Accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant boost for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas

Tumour volumes: Predictors of early treatment response in locally advanced head and neck cancers treated with definitive chemoradiation

AIM

To analyse and predict early response 3 months post definitive chemoradiation (CCRT) utilising tumour volume (TV) measurement in locally advanced head and neck cancers (LAHNC).

BACKGROUND

LAHNC are 3-dimentional lesions. The largest diameter of these tumours measured for T-classification may not necessarily reflect the true tumour dimensions. TV accurately reflects the tumour burden because it is a measurement of tumour burden in all three dimensions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It is a single institutional prospective study including 101 patients with LAHNC treated with definitive CCRT. TV data noted were primary tumour volume (PTV), total nodal volume (TNV) and total tumour volume (TTV). Response evaluation was done at 3 months after the completion of definitive CCRT and patients were categorised either having achieved complete response (CR) or residual disease.

RESULTS

Patients who had not achieved CR were found to have larger TV compared with those who had achieved CR. There were significant inverse correlations between PTV and response (median 16.37 cm(3) vs. 45.2 cm(3); p = 0.001), and between TTV and response (median 36.14 cm(3) vs. 66.06 cm(3); p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an "optimal cut-off" value of 41 cm(3) for PTV and 42 cm(3) for TTV above and below which the magnitude of difference in response was the greatest.

CONCLUSIONS

If response evaluation 3 months post CCRT is to be predicted it is simply not enough to measure the largest single dimension of the tumour. TV seems to be a better and more accurate reflection of the true total tumour burden or extent of the disease.

Prognostic significance of radiologically determined neck node volume in head and neck cancer: a systematic review

This systematic review addresses the prognostic significance of neck node volume in head and neck cancer. Primary tumor volume evolved as an independent significant factor for survival in head and neck cancer patients. Besides primary tumor volume, multiple prognostic features related to the regional lymph nodes were studied in literature. In literature, some authors showed the significance of total tumor volume/nodal volume for survival and loco-regional control. Articles reporting prognosis and survival in nodal tumor volumes were collected by systematically reviewing publications listed in the Pubmed and Embase databases. Publications were included when they at least reported on total tumor volume (TTV) or nodal volume and survival. In this systematic review we studied 21 articles. For measurement of nodal volume different formulas were used. Until now, there's no clear statistical evidence for the use of either TTV or nodal volume versus primary tumor volume to predict the individual loco-regional control or survival after treatment. There is wide variety of tumor measuring systems in the literature. The cut-off value for local tumor response also shows large variation. Firstly consensus should be accomplished on standardization of volume measurements, preferably automatic, and secondly large study groups are needed with identical treatment modalities to further unravel the role of neck node volume as separate staging tool.

A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to assess the literature for prevalence, severity, and impact on quality of life of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies.

METHODS

The electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles published in English since the 1989 NIH Development Consensus Conference on the Oral Complications of Cancer Therapies until 2008 inclusive. Two independent reviewers extracted information regarding study design, study population, interventions, outcome measures, results and conclusions for each article.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 184 articles covering salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by conventional, 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients, cancer chemotherapy, total body irradiation/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, radioactive iodine treatment, and immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia are induced by radiotherapy in the head and neck region depending on the cumulative radiation dose to the gland tissue. Treatment focus should be on optimized/new approaches to further reduce the dose to the parotids, and particularly submandibular and minor salivary glands, as these glands are major contributors to moistening of oral tissues. Other cancer treatments also induce salivary gland hypofunction, although to a lesser severity, and in the case of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, the adverse effect is temporary. Fields of sparse literature included pediatric cancer populations, cancer chemotherapy, radioactive iodine treatment, total body irradiation/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and immunotherapy.

