Metachronous contralateral breast cancer as first event of relapse

Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance

This work reviews the evidence on breast imaging for screening (surveillance) in women with a history of breast cancer (BC). Early detection of second BCs in these women improves their prognosis based on studies using mammography (usually with clinical examinations) for surveillance. Cohort studies have estimated that mammography surveillance has moderate sensitivity (65.4%) and good specificity (98.3%), and have shown that these women are at a higher risk of interval BC than age- and breast density-matched women without a history of BC. Studies of adjunct imaging (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging) for surveillance that have reported detection and accuracy measures have generally shown that adjunct imaging detected more second BCs than mammography and added substantially to the amount of false-positive results; however, little evidence exists regarding screening efficacy of adjunct imaging as part of routine surveillance.

Usefulness of abbreviated breast MRI screening for women with a history of breast cancer surgery

PURPOSE

We investigated the usefulness of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI), including fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging, pre- and postcontrast image acquisition, and subtracted maximum-intensity projection imaging, for the screening of women with a history of breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

Between October 2014 and March 2016, a total of 799 AB-MRI examinations were performed for 725 women with a history of breast cancer surgery. The image acquisition time was 8.5 min. Screening mammography, ultrasound, and AB-MRI were generally performed around the same time. The cancer detection rate, positive predictive values for recall and biopsy, sensitivity and specificity of screening MRI, and rate of malignancy belonging to each breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category were assessed.

RESULTS

AB-MRI detected 12 malignancies in 12 women (15.0 cancers per 1000 cases). Seven of these 12 malignancies were initially invisible on ultrasound and mammography, although subsequent targeted ultrasound revealed lesions corresponding to the MRI-detected lesions. The positive predictive values for recall and biopsy and sensitivity and specificity values for screening MRI were 12.4, 61.5, 100, and 89.2%, respectively. The rates of malignancies belonging to categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the BI-RADS were 0, 0, 4.8, and 57.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of screening AB-MRI for women with a history of breast cancer surgery is acceptable, with the advantages of short examination and interpretation times and low costs. Thus, it could be used as a main screening modality that may replace conventional imaging in breast cancer survivors.

Predictors associated with MRI surveillance screening in women with a personal history of unilateral breast cancer but without a genetic predisposition for future contralateral breast cancer

PURPOSE

For women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC), no validated mechanisms exist to calculate future contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk. The Manchester risk stratification guidelines were developed to evaluate CBC risk in women with a PHBC, primarily for surgical decision making. This tool may be informative for the use of MRI screening, as CBC risk is an assumed consideration for high-risk surveillance.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-two women with a PHBC were treated with unilateral surgery within our multidisciplinary breast clinic. We calculated lifetime CBC risk using the Manchester tool, which incorporates age at diagnosis, family history, genetic mutation status, estrogen receptor positivity, and endocrine therapy use. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (UVA/MVA) were performed, evaluating whether CBC risk predicted MRI surveillance.

RESULTS

For women with invasive disease undergoing MRI surveillance, 66% had low, 23% above-average, and 11% moderate/high risk for CBC. On MVA, previous mammography-occult breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) 18.95, p < 0.0001], endocrine therapy use (OR 3.89, p = 0.009), dense breast tissue (OR 3.69, p = 0.0007), mastectomy versus lumpectomy (OR 3.12, p = 0.0041), and CBC risk (OR 3.17 for every 10% increase, p = 0.0002) were associated with MRI surveillance. No pathologic factors increasing ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence were significant on MVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CBC risk predicted MRI surveillance, 89% with invasive disease undergoing MRI had <20% calculated CBC risk. Concerns related to future breast cancer detectability (dense breasts and/or previous mammography-occult disease) predominate decision making. Pathologic factors important for determining ipsilateral recurrence risk, aside from age, were not associated with MRI surveillance.

