Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy as salvage treatment of locally advanced or recurrent gynecologic cancer

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy with hypoxic radiosensitizer KORTUC II for unresectable pelvic sidewall recurrence of uterine cervical cancer: a case report

In order to improve oncologic outcomes in radiotherapy treatments of patients with unresectable pelvic sidewall recurrences of uterine cervical cancer, we combined high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) with newly tested hypoxic radiosensitizer Kochi oxydol-radiation therapy for unresectable carcinomas (KORTUC II), an enzyme-targeting radiosensitization treatment involving intra-tumoral injection of sodium hyaluronate mixed with hydrogen peroxide. We report on a 63-year-old patient referred to our department with an extensive pelvic sidewall recurrence of uterine cervical cancer after initial hysterectomy. The tumor size was 55 × 25 × 80 mm, with a calculated volume of 89.7 cc. Whole pelvic irradiation of 50 Gy in 25 fractions was administered, combined with weekly cisplatin injections. KORTUC II injections were given two times: at day 21 (42 Gy) and at day 24 (48 Gy). After finishing whole pelvic irradiation, HDR-ISBT of 25 Gy in 5 fractions b.i.d. over 3 days was administered. KORTUC II was also injected at the time of implantation. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) values for clinical target volume were D₉₀, D₉₈, and D₁₀₀ of 6.0, 5.0, and 3.5 Gy per fraction, respectively. D_2cc values were 2.1, 4.1, 3.2, and 2.0 Gy per fraction for the bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and small bowel, respectively. No acute adverse events ≥ grade 3 were observed. Repeated grade 3 pyelonephritis occurred as a late complication at 11, 24, and 26 months after the treatment, and was successfully resolved with antibiotics. Moreover, grade 2 late toxicity was documented, including sciatic neuralgia, lower limb lymphedema, and urinary incontinence. At present, 32 months after HDR-ISBT, the patient remains free of disease, with no toxicity-related deterioration in physical condition.

Salvage interstitial brachytherapy based on computed tomography for recurrent cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy: case presentations and introduction of the technique

PURPOSE

Locally recurring cervical cancer after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy remains a major therapeutic challenge. This paper presents a new therapeutic technique for such patients: interstitial brachytherapy (BT) guided by real-time three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with recurrent cervical cancer after radical surgery and adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) were included in this study. These patients underwent high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial BT with free-hand placement of metal needles guided by real-time 3D-CT. Six Gy in 6 fractions were prescribed for the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV). D₉₀ and D₁₀₀ for HR-CTV of BT, and the cumulative D_2cc for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, including previous EBRT and present BT were analyzed. Treatment-related complications and 3-month tumor-response rates were investigated.

RESULTS

The mean D₉₀ value for HR-CTV was 52.5 ± 3.3 Gy. The cumulative D_2cc for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 85.6 ± 5.8, 71.6 ± 6.4, and 69.6 ± 5.9 Gy, respectively. The mean number of needles was 6.1 ± 1.5, with an average depth of 3.5 ± 0.9 cm for each application. Interstitial BT was associated with minor complications and passable tumor-response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial BT guided by real-time 3D-CT for recurrent cervical cancer results in good dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. The current technique may be clinically feasible. However, long-term clinical outcomes should be further investigated.

Pelvic radiotherapy and sexual function in women

BACKGROUND

During the past decade there has been considerable progress in developing new radiation methods for cancer treatment. Pelvic radiotherapy constitutes the primary or (neo) adjuvant treatment of many pelvic cancers e.g., locally advanced cervical and rectal cancer. There is an increasing focus on late effects and an increasing awareness that patient reported outcomes (PROs) i.e., patient assessment of physical, social, psychological, and sexual functioning provides the most valid information on the effects of cancer treatment. Following cure of cancer allow survivors focus on quality of life (QOL) issues; sexual functioning has proved to be one of the most important aspects of concern in long-term survivors.

