High-dose whole abdominal and pelvic irradiation for treatment of ovarian carcinoma: long-term toxicity and outcomes

Is It Time to Reassess the Role of Radiotherapy Treatment in Ovarian Cancer?

With a 5-year survival rate of fewer than 50%, epithelial ovarian carcinoma is the most fatal of the gynecologic cancers. Each year, an estimated 22,000 women are diagnosed with the condition, with 14,000 dying as a result, in the United States. Over the last decade, the advent of molecular and genetic data has enhanced our understanding of the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer. More than 80% of women diagnosed with advanced illness have an initial full response to rigorous therapy at diagnosis, including surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, these responses are infrequently lasting, and the majority of women with ovarian cancer suffer recurrent disease, which is often incurable, despite the possibility of future response and months of survival. And what therapeutic weapons do we have to counter it? For many years, radiation therapy for ovarian tumors was disregarded as an effective treatment option due to its toxicity and lack of survival benefits. Chemotherapy is widely used following surgery, and it has nearly completely supplanted radiation therapy. Even with the use of more modern and efficient chemotherapy regimens, ovarian cancer failures still happen. After receiving first-line ovarian cancer chemotherapy, over 70% of patients show evidence of recurrence in the abdomen or pelvis. It is necessary to reinterpret the function of radiation therapy in light of recent technological developments, the sophistication of radiation procedures, and the molecular and biological understanding of various histological subtypes. This review article focuses on the literature on the use of radiation in ovarian tumors as well as its rationale and current indications.

Paeonol enhances the sensitivity of human ovarian cancer cells to radiotherapy-induced apoptosis due to downregulation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt/phosphatase and tensin homolog pathway and inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor

Radiotherapy is a vital and effective method to treat solid tumors. However, in many tumor types, development of resistance of cancer cells and cytotoxicity in normal tissues presents a major therapeutic problem. It is therefore crucial to identify and develop novel sensitizing agents that may improve the response to radiation therapy without causing any adverse effects. The present study aimed to investigate whether paeonol, a bioactive flavonoid, was able to confer sensitivity to radiation in human ovarian cancer cells. The human ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3 were exposed to varying doses of radiation (2, 4 or 6 Gy) in the presence or absence of paeonol (25, 50 or 100 µM). Radiosensitivity was assessed by measuring cell viability using a CCK-8 assay and Annexin V/PI staining. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), proteins of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway and apoptotic pathway proteins [caspase-3, Bcl-2-associated death promoter, B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-2, Bcl-2-associated X and Bcl-extra large (Bcl-xL)] were also assessed. Paeonol treatment enhanced apoptosis of SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3 cells that were exposed to radiation. The expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL were markedly upregulated in these cells. Treatment with paeonol concentrations of 50 and 100 µM caused a significant downregulation of VEGF, HIF-1α and PI3K/Akt pathway proteins. Paeonol effectively enhanced the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to radiation by significantly altering regulation of the proteins of the PI3K/Akt pathway, in addition to downregulating VEGF and HIF-1α.

Adjuvant Intensity Modulated Whole-Abdominal Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Patients With Ovarian Cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage III): First Results of a Prospective Phase 2 Study

PURPOSE

To assess treatment tolerance and toxicity rates of consolidative whole-abdominal radiation therapy (WART) following cytoreductive surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in high-risk patients with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III) using intensity modulated radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The OVAR-IMRT-02 study is a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Twenty patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III) with complete remission after chemotherapy were treated with intensity modulated WART as a consolidation therapy. A total dose of 30 Gy in 20 fractions of 1.5 Gy was applied to the entire peritoneal cavity. The primary endpoint was treatment tolerability, defined as lack of any Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 toxicity within 10 weeks after start of treatment; secondary objectives were acute and chronic toxicity, quality of life, rates of therapy disruption and abortion, and progression-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Intensity modulated WART resulted in excellent coverage of the whole peritoneal cavity, with effective sparing of all organs at risk. The primary analysis included all 20 enrolled patients, of whom 19 did not experience Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 toxicity. Only 1 patient experienced acute grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Thus, the tolerability rate of intensity modulated WART was significantly higher than 70%. No gastrointestinal acute toxicities higher than grade 2 have been observed. During WART, mean global health status decreased by 18.1 points (95% confidence interval 7.1, 29.0). Six weeks after WART, global health status had already increased, with a mean score difference of 4.6 (95% confidence interval -11.1, 20.4) compared with baseline. Similar characteristics were observed for all function scale scores.

