Cost benefit of emerging technology in localized carcinoma of the prostate

Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer

We reviewed the literature on the use of margins in radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer, focusing on different options for image guidance (IG) and technical issues. The search in PubMed database was limited to include studies that involved external beam radiotherapy of the intact prostate. Post-prostatectomy studies, brachytherapy and particle therapy were excluded. Each article was characterized according to the IG strategy used: positioning on external marks using room lasers, bone anatomy and soft tissue match, usage of fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking and adapted delivery. A lack of uniformity in margin selection among institutions was evident from the review. In general, introduction of pre- and in-treatment IG was associated with smaller planning target volume (PTV) margins, but there was a lack of definitive experimental/clinical studies providing robust information on selection of exact PTV values. In addition, there is a lack of comparative research regarding the cost-benefit ratio of the different strategies: insertion of fiducial markers or electromagnetic transponders facilitates prostate gland localization but at a price of invasive procedure; frequent pre-treatment imaging increases patient in-room time, dose and labour; online plan adaptation should improve radiation delivery accuracy but requires fast and precise computation. Finally, optimal protocols for quality assurance procedures need to be established.

Low-dose rate brachytherapy for men with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Localized prostate cancer is a slow growing tumor for many years for the majority of affected men. Low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) is short-distance radiotherapy using low-energy radioactive sources. LDR-BT has been recommended for men with low risk localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefit and harm of LDR-BT compared to radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and no primary therapy (NPT) in men with localized prostatic cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1950), and EMBASE (from 1980) were searched in June 2010 as well as online trials registers and reference lists of reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, controlled trials comparing LDR-BT versus RP, EBRT, and NPT in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data on study methods, participants, treatment regimens, observation period and outcomes were recorded by two reviewers independently.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified only one RCT (N = 200; mean follow up 68 months). This trial compared LDR-BT and RP. The risk of bias was deemed high. Primary outcomes (overall survival, cause-specific mortality, or metastatic-free survival) were not reported. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years follow up was not significantly different between LDR-BT (78/85 (91.8%)) and RP (81/89 (91.0%)); P = 0.875; relative risk 0.92 (95% CI: 0.35 to 2.42).For severe adverse events reported at 6 months follow up, results favored LDR-BT for urinary incontinence (LDR-BT 0/85 (0.0%) versus RP 16/89 (18.0%); P < 0.001; relative risk 0) and favored RP for urinary irritation (LDR-BT 68/85 (80.0%) versus RP 4/89 (4.5%); P < 0.001; relative risk 17.80, 95% CI 6.79 to 46.66). The occurrence of urinary stricture did not significantly differ between the treatment groups (LDR-BT 2/85 (2.4%) versus RP 6/89 (6.7%); P = 0.221; relative risk 0.35, 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.68). Long-term information was not available.We did not identify significant differences of mean scores between treatment groups for patient-reported outcomes function and bother as well as generic health-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rate brachytherapy did not reduce biochemical recurrence-free survival versus radical prostatectomy at 5 years. For short-term severe adverse events, low-dose rate brachytherapy was significantly more favorable for urinary incontinence, but radical prostatectomy was significantly more favorable for urinary irritation. Evidence is based on one RCT with high risk of bias.

Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer

Background:

Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has shown to reduce prostate cancer mortality in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial. Overdetection and overtreatment are substantial unfavourable side effects with consequent healthcare costs. In this study the effects of introducing widespread PSA screening is evaluated.

Methods:

The MISCAN model was used to simulate prostate cancer growth and detection in a simulated cohort of 100 000 men (European standard population) over 25 years. PSA screening from age 55 to 70 or 75, with 1, 2 and 4-year-intervals is simulated. Number of diagnoses, PSA tests, biopsies, treatments, deaths and corresponding costs for 100 000 men and for United Kingdom and United States are compared.

Results:

Without screening 2378 men per 100 000 were predicted to be diagnosed with prostate cancer compared with 4956 men after screening at 4-year intervals. By introducing screening, the costs would increase with 100% to €60 695 000. Overdetection is related to 39% of total costs (€23 669 000). Screening until age 75 is relatively most expensive because of the costs of overtreatment.