METHODS

An updated literature search in PubMed was performed on pelvic radiotherapy and female sexual functioning/dysfunction. Studies on gynaecological, urological and gastrointestinal cancers were included. The focus was on the period from 2010 to 2014, on studies using PROs, on potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where female sexual dysfunction (FSD) at least constituted a secondary outcome, and on studies reporting from modern radiotherapy modalities.

RESULTS

The literature search revealed a few RCTs with FSD evaluated as a PRO and being a secondary outcome measure in endometrial and in rectal cancer patients. Very limited information could be extracted regarding FSD in bladder, vulva, and anal cancer patients. The literature before and after 2010 confirms that pelvic radiotherapy, independent on modality, increases the risk significantly for FSD both compared to data from age-matched healthy control women and compared to data on patients treated by surgery only. There was only very limited data available on modern radiotherapy modalities. These are awaited during the next five years. Several newer studies confirm that health care professionals are still reluctant to discuss treatment induced sexual dysfunction with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic radiotherapy has a persistent deteriorating effect on the vaginal mucosa impacting negatively on the sexual functioning in female cancer patients. Hopefully, modern radiotherapy modalities will cause less vaginal morbidity but results are awaited to confirm this assumption. Health care professionals are encouraged to address potential sexual dysfunction both before and after radiotherapy and to focus more on quality than on quantity.

A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy is a treatment modality that combines physical advantages of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with the radiobiological advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this review was to describe the effective clinical use of PDR brachytherapy worldwide in different tumour locations. We found 66 articles reporting on clinical PDR brachytherapy including the treatment procedure and outcome. Moreover, PDR brachytherapy has been applied in almost all tumour sites for which brachytherapy is indicated and with good local control and low toxicity. The main advantage of PDR is, because of the small pulse sizes used, the ability to spare normal tissue. In certain cases, HDR resembles PDR brachytherapy by the use of multifractionated low-fraction dose.

Treatment results of image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for pelvic recurrence of uterine cancer

PURPOSE

We analyzed clinical data to evaluate the effectiveness of image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for pelvic recurrence of uterine cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2003 and 2011, 56 patients were treated with HDR-ISBT with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The median followup time was 33 months (range, 1-109 months). Pre-ISBT treatments included radical hysterectomy for 35 patients (Group A), radical hysterectomy with postoperative radiotherapy for 8 patients (Group B), and radical radiotherapy for 13 patients (Group C). We initiated MRI-assisted CT-based planning for the last 49 patients. The median ISBT single fraction dose was 6 Gy. The median total doses were 30 and 54 Gy with and without EBRT (range, 30-50 Gy) for Group A, respectively and 48 Gy without EBRT for Groups B and C.

RESULTS

The 3-year local control (LC) rates were 85%, 75%, and 46% for Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = 0.017). The 3-year LC rates were 84%, 73%, and 33% for clinical target volume at the time of HDR-ISBT of <10, 10-29, and ≥30 cc, respectively (p = 0.005). The 3-year LC results tended to be higher for patients whose D100 (clinical target volume) was equal or higher than 67.1 Gy (p = 0.098). A total of 13 late complications of Grades 3-5 occurred in 11 patients (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our image-guided HDR-ISBT for pelvic recurrence of uterine cancer provided good treatment outcomes. The treatment results for patients who underwent radical surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy are better than those for patients who underwent radical radiotherapy.

Image and laparoscopic guided interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced primary or recurrent gynaecological cancer using the adaptive GEC ESTRO target concept

