Treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (stage I, II) of the elderly: usefulness of local and regional irradiation and reduced dose chemotherapy

Feasibility and Results of a Multimodality Approach in Elderly Patients with Localized Intermediate to High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas

Aims and background

A prospective clinical study to determine efficacy and feasibility of a brief course or standard course of anthracycline-based chemotherapy and consolidation radiation therapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients over 60 years of age.

Methods

Twenty-five consecutive patients with stage I-IE intermediate to high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma aged 60 and older were treated in an outpatient setting in the Radiotherapy Oncology and Hematology units. All patients had a performance status of 0-1 according to WHO criteria. The survival end points, ie, overall survival, disease-free survival and event-free survival, were considered. Lactate dehydrogenase value, nodal versus extranodal localization and dose intensity were assessed as risk factors for disease-free and overall survival. A comparison using logrank analysis with a wellmatched group of stage I-IE non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients aged less than 60 years was performed.

Results

The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 90% and 86%, respectively. There was no statistical difference with respect to the younger population regarding these survival end points. Finally, the 5-year event-free survival was 85% and 86% for elderly and younger patients, respectively, without statistical difference (P = 0.41). Neither acute nor late toxicity (G3-G4) was observed during chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment and the follow-up in the elderly group.

Conclusions

We confirm the efficacy and feasibility of a full-dose combined chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with a good performance status with localized I-IE intermediate to high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A prospective study of reduced-dose three-course CHOP followed by involved-field radiotherapy for patients 70 years old or more with localized aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

We conducted a multicenter prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduced-dose three-course CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) followed by involved-field radiotherapy for elderly patients with localized aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The primary endpoint was compliance with the combined modality.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study included untreated patients, > or =70 years old, with diffuse aggressive lymphoma, Stage IA or contiguous nonbulky Stage IIA. 80%-CHOP (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.1 mg/m(2), and prednisolone at 80 mg/day for 5 days) was repeated every 3 weeks. After three cycles of chemotherapy, involved-field radiotherapy was performed with a radiation dose of 30-50 Gy in 15-28 fractions.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with a median age of 75 years (range, 70-84 years) were enrolled. The compliance rate of the protocol study was 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.6-97.3). Three patients received only two cycles of chemotherapy because of toxicity or second neoplasm. There were no deaths caused by severe toxicity. The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 83.1% (95% CI, 75.4-90.8) and 82.9% (95% CI, 75.1-90.6), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Three-course 80%-CHOP followed by involved-field radiotherapy may be safe for administration to elderly patients over 70 years old. The next step is to evaluate three-course 80%-CHOP and rituximab followed by radiotherapy in elderly patients with localized disease.

The influence of age and comorbidity on receiving radiotherapy as part of primary treatment for cancer in South Netherlands, 1995 to 2002

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to study the influence of age and comorbidity on receiving radiotherapy (RT) in primary treatment of cancer.

METHODS

In a population-based setting, the authors calculated the proportion of irradiated patients within 6 months after they received a diagnosis of lung, rectal, breast, or prostate cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 33,369 patients) according to age and comorbidity between 1995 and 2002. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for age, comorbidity, gender, and stage.

RESULTS

Patients with localized nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ages 65 years to > or = 80 years or with comorbid conditions received RT alone significantly more often compared with younger patients (ages 65-79 years: odds ratio [OR], 3.4; age > or = 80: OR, 12.0) and patients without comorbidities (1 comorbid condition: OR, 2.1; > or = 2 comorbid conditions: OR, 2.4). This also applied to patients with nonlocalized NSCLC ages 65 years to 79 years compared with younger patients (OR, 1.4). RT was administered significantly less often to elderly patients with resected rectal cancers (ages 65-79 years: OR, 0.7; age > or = 80 years: OR, 0.4), patients age > or = 80 years with breast cancer after undergoing conserving surgery (OR, 0.1), and patients age > or = 80 years with clinical T1-T3,N0,M0 prostate cancer age (OR, 0.1) compared with younger patients. Patients with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery received RT significantly less often in the presence of comorbidities (1 comorbid condition: OR, 0.6; > or = 2 comorbid conditions: OR, 0.4). Older patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma received only RT as treatment significantly more often compared with younger patients (OR, 3.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidity and age did have influence over whether patients received RT, although, for most tumor types, age appeared to be a stronger predicting factor. Under treatment was observed among patients with breast cancer and rectal cancer.