Conclusion:

Introduction of PSA screening will increase total healthcare costs for prostate cancer substantially, of which the actual screening costs will be a small part.

Resveratrol sensitization of DU145 prostate cancer cells to ionizing radiation is associated to ceramide increase

Radiotherapy is an established therapeutic modality for prostate cancer. Since it is well known that radiotherapy is limited due to its severe toxicity towards normal cells at high dose and minimal effect at low dose, the search for biological compounds that increase the sensitivity of tumors cells to radiation may improve the efficacy of therapy. Resveratrol, a natural antioxidant, was shown to inhibit carcinogenesis in animal models, and to block the process of tumor initiation and progression. The purpose of this study was to examine whether or not resveratrol can sensitize DU145, an androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell line, to ionizing radiation. We report here that DU145 cells are resistant to ionizing radiation-induced cell death, but pretreatment with resveratrol significantly enhances cell death. Resveratrol acts synergistically with ionizing radiation to inhibit cell survival in vitro. Resveratrol also potentiates ionizing radiation-induced ceramide accumulation, by promoting its de novo biosynthesis. This confirms ceramide as an effective mediator of the anticancer potential induced by resveratrol.

Technology Enhancements and Changes in Radiotherapy Throughput in New South Wales

AIMS

To assess the effect that the age of linear accelerators and recent changes in technology have had on linear accelerator throughput in New South Wales, Australia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Duration was measured (time of patient entry into the treatment room to time of exit) of each radiotherapy treatment fraction delivered on each linear accelerator over a 5-day period. Patient-, treatment- and equipment-based variables were collected for all treatment fractions, and assessed for their effect on fraction duration. Comparisons were made between these data and similar productivity data collected from a study carried out in 1996. Since the sample sizes for both the study periods were large enough, the distributions of the means were assumed normal (Central Limit Theorem). Specific analyses were carried out to assess the affect that new technologies, such as automatic field-sequencing (AFS) and multi-leaf collimator (MLC), have had on fraction duration.

RESULTS

A total of 12 892 treatment fields and 4316 treatment fractions were delivered on 27 linear accelerators over 135 days. Comparison between the 2003 and 1996 productivity data showed an increase in the mean number of patients treated per hour by 11% and fields treated per hour by 31%. The mean number of fields treated per fraction increased by 15%. The mean fraction duration was reduced by 13% for linear accelerators of less than the median age of 7 years that were equipped with MLC/AFS, or both, compared with older linear accelerators without AFS and MLC. This reduction was more obvious for complex techniques, such as four-field breast treatments (27% decrease in fraction duration). The mean number of fields treated per hour was 43% more on the newer machines equipped with AFS and MLC.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in productivity has been observed between the 1996 and 2003 study periods, as measured by patients or fields per hour, despite an increase in treatment complexity as measured by fields per fraction. The application of AFS and MLC, and the use of newer linear accelerators, significantly shortened the mean duration per fraction for the common treatment techniques.

Three-Dimensional Conformal Therapy Versus Standard Radiation Therapy in Localized Carcinoma of Prostate: An Update