Influence of intravenous amifostine on xerostomia, tumor control, and survival after radiotherapy for head-and- neck cancer: 2-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, phase III trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate chronic xerostomia and tumor control 18 and 24 months after initial treatment with amifostine in a randomized controlled trial of patients with head-and-neck cancer; at 12 months after radiotherapy (RT), amifostine had been shown to reduce xerostomia without changing tumor control.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Adults with head-and-neck cancer who underwent once-daily RT for 5-7 weeks (total dose, 50-70 Gy) received either open-label amifostine (200 mg/m2 i.v.) 15-30 min before each fraction of radiation (n = 150) or RT alone (control; n = 153).

RESULTS

Amifostine administration was associated with a reduced incidence of Grade > or =2 xerostomia over 2 years of follow-up (p = 0.002), an increase in the proportion of patients with meaningful (>0.1 g) unstimulated saliva production at 24 months (p = 0.011), and reduced mouth dryness scores on a patient benefit questionnaire at 24 months (p < 0.001). Locoregional control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not significantly different between the amifostine group and the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Amifostine administration during head-and-neck RT reduces the severity and duration of xerostomia 2 years after treatment and does not seem to compromise locoregional control rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival.

Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas: II—clinical results

PURPOSE

To perform a Phase I radiation dose-escalation trial to determine the maximal tolerable dose (MTD) deliverable to the gross tumor volume (GTV) using an accelerated fractionation with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy regimen with parotid gland sparing as the sole therapy in the treatment of locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. The primary objective was the definition of the MTD using established criteria of quantifying acute dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary objectives included analysis of failure patterns, tumor control rates, and toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between July 1999 and June 2002, eligible patients with bulky Stage II to Stage IVB head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma, excluding laryngeal primaries, were enrolled. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was delivered with 6-MV photons using a "sliding-window" technique. Enrollment of 6 patients for each dose level was planned; if DLTs were seen in >2 of 6 patients, the previous dose was to be expanded by an additional 6 patients to confirm that dose level as the MTD. All schedules administered a total of 30 fractions, but with escalating doses per fraction (2.27, 2.36, and 2.46 Gy) to achieve a total dose to the GTV of 68.1, 70.8, and 73.8 Gy, respectively. The remaining target tissues were constrained to receive the same dose in all patients regardless of the GTV dose level. The clinical target volume, defined as tissue within 1 cm around the GTV (at high risk of subclinical disease), received 60 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.0 Gy. The electively irradiated target volume, defined as the clinically uninvolved lymph node-bearing tissues, received 54 Gy in 30 fractions of 1.8 Gy. The parotid glands were spared to the degree possible without compromising target coverage. Acute toxicity was scored weekly using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. DLT was defined as any Grade 4 acute toxicity or any acute toxicity requiring either a dose reduction or a treatment break of >5 treatment days.

RESULTS

Of 18 men and 2 women (average age, 57 years; range, 37-80 years), 17 presented with oropharyngeal primary tumors, and 1 each with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, nasopharynx, and hypopharynx. None of the 6 patients at dose level 1, and 2 of the 6 patients initially enrolled at dose level 2, developed DLT. Both patients treated at dose level 3 required a 3-day treatment break and dose reduction after rapid development of Grade 3 toxicity (by Day 15). Six additional confirmatory patients subsequently enrolled at dose level 2 completed treatment without DLT. At least 50% of the total parotid gland volume received <30 Gy in 14 patients (average, 54% of volume), with an average mean dose of 32 Gy. In contrast, >/=50% of the distal parotid gland volume received <25 Gy in 15 patients (average, 63% of volume), with an average mean dose of 24 Gy. With a median follow-up of 20 months from the date of enrollment and 28 months for surviving patients, the actuarial 2-year local control (primary site), regional control (nodal sites), and distant control rate was 76.3%, 66.7%, and 71.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dose level 2, 70.8 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.36 Gy, was defined as the MTD deliverable to the GTV using this accelerated fractionation with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy regimen with parotid gland sparing as the sole treatment for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Adequate parotid sparing was achievable in most cases. Early toxicity, tumor control, and survival rates compared favorably with the outcomes after other accelerated regimens.