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance in breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

As the breast cancer survivor population increases, the topic of screening these women for recurrences is increasingly relevant. In our institution, we use both breast MRI and mammography in the surveillance of breast cancer survivors, although little data exists on the use of MRI in this setting. We present a retrospective analysis of our experience and compare the sensitivity and specificity of MRI vs. mammography in this setting.

METHODS

We identified women under 65 with a history of breast cancer and at least one follow-up MRI performed along with a mammogram done within 6 months of the MRI. We compared the outcomes of MRI and mammography in terms of biopsies performed as well as in detection of new cancers.

RESULTS

Of 617 charts reviewed, 249 patients met inclusion criteria, with 571 paired MRI/mammogram results. There were 27 biopsies performed due to MRI findings alone, 10 done due to mammographic findings alone, and 15 done based on abnormalities seen on both imaging modalities. There were 8 malignancies identified based on an abnormal MRI, 3 detected on both MRI and mammography, and none identified via mammography alone. Overall, MRI had a sensitivity of 84.6% (the 95% CI 54.6-98.1) and a specificity of 95.3% (the 95% CI 93.3-96.9); mammography a sensitivity of 23.1% (the 95% CI 5.0-53.8), and a specificity of 96.4% (the 95% CI 94.5-97.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast MRI is a useful surveillance modality in breast cancer survivors and may be more sensitive at detecting recurrences than mammography alone in this population.

Cost-effectiveness of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for prevention of contralateral breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A growing number of women with sporadic unilateral, early-stage breast cancers are undergoing ipsilateral therapeutic mastectomy with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) to prevent the development of new cancers in the contralateral breast.

METHODS

A decision-tree using TreeAge Pro 2012 software was used to model the costs and effects of CPM versus unilateral mastectomy (UM) in women younger than 50 years of age with sporadic unilateral, early stage breast cancers. Cost estimates were obtained from the Medicare Fee Schedule and the Healthcare Utilization Project. Probability estimates were obtained from the literature. Outcome effects were measured by incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. A 10-year risk period for contralateral breast cancer (CBC), a lifetime time horizon, and a societal perspective were used.

RESULTS

Treatment with CPM results in 0.2 QALYs less than UM and $279 less in costs during a 10-year risk period and lifetime follow-up. The resulting incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) is a savings of $1397 per QALY lost. The ICER is sensitive to the rate and method of postmastectomy reconstruction and the cost of radiologic surveillance after UM.

CONCLUSIONS

CPM is cost-saving for the prevention of CBC in women younger than 50 years of age with sporadic, unilateral, early-stage breast cancers, but also reduces resulting health. The savings for health lost are insufficient to be considered cost-effective at this time.

Influence of radiotherapy for the first tumor on aggressiveness of contralateral breast cancer

We aimed to investigate if characteristics of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) are influenced by adjuvant radiotherapy for the first breast cancer. Using information from population-based registers and medical records, we analyzed two cohorts comprising all women with CBC diagnosed >3 months after their first cancer (809 patients in Stockholm 1976-2005 and 750 patients in South Sweden 1977-2005). We used Poisson regression to calculate risk of distant metastasis after CBC, comparing patients treated and not treated with radiotherapy for the first cancer. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) of more aggressive tumor characteristics in the second cancer, compared to the first. For patients with CBC in Stockholm with <5 years between the cancers radiotherapy for the first cancer conferred a nearly doubled risk of distant metastasis [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-2.88], compared to those not treated with radiotherapy. This was replicated in the South Swedish cohort [IRR = 2.12 (95% CI: 1.40-3.23)]. In Stockholm, we found an increased odds that, following radiotherapy, a second cancer was of more advanced TNM-stage [OR 2.16 (95% CI 1.13-4.11)] and higher histological grade [OR = 2.00 (95% CI 1.08-3.72)] compared to the first, for patients with CBC with <5 years between the cancers. No effect on any of the investigated outcomes was seen for patients diagnosed with CBC >5 years from the first cancer. In conclusion, patients diagnosed with CBC within 5 years had worse prognosis and more aggressive tumor characteristics of the second cancer, if they had received radiotherapy for their first cancer, compared to no radiotherapy.