CONCLUSION

Intensity modulated WART after aggressive surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with an acceptable risk of acute toxicity and a treatment tolerability rate significantly higher than 70%. Together with our knowledge about clinical feasibility, meaning excellent coverage of the planning target volume and effective sparing of organs at risk, intensity modulated WART could offer a new therapeutic option for consolidation treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Patterns of recurrence and role of pelvic radiotherapy in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE(S)

The aims of this study were to analyze patterns of recurrence in patients with ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCA) and to evaluate the role of pelvic radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients with ovarian CCA treated at a single institution between 1989 and 2012 were identified, and their medical records were reviewed. Eligibility criteria included histologic diagnosis of pure CCA of the ovary, surgical staging for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-to-IIIC disease, and adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Selected end points were 3-, 5-, and 8-year cumulative incidence of pelvic recurrence (CIPR).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients met eligibility criteria. Most received intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel for a median of 6 cycles. Six patients (10.7%) received pelvic RT, and 50 (89.3%) did not. Pelvic RT patients had stage I-to-IIC disease. Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 1-69 months). For the group as a whole, 14 patients (25%) had initial disease recurrence involving the pelvis, whereas 6 (10.7%) had first recurrence outside the pelvis. Three-, 5- and 8-year CIPR were 28.2%, 38.5%, and 43.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 3-, 5-, or 8-year CIPR between the group of patients receiving RT (20%, 20%, and 20%) and a group of patients with stages I to IIC who did not receive RT (9.9%, 22.4%, and 30.2%), P = 0.22. During RT, patients developed mild grade 1-to-2 side effects. After RT, 1 patient developed lower extremity lymphedema with recurrent cellulitis. One patient who developed small bowel obstruction before RT developed small bowel radiation enteritis and obstruction after RT, ultimately requiring surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that ovarian CCA exhibits a propensity for pelvic recurrence after surgery and chemotherapy. RT, a local treatment that can effectively sterilize microscopic tumor cells, may benefit patients with this disease. Prospective studies with sufficient statistical power are warranted to further evaluate the role of RT.

Successful salvage treatment of myxoid liposarcoma with multiple peritoneal seeding using helical tomotherapy-based intraperitoneal radiotherapy: a case report

Background

Myxoid liposarcoma is the most common soft-tissue sarcoma that metastasizes to the peritoneal cavity. Recently, an advanced intensity-modulated radiotherapy, known as helical tomotherapy, has been introduced to improve target coverage, while reducing normal tissue radiation. Here, we report a case of myxoid liposarcoma with multiple peritoneal seeding that was chemotherapy-refractory, but was successfully salvaged by helical tomotherapy-based intraperitoneal radiotherapy.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old East-Asian male was initially diagnosed with myxoid liposarcoma in his left thigh by excision. Six years later, the patient underwent a left pneumonectomy for metastatic myxoid liposarcoma in the left lung. Since then, the patient was treated with two segmental resections, and multiple lines of chemotherapy, for repeated recurrences in the peritoneal cavity. The patient underwent intraperitoneal radiotherapy followed by tumor boost radiotherapy, as salvage treatment for chemotherapy-resistant metastatic peritoneal myxoid liposarcoma. The prescribed dose was 24 Gy delivered in 15 fractions of 1.6 Gy over 3 weeks, followed by a 16 Gy boost dose administered in eight fractions of 2 Gy, to multifocal peritoneal lesions. A positron emission tomography scan obtained 8 weeks after completion of radiotherapy, showed a complete metabolic response of metastatic peritoneal lesions. Radiotherapy was well tolerated, without any side effects. In a computed tomography scan obtained 20 weeks after completion of radiotherapy, most of the peritoneal metastatic lesions had disappeared, except for two small residual nodules.

Conclusion

This case suggests that low fraction-sized intraperitoneal radiotherapy (1.6 Gy administered once daily), followed by a focal boost using helical tomotherapy, is a feasible treatment without side effects. It produced an excellent tumor response, and durable intraperitoneal control for metastatic peritoneal myxoid liposarcoma.

Intensity-modulated whole abdomen irradiation following adjuvant carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy for FIGO stage III ovarian cancer : four-year outcomes

