Technology assessment of multileaf collimation: a North American users survey

Siemens multileaf collimator characterization and quality assurance approaches for intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Application of the multileaf collimator (MLC) has evolved from replacing blocks to create treatment fields to creating photon fluence modulation for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Multileaf collimator system performance requirements are far more stringent for such applications and will require increased performance for future applications, such as motion tracking. This article reviews Siemens MLC systems, including a technical description and dosimetric characteristics of 56-, 82-, and 160-leaf designs. Routine quality assurance of MLC for IMRT necessitates frequent and critical assessment of MLC leaf position calibration errors that can present in many different ways (e.g., accuracy, reproducibility, longevity, hysteresis, and collimator/gantry angle dependencies). Several techniques for measuring these errors are presented, along with qualitative and quantitative techniques for analyzing results. In particular, increased accuracy of leaf position measurement at variable gantry angles is enabled by spatial transformations to electronic portal imaging device position quantified by calibration protocols introduced with megavoltage cone beam. Measured values of X-ray transmission (intra-leaf, inter-leaf, and through abutting leaf pairs) and penumbra (leaf end, leaf tongue, leaf groove) are presented with an evaluation of their characterization by a treatment-planning system. The dosimetric impact of planning system model inadequacies is demonstrated for collimator scatter, dose profile values within 30 mm of the field edge, and the resultant effect demonstrated on clinical cases. Finally, a description of automated quality assurance delivery, analysis, and calibration protocols applicable for the specific vendor's system is provided.

Mantle fields in the era of dynamic multileaf collimation: field shaping and electronic tissue compensation

Mantle field radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease is complicated by significant dose gradient (up to 10-20%) across the large fields required. Many different strategies of tissue compensation have been investigated, including custom physical compensators to provide better dose distributions. We present a method using dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC) fluence modulation to simultaneously shape the treatment field and give homogeneous dose at depth throughout the classic mantle field. Five patients were treated for early-stage Hodgkin's disease with a conventional anterior-posterior-posterior-anterior (AP-PA) mantle field. The patients were planned using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system, version 6.1.3, and treated on a Varian 2300CD. An AP-PA dynamic MLC beam-shaped and dose-compensated plan was created for each, and compared with the conventional blocked plan. Nine dose points were calculated at midplane in each plan. Chamber measurements were taken to confirm accurate dMLC delivery of the planned doses. The mean dose per fraction, relative to a central axis dose of 1.8 Gy, was increased in the conventional plans compared with the dMLC plans in the right (R) neck, left (L) neck, R supraclavicular, L supraclavicular, and L axillary points. The mediastinum tended to be underdosed relative to central axis, with the mid-mediastinal and lower mediastinal points showing improved coverage with the dMLC plans. Measurements showed excellent agreement between planned doses and delivered doses, with less than 2% in-field variation. Dynamic MLC fluence modulation was used to effectively deliver a mantle field that is both shape- and electronically-dose-compensated with sliding window MLC. Homogeneity was significantly improved throughout the treatment field, and measurements confirmed accurate dose delivery using this technique.

Clinicians' evaluations of fetal oximetry sensor placement in a multicentre randomised trial (the FOREMOST trial)

BACKGROUND

Fetal pulse oximetry (FPO) may improve the assessment of the fetal well-being in labour. Reports of health-care provider's evaluations of new technology are important in the overall evaluation of that technology.

AIMS

To determine doctors' and midwives' perceptions of their experience placing FPO sensors.

METHODS

We surveyed clinicians (midwives and doctors) following placement of a FPO sensor during the FOREMOST trial (multicentre randomised trial of fetal pulse oximetry). Clinicians rated ease of sensor placement (poor, fair, good and excellent). Potential influences on ease of sensor placement (staff category, prior experience in Birth Suite, prior experience in placing sensors, epidural analgesia, cervical dilatation and fetal station) were examined by ordinal regression.

RESULTS

There were 281 surveys returned for the 294 sensor placement attempts (response rate 96%). Sensors were placed by midwives (29%), research midwives (48%), registrars (22%) and obstetricians (1%). The majority of clinicians had 1 or more years' Birth Suite experience, had placed six or more sensors previously, and rated ease of sensor placement as good. Advancing fetal station (P < 0.001) and the presence of epidural analgesia prior to sensor placement (P = 0.029) predicted improved ease of sensor placement. Having a clinician placing a sensor for the first time predicted a lower rating for ease of sensor placement (P = 0.001), compared to having placed one or more sensors previously.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians with varying levels of Birth Suite experience successfully placed fetal oxygen saturation sensors, with the majority rating ease of sensor placement as good.

