Multi-institutional randomized trial of external radiotherapy with and without intraluminal brachytherapy for esophageal cancer in Japan. Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Study Group

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervical Esophagus: Systematic Review and Guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) is an uncommon malignancy accounting for <5% of all esophageal carcinomas. Treatment of CEC varies and is adapted from established regimens used for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or the lower esophageal and head and neck. The present systematic review and guidelines are intended to assist treatment decision making for patients with CEC based on the available evidence.

METHODS

Using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Study Design (PICOTS) framework, the evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included prospective Phase II to III trials and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2013 and February 23, 2024 in the Ovid Medline database. These references were assessed through the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) methodology. A systematic review PRISMA 2020 checklist confirmed the completion of essential elements. RAND-UCLA consensus methodology was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options.

RESULTS

ARS AUC recommendations include (1) larynx preservation using endoscopic resection (EMR or ESD) alone for the typical case with pT1a cN0 cM0 CEC, (2) definitive CRT for the typical case with cT1bN0M0 in patients who cannot undergo endoscopic resection, (3) larynx-preserving using definitive CRT (with or without induction chemotherapy) for the typical case with nonmetastatic locally advanced CEC (advanced T-stage tumors or involved lymph nodes), with surgery reserved for those patients with incomplete response or locoregional recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This ARS AUC summary provides guidelines for the management of SCC of the cervical esophagus provides based on available evidence. Topics that warrant further investigation include optimization of (1) patient selection; (2) multimodality therapies including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted agents; (3) radiation dose, schedule, and treatment volume; and (4) supportive care for patients with CEC. Ongoing trials continue to improve outcomes for patients with CEC.

Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Brachytherapy for the Definitive Treatment of Esophageal Carcinoma

This study aims to investigate the effect of dose escalation with brachytherapy (BT) as an addition to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on local control and survival in esophageal cancer. From 2001 to 2020, 183 patients with locally limited or locally advanced esophageal cancer received definitive CRT with or without brachytherapy in a two-center study. External-beam radiotherapy was delivered at 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions, followed by a sequential boost to the primary tumor of 9 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions if indicated. Intraluminal high dose rate (HDR) Ir-192 brachytherapy was performed on 71 patients at 10 Gy in two fractions, with one fraction per week. The combined systemic therapy schedules used included 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil alone. Cisplatin was not administered in patients receiving brachytherapy. The median local progression-free survival was significantly extended in the BT group (18.7 vs. 6.0 months; p < 0.0001), and the median local control was also significantly prolonged (30.5 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.008). Overall survival (OS) significantly increased in the BT group (median OS 22.7 vs. 9.1 months, p < 0.0001). No significant difference in the overall rate of acute toxicities was observed; however, the rate of acute esophagitis was significantly higher in the BT group (94.4% vs. 81.2%). Likewise, the overall rate of late toxicities (43.7% vs. 18.8%) was significantly higher in the BT group, including the rate of esophageal stenosis (22.5% vs. 9.8%). There was no difference in the occurrence of life-threatening or lethal late toxicities (grades 4 and 5). Brachytherapy, after chemoradiation with single-agent 5-FU, represents a safe and effective alternative for dose escalation in the definitive treatment of esophageal cancer.

Late Toxicities, Failure Patterns, Local Tumor Control, and Survival of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients After Chemoradiotherapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost: A 5-Year Phase II Study

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty-seven patients with primary ESCC enrolled in this phase II trial. The majority (92.0%) had locoregionally advanced disease. They underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. The radiotherapy doses were 66 Gy for the gross tumor and 54 Gy for the subclinical disease. Doses were simultaneously administered in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. The patients also underwent concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy, which comprised cisplatin and fluorouracil. The study end points were acute and late toxicities, first site of failure, locoregional tumor control, and overall survival rates.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 65.7 (range, 2.2-97.5) months for all patients and 81.5 (range, 19.4-97.5) months for those alive. There were 17 cases (19.5%) of severe late toxicities, including four cases (4.6%) of grade 5 and seven (8.0%) of grade 3 esophageal ulceration, four (4.6%) of grade 3 esophageal stricture, and two (2.3%) of grade 3 radiation-induced pneumonia. Twenty-three (26.4%) patients had locoregional disease progression. Most (86.7%) locally progressive lesions were within the dose-escalation region in the initial radiation plan, while majority of the recurrent lymph nodes were found out-of-field (83.3%) and in the supraclavicular region (75.0%). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year locoregional tumor control and overall survival rates were 79.2%, 72.4%, 72.4%, 70.8%, and 82.8%, 66.6%, 61.9%, 58.4%, respectively. Incomplete tumor response, which was assessed immediately after CCRT was an independent risk predictor of disease progression and death in ESCC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CCRT with SIB was well tolerated in ESCC patients during treatment and long-term follow-up. Moreover, patients who underwent CCRT with SIB exhibited improved local tumor control and had better survival outcomes compared to historical data of those who had standard-dose radiotherapy.