INTRODUCTION

A prospective study to assess toxicity and survival outcomes after intensity-modulated whole-abdominal irradiation (IM-WAI) following surgery and adjuvant intravenous carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy in advanced FIGO stage III ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2009, 16 patients with optimally resected FIGO stage III ovarian cancer, who had received six cycles of adjuvant carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy were treated with consolidation IM-WAI. Radiotherapy was delivered to a total dose of 30 Gy in 1.5-Gy fractions, using step-and-shoot (n = 3) or helical tomotherapy (n = 13). The first 10 patients were treated within a phase I trial; the following patients received the same treatment modality. The target volume included the entire peritoneal cavity, the diaphragm, the liver capsule, and the pelvic and para-aortic node regions. Organs at risk were kidneys, liver, heart, and bone marrow.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 44 months (range 19.2-67.2 months). No grade 4 toxicities occurred during IM-WAI. Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 toxicities were: diarrhea (25 %), leucopenia (19 %), nausea/vomiting (6 %), and thrombocytopenia (6 %). No toxicity-related treatment break was necessary. Small bowel obstruction occurred in a total of 6 patients: in 3 cases (19 %) due to postsurgical adhesions and in 3 cases due to local tumor recurrence (19 %). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 27.6 months (95 % confidence interval, CI = 24-44 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 42.1 months (95 %CI = 17-68 months). The peritoneal cavity was the most frequent site of initial failure.

CONCLUSION

Consolidation IM-WAI following surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and can be performed with manageable acute and late toxicity. The favorable RFS outcome is promising and justifies further clinical trials.

Helical tomotherapy versus conventional radiation to deliver abdominopelvic radiation

While whole abdominopelvic radiation (APRT) provided satisfactory radiation dosimetry for the treatment of cancers with peritoneal dissemination, APRT was abandoned due to unsatisfactory tumor control from necessary radiation shielding of vital organs. Our goal was to develop a helical tomotherapy (TOMO) abdominopelvic radiation technique improving target tissue coverage while dose-limiting vital organs, especially hematopoietic bone marrow. This study reports our clinical development of a TOMO abdominopelvic radiation technique for treatment of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. Novel chemoradiosensitizing agent clinical trials incorporating our TOMO abdominopelvic radiation technique for treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer are under development.

Cytosolic phospholipase A2 as a molecular target for the radiosensitization of ovarian cancer

In ovarian cancer, the molecular targeted chemotherapeutics could increase the efficiency of low-dose radiotherapy while decreasing injury to adjusted organs. In irradiated A2780 human ovarian carcinoma cells, cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA(2)) inhibitor AACOCF(3) prevented activation of pro-survival Akt signaling and enhanced cell death. The potential molecular mechanisms of this effect could involve signaling through lysophosphatidic acid receptors. In the heterotopic A2780 tumor model using nude mice, cPLA(2) inhibition significantly delayed tumor growth compared to treatment with radiation or vehicle alone. These results identify cPLA(2) as a molecular target to enhance the therapeutic ratio of radiation in ovarian cancer.

Low-dose abdominal radiation as a docetaxel chemosensitizer for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of whole abdomen radiation as a chemosensitizer of weekly docetaxel for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women were enrolled on one of three dose levels of docetaxel (20, 25, or 30 mg/m(2)) administered weekly with concurrent low-dose whole abdominal radiation given as 60 cGy bid 2 days weekly for a total of 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirteen women were enrolled and received 70 weekly treatments of docetaxel in combination with radiation therapy. At the first dose level, docetaxel 25mg/m(2), grade 3 fatigue and thrombocytopenia were observed. At the next dose level, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2), grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia with epistaxis, and grade 3 diarrhea were observed. Given these dose-limiting toxicities, a lower dose of docetaxel 20mg/m(2) was administered and found to be tolerable. No objective responses were observed among the 10 patients with measurable disease; however, the median progression-free survival (PFS) in all patients was 3.3 months, and 3 of the patients with measurable disease were free of tumor progression after 6 months (30%; 90% confidence interval 8.7-61%).

CONCLUSIONS

Twice weekly low-dose whole abdomen radiation during weekly docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) was well-tolerated. Given the PFS demonstrated in these women with resistant ovarian cancer, further study of whole abdominal radiation and concurrent chemotherapy may be warranted.

Phase II study evaluating consolidation whole abdominal intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer stage FIGO III--the OVAR-IMRT-02 Study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with advanced FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer remains poor despite the aggressive standard treatment, consisting of maximal cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The median time to recurrence is less than 2 years, with a 5-years survival rate of -20-25%. Recurrences of the disease occur mostly intraperitoneally.Ovarian cancer is a radiosensitive tumor, so that the use of whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) as a consolidation therapy would appear to be a logical strategy. WAR used to be the standard treatment after surgery before the chemotherapy era; however, it has been almost totally excluded from the treatment of ovarian cancer during the past decade because of its high toxicity. Modern intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has the potential of sparing organs at risk like kidneys, liver, and bone marrow while still adequately covering the peritoneal cavity with a homogenous dose.Our previous phase I study showed for the first time the clinical feasibility of intensity-modulated WAR and pointed out promising results concerning treatment tolerance. The current phase-II study succeeds to the phase-I study to further evaluate the toxicity of this new treatment.