Outcomes of surveillance for contralateral breast cancer in patients less than age 60 at the time of initial diagnosis

BACKGROUND

After an initial diagnosis of breast cancer, the risk of contralateral breast cancer is approximately 0.5% per year. Annual mammography is recommended to identify local recurrences and contralateral new primaries. Because the sensitivity of mammography tends to be lower in younger women, we conducted a retrospective review of the method of detection and pathologic stage of metachronous contralateral primary breast cancers according to age at diagnosis in a cohort of breast cancer patients.

METHODS

The Henrietta Banting Database contains information on cases of breast cancer diagnosed at Women's College Hospital from 1987 to 2004. From among 1992 women in the database, 71 patients were identified who were initially diagnosed before age 60 and who subsequently developed a contralateral breast cancer. Medical records were obtained for 53 of the 71 patients.

RESULTS

Of the 53 contralateral cancers, 33 (62%) were detected by mammography, including 4 in 16 patients (25%) diagnosed before age 50 and 29 in 37 patients (78%) diagnosed at age 50 or older (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mammography has poor sensitivity for the surveillance of contralateral breast cancer in early-onset breast cancer patients. Other imaging modalities should be evaluated in this setting.

Prognostic implications of estrogen receptor pattern of both tumors in contralateral breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) status is important for breast cancer survival, it is however unclear how prognosis of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is affected by ER-status of the two tumors. We conducted a large, population-based study of ER-status of both tumors in CBC patients and its influence on prognosis. The cohort consisted of all women diagnosed with CBC in Stockholm, Sweden during 1976-2005, with information on ER-status from medical records (N = 933). Prognosis was modeled as incidence rates of distant metastasis via Poisson regression. The proportion of CBCs with both cancers of the same ER-status was significantly larger than expected by chance. For synchronous (simultaneous) cancers the prognosis was significantly affected by the combined ER-status of both tumors (p = 0.01). Compared to unilateral breast cancer patients the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for patients with double ER-positive tumors was 1.25 (95 % CI: 0.88-1.76), for ER-discordant tumors 2.19 (95 % CI: 1.18-4.08) and for double ER-negative tumors 3.95 (95 % CI: 1.77-8.81). For metachronous (non-simultaneous) cancers, women with double ER-positive tumors had similarly bad prognosis (IRR = 2.95; 95 % CI: 2.39-3.64) as women with double ER-negative tumors (IRR = 2.88; 95 % CI: 1.83-4.52). Both shorter time span between first and second cancer and endocrine therapy for the first cancer further worsened prognosis of women with double ER-positive metachronous CBC. For synchronous CBC patients, ER-pattern of both tumors is an important prognosticator, while among metachronous CBC patients, double ER-positive tumors confer equally bad prognosis as double ER-negative cancers. Our results indicate that this might be due to endocrine therapy resistance.

Patterns and risk factors of locoregional recurrence in T1-T2 node negative breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy: implications for postmastectomy radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) can reduce locoregional recurrences (LRR) in high-risk patients, but its role in the treatment of lymph node negative (LN-) breast cancer remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify a subgroup of T1-T2 breast cancer patients with LN- who might benefit from PMRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed 1,136 node-negative T1-T2 breast cancer cases treated with mastectomy without PMRT at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 1980 and 2004. We estimated cumulative incidence rates for LRR overall and in specific subgroups, and used Cox proportional hazards models to identify potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 9 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 5.2% (95% CI: 3.9-6.7%). Chest wall was the most common (73%) site of LRR. Tumor size, margin, patient age, systemic therapy, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were significantly associated with LRR on multivariate analysis. These five variables were subsequently used as risk factors for stratified analysis. The 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR for patients with no risk factors was 2.0% (95% CI: 0.5-5.2%), whereas the incidence for patients with three or more risk factors was 19.7% (95% CI: 12.2-28.6%).