This study updates technical principles and results of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in localized carcinoma of the prostate. Between January 1992 and December 1999, 312 patients were treated with 3D-CRT and 135 patients were treated with bilateral arcs standard radiation therapy (SRT) alone for clinical stage T1b-c or T2 histologically confirmed prostate cancer. None of these patients received hormonal therapy. Mean follow-up for patients in the 3D-CRT group was 3.2 years (range, 2-5.9 years) and for SRT patients, 4.7 years (range, 4-7 years). For 3D-CRT, 7 intersecting fields were used (cerrobend blocking or multileaf collimation) to deliver 68-74 Gy to the prostate. Standard radiation therapy consisted of bilateral 120 degree rotational arcs, with portals using 2-cm margins around the prostate to deliver 68-70 Gy to the prostate. The criterion for chemical disease-free survival was a postirradiation prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value following the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines. Symptoms during treatment were quantitated weekly, and late effects were assessed every 4-6 months. Dose-volume histograms showed a two-thirds reduction with 3D-CRT in normal bladder or rectum receiving > or = 70 Gy with 3D-CRT. Higher 5-year chemical disease-free survival was observed with 3D-CRT (75%; for T1b-c and 79%; for T2 tumors) compared with SRT (61% and 65%, P = 0.01 and P = 0.12, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in chemical disease-free survival in patients with Gleason score of < or = 4 (P = 0.85), but, with Gleason score of 5-7, the 5-year survival rates were 83% with 3D-CRT and 59% with SRT (P < or = 0.01). In 245 patients with pretreatment PSA of < or = 10 ng/mL treated with 3D-CRT, the chemical disease-free rate was 80% versus 72% in 98 patients treated with SRT (P = 0.21). In patients with PSA of 10.1-20 ng/mL, the chemical disease-free survival rate for 50 patients treated with 3D-CRT was 71% compared with 43% for 20 patients treated with SRT (P = 0.02). The corresponding values were 59% and 16%, respectively, for patients with PSA levels > 20 ng/mL (P = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for chemical failure were pretreatment PSA (P = 0.004), nadir PSA (P = 0.001), and 3D-CRT technique (P = 0.012). Moderate dysuria was reported by 2%-5% of patients treated with 3D-CRT in contrast to 6%-9% of patients treated with SRT. The incidence of moderate loose stools or diarrhea, usually after the fourth week of treatment, was 3%-5% in the 3D-CRT patients and 8%-19% in the SRT group. Late intestinal grade 2 morbidity (proctitis or rectal bleeding) was 1% in the 3D-CRT group in contrast to 7% in SRT patients. The 3D-CRT spares more normal tissues, yields higher chemical disease-free survival, and results in less treatment morbidity than SRT in treatment of stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Follow-up at > or = 10 years is needed to confirm these observations.

An economic overview of prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In the United States in 2000, 180,400 new cases of prostate carcinoma were expected to occur, with 31,900 men expected to die from this illness. In addition, prostate carcinoma is the cause of over half a million disability-adjusted life-years. This study summarizes the current body of published literature about the economics of prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

The authors used a MEDLINE-based literature review for relevant articles from 1990 to the present.

RESULTS

The authors' search returned 216 articles, 56 of which met the criteria of interest. Prostate carcinoma is costly to treat, currently averaging above $20,000 per case. Cost of care is directly related to stage of disease and comorbidity. Substantial geographic variation exists, even within small locales, with regard to care patterns and cost. In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost are inversely related to case volume. Care rendered in health maintenance organizations is generally less technologically intensive than in the fee-for-service sector. Out of the 18 cost studies examined, 13 were cost-minimization analyses and five assessed cost-effectiveness. From a cost perspective, laparoscopic pelvic node dissection was favored over an open pelvic procedure; 3D conformal radiation therapy was favored over 2D; and radiation therapy was favored over radical prostatectomy. Cost-effectiveness analyses favored the use of metastron, mitroxantone plus prednisone over prednisone alone, flutamine with either medical or surgical castration, and orchiectomy as the androgen suppression therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature on the economics of prostate carcinoma is relatively meager. Most cost studies were done on small samples, had short follow-up periods, used charges rather than cost data, and did not include adequate representation of all stages of disease. Additional research is needed.

Image segmentation in treatment planning for prostate cancer using the region growing technique

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a region growing technique for segmenting prostate, bladder and rectum in CT images of prostate cancer patients. Prostate, bladder and rectum were segmented in all CT images of 10 patients using the region growing technique and manual tracing. Volumes of the above organs computed with the region growing technique were compared with those from manually traced images on a slice-by-slice basis. Measurement reproducibility of both segmentation techniques was evaluated using the data obtained from four independent observers. The region growing technique was 1.5 times faster than manual tracing. There was no statistical difference between the slice volumes of prostate, bladder and rectum obtained by the two segmentation techniques (p > 0.05, paired Student's t-test). Correlation between slice volumes of all organs of interest provided both by region growing and by manual tracing was very good (prostate r2 = 0.84; bladder r2 = 0.93; rectum r2 = 0.85). An overall reasonable agreement was found between the two segmentation techniques. The intraobserver and interobserver variations for prostate, bladder and rectum volume segmentation were found to be lower with the region growing technique than with manual tracing. The suggested semi-automatic technique allows the possibility of generating accurate and reproducible segmentation of prostate, bladder and rectum from CT data with great saving in labour.