METHODS/DESIGN

The OVAR-IMRT-02 study is a single-center one arm phase-II trial. Thirty seven patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer stage FIGO III having a complete remission after chemotherapy will be treated with intensity-modulated WAR as a consolidation therapy.A total dose of 30 Gy in 20 fractions of 1.5 Gy will be applied to the entire peritoneal cavity including the liver surface and the pelvic and para-aortic node regions. Organ at risk are kidneys, liver (except the 1 cm-outer border), heart, vertebral bodies and pelvic bones.Primary endpoint is tolerability; secondary objectives are toxicity, quality of life, progression-free and overall survival.

DISCUSSION

Intensity-modulated WAR provides a new promising option in the consolidation treatment of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a complete pathologic remission after adjuvant chemotherapy. Further consequent studies will be needed to enable firm conclusions regarding the value of consolidation radiotherapy within the multimodal treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01180504.

Whole abdomen radiation therapy in ovarian cancers: a comparison between fixed beam and volumetric arc based intensity modulation

Purpose

A study was performed to assess dosimetric characteristics of volumetric modulated arcs (RapidArc, RA) and fixed field intensity modulated therapy (IMRT) for Whole Abdomen Radiotherapy (WAR) after ovarian cancer.

Methods and Materials

Plans for IMRT and RA were optimised for 5 patients prescribing 25 Gy to the whole abdomen (PTV_WAR) and 45 Gy to the pelvis and pelvic nodes (PTV_Pelvis) with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) technique. Plans were investigated for 6 MV (RA6, IMRT6) and 15 MV (RA15, IMRT15) photons. Objectives were: for both PTVs V_90% > 95%, for PTV_Pelvis: D_max < 105%; for organs at risk, maximal sparing was required. The MU and delivery time measured treatment efficiency. Pre-treatment Quality assurance was scored with Gamma Agreement Index (GAI) with 3% and 3 mm thresholds.

Results

IMRT and RapidArc resulted comparable for target coverage. For PTV_WAR, V_90% was 99.8 ± 0.2% and 93.4 ± 7.3% for IMRT6 and IMRT15, and 98.4 ± 1.7 and 98.6 ± 0.9% for RA6 and RA15. Target coverage resulted improved for PTV_Pelvis. Dose homogeneity resulted slightly improved by RA (Uniformity was defined as U_5-95% = D_5%-D_95%/D_mean). U₅-_95% for PTV_WAR was 0.34 ± 0.05 and 0.32 ± 0.06 (IMRT6 and IMRT15), 0.30 ± 0.03 and 0.26 ± 0.04 (RA6 and RA15); for PTV_Pelvis, it resulted equal to 0.1 for all techniques. For organs at risk, small differences were observed between the techniques. MU resulted 3130 ± 221 (IMRT6), 2841 ± 318 (IMRT15), 538 ± 29 (RA6), 635 ± 139 (RA15); the average measured treatment time was 18.0 ± 0.8 and 17.4 ± 2.2 minutes (IMRT6 and IMRT15) and 4.8 ± 0.2 (RA6 and RA15). GAI_IMRT6 = 97.3 ± 2.6%, GAI_IMRT15 = 94.4 ± 2.1%, GAI_RA6 = 98.7 ± 1.0% and GAI_RA15 = 95.7 ± 3.7%.

Conclusion

RapidArc showed to be a solution to WAR treatments offering good dosimetric features with significant logistic improvements compared to IMRT.

Clinical tolerance in large field radiotherapy--the knowledge gained over the last ten years

Malignant disorders are still far from being successfully managed in spite of the apparent progress achieved by surgical treatment, high energy radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CHT). They keep being the second most frequent cause of lethal outcomes both in Bulgaria and in most countries of the world. One of the promising approaches to increasing the efficaciousness of treatment is development and use of methods that are in full accord with the modern requirements of a complex therapy. Over the last fifty years, large field radiation techniques, applied as systemic therapy in oncology, have been investigated and established. These techniques show the transition in oncology to using actively various variants of large field radiotherapy (LFR), the "heavy artillery" of oncoradiologic practice, as an alternative or adjunct therapy to chemotherapy (CHT). In the present paper we review the current knowledge in the field and present the clinical experience accumulated over the last ten years with respect to clinical tolerance in the major large-field radiotherapy techniques--total body irradiation, half body irradiation, whole abdominal irradiation, total and partial lymphoid irradiation. Described in detail are the contemporary knowledge about clinical and hematologic tolerance in total body irradiation as part of the myelo- and nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens as well as in half body irradiation as a systemic therapy in oncology. We also present the amassed experience in clinical tolerance in partial body irradiation in the form of whole abdominal and total or partial lymphoid irradiation. Another point worth noting based again on the experience gained over the last ten years is that for LFR we need to develop a radiotherapy technique that is designed carefully to achieve an optimal therapeutic effect that should include the disease control, good clinical tolerance and reduction of post-radiotherapy sequelae.