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess treatment outcome of image and laparoscopic guided interstitial pulsed dose rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) for locally advanced gynaecological cancer using the adaptive GEC ESTRO target concept.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2005 and December 2010, 28 consecutive patients were treated for locally advanced primary vaginal (nine), recurrent endometrial (12) or recurrent cervical cancer (seven) with combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and interstitial PDR-BT. Treatment was initiated with whole pelvic EBRT to a median dose of 45 Gy followed by PDR-BT using the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT). All implants were virtually preplanned using MRI of the pelvis with a dummy MUPIT in situ. The GEC ESTRO high risk clinical target volume (HR CTV), intermediate risk clinical target volume (IR CTV) and the organs at risk (OAR) were contoured and a preplan for implantation was generated (BrachyVision, Varian). The subsequent implantation was performed under laparoscopic visualisation. Final contouring and treatment planning were done using a post-implant CT. Planning aim of PDR-BT was to deliver 30 Gy in 50 hourly pulses to HR CTV. Manual dose optimisation was performed with the aim of reaching a D90>80 Gy in the HR CTV calculated as the total biologically equivalent to 2 Gy fractions of EBRT and BT (EQD2). Dose to the OAR were evaluated using dose volume constraints for D(2cc) of 90 Gy for bladder and 70 Gy for rectum and sigmoid.

RESULTS

For HR CTV the median volume was 26 cm(3) (7-91 cm(3)). Coverage of the HR CTV was 97% (90-100%) and D90 was 82 Gy (77-88 Gy). The D(2cc) for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 65 Gy (47-81 Gy), 61 Gy (50-77 Gy), and 52 Gy (44-68 Gy), respectively. Median follow up was 18 months (6-61 months). The actuarial 2 years local control rate was 92% (SE 5), while disease-free survival and overall survival were 59% (SE 11) and 74%, respectively (SE 10). No complications to the laparoscopic guided implantation were encountered. Late grade 2 (CTC v 3.0) complications were recorded in nine (32%) patients. One patient had a grade 3 vaginal complication. No grade 4-5 complications have been recorded so far.

CONCLUSION

Image and laparoscopic guided interstitial PDR-BT using the GEC ESTRO target concept is applicable for locally advanced primary vaginal or recurrent endometrial and cervical cancer resulting in an excellent local control rate and limited morbidity.

Preliminary results of magnetic resonance imaging-aided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent uterine carcinoma after curative surgery

This report presents initial experience with imaging-aided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for post-operative recurrence of uterine carcinoma. Fourteen patients presenting with post-operative recurrence of uterine carcinoma (nine cervix and five corpus) between July 2005 and October 2008 were enrolled in this study (median follow-up: 37 months, range: 6-59 months). We implanted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible plastic applicators using our own ambulatory technique. HDR-ISBT treatment consisted of twice-a-day irradiation of 6 Gy each with at least a six-hour interval to provide the total prescribed dose. Treatment was based on treatment planning-computed tomography with MRI as a reference. Seven patients were treated with a combination of ISBT (median 30 Gy/5 fractions; range: 27-33 Gy) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and the other seven with brachytherapy only (median 54 Gy/9 fractions; range: 48-54 Gy), one of whom had previously received pelvic EBRT. The three-year estimates of local control and overall survival rates were 77.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 55.8-100%) and 77.1% (95% CI: 54.2-100%), respectively. Two patients, who had received combined treatment with EBRT showed untoward reactions, including a grade 3 subileus and grade 2 constipation. Another patient, who had been treated with ISBT alone, developed grade 2 urinary constriction. Our imaging-aided HDR-ISBT for post-operative recurrence of uterine carcinoma was found to be practical with promising preliminary results.

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy - is it the right way?

Pulsed dose rate (PDR-BT) treatment is a brachytherapy modality that combines physical advantages of high-dose-rate (HDR-BT) technology (isodose optimization, radiation safety) with the radiobiological advantages of low-dose-rate (LDR-BT) brachytherapy. Pulsed brachytherapy consists of using stronger radiation source than for LDR-BT and producing series of short exposures of 10 to 30 minutes in every hour to approximately the same total dose in the same overall time as with the LDR-BT. Modern afterloading equipment offers certain advantages over interstitial or intracavitary insertion of separate needles, tubes, seeds or wires. Isodose volumes in tissues can be created flexibly by a combination of careful placement of the catheter and the adjustment of the dwell times of the computerized stepping source. Automatic removal of the radiation sources into a shielded safe eliminates radiation exposures to staff and visitors. Radiation exposure is also eliminated to the staff who formerly loaded and unloaded multiplicity of radioactive sources into the catheters, ovoids, tubes etc. This review based on summarized clinical investigations, analyses the feasibility and the background to introduce this brachytherapy technique and chosen clinical applications of PDR-BT.