Modern development of high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Brachytherapy is an invasive therapy with placement of radiation source into or near the tumor. The difference between planning target volume and clinical target volume is minimal, and the dose out of the tumor reduces rapidly due to the inverse-square law. High-dose-rate brachytherapy enables three-dimensional image guidance, and currently, tumor dose as well as doses of the surrounding normal structures can be evaluated accurately. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is the utmost precision radiation therapy even surpassing carbon ion therapy. Biological disadvantages of high-dose rate have been overcome by the fractional irradiation. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is indispensable in the definitive radiation therapy of cervical cancer. Also in prostate cancer and breast cancer, high-dose-rate brachytherapy plays a significant role. Brachytherapy requires techniques and skills of radiation oncologists at the time of invasive placement of the radiation source into the tumor area. Education of young radiation oncologists is most urgent and important.

Esophageal brachytherapy: Institut Gustave Roussy's experience

PURPOSE

Esophageal cancer is characterized by its propension to local evolution, which conditions prognosis and quality of life. Brachytherapy may be a therapeutic option for all stages of esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective unicentric study included all consecutive patients treated for an esophageal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in our institution from 1992 to 2018.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included. They were treated in four distinct indications: exclusive (7 patients), boost after external beam radiotherapy (41), reirradiation (36), or palliative aim (6). Most frequently prescribed schemes were 3 × 5 Gy (boost) or 6 × 5 Gy (exclusive treatment and reirradiation) at applicator's surface or at 5 mm. At the end of follow-up, 50% of patients had presented with local recurrence. Seventeen percent of patients had a metastatic relapse. Median overall survival was 15 months in the whole cohort: 22 months in the boost setting, 25 months for exclusive brachytherapy, 15 months for reirradiation, and only 2 months for palliative treatment. Tumor length at brachytherapy, brachytherapy dose, and interfraction response were significantly associated to overall survival. 40% of patients presented with grade 2+ toxicity, mostly esophagitis, including three toxic deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Although local control outcomes are still poor, one must remember that patients are unfit for any curative therapeutic option and that palliative chemotherapy offers mediocre results. The most promising setting probably is reirradiation because brachytherapy offers a remarkable dose gradient allowing best organ at risk sparing, with an encouraging rate of long survivors (19% at 2 years). Esophageal brachytherapy deserves to be further investigated because some patients, even unfit, may benefit from it, with acceptable toxicity.

Brachytherapy: An overview for clinicians

Brachytherapy is a specific form of radiotherapy consisting of the precise placement of radioactive sources directly into or next to the tumor. This technique is indicated for patients affected by various types of cancers. It is an optimal tool for delivering very high doses to the tumor focally while minimizing the probability of normal tissue complications. Physicians from a wide range of specialties may be involved in either the referral to or the placement of brachytherapy. Many patients require brachytherapy as either primary treatment or as part of their oncologic care. On the basis of high-level evidence from randomized controlled trials, brachytherapy is mainly indicated: 1) as standard in combination with chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer; 2) in surgically treated patients with uterine endometrial cancer for decreasing the risk of vaginal vault recurrence; 3) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer to perform dose escalation and improve progression-free survival; and 4) in patients with breast cancer as adjuvant, accelerated partial breast irradiation or to boost the tumor bed. In this review, the authors discuss the clinical relevance of brachytherapy with a focus on indications, levels of evidence, and results in the overall context of radiation use for patients with cancer.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of oesophageal cancer was published in 2016, and covered the management and treatment of local/locoregional disease, limited disease, locally advanced disease and the management of advanced/metastatic disease. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2017 it was decided by both ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special guidelines meeting immediately after the JSMO Annual Meeting in 2018. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2016 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of metastatic oesophageal cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer representing the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (CSCO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence, and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.