Interventions for the treatment of borderline ovarian tumours

BACKGROUND

The safety of conservative surgery and the benefit of additional interventions after surgery for borderline ovarian tumours are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harm of different treatment modalities offered for borderline ovarian tumours.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register to 2009, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE and EMBASE to 2009. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different interventions in adult women diagnosed with borderline ovarian tumours of any histological variant.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified seven RCTs that enrolled 372 women. We could not pool results of trials as the treatment comparisons differed.Six RCTs (n = 340) conducted over 15 years ago, evaluated adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, pelvic external irradiation or intra-peritoneal radioactive isotope therapy) after radical surgery; over 87% of participants had Stage I tumours. Most participants were followed up for over 10 years. Overall and recurrence-free survival were similar between both arms of these trials, except that one trial (n = 66) showed a significantly lower survival (P = 0.03) in women who received chemotherapy (thio-TEPA). Adverse effects of treatment were incompletely reported and all six trials were at high risk of bias.One further trial (n = 32) that recruited participants with bilateral serous tumours who were wishing fertility preservation, revealed a significantly increased chance of pregnancy (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 8.0) but non-significantly earlier disease recurrence (HR = 1.5, 95% CI 0.6 to 3.8) in the women who had ultra-conservative surgery (bilateral cystectomy) than in those who had conservative surgery (cystectomy and contralateral oophorectomy). This trial was at low risk of bias.Quality of life (QoL) was not documented in any included trial. We did not find any trials that compared radical with conservative surgery or laparoscopy with laparotomy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence to support the use of any specific type of adjuvant therapy for borderline ovarian tumours. RCTs evaluating the benefit of adjuvant therapy with optimally dosed chemotherapy and newer targeted drugs are necessary, particularly for advanced borderline ovarian tumours. The low mortality from borderline ovarian tumours should make recurrence-free survival, time to recurrence and morbidity important end points in such trials.Bilateral cystectomy may be offered to women with bilateral borderline ovarian tumours diagnosed intra-operatively who are wishing to preserve their fertility. Similarly, women who had RCTs comparing radical with conservative surgery and comparing laparoscopy with laparotomy are needed.

Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy using intensity-modulated arc therapy in the palliative treatment of chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer with bulky peritoneal disease: a single-institution experience

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review our experience with whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy in the palliative treatment of chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer with bulky peritoneal disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 2002 and April 2008, 13 patients were treated with WAPRT using intensity-modulated arc therapy. We prescribed a dose of 33 Gy to be delivered in 22 fractions of 1.5 Gy to the abdomen and pelvis. All patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage III or IV ovarian cancer at the initial diagnosis. At referral, the median age was 61 years, and the patients had been heavily pretreated with surgery and chemotherapy. All patients had symptoms from their disease, including gastrointestinal obstruction or subobstruction in 6, minor gastrointestinal symptoms in 2, pain in 4, ascites in 1, and vaginal bleeding in 2. A complete symptom or biochemical response required complete resolution of the patient's symptoms or cancer antigen-125 level. A partial response required ≥50% resolution of these parameters. The actuarial survival was calculated from the start of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 21 weeks, with a 6-month overall survival rate of 45%. The 9 patients who completed treatment obtained a complete symptom response, except for ascites (partial response). The median and mean response duration (all symptoms grouped) was 24 and 37 weeks, respectively. Of the 6 patients presenting with obstruction or subobstruction, 4 obtained a complete symptom response (median duration, 16 weeks).

CONCLUSION

WAPRT delivered using intensity-modulated arc therapy offers important palliation in the case of peritoneal metastatic ovarian cancer. WAPRT resolved intestinal obstruction for a substantial period.

Whole abdominal radiotherapy in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and toxicity after adjuvant whole abdominal radiotherapy (WART) in patients with ovarian cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten patients with optimal cytoreduced ovarian cancer, with a mean age of 58 years (40-70) and stage Ic: 4, stage II: 2, stage III: 4, were treated with WART and adjuvant chemotherapy (9/10). The total radiation dose was 22.5 Gy in the whole abdomen and 42-45 Gy in the pelvis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 8 years. The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) was 60%, and the overall survival (OS) was 70%. Four patients had disease recurrence. The sites of recurrence were the abdomen in 2 patients and distant metastases in the other 2 patients (liver and brain metastasis). Gastrointestinal toxicity was as follows: acute 3/10 grades I and II, and late toxicity: 2/10 grades I and II, and only 1 patient developed small bowel obstruction (SBO) that required surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole abdominal radiotherapy after surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy achieves high locoregional disease control with an acceptable risk of acute toxicity.