CONCLUSION

It has been suggested that patients with T1-T2N0 breast cancer who undergo mastectomy represent a favorable group for which PMRT renders little benefit. However, this study suggests that select patients with multiple risk factors including LVI, tumor size ≥2 cm, close or positive margin, age ≤50, and no systemic therapy are at higher risk of LRR and may benefit from PMRT.

Mammographic surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer: how accurate? How effective?

We review the accuracy and potential effect of mammography in surveillance of women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). A literature review was performed to identify studies on screening mammography or breast surveillance reporting data on the accuracy or detection capability of mammography, or the effect of early detection of second breast cancers, in women with a PHBC. Evidence on mammography screening in women with PHBC comes from non-randomised studies, and is generally limited by several factors including design limitations. The proportion of ipsilateral breast recurrences detected with mammography ranges between 50% and 80% (including cancers detected also on clinical examination) but is lower at 8%-51% for mammography-only detection. Mammography detects approximately 45%-90% of contralateral cancers. There is evidence of a potential benefit for asymptomatic/early-detected second breast cancers (range of estimated hazard ratios: 0.10-0.86) relative to symptomatic or clinical-detection, in various surveillance strategies that include mammography, however these estimates are likely to have overestimated screening benefit. New evaluations of screening women with a PHBC are needed from screening programs or population datasets, to provide comprehensive measures of screening accuracy and outcomes in this population of women.

Clinical outcome of breast cancer occurring after treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma: case-control analysis

Background

To evaluate diagnosis, management and outcome of breast cancer (BC) occurring after irradiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL).

Methods

39 cases of BC in 28 HL survivors were retrospectively reviewed. 21 patients were included in a case-control analysis.

Results

The median age at diagnosis of HL and BC was 25.3 and 45.3 years, respectively. The median interval to develop BC was 16.1 years. Eleven women (39.2%) had bilateral disease. Mode of detection of the index breast cancers was by mammographic screening in 17 patients (60.7%), palpable lump in 8 patients (28.6%), clinical examination in two patients (7.1%), and unknown in one patient (3.6%). Case-control analysis showed that histological features and prognosis of BC after HL were similar to those of primary BC, however, for BC after HL, mastectomy was the predominant surgery (P = .001) and adjuvant radiotherapy and anthracycline-based chemotherapy were less frequently used as compared to primary BC (P < .001 and .003, respectively).

Conclusion

The previous history of HL does not appear to be a poor prognostic factor for BC occurring thereafter.

Posttreatment breast cancer surveillance and follow-up care experiences of breast cancer survivors of African descent: an exploratory qualitative study

Breast cancer survivors are at considerable risk for breast cancer recurrence and at higher risk of developing a new breast cancer compared with women never diagnosed. It is recommended that survivors undergo careful breast cancer surveillance as cancers detected early are more treatable. However, data indicate that surveillance among African American survivors, particularly mammography, is lower than that of white survivors. There is little published work focusing on general experiences of posttreatment breast cancer surveillance among survivors of African descent. In the current qualitative pilot study, key informant interviews were conducted in order to explore the following: (1) the extent of posttreatment surveillance information provided to or obtained by survivors of African descent; (2) the actual follow-up care received by survivors in the past year; and (3) factors that are either motivators of or barriers to care. Participants were 10 African American and African Caribbean breast cancer survivors. Survivors reported a number of factors that motivated them in obtaining follow-up care: a desire to maintain good health, concern about recurrence, support from healthcare providers, familial relationships, relationships with other survivors, and religious/spiritual faith. Survivors also reported barriers to care: fear of recurrence, low support from family and friends, lack of information about posttreatment follow-up care, and medical care costs. These results represent formative work that may inform similar studies examining factors in breast cancer surveillance and follow-up care in larger samples of survivors of African descent.

Relation between the method of detection of initial breast carcinoma and the method of detection of subsequent ipsilateral local recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Mammography and physical examination are routine methods for the detection of ipsilateral local recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma in patients initially undergoing breast conservation treatment. The current study reports the relation between the method of detection of the initial breast carcinoma and the method of detection of subsequent ipsilateral local recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the records of female patients with initial American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I and II invasive breast carcinoma who developed ipsilateral local recurrence or contralateral breast carcinoma after breast conservation treatment. The method of detection of local recurrence in the ipsilateral breast and the method of detection of contralateral breast carcinoma were compared with the method of detection of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

There were 125 ipsilateral breast local recurrences and 71 contralateral breast carcinoma cases detected. Of the 125 recurrences in the ipsilateral breast, 38% (48 recurrences) were detected by mammography only, 37% (46 recurrences) were detected by physical examination only, and 25% (31 recurrences) were detected by both methods. Of the 71 contralateral breast carcinoma cases, 53% (38 cases) were detected by mammography only, 23% (16 cases) were detected by physical examination only, and 24% (17 cases) were detected by both methods. When the primary tumors were detected by mammography only, 21% of the local recurrences (3 of 14 local recurrences) and 19% of the contralateral breast carcinoma cases (4 of 21 cases) were detected by physical examination only. When the primary tumors were detected by physical examination only, 24% of the local recurrences (14 of 58 local recurrences) and 42% of the contralateral breast carcinoma cases (8 of 19 cases) were detected by mammography only. When stratified by the interval between diagnosis of the primary tumor and ipsilateral local recurrence or contralateral breast carcinoma (< or = 5 years vs. > 5 years) or age of the patient at the time of ipsilateral breast recurrence or contralateral breast carcinoma (age < or = 49 years vs. age > or = 50 years), both breast examination and mammography were found to be important in the detection of locally recurrent tumor and contralateral breast carcinoma in each subgroup of the patients, regardless of the method of presentation of the primary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Both mammography and physical examination were found to be significant in the detection of locally recurrent tumor in the ipsilateral breast and in the detection of contralateral breast carcinoma, regardless of the method of detection of the primary tumor.

Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review

As the prevalence of diagnosed breast cancer increases, it is important to define how best to provide long-term follow-up. Whereas many aspects of follow-up remain controversial, guidelines recommend surveillance mammograms as the only investigation to be performed routinely. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to elucidate the effect of routine surveillance mammograms on detecting ipsilateral recurrence (IR) and contralateral breast cancers (CBC). The systematic review yielded 15 articles. All were observational studies and ranked as level II-2 or III evidence. There were no randomized controlled trials identified. Most of the ten studies on detection of IR did not report on outcomes after detection. When reported, most studies found that the method of detection of IR did not influence overall survival or disease-free survival. Two of the nine studies on detection of CBC found that the CBC was detected at an earlier stage than the initial breast cancer, but did not report on long-term outcomes. This systematic review highlights the need for further research to help better define the optimum surveillance mammography regimen.

The long-term outcome of synchronous bilateral breast cancer is worse than metachronous or unilateral tumours

AIM

There is uncertainty in the literature as to whether bilateral breast cancer carries a worse prognosis than unilateral disease because some studies suggest that the development of a second primary does not influence survival, while others report a decreased survival in patients suffering from bilateral disease.

METHODS

A prospectively accrued and regularly validated database of 1945 patients with breast cancer treated in a district general hospital between 1963 and 1999 was analysed for clinical and pathological tumour characteristics including family history, grade, type of tumour, treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

Five per cent of patients (92) suffered from metachronous and 43 (2%) from synchronous bilateral breast cancer. A family history of breast cancer was more common in patients with metachronous bilateral breast cancer (38%), compared with the unilateral group (15%) and the synchronous bilateral breast cancer group (17%) (chi(2)=22.9, P<0.001). Patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer had a significantly worse overall survival when compared with those with metachronous bilateral or unilateral breast cancer (log-rank test chi(2)=6.1, P=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Women with metachronous breast cancer were more likely to have positive family history, while those with synchronous bilateral breast cancer tend to have shorter survival when compared with those with unilateral breast cancer. Synchronous bilaterality is not, however, an independent risk factor on multivariate analysis.