Relationship of first-year costs of treating localized prostate cancer to initial choice of therapy and stage at diagnosis: results from the CAPSURE database

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship among the initial choice of therapy, stage at presentation, and first-year treatment costs in men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

First-year resource use and clinical data were collected for 235 subjects with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer. The costs were estimated from the standard Medicare payment schedules. The relationship among the initial therapy, stage at presentation, and overall cost was examined for the entire cohort and in the subgroup of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. In addition, the inpatient, outpatient, and medication cost components were evaluated separately to determine what influenced the changes in cost by stage.

RESULTS

The mean first-year cost of treating localized prostate cancer in CaPSURE was $6375. When broken down by stage, the mean first-year cost for patients with Stage T1c was $5731, with T2a/b was $6426, and with Stage T2c was $6810 (P = 0.059). The initial treatment choice was significantly associated with the total first-year costs (P <0.001). The mean cost specifically for radical prostatectomy patients with Stage T1c disease was $6881, with T2a/b was $7216, and with T2c was $8027 (P = 0.004). The increases in the first-year cost with higher stage appeared to primarily be associated with increased inpatient resource use and the greater use of adjuvant hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The first-year costs of treating localized prostate cancer in CaPSURE are associated with the choice of primary and adjuvant therapy. This supports the notion that cost savings may be possible with earlier detection of disease or by minimizing the use of hormonal adjuvant therapy.

Cost-minimization analysis: radiation treatment with and without a multi-leaf collimator

PURPOSE

To compare the costs of radiation treatment on a linear accelerator with a multileaf collimator (MLC) versus treatment on a linear accelerator without an MLC. The study was designed to determine whether the increased throughput of fields and decreased block cutting made the MLC cost effective from an institutional perspective.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The number of fields, basic treatment equivalent, equivalent simple treatment visits, and blocks were prospectively collected for the four linear accelerators. Building, equipment, staffing, and service costs were all obtained in 1999 Australian dollars from the manufacturers and hospital department heads. The Joint Radiation Oncology Centre at Westmead and Nepean Hospitals, which are Australian public hospitals, runs as one unit, with the same staff, and currently operates five linear accelerators. Currently, four of the linear accelerators are used for general radiotherapy, operating for exactly the same hours; the final machine operates more limited hours and is used for specialized radiotherapy techniques and emergency cases.

RESULTS

The two machines with MLCs, on average, treated 5,169 fields each, while the two machines without MLCs treated 4,543 fields in a 3-month period, a 12% increase in throughput. The two non-MLC machines required 155 premounted trays (PMTs) in total, while the MLC machines required 17 PMTs. Linear accelerators with MLCs were demonstrably more efficient, and while their capital costs were higher, the reduction in labor costs associated with block cutting and, particularly the increased throughput, more than offset these initial costs. The total cost of a radiation field with an MLC was found to be $A101.69 compared to $A106.98 without an MLC. A multiway sensitivity analysis showed the results to be robust. The worst-case scenario was a departmental savings of $A168,000 per year; the best-case scenario was a savings of $A680,000 per year.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions pertaining to the radiation oncology department in this group of hospitals, and in similar departments, the use of an MLC can be justified.

Three-dimensional conformal therapy or standard irradiation in localized carcinoma of prostate: preliminary results of a nonrandomized comparison

PURPOSE

We present preliminary results of a nonrandomized comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) and standard radiation therapy (SRT) in localized carcinoma of the prostate in two groups of patients with comparable prognostic factors treated during the same period.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1992 and December 1997, 146 patients were treated with 3D CRT and 131 with SRT alone for clinical stage T1c or T2 histologically confirmed carcinoma of the prostate. None of these patients received hormonal therapy. Mean follow-up for all patients is 3 years (range, 1-6 years). For 3D CRT, 7 intersecting fields were used (Cerrobend blocking or multileaf collimation) to deliver 68-73.8 Gy to the prostate; 3D dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the planning target volume, bladder, and rectum were obtained. SRT consisted of bilateral 120 degrees rotational arcs, with portals with 2-cm margins around the prostate to deliver 68-70 Gy to the prostate. The criterion for chemical disease-free survival was a postirradiation prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (Tandem-R, Hybritech) value following the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines. Symptoms during treatment were quantitated weekly, and late effects were assessed every 4-6 months.

RESULTS

DVHs showed a two-thirds reduction in normal bladder or rectum receiving 70 Gy or more with 3D CRT. Higher 5-year chemical disease-free survival was observed with 3D CRT (91% for T1c and 96% for T2 tumors) compared with SRT (53% and 58%, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in chemical disease-free survival in patients with Gleason score of 4 or less (p = 0.83), but with Gleason score of 5-7, the 5-year survival rates were 96% with 3D CRT and 53% with SRT (p < or = 0.01). In 111 patients with pretreatment PSA of 10 ng/mL or less, treated with 3D CRT, the chemical disease-free rate was 96% vs. 65% in 94 patients treated with SRT (p < or = 0.01). In patients with PSA of 10. 1-20 ng/mL, the chemical disease-free survival rate for 26 patients treated with 3D CRT was 88% compared with 40% for 20 patients treated with SRT (p = 0.05). The corresponding values were 71% and 26%, respectively, for patients with PSA levels of greater than 20 ng/mL (p = 0.30). On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for chemical failure were pretreatment PSA (p = 0. 023), nadir PSA (p = 0.001), and 3D CRT technique (p = 0.033). Moderate dysuria and difficulty in urinating were reported by 2-5% of patients treated with 3D CRT in contrast to 6-9% of patients treated with SRT; moderate urinary frequency and nocturia were reported by 18-24% treated with 3D CRT and 18-27% of patients in the SRT group. The incidence of moderate loose stools/diarrhea, usually after the 4th week of treatment, was 3-5% in the 3D CRT patients and 8-19% in the SRT group. Late intestinal morbidity (proctitis, rectal bleeding) was very low (1.7%) in the 3D CRT group in contrast to the SRT patients (8%).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional CRT spares more normal tissues, yields higher chemical disease-free survival, and results in less treatment morbidity than SRT in treatment of Stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these preliminary observations.

The cost effectiveness of 3D conformal radiation therapy compared with conventional techniques for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated the advantages of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in improved rates of biochemical (bNED) control in certain subsets of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, in this era of cost consciousness and limited resources, the cost effectiveness of 3DCRT compared with conventional external beam irradiation (CRT) remains unexamined.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1, 1987 and November 30, 1991, 193 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received definitive external beam irradiation at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The 1998 Medicare fee schedule was used to determine treatment charges and to provide a reference for a national comparison. Complete charges for pretreatment work-up, treatment, and follow-up were tabulated for each patient. The mean total charges (MTC) using the Lin method of estimating medical costs was used to analyze and compare costs between groups. A matched case/control analysis was performed to further evaluate the effect of cost between techniques. The median follow-up was 72 months (range 3-118).

RESULTS

The overall 5-year actuarial rate of bNED control was 41% and 53%, respectively, for the CRT and 3DCRT patients (p = 0.03). The MTC for the CRT patients was $10,544.53. For the 3DCRT patients, the MTC was $8,955.48. The sample mean of the total costs from the observed deaths for the two patient groups by follow-up interval ranged from $9,800.63 to $59,635.01 for the CRT patients to $17,259.00 to $24,250.38 for the 3DCRT patients. No statistically significant difference in cost was observed between groups using the matched case/control analysis.

CONCLUSION

Initial work-up and treatment costs were greater for patients treated with 3DCRT compared with patients treated with conventional techniques. However, with longer follow-up, the mean total cost of treatment was not statistically different between the two treatment groups. Because of improved rates of bNED control for these patients and the increased costs associated with the treatment of a greater fraction of patients with recurrent disease following CRT, 3DCRT was cost effective for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

[Economic aspects of conformal radiotherapy]

The significantly higher human and material costs induced by the development of conformal radiotherapy cannot be ignored. In France, the present criteria for medical reimbursements underestimate the costs related to treatment preparation and evaluation, slowing down the implementation of new equipment and therapeutic practices. To fit the legitimate concerns regarding health cost containment, conformal radiotherapy should be submitted to appropriate economic analyses. These analyses are based on rigorous methods aimed at weighing the actual costs of conformal treatment by the benefits achieved in terms of tumor control, normal tissue complication and the patients' quality of life. The conclusions from the few studies published to date are rather in favour of conformal radiotherapy when compared to alternative therapeutic procedures. These early results need to be confirmed in order to support more rational reimbursement modalities to promote innovative treatments.

Recent advances in the treatment of prostate cancer

As new evidence for prostate cancer treatment has emerged in the last few years, longstanding controversies in the treatment of prostate cancer have resurfaced. A number of long-held tenets of prostate cancer therapy have been revisited, sometimes with surprising and challenging results. Although neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy decreases positive surgical margin rates, longer follow-up is needed to support survival improvement of this combined modality therapy. Androgen deprivation combined with radiation therapy appears to improve disease-free survival (and survival in one series) in patients with locally advanced cancer. Another approach to locally advanced prostate cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy may improve long term outcome. The data are currently insufficient to conclude that interstitial low dose rate brachytherapy is equivalent to conventional treatments: patients with small tumor volumes and low Gleason grade seem to obtain more benefit, whereas for large tumors with higher gleason grades this approach seems inferior to conventional treatments. In advanced prostate cancer recent data suggest that immediate hormonal therapy improves survival. In this group of patients the use of maximum androgen blockade remains controversial but may adversely affect quality of life compared to orchiectomy alone. Intermittent hormonal therapy may improve quality of life, although effect upon survival is unknown. Chemotherapy in combination with androgen deprivation is currently being studied as front-line therapy in advanced prostate cancer. Palliative benefit of chemotherapy for hormone refractory prostate cancer remains an important endpoint; survival advantage has not been seen in any randomized trials. Suramin may delay disease progression in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Many aspects of prostate cancer treatment will remain controversial until results of large, randomized trials with longer follow-up are available.

Technology assessment of multileaf collimation: a North American users survey

PURPOSE

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) initiated an Assessment of Technology Subcommittee (ATS) to help the radiotherapy community evaluate emerging technologies. The ATS decided to first address multileaf collimation (MLC) by means of a North American users survey. The survey attempted to address issues such as MLC utility, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and customer satisfaction.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The survey was designed with 38 questions, with cross-tabulation set up to decipher a particular clinic's perception of MLC. The surveys were coded according to MLC types, which were narrowed to four: Elekta, Siemens, Varian 52-leaf, and Varian 80-leaf. A 40% return rate was desired.

RESULTS

A 44% (108 of 250) return was achieved. On an MLC machine, 76.5% of photon patients are being treated with MLC. The main reasons for not using MLC were stair stepping, field size limitation, and physician objection. The most common sites in which MLC is being used are lung, pelvis, and prostate. The least used sites are head & neck and mantle fields. Of the facilities, 31% claimed an increase in number of patients being treated since MLC was installed, and 44% claimed an increase in the number of fields. Though the staffing for block cutting has decreased, therapist staffing has not. However, 91% of the facilities claimed a decreased workload for the therapists, despite the increase in daily treated patients and fields. Of the facilities that justified MLC purchase for more daily patients, 63% are actually treating more patients. Only 26% of the facilities that justified an MLC purchase for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are currently using it for that purpose. The satisfaction rating (1 = low to 5 = high) for department groups averaged 4.0. Therapists ranked MLC as 4.6.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey shows that most users have successfully introduced MLC into the clinic as a block replacement. Most have found MLC to be cost-effective and efficient. The use of MLC for IMRT has progressed slower, but users anticipate escalated use.

Costs of standard and conformal photon radiotherapy in Austria

BACKGROUND

The increasing shortage of health care resources necessitates a more rational use of the funds available. New treatment strategies in radiotherapy generate additional expenses. In this study, the expenses incurred for standard radiotherapy in patients with prostate and lung cancer were compared with those for conformal photon therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To itemize the direct costs, a distinction was made between pretreatment measures (independent of the tumor entity) and treatment measures proper. The cost analysis was based on a break-down by personnel, material and equipment depreciation costs. Overheads were not considered.

RESULTS

Conformal photon therapy was found to be over 60% more expensive than standard radiotherapy for prostate cancer and over 100% for lung cancer. The additional expenses were attributable to the more expensive linear accelerator equipment and the additional time needed for CT localization and planning as well as for patient positioning and verification during daily therapy.

CONCLUSION

Conformal photon therapy should be examined for its clinical usefulness in dedicated studies and allocated an adequate place in the reimbursement schemes for radiotherapy. If it should be found to produce higher cure rates, other costing procedures, e.g. cost--benefit analyses, should be used for establishing the costs of treatment strategies.

Beam characteristics of a retrofitted double-focused multileaf collimator

Multileaf collimators (MLCs) are generally believed to be convenient and cost-effective tools for intensity modulation and conformal therapy. They are becoming a standard feature on new accelerators; however, the older units can be retrofitted with modern MLCs. Before such a unit can be clinically used, the beam characteristics must be verified. In this study the beam characteristics of a Siemens double-focused MLC retrofitted to an MD2 linear accelerator are presented. The head leakage along with inter- and intra-leaf radiation transmission were measured using film. The collimator (Sc), phantom (Sp), total (Scp) scatter factors, central axis depth dose, beam profiles for off-axis ratios, penumbra, and surface dose were evaluated for square, rectangular, and irregularly shaped fields. The maximum head leakage was estimated to be < 0.05% in any plane at a distance of 1 m and maximum transmission through the MLC leaves was estimated to be < 1.4% and < 1.1% for the 10 MV and 6 MV beams, respectively. The maximum differences between pre- and post-MLC installation data for the Sc and Scp were < or = 0.7% and < or = 1.4%, respectively. Similarly, the percent depth dose data for all fields and both beam energies were within 1.5% of the original data. The beam profiles measured at various depths were also in agreement with those of the pre-MLC installation data. The measured beam penumbra (20%-80%) showed a range of 7.8 mm-11.0 mm for the 6 MV and 8.4 mm-11.1 mm for the 10 MV beams from smallest to largest fields. These ranges differ by less than a millimeter from those of the old data. The surface dose measurements were slightly lower than the conventional jaw values suggesting that MLC does not produce significant electron contamination. It is concluded that the retrofitted MLC maintains the integrity of the original beam and may provide a cost-effective conformal therapy.

Physician resource utilization in radiation oncology: a model based on management of carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To develop a methodology to estimate the comparative cost of physician time in treating patients with localized prostate cancer, using as an example two-dimensional (2D) vs. three-dimensional (3D) conformal irradiation techniques, and to illustrate how current cost-accounting techniques can be used to quantify the cost of physician time and effort of any treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Activity-based costing, a recent innovation in accounting, widely recommended for estimating and managing the costs of specific activities, was used to derive physician resource utilization costs (actual cost of the physician services and related support services consumed).

RESULTS

Patients treated with 3D conformal irradiation consume about 50% more physician time than patients receiving 2D conventional radiation therapy. The average professional reimbursement for the 3D conformal irradiation is only about 26% more than for the 2D treatment. Substantial variations in cost are found depending on the total available physician working hours. In an academic institution, a physician working 40 hours a week would have to spend an average of about 60% of available time on clinical services to break even on a 2D treatment process and over 74% of available time on clinical work to break even on a 3D treatment process. The same physician working 50 hours a week would have to spend an average of about 48% of available time on 2D clinical services and about 60% of available time on 3D clinical work to break even. Current Medicare reimbursement for 3D treatment falls short of actual costs, even if physicians work 100% of a 50-hour week. Medicare reimbursement for 2D barely allows the department to break even for 2D treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs based on estimates of resource use can be substantially under- or overestimated. A consistent language (method) is needed to obtain and describe the costs of radiation therapy. The methodology described here can help practitioners and researchers more accurately interpret actual cost information. Future use of such cost-estimation methodologies could provide consistent and comparable costs for negotiations with health care providers and help assess different treatment strategies.