Insufficiency fractures after pelvic radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence, predisposing factors, and clinical characteristics of insufficiency fractures (IF) in patients with prostate cancer, who received pelvic radiotherapy as part of their definitive treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The charts of 134 prostate cancer patients, who were treated with pelvic radiotherapy between 1998 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. IF was diagnosed by bone scan and/or CT and/or MRI. The cumulative incidence of symptomatic IF was estimated by actuarial methods.

RESULTS

Eight patients were identified with symptomatic IF after a median follow-up period of 68 months (range, 12-116 months). The 5-year cumulative incidence of symptomatic IF was 6.8%. All patients presented with lower back pain. Insufficiency fracture developed at a median time of 20 months after the end of radiotherapy and was managed conservatively without any need for hospitalization. Three patients were thought to have metastatic disease because of increased uptake in their bone scans. However, subsequent CT and MR imaging revealed characteristic changes of IF, avoiding any further intervention. No predisposing factors for development of IF could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic IF is a rare complication of pelvic radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Knowledge of pelvic IF is essential to rule out metastatic disease and prevent unnecessary treatment, especially in a patient cohort with high-risk features for distant spread.

Whole-body dosimetry for individualized treatment planning of 131I-MIBG radionuclide therapy for neuroblastoma

The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between whole-body absorbed dose and hematologic toxicity and to assess the most accurate method of delivering a prescribed whole-body absorbed dose in (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((131)I-MIBG) therapy for neuroblastoma.

METHODS

A total of 20 children (1-12 y), 5 adolescents (13-17 y), and 1 adult (20 y) with stage 3 or 4 neuroblastoma were treated to a prescribed whole-body absorbed dose, which in most cases was 2 Gy. Forty-eight administrations of (131)I-MIBG were given to the 26 patients, ranging in activity from 1,759 to 32,871 MBq. For 30 administrations, sufficient data were available to assess the effect of whole-body absorbed dose on hematologic toxicity. Comparisons were made between the accuracy with which a whole-body absorbed dose could be predicted using a pretherapy tracer study and the patient's most recent previous therapy. The whole-body absorbed dose that would have been delivered if the administered activity was fixed (7,400 MBq) or determined using a weight-based formula (444 MBq.kg(-1)) was also estimated.

RESULTS

The mean whole-body absorbed dose for patients with grade 4 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) neutropenia after therapy was significantly higher than for those with grade 1 CTCAE neutropenia (1.63 vs. 0.90 Gy; P = 0.05). There was no correlation between administered activity and hematologic toxicity. Absorbed whole-body doses predicted from previous therapies were within +/-10% for 70% of the cases. Fixed-activity administrations gave the largest range in whole-body absorbed dose (0.30-3.11 Gy).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that even in a highly heterogeneous and heavily pretreated patient population, a whole-body absorbed dose can be prescribed accurately and is a more accurate predictor of hematologic toxicity than is administered activity. Therefore, a whole-body absorbed dose can be used to deliver accurate and reproducible (131)I-MIBG therapy on a patient-specific basis.

Intra-peritoneal cisplatin and whole abdomen hyperthermia for relapsed ovarian carcinoma

The study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IP cisplatin [CDDP] combined with intravenous thiosulphate and concurrent whole abdomen hyperthermia for advanced, recurrent or progressive ovarian carcinoma. Between September 1991 and November 1998, 41 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer received escalating doses of IP (IP) cisplatin (six cycles given every 3-4 weeks) and whole abdomen hyperthermia with intravenous thiosulphate as second line treatment. Whole abdomen hyperthermia was administrated using a BSD-2000 annular phased array system. Forty-one patients were enrolled in the phase I/II portions of the study. Forty-four per cent (18/41) had undergone sub-optimal cytoreductive surgery and 15% (6/41) had been optimally debulked of their disease. Ninety per cent (37/41) had platinum-resistant disease and 10% (4/41) had platinum-sensitive disease. No DLTs occurred in the phase I testing and the recommended dose for this combination schedule was 180 mg m-2 of IP cisplatin with thiosulphate and whole abdomen hyperthermia. The overall response rate was 44% (10 CR, 8 PR) and the median survival for all patients from protocol entry was 30 months (range 2-107 months). Median duration and survival of those achieving a pathologic CR was 14 months (range 2-27 months) and 35 months (range 14-71 months, 95% CI 16-54 months), respectively. Salvage platinum based IP cisplatin with hyperthermia did achieve pathologic CR in selected patients and was well tolerated. These promising results suggest a role for the use of adjuvant whole abdomen hyperthermia as a means of augmenting chemosensitization.