Endoluminal brachytherapy: Bronchus and oesophagus

Endobronchial brachytherapy could be proposed in case of endoluminal tumours either as a palliative or a curative treatment. As a curative treatment, endobronchial brachytherapy could obtain a high local control rate in case of limited disease. In palliative setting, endobronchial brachytherapy improved thoracic symptoms in more than 80% of cases, but it is less efficient than external beam radiation therapy for palliation. It could be also proposed to maintain the airway open after laser therapy. Oesophageal brachytherapy is a valuable option as a palliative treatment, underused at this time. It causes less side effects and a better quality of life compared to self-expanded metallic stents. For a curative aim, there is today no demonstration that a combination of external beam radiotherapy and oesophageal brachytherapy give better results than external beam radiotherapy alone in locally advanced tumours. For superficial diseases, the combination of external beam radiotherapy and oesophageal brachytherapy seems, on the contrary, promising.

Intraluminal brachytherapy boost following external beam radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy of oesophagus carcinoma: Results of a prospective observational study

PURPOSE

The main objective of our study is to evaluate response and toxicity profile in patients receiving external beam radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy followed by intraluminal brachytherapy boost for a carcinoma of the oesophagus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients with biopsy-proven carcinoma of the oesophagus received external beam radiotherapy (50Gy in 25 fractions) with concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin: 40mg/m²). After a gap of two to three weeks, intraluminal brachytherapy (10Gy in two fractions each 1 week apart by a high dose rate ⁶⁰Co source) was given. Response was evaluated at 1 month and at 1 year of completion of treatment. In addition, acute and chronic toxicity was evaluated at 1 month and 6 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Complete response were seen in 80% of patients and partial response in 20% at 1 month. Moreover, there were 65% complete response, 10% local recurrences, 15% patients showed local control with distant metastasis and 10% patients died at 1 year. Grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3 oesophagitis were seen in 10%, 70% and 20% of patients respectively. Stricture was seen in 40% of patients and fistula in 10% of patients. There was no spinal cord, cardiac and nephrotoxicity found.

CONCLUSIONS

With the concept that high tumoricidal dose for adequate tumor control achieved by intraluminal brachytherapy as a mean of dose escalation, while sparing surrounding normal tissue and potentially improving therapeutic ratio, external beam radiotherapy followed by intraluminal brachytherapy could be a better choice for oesophagus carcinoma.

Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

The treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer is controversial. For patients who are candidates for surgical resection, multiple prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the advantages of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. For patients who are medically inoperable, definitive chemoradiation is an alternative approach with survival rates comparable to trimodality therapy. Although trials of dose escalation are ongoing, the standard radiation dose remains 50.4 Gy. Modern radiotherapy techniques such as image-guided radiation therapy with motion management and intensity-modulated radiation therapy are strongly encouraged with a planning objective to maximize conformity to the intended target volume while reducing dose delivered to uninvolved normal tissues.

Clinical implementation of a novel applicator in high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

In this study, we present the clinical implementation of a novel transoral balloon centering esophageal applicator (BCEA) and the initial clinical experience in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment of esophageal cancer, using this applicator.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Acceptance testing and commissioning of the BCEA were performed prior to clinical use. Full performance testing was conducted including measurements of the dimensions and the catheter diameter, evaluation of the inflatable balloon consistency, visibility of the radio-opaque markers, congruence of the markers, absolute and relative accuracy of the HDR source in the applicator using the radiochromic film and source position simulator, visibility and digitization of the applicator on the computed tomography (CT) images under the clinical conditions, and reproducibility of the offset. Clinical placement of the applicator, treatment planning, treatment delivery, and patient's response to the treatment were elaborated as well.

RESULTS

The experiments showed sub-millimeter accuracy in the source positioning with distal position at 1270 mm. The digitization (catheter reconstruction) was uncomplicated due to the good visibility of markers. The treatment planning resulted in a favorable dose distribution. This finding was pronounced for the treatment of the curvy anatomy of the lesion due to the improved repeatability and consistency of the delivered fractional dose to the patient, since the radioactive source was placed centrally within the lumen with respect to the clinical target due to the five inflatable balloons.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency of the BCEA positioning resulted in the possibility to deliver optimized non-uniform dose along the catheter, which resulted in an increase of the dose to the cancerous tissue and lower doses to healthy tissue. A larger number of patients and long-term follow-up will be required to investigate if the delivered optimized treatment can lead to improved clinical outcomes.

Portfolio of prospective clinical trials including brachytherapy: an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database

Background

To evaluate the current status of prospective interventional clinical trials that includes brachytherapy (BT) procedures.