MLC leaf width impact on the clinical dose distribution: a Monte Carlo approach

PURPOSE

The influence of the multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf width on the dose distribution in patients treated with conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy has been analyzed. This study was based on the Monte Carlo simulation with the beams generated by a linac with the double-focused MLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The transmission through the leaves and the exact shape of the penumbra regions are difficult to model by treatment planning system algorithms. An accurate assessment of the dose variations due to the leaf width change can be achieved by means of Monte Carlo simulation. The BEAM/EGS4 code was used at the Hospital of the Virgen Macarena to model a Siemens PRIMUS linac, featuring an MLC with a leaf width projecting 1 cm at the isocenter. Based on this real model, a virtual head was designed while allowing for a variation of the leaf width projection. Both the real linac and the virtual linac, with leaves projecting 0.5 cm, were used to obtain the dose distributions for several treatments. A few disease sites, including the prostate, head and neck, and endometrium, were selected for the design of the conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments with a forward planning algorithm sensitive to the different shapes of the volumes of interest. Isodose curves, differential matrix, gamma function, and the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) corresponding to both MLC models were obtained for all cases. The tumor control probability and the normal tissue complication probability were derived for those cases studied featuring the greatest differences between results for both MLCs.

RESULTS

The impact on the DVHs of changing leaf width projections at the isocenter from 1.0 cm to 0.5 cm was low. Radiobiologic models showed slightly better tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability values using the virtual MLC with a leaf width projecting 0.5 cm at isocenter in those cases presenting greater differences in the DVHs.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact on the clinical dose distribution due to the MLC leaf width change is low based on the design and conditions used in this study.

MLC quality assurance techniques for IMRT applications

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) requires extensive knowledge of multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positioning accuracy, precision, and long-term reproducibility. We have developed a technique to efficiently measure the absolute position of each MLC leaf, over the range of leaf positions utilized in IMRT, based on dosimetric information. A single radiographic film was exposed to 6 MV x-rays for twelve exposures: one open field with a radio-opaque marker tray present, and eleven fields (1 x 28 cm strips via 1 cm gaps between opposed leaf pairs) separated by 2 cm center to center. The process was repeated while varying direction of leaf travel; each film was digitized using a commercial film dosimetry system. The digital images were manipulated to remove translation and rotation of the film data with respect to the collimator coordinate system by extraction of radiation dose profiles perpendicular to the MLC leaf motion and measuring the center of the x-ray leakage between leaves. Radiation dose profiles in the direction of leaf motion were acquired through the center of each leaf pair (leaves 2-28), which provided leaf position information every 2 cm with 0.2 mm precision. Nine separate leaf reproducibility studies over a 90 day period which evaluated 600 measurement points on each film show 0.3 mm precision for 95% confidence, while hysteresis studies show 0.5 mm precision. Absolute leaf position error measurements demonstrated a radial dependence, with a maximum of 1.5 mm at 16.4 cm from central axis, due to rotational error at calibration. Recalibration of the MLC leaves based utilizing this tool yields absolute leaf position measurements where 91.5% of all leaves/positions were within 0.5 mm, with a mean error of 0.1 mm and a maximum error less than 1.0 mm.

Cost-minimization analysis: radiation treatment with and without a multi-leaf collimator

PURPOSE

To compare the costs of radiation treatment on a linear accelerator with a multileaf collimator (MLC) versus treatment on a linear accelerator without an MLC. The study was designed to determine whether the increased throughput of fields and decreased block cutting made the MLC cost effective from an institutional perspective.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The number of fields, basic treatment equivalent, equivalent simple treatment visits, and blocks were prospectively collected for the four linear accelerators. Building, equipment, staffing, and service costs were all obtained in 1999 Australian dollars from the manufacturers and hospital department heads. The Joint Radiation Oncology Centre at Westmead and Nepean Hospitals, which are Australian public hospitals, runs as one unit, with the same staff, and currently operates five linear accelerators. Currently, four of the linear accelerators are used for general radiotherapy, operating for exactly the same hours; the final machine operates more limited hours and is used for specialized radiotherapy techniques and emergency cases.

RESULTS

The two machines with MLCs, on average, treated 5,169 fields each, while the two machines without MLCs treated 4,543 fields in a 3-month period, a 12% increase in throughput. The two non-MLC machines required 155 premounted trays (PMTs) in total, while the MLC machines required 17 PMTs. Linear accelerators with MLCs were demonstrably more efficient, and while their capital costs were higher, the reduction in labor costs associated with block cutting and, particularly the increased throughput, more than offset these initial costs. The total cost of a radiation field with an MLC was found to be $A101.69 compared to $A106.98 without an MLC. A multiway sensitivity analysis showed the results to be robust. The worst-case scenario was a departmental savings of $A168,000 per year; the best-case scenario was a savings of $A680,000 per year.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions pertaining to the radiation oncology department in this group of hospitals, and in similar departments, the use of an MLC can be justified.