Intensity-modulated whole abdominal radiotherapy after surgery and carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: phase I study

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility and toxicity of consolidative intensity-modulated whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) after surgery and chemotherapy in high-risk patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIIc were treated in a Phase I study with intensity-modulated WAR up to a total dose of 30 Gy in 1.5-Gy fractions as consolidation therapy after adjuvant carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy. Treatment was delivered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in a step-and-shoot technique (n = 3) or a helical tomotherapy technique (n = 7). The planning target volume included the entire peritoneal cavity and the pelvic and para-aortal node regions. Organs at risk were kidneys, liver, heart, vertebral bodies, and pelvic bones.

RESULTS

Intensity-modulated WAR resulted in an excellent coverage of the planning target volume and an effective sparing of the organs at risk. The treatment was well tolerated, and no severe Grade 4 acute side effects occurred. Common Toxicity Criteria Grade III toxicities were as follows: diarrhea (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and leukopenia (n = 3). Radiotherapy could be completed by all the patients without any toxicity-related interruption. Median follow-up was 23 months, and 4 patients had tumor recurrence (intraperitoneal progression, n = 3; hepatic metastasis, n = 1). Small bowel obstruction caused by adhesions occurred in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this Phase I study showed for the first time, to our knowledge, the clinical feasibility of intensity-modulated whole abdominal radiotherapy, which could offer a new therapeutic option for consolidation treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma after adjuvant chemotherapy in selected subgroups of patients. We initiated a Phase II study to further evaluate the toxicity of this intensive multimodal treatment.

Long-term morbidity of adjuvant whole abdominal radiotherapy (WART) or chemotherapy for early stage ovarian cancer

The aim of the study was to evaluate long-term toxicity of adjuvant treatment in early stage ovarian cancer survivors. Data from all patients treated in one hospital for early stage ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1980 and 1990 were collected using a structured data form. In 93 FIGO stages I and II patients, cytoreductive and staging surgery was performed; 15 received no adjuvant treatment (controls), 39 whole abdominal radiotherapy (WART) and 39 platin-based chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 54 years (range 21-83 years). During follow-up, 49/93 (53%) patients have died with a median overall survival of 18.4 years (95% CI 12.8-23.9). In both the radiotherapy and the chemotherapy group, 50% of patients reported long-term side-effects (all grades) versus 13% of controls. Two patients in the WART group died from bowel complications. Secondary malignancies were observed in 16 patients. Of all patients alive at the last follow-up, 12/17 (71%) patients treated with radiotherapy and 11/18 (61%) treated with chemotherapy experienced long-term morbidity versus 2/9 (22%) controls (P=0.03).

IN CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up of early stage ovarian cancer patients showed lasting GI morbidity in the survivors treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, which has therefore become obsolete. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy caused peripheral neuropathy versus virtual absence of problems in the survivors of just surgery, emphasising the need for strict criteria before instigating adjuvant treatment.

Whole-abdomen radiotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using twice-daily fractionation

PURPOSE

To report the tolerability and efficacy of twice-daily whole-abdomen irradiation (WAI) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of 123 patients treated for NHL with WAI, 37% received previous chemotherapy, 28% received WAI as part of comprehensive lymphatic irradiation (CLI), and 32% received WAI for palliation. The median dose to the whole abdomen was 25.0 Gy, followed by a median tumor boost of 9.8 Gy in 58 patients. Fractionation was 1.0 Gy once daily (54%) or 0.8 Gy twice daily (46%). Blood counts were measured weekly.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 4.3 years, local control was 72% and overall survival was 55% at 5 years. Median time of WAI was 42 days for once-daily treatment and 32 days for twice-daily treatment. Patients receiving twice-daily WAI did not have a significantly higher rate of acute side effects (e.g., nausea, diarrhea, platelet or red blood cell toxicity). Overall, acute thrombocytopenia was the most frequent side effect of treatment; 24 of 96 patients (25%) with available hematologic data had Grade 3+ toxicity. There was no acute Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and no late small bowel obstruction. Multiple regression indicated that patients with four or less involved sites and disease size < or =6 cm had improved local control and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Twice-daily WAI using 0.8 Gy/fraction does not appear to have any greater toxicity compared with once-daily treatment using 1 Gy/fraction. Small doses per fraction (0.8-1 Gy/fx) are effective, tolerated well in the acute setting, and associated with a low rate of late toxicity.