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) is a new modality for dose delivery in brachytherapy. It uses modern afterloading technology (miniaturized source, cable driven, software controlled), with source activities in the range of 1 Ci, which is actually one tenth of the normal activity used for high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Modern technology allows dose optimization, and source strength in the above-mentioned range creates a new dose rate condition. For small fractions (pulses) with short interpulse intervals, PDR mimics the radiobiology of high dose rate brachytherapy, whereas for bigger doses per fraction, dose adjustments are needed to compensate for the loss of therapeutic ratio. Clinical series showed good figures for local control and toxicity. Almost every clinical site has been reported to have been treated with PDR, with some thousand of patients having been reported. Technical difficulties in some body sites can be overcome by slightly modifying the implant technique. PDR brachytherapy is an ideal environment for the development of new dose fractionation schedules. It creates unique conditions in which to operate. Knowledge of tissue repair kinetics is extremely important for adequate selection of dose per pulse and interpulse interval. Therapeutic ratio can be improved by adjusting interpulse intervals to the repair half-times for normal tissues. On the other hand, superfractionated schedules with low dose per pulse can be explored in conditions of tumor hypoxia, thanks to the predicted hypersensitivity at low dose per fraction. The use of chemical agents (nicotinamide and others) in concomitance with this superfractionated schedules is foreseen in controlled clinical trials. In conclusion, PDR brachytherapy can be considered a new paradigm for dose delivery. It is safe and reliable, can be used in the setting of image-guided radiation therapy, and exploit the differential effect of ionizing radiations by a thorough knowledge of tissue kinetics for an improved therapeutic ratio.

Safety aspects of pulsed dose rate brachytherapy: analysis of errors in 1,300 treatment sessions

PURPOSE

To determine the safety of pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy by analyzing errors and technical failures during treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

More than 1,300 patients underwent treatment with PDR brachytherapy, using five PDR remote afterloaders. Most patients were treated with consecutive pulse schemes, also outside regular office hours. Tumors were located in the breast, esophagus, prostate, bladder, gynecology, anus/rectum, orbit, head/neck, with a miscellaneous group of small numbers, such as the lip, nose, and bile duct. Errors and technical failures were analyzed for 1,300 treatment sessions, for which nearly 20,000 pulses were delivered. For each tumor localization, the number and type of occurring errors were determined, as were which localizations were more error prone than others.

RESULTS

By routinely using the built-in dummy check source, only 0.2% of all pulses showed an error during the phase of the pulse when the active source was outside the afterloader. Localizations treated using flexible catheters had greater error frequencies than those treated with straight needles or rigid applicators. Disturbed pulse frequencies were in the range of 0.6% for the anus/rectum on a classic version 1 afterloader to 14.9% for orbital tumors using a version 2 afterloader. Exceeding the planned overall treatment time by >10% was observed in only 1% of all treatments. Patients received their dose as originally planned in 98% of all treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the experience in our institute with 1,300 PDR treatments, we found that PDR is a safe brachytherapy treatment modality, both during and outside of office hours.

Pulsed Dose-Rate Perioperative Interstitial Brachytherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Skeletal Muscles of the Trunk

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the role of pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (BRT), delivered alone or as a boost to external beam radiotherapy, as adjuvant therapy for the local control of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and skeletal muscles of the trunk that have undergone surgical treatment.