Long-term follow-up of patients treated with radiotherapy alone for early-stage histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Historically localised aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has been treated with involved field radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, or a combination of both modalities. The current weight of evidence supports a preference for combined modality treatment (CMT). Increased patient age at diagnosis is well recognised as a poor prognostic indicator in NHL, but despite this some perceive CMT as too toxic for use in the elderly. As a result, some older patients continue to be offered RT alone. Here, we present long-term follow-up of 377 adults of all ages treated with RT alone for early-stage diffuse large-cell lymphoma on British National Lymphoma Investigation trials between 1974 and 1997. 10-year cause-specific survival in patients older than 60 years was poor and significantly inferior to that in younger patients (47 and 75% respectively; P<0.001). There is growing evidence that short-course chemotherapy, with or without RT, is superior to RT alone in early-stage aggressive NHL, in elderly as well as in younger patients. Increased age alone should not exclude patients from systemic treatment for early-stage aggressive NHL.

Stage I high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

We report long-term survival and prognostic factors in 252 patients with stage I high-grade lymphoma. Median patient age was 64 years and 49% of patients had extranodal lymphoma. Premenopausal women had less risk of extranodal lymphoma than older women or males (p < 0.002). Disease specific 5 and 15 years' survival in patients < 64 years was 83% and 76%, respectively; compared to 54% and 46% in patients > 64 years of age. Age, non-centroblastic histology, B-symptoms, and increased serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were independently negative prognostic factors (p < 0.01), while extranodal, testicular, or bulky ( > 6 cm) lymphoma presentation were of no prognostic significance. A radiation dose of 40 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to the primary site prevented in-field relapse in 159 of 173 irradiated patients (92%) and only three of 173 patients (1.7%) had local relapse in the absence of systemic dissemination.

The management of adult aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphona include diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphona, and different peripheral T-cell lymphomas. An international prognostic index has been developed including age, serum LDH, performance status, and extranodal involvement. For localized aggressive lymphoma, the preferred treatment is 3-4 CHOP and radiation therapy, with a cure rate of 70-80%. For disseminated aggressive lymphoma, current regimens have a cure rate of less than 40%. Innovative strategies, including dose escalation, autologus stem cell support, new drugs, and immunotherapy are being explored to improve these results.

Combined chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for treatment of early-stage intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Treatment of localized (stages I, IE, non-bulky II and IIE) aggressive histologies of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has evolved over the past 20 years. Prior to 1980, these diseases were shown to be locally controlled with radiotherapy, but systemic relapse and death were common. With the discovery of potentially curative doxorubicin- containing chemotherapy, pilot studies during the 1980s demonstrated the utility of combination chemotherapy as initial therapy by increasing the proportion of cured patients. In the 1990s, two large randomized, prospective trials set the benchmark for future comparisons by establishing initial chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy (combined modality therapy) as the best available current treatment strategy.

Radiation therapy of the older patient

Radiotherapy has a major role in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer therapy. It is widely used for curative and palliative treatment of cancer involving various sites. Radiotherapy is of particular benefit to older and frail cancer patients as an alternative to surgery and to systemic therapy. The available data on the sensitivity of normal tissues to radiotherapy in elderly patients strongly suggest that older patients with good functional status tolerate radiotherapy as well as younger patients and have comparable tumor response and survival rates. Aggressive radiotherapy should not be withheld from older patients because of chronological age alone.