Diagnosis of metachronous contralateral breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of primary breast cancers (PBCs) and metachronous contralateral breast cancers (MCBCs). Between 1984 and 1996, 236 women treated with curative intent for PBC who developed a MCBC >6 months after initial diagnosis (without previous evidence of distant metastases) were retrospectively evaluated for clinical and pathologic characteristics and method of diagnosis of their tumors. There were more noninvasive cancers among the MCBCs than the PBCs (11.4% and 5.1%, respectively, p < 0.02). Among the invasive cancers, the mean size of the MCBCs was smaller than the PBCs (1.94 versus 2.55 cm, p < 0.001). MCBCs were more likely than PBCs to be mammographically detected (46.2% versus 19.9%, p < 0.001). Tumor size was correlated with the method of diagnosis. The mean tumor size was 1.39, 2.02, and 2.69 cm for mammogram-, physician-, and patient-detected tumors, respectively. Among patients having axillary lymph node dissections, mammogram- and physician-detected tumors were less likely to have lymph node metastases than patient-detected tumors (22.0% versus 41.2%, p < 0.005). Regular follow-up of breast cancer patients diagnoses MCBCs when they are smaller and less likely to have nodal metastases than PBCs mainly because of early mammographic detection.

An overview of the management of recurrent breast cancer

Breast cancer recurrence is a potential problem for anyone who is diagnosed with breast cancer. Recurrent breast cancer can manifest both locally and systemically and can cause a variety of symptoms. After a diagnosis is established, treatment and symptom management may include radiation, chemotherapy, surgery and hormone therapy. The confirmation of a recurrent diagnosis may have far-reaching psychological and social implications for the patient. The care of each patient with metastatic disease must be tailored to that individual's needs and will involve the varied skills of the multidisciplinary team. The type of care that is given should be negotiated with each patient, and includes a combination of active treatment and symptom management, with the ultimate aim of ensuring that the patient's quality of life is maintained at an optimum level for as long as possible.

Survival from contralateral breast cancer

First primary, or unilateral, breast cancer (UBC) cases diagnosed in 1960-89 at the Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India were followed-up until December 31, 1994. Patients with UBC (n = 3163) and those who developed second cancer in the contralateral breast (CBC) after the initial breast cancer (n = 67 or 2.1% of UBC) were analysed. Compared to UBC patients, those who developed CBC were younger at the time of diagnosis of initial breast cancer and had higher frequency of breast cancer among the family members. The relative survival rate takes into account competing causes of death and was estimated as the ratio of observed survival rate to the expected survival rate. The cumulative relative survival from UBC at 5 and 10 years were 51% and 41%, respectively, and the corresponding rates for CBC were 47% and 30%; the survival difference seen between UBC and CBC patients was not statistically significant. The survival rates among younger, middle-aged and older women were significantly different from each other in UBC but not in CBC patients. Both UBC and CBC with early stage disease had a better survival compared to late stage disease. Survival advantage was also seen among both UBC and CBC patients with family history of breast cancer compared to those without. The multivariate analysis by the life table proportional hazards model showed that the age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer. The study results should be interpreted in the light of small sample size of second cancers.

Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies

BACKGROUND

Patients with a history of carcinoma of one breast have an estimated risk of 0.5% to 0.75% per year of developing a contralateral breast cancer. This risk prompts many women to consider contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) as a preventive measure. Virtually nothing is known about patient acceptance following CPM. We have developed a National Prophylactic Mastectomy Registry comprised of a volunteer population of 817 women from 43 states who have undergone prophylactic (unilateral or bilateral) mastectomy.