METHODS

Between July 1998 and January 2002, 42 patients were treated with a combination of surgery and BRT alone (18 patients) or BRT/external beam radiotherapy (24 patients) for the treatment of primary (n = 32) and recurrent (n = 10) soft tissue sarcomas located in the proximal extremity (n = 17), distal extremity (n = 17), and trunk (n = 8). Tumor size was <5 cm in 20 cases and >5 cm in 22 cases, with histological grading of 1 (n = 7), 2 (n = 18), or 3 (n = 17). The median BRT dose delivered was 15 Gy, and the median external beam irradiation dose was 50 Gy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 34 months, the 36-month survival was 83.9% (SE, 6.1%), and the local control was 89%.

CONCLUSIONS

PDR interstitial BRT for soft tissue sarcoma is an effective, well-tolerated adjuvant radiation treatment that offers several practical advantages, among which are low acute and late toxicity with maximum normal tissue and critical structure sparing and overall shorter radiotherapy and hospital stay.

Validation of a questionnaire for self-rating of urological and gynaecological morbidity after treatment of gynaecological cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patient self-assessment of symptom severity provides clinicians and researchers with important information. It is crucial to evaluate the validity of a self-assessment questionnaire in the context of its intended use. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of the uro-gynaecological questionnaire (UGQ), a new instrument for patient self-assessment of urological-, genital-, menopausal-, and pain symptomatology in gynaecological cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The UGQ was developed after literature review, patient- and expert interviews and pilot testing. From February 1992 to October 1992, 88 gynaecological cancer patients were invited to participate in a validation study after the initiation of their primary radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The method of validation investigated whether patients and researchers interpreted the items of the questionnaire in the same way. The patient's written response before interview was compared with an observer rating of the patient's open-ended audio-taped responses to the same questionnaire, administered as an interview. Qualitative recordings by the observer were made to describe potential misinterpretations.

RESULTS

The agreement between the patient's and the observer's ratings was high: the median overall agreement was 0.91 (range 0.71-1.00) and the median kappa was 0.88 (range 0.45-1.00). The quantitative and the qualitative results identified a few minor validity problems; especially, the issue of selective reporting, i.e. some patients only reporting those symptoms they considered relevant for the study, which may lead to systematic errors.

CONCLUSIONS

The results strongly suggest that patients interpret the UGQ items as intended, i.e. they are valid. The UGQ is recommended for patient self-assessment of uro-gynaecological morbidity in gynaecological cancer patients.

Pulsed–dose rate brachytherapy with concomitant chemotherapy and interstitial hyperthermia in patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

We attempted in our clinic to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a simultaneous application of a cis-platinum-based chemotherapy and interstitial hyperthermia to interstitial pulsed-dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy in patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1999 and September 2001, 15 patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer were treated with PDR brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and interstitial hyperthermia. All patients had received prior radiation therapy. A dose per pulse of 0.46 to 0.55 Gy was given up to a median total dose of 55 Gy. Simultaneously to the PDR brachytherapy, chemotherapy was given with cis-platinum 20 mg/m2 as a short i.v. infusion each day and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2 by continuous infusion from Day 1 to Day 5. After the PDR brachytherapy was finished, all patients were treated with a single session of interstitial hyperthermia.

RESULTS

All the patients could receive the whole treatment. After treatment, only mild oral mucositis occurred. One patient developed soft tissue ulceration. None of the patients developed osteoradionecrosis. After a median follow-up of 6 months, the local tumor control rate was 80% (12 of 15), and the 2-year overall survival was 67% (10 of 15).

CONCLUSIONS

The intensification of the interstitial PDR brachytherapy with chemotherapy and hyperthermia is feasible and safe, and the preliminary results are encouraging.