Twenty-five year outcome of sequential abdominal radiotherapy and melphalan:implications for future management of epithelial carcinoma of the ovary

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study is evaluation of the long-term efficacy of sequential abdominopelvic radiotherapy and melphalan in the management of ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

From 1970 to 1976, 94 women with stages I-III epithelial ovarian carcinoma enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized clinical trial were prescribed 20 Gy to the upper abdomen and 50 Gy to the pelvis followed by courses of melphalan (1 mg/kg/course). Primary endpoints were survival, recurrence, and toxicity.

RESULTS

There were 19 stage I, 25 stage II, and 50 stage III patients. For all stages, overall survival was 42% at 5 years, 30% at 10 years, and 17% at 25 years. Median follow-up of the survivors was 24 years. Disease-free survival was 48% at 5 years and remained at 45% from 10 to 25 years. All but two recurrences occurred within the first 27 months. No recurrence or treatment-related death occurred after 8 years. No recurrence was salvaged. All but one initial recurrence was within the peritoneal cavity. Of the 31 patients undergoing a second-look surgical procedure, 84% were free of tumor. Only 8% of patients recurred after a negative second look. Stage and the presence of palpable postoperative disease were significant prognostic factors. Disease-free survivals were 95% from 5 to 25 years for stage I, 70% at 5 years and 60% at 25 years for stage II, and 20% from 5 to 25 years for stage III (P < 0.0001). Although no patient with postoperative palpable tumor was cured, 25% lived beyond 2 years. Stage III patients without postoperative palpable tumor achieved a 47% 25-year disease-free survival. Acute toxicity was acceptable, and 98% of patients completed radiation therapy. Chronic toxicity included a 12% small bowel obstruction rate and a 3% fatal second malignancy/hematological toxicity rate (two cases of acute myelocytic leukemia, one case of thrombocytopenia).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term disease-free survival obtained with abdominopelvic radiotherapy followed by single alkylating agent chemotherapy has not been exceeded by three subsequent decades of multiagent chemotherapy trials. Abdominal radiotherapy may be useful to consolidate complete responses following therapy multiagent chemotherapy, particularly with the upper abdominal dose escalation provided by intensity modulated radiation therapy and possibly in conjunction with chemotherapy.

Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: A Clinicopathologic Review

Endometriosis is a common clinical disorder in women and usually presents with pelvic pain, infertility, or adnexal masses secondary to intracystic hemorrhage with the formation of an endometrioma. Endometriosis shares certain characteristics with malignant neoplasms, and malignant ovarian tumours have been documented in women with endometriosis. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) usually occurs in younger women, has favourable outcomes, and appears as either a low-grade tumour of endometrioid cell type or as a clear cell tumour. As it has been suggested that the pathologic features of "atypical endometriosis" may constitute a precancerous state, women with atypical endometriosis may be at an increased risk of developing EAOC. There are no prospective randomized trials assessing treatment regimens for EAOC. Most women receive treatment similar to other epithelial ovarian cancers. However, women with EAOC represent a subgroup of patients that may require different therapeutic options. English-language journals indexed in MEDLINE and PubMed were searched for relevant articles that evaluated the association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer, theories of pathogenesis and transformation, the clinical presentation and pathologic features of EAOC, as well as the treatment options available.

Limitations of adjuvant radiotherapy for uterine sarcomas spread beyond the uterus

OBJECTIVE

The present review analyzes patients with advanced uterine sarcomas with the goal of identifying patients likely to benefit from larger volumes and higher dosages of radiotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of medical records of all patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy for advanced uterine sarcomas from 1978 to 1997 at the University of Minnesota.

RESULTS

Nineteen women with advanced uterine sarcomas received adjuvant radiotherapy. Seven also received adjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients had FIGO stage IIIA, 1 stage IIIB, 5 stage IIIC, and 12 stage IVB. Patients with mixed mullerian tumors had overall and disease-free survivals of 31% at 1 year and 23% at 5 years. For leiomyosarcomas, overall survival was 67% at 1 year and 33% at 5 years, but relapse-free survival was 33% at 1 and 5 years. First sites of failure were three pelvic and abdominal, one abdominal only, one abdominal and distant, two pelvic and distant, one pelvic, abdominal, and distant, five distant only, and one unknown. No Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing technical advancements in radiotherapy offer more precise radiation delivery, particularly to the peritoneal cavity. Although abdominal failures are common in women with mixed mullerian tumors, translation of higher radiation dosage to cure is unproven, and the majority of failures have a distant component. Until effective systemic therapy is developed, the prognosis of uterine sarcomas with any spread beyond the uterus will remain poor.