METHODS

Of the 346 women with CPM who responded to national notices, 296 women returned detailed questionnaires. The information obtained included patient demographics, family history, reproductive history, ipsilateral breast cancer staging and treatment, as well as issues involving the CPM.

RESULTS

At median follow-up of 4.9 years, the respondents were primarily married (79%), white (97%) women who had some level of college education or above (81%). These women cited the following reasons for choosing CPM: (1) physician advice regarding the high risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (30%); (2) fear of developing more breast cancer (14%); (3) desire for cosmetic symmetry (10%); (4) family history (7%); (5) fibrocystic breast disease (4%); (6) a combination of all of these reasons (32%); (7) other (2%); and (8) unknown (1%). Eighteen of the 296 women (6%) expressed regrets regarding their decision to undergo CPM. Unlike women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomies, regrets tended to be less common in the women with whom the discussion of CPM had been initiated by their physician (5%) than in the women who had initiated the discussion themselves (8%) (P = ns). Family history and stage of index lesion had no impact on regret status. The reasons for regret included: (1) poor cosmetic result, either of the CPM or of the reconstruction (39%); (2) diminished sense of sexuality (22%); (3) lack of education regarding alternative surveillance methods or CPM efficacy (22%); and (4) other reasons (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

To minimize the risk of regrets in women contemplating CPM, it is imperative that these women be counseled regarding an estimation of contralateral breast cancer risk, the alternatives to CPM, and the efficacy of CPM. In addition, these women should have realistic expectations of the cosmetic outcomes of surgery and understand the potential impact on their body image.

Reducing scatter radiation to the contralateral breast with a mobile, conformal shield during breast cancer radiotherapy

During a standard course of breast radiotherapy, the contralateral breast generally receives approximately 2.5 to 6.0 Gy of scattered radiation. Although most studies have not found an overall increase in metachronous contralateral breast cancers in patients undergoing radiotherapy, a cohort of younger women may be genetically more susceptible to radiation-induced breast cancers and may thus be adversely affected by the scattered radiation. We are attempting to develop a simple, convenient, effective mechanism for minimizing the scattered radiation to the contralateral breast during the process of clinical breast radiotherapy. We therefore designed a conformal, platform-based breast shield consisting of 2.5 cm of molded lead in a mobile counterweighted polystyrene casing. This shield was intended to serve as a physical barrier to prevent both low and high energy scattered photons from the medial and lateral tangential fields. We conducted a prospective trial of 20 women, each woman serving as her own control. Each woman received breast radiotherapy with and without shield, and an array of thermoluminescent dosimeters was positioned across the contralateral breast to evaluate the in vivo dosimetry and the impact of the breast shield on surface absorption of scattered radiation. We found that the use of the breast shield reduced the median dose of scattered radiation by approximately 60% (p < 0.0001). This represented a median dose reduction of approximately 300 cGy at the nipple. The shield was easily positioned and added < 1 min to daily setup time. We conclude that the use of this sort of surface barrier shielding technique was feasible, effective, and practical for clinical use. The degree of scatter reduction accomplished through the use of this breast shield may be biologically significant, especially for those patients with biologic or epidemiologic risk factors that may predispose them to the development of radiogenic breast cancers.

Analyzing prognostic factors in breast cancer using a multistate model

In breast cancer clinical research, an important goal is to analyze how factors are seen to affect the disease process. Meanwhile, the disease progression is not fully modelled using standard analysis since transitions between intermediate events such as local-regional recurrences (LRR) or metachronous contralateral breast cancer (MCBC) are not considered. In the present study, the progression of disease was modelled using a multistate model. By this approach, we assessed transitions during the course of the disease and studied prognostic factors for each transition. The model was applied to 6,185 patients with unilateral ductal invasive breast cancer, clinical stage I through III, treated between 1981 and 1988 at the Curie Institute. At first diagnosis, high clinical stage, high histological grade, positive lymph nodes, and age less than 40 years were associated with increased risks of LRR, metastases, or death. Except age, the same factors remained predictive for metastases or death following LRR. Chemotherapy for the first cancer was associated with a decreased risk for developing MCBC. As the time interval from diagnosis of the primary tumor to that of a local or contralateral recurrence increased, the risk of metastases or death decreased. Nodal status for the first tumor and clinical stage for the contralateral tumor increased the risk of metastases or death following MCBC. Conversely, the risk decreased for patients who received adjuvant hormone therapy following MCBC. In conclusion, the multistate model offers us a much more appropriate way to study prognostic factors for each transition in breast cancer disease.