Office hours pulsed brachytherapy boost in breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiobiological studies suggest equivalent biological effects between continuous low dose rate brachytherapy (CLDR) and pulsed brachytherapy (PB) when pulses are applied without interruption every hour. However, radiation protection and institute-specific demands requested the design of a practical PB protocol substituting the CLDR boost in breast cancer patients. An office hours scheme was designed, considering the CLDR dose rate, the overall treatment time, pulse frequency and tissue repair characteristics. Radiobiological details are presented as well as the logistics and technical feasibility of the scheme after treatment of the first 100 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated according to the linear quadratic model for incomplete repair. Radiobiological parameters included an alpha/beta value of 3 Gy for normal tissue late effects and 10 Gy for early normal tissue or tumour effects. Tissue repair half-time ranged from 0.1 to 6 h. The reference CLDR dose rate of 0.80 Gy/h was obtained retrospectively from analysis of patients' data. The treatment procedure was evaluated with regard to variations in implant characteristics after treatment of 100 patients.

RESULTS

A PB protocol was designed consisting of two treatment blocks separated by a night break. Dose delivery in PB was 20 Gy in two 10 Gy blocks and, for application of the 15 Gy boost, one 10 Gy block plus one 5 Gy block. The dose per pulse was 1.67 Gy, applied with a period time of approximately 1.5 h. An inter-patient variation of 30% (1 SD) was observed in the instantaneous source strength. Taking also the spread in implant size into account, the net variation in pulse duration amounted to 38%.

CONCLUSION

An office hours PB boost regimen was designed for substitution of the CLDR boost in breast-conserving therapy on the basis of the BED. First treatment experience shows the office hour regimen to be convenient to the patients and no technical perturbations were encountered.

Radiotherapy in the management of cervical cancer in elderly patients

PURPOSE

To report treatment results and complications experienced by elderly patients treated with curatively intended radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and fourteen elderly patients (median 75.5 years, range 70.0-85.9) consecutively referred for curative radiotherapy in the period 1987-1996 were prospectively followed with regard to tumour control and complications. The importance of age, stage (FIGO), tumour size, histology, tumour fixation, haemoglobin, concurrent disease, performance status (WHO) and type of radiotherapy were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Treatment was completed as planned in 68%, delayed in 29% and stopped prematurely in 3%. The frequency of grade 3 late complications was 11% and the actuarial probability at 5 years was 20%. Overall 5-year survival according to FIGO was 61% (I), 34% (II) and 25% (III). Cox multivariate analysis identified tumour size as independent prognostic factor for tumour control, disease-free survival and overall survival. FIGO stage was predictive for late grade 2 complications. We were unable to identify significant factors with respect to grade 3 complications. Age was not a significant parameter for any of the investigated endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients in good performance status with advanced cancer of the uterine may tolerate radical radiotherapy with acceptable morbidity and reasonable survival. Radiotherapy may also be a good alternative in early stage disease for surgically unfit elderly patients.

Early results of pulsed-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for head and neck malignancies after limited surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative incidence of toxicity and local control in patients with head and neck malignancies who underwent interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (iBT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 1997 to December 1998, 61 patients underwent interstitial PDR brachytherapy procedures in our department; 47 were patients with head and neck cancer. Forty patients received brachytherapy as part of their curative treatment regimen, and 7 patients were implanted for palliative purposes and excluded from the analysis of therapy efficacy. Twenty-four patients had interstitial brachytherapy procedures alone with D(REF) = 50 Gy; in 23 patients, iBT procedures were performed with D(REF) = 24 Gy in combination with external radiation. A dose per pulse (dp) of 0.5 Gy was prescribed for 38/47 patients, and a dp = 0.7 Gy for 9/47 patients. The pulses were delivered 24 h a day, with a time interval of 1 h between two pulses, resulting in an effective dose rate of 0.5 Gy/h or 0.7 Gy/h. A follow-up of the patients was done to analyze acute and delayed toxicity, local control, and survival. The analysis was performed after median follow-up of 12 months (5-18 months).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 12 months, soft tissue necrosis was seen in one patient and bone necrosis in another. No other serious side effects were observed. Permanent locoregional tumor control was achieved in 37 of 40 patients. No distant metastases were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PDR interstitial brachytherapy with 0.5-0.7 Gy/h is a safe therapy. These preliminary results suggest that PDR interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer is comparable with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy.