase of prostate dose over 70 Gy. It is on the way to become a standard. Intensity modulated radiation therapy increases dose homogeneity and reduces rectal dose. These methods necessitate rigorous procedures in reproducibility, delineation of volumes, dosimetry, daily treatment. They need also technological and human means. It is clear that localized prostate cancer is a good example for evaluation of these new radiotherapy modalities.

Computed tomography determination of prostate volume and maximum dimensions: a study of interobserver variability

OBJECTIVE

(1) To evaluate the reproducibility of prostate volume, maximum dimensions and geometrical center coordinates determination using computed tomography (CT) and (2) to identify patterns of interobserver variability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients, suitable for our brachytherapy program, were selected for the study. All patients underwent CT scanning and the prostate volumes were determined by three radiation oncologists. Measurements of geometrical center coordinates, maximum organ dimensions in the anterior-posterior (AP), lateral (Lat) and longitudinal (Long) axes as well as prostate volumes were recorded. This yielded 840 measurements of seven variables for analysis. The means and corresponding standard deviations (SD) of each variable were calculated for each patient. The SDs were then averaged and presented as indices of dispersion. Average variations from the mean were also calculated for each observer along with the SDs.

RESULTS

Analysis of the geometrical center coordinates revealed acceptable variability amongst observers. For the AP, Lat and Long coordinates the SDs were 0.78, 0.89 and 1.72 mm, respectively. The corresponding values for the maximum organ dimensions were 2.54, 2.72 and 4.43 mm, respectively. While the volumes outlined by observer B were less than or equal to the mean in 95% of cases and those of observer C were greater than or equal to the mean in 93% of cases, the volumes of observer A were equally distributed above and below the mean (48% in both cases).

CONCLUSION

The determination of the geometrical center coordinates was reproducible amongst observers. The largest variations were seen with the Long axis. The volume determination is more variable. However, a characteristic trend was seen amongst observers when their volumes were compared to the mean volumes of the group.