Feasibility of breast conservation therapy in metachronous or synchronous bilateral breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of contralateral breast cancer (CC) in patients previously treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is unclear, as is whether these patients continue to choose BCT as the preferred treatment of their second breast cancer.

METHODS

Of 1328 patients treated with BCT at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1958 and 1994, 63 developed a contralateral breast cancer. We reviewed the charts of these patients retrospectively, and standard demographic and treatment variables were evaluated. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and subgroups by chi2 analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine percent of the patients had a family history of breast cancer. First breast cancers were detected by patient or physician in 67% of cases and by mammogram in 17% of cases, compared to 59% and 36%, respectively, of CC (P = .04). Median time to development of CC was 61 months. Sixty percent of the initial tumors were AJCC stage 0 or I with a median size of 2 cm, whereas 74% of the CC were stage 0 or I (P = .02), with a median size of 1.5 cm. Eighty-seven percent of patients chose BCT for treatment of CC. There were few treatment-related complications. Recurrence rates were not significantly different from those of patients undergoing BCT for the initial cancer (P = .47), and 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rates after the first cancer were 93% and 76%, respectively. Median follow-up was 134 and 56 months from the time of diagnosis of the initial cancer and CC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Because contralateral breast cancer often is detected at an early stage, there are few treatment-related complications, and the risk of recurrence is no different from that for the initial cancer, BCT is an acceptable and desirable option for appropriately selected patients with metachronous or synchronous bilateral breast cancers.

Detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients by multiple-marker RT-PCR

This study was undertaken to assess a multiple-marker RT-PCR and Southern blot assay for detection of metastases in frozen sections of sentinel lymph nodes from breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymphadenectomy was performed in 41 AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage I-IIIA breast cancer patients and 57 sentinel nodes (SNs) were excised. The SN, which is the first node in the lymphatic basin to receive metastases from the primary tumor, was identified using isosulfan blue dye. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), immuno-histochemistry (IHC) and RT-PCR were performed on adjacent sections of the SN. Six consecutive 12-microm frozen sections of each SN were obtained for the RT-PCR assay to determine expression of mRNA tumor markers C-Met, beta1 --> 4GalNAc-T and P97. Metastatic breast cancer was detected by H&E in 10 of 57 (18%) SNs and by IHC in an additional 7 (12%). Only 1 of 17 (6%) SNs with metastases did not express any of the 3 tumor mRNA markers. C-Met, beta1 --> 4GalNAc-T and P97 tumor mRNA markers were expressed in 31 (78%), 21 (53%) and 25 (63%) of 40 SNs without metastases, respectively. At least 2 mRNA tumor markers were expressed in 25/40 (63%) histo-pathologically tumor-free SNs, whereas all 3 mRNA tumor markers were expressed in 17/40 (43%) SNs. Expression of all 3 mRNA tumor markers in a SN was significantly higher in patients with a family history of breast cancer (p = 0.05), prior history of breast cancer (p < 0.05), infiltrating lobular carcinoma (p = 0.06), estrogen receptor-negative (p = 0.04) tumor or a higher Bloom Richardson score (p = 0.04). The multiple-marker RT-PCR and Southern blot assay improves the detection of occult metastases in the SN when compared to conventional H&E and IHC analysis. Expression of all 3 tumor mRNA markers in the SN correlated with poor prognostic clinico-pathologic factors compared to expression of 0 to 2 markers.