Methods

The records of 175,538 (100 %) clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov were downloaded on September 2014 and a database was established. Trials using BT as an intervention were identified for further analyses. The selected trials were manually categorized according to indication(s), BT source, applied dose rate, primary sponsor type, location, protocol initiator and funding source. We analyzed trials across 8 available trial protocol elements registered within the database.

Results

In total 245 clinical trials were identified, 147 with BT as primary investigated treatment modality and 98 that included BT as an optional treatment component or as part of the standard treatment. Academic centers were the most frequent protocol initiators in trials where BT was the primary investigational treatment modality (p < 0.01). High dose rate (HDR) BT was the most frequently investigated type of BT dose rate (46.3 %) followed by low dose rate (LDR) (42.0 %). Prostate was the most frequently investigated tumor entity in trials with BT as the primary treatment modality (40.1 %) followed by breast cancer (17.0 %). BT was rarely the primary investigated treatment modality for cervical cancer (6.8 %).

Conclusion

Most clinical trials using BT are predominantly in early phases, investigator-initiated and with low accrual numbers. Current investigational activities that include BT mainly focus on prostate and breast cancers. Important questions concerning the optimal usage of BT will not be answered in the near future.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0624-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared with definitive conventional radiotherapy in cervical oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The authors compared definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with definitive conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) in cervical oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 101 patients with CESCC treated with definitive radiotherapy from January 2001 to April 2012 were analysed. 37 patients were irradiated using 2D-RT, whereas 64 cases were treated using IMRT.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 15.5 months for all the patients. For all patients, the overall 2-year local failure-free survival (LFFS), regional failure-free survival (RFFS), and overall survival (OS) rate was 67.4, 85.2 and 46.2%, respectively. The 2-year LFFS rate and the 2-year RFFS rate in the IMRT group were higher than the 2D-RT group, although no statistically significant difference was observed in LFFS and RFFS. No statistically significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS) between the groups. Compared with 2D-RT, the rate of grade 3 dysphagia after radiotherapy was lower (6.3 vs. 8.1%) and none had hypothyroidism requiring lifelong thyroxine replacement in the IMRT group. Matched-cases analysis did not show a statistical difference in terms of LFFS, RFFS and OS between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no statistically significant difference was observed in OS, LFFS and RFFS between the IMRT group and the 2D-RT group, the incidence of late toxicity declined using IMRT, thereby resulting in an improved therapeutic ratio for patients with CESCC.

Measuring relief of dysphagia in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients submitted to high-dose-rate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Esophageal neoplasm has a poor prognosis, and palliative care remains an important goal of treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) to improve dysphagia in 115 patients treated at our institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients previously submitted to external beam radiotherapy that at least, 1 month after, presented with residual disease and persistent dysphagia, were given HDRB as palliative treatment. Patients with tumors extending to the level of cardia and those with cervical esophageal lesions were also eligible. HDRB consisted of three fractions of 500 cGy given weekly. Dysphagia was assessed using a food texture-based scale classified according to the type of food patients were able to swallow (absent, solid, pasty, or liquid). At the end of treatment, a single-category shift in dysphagia classification was scored as +1 (e.g., liquid to pasty) or -1 (e.g., solid to pasty), and a dual-category shift was scored as +2 (e.g., liquid to solid) or -2 (e.g., absent to pasty).

RESULTS

Most patients (51.1%) had improvement of dysphagia, and 55.3% of this group experienced one-point improvement. Procedural complications included stricture (38.2%), bleeding (7%), and fistula (8.7%). In the present study, 13 patients with cervical esophageal lesions underwent HDRB without fistula formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal HDRB effectively reduces dysphagia. Tumor location was not related to development of complications.

Intraluminal brachytherapy in oesophageal cancer: defining its role and introducing the technique

Intraluminal brachytherapy plays an important role in the treatment of oesophageal tumours. This article aims to define this role in the curative as well as in the palliative treatment settings drawing on data from the literature, and also emphasizing its potential for harm when used inexpertly. It also provides a short introduction to practical aspects of the treatment procedure and treatment planning.

Californium-252 neutron brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: long-term treatment results

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively observe and analyze the long-term treatment outcomes for a total of 952 esophageal cancer patients who were treated with (252)Cf neutron brachytherapy (NBT) in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From November 2001 to March 2012, 952 patients with esophageal cancer underwent NBT in combination with EBRT. The patient numbers distributed over various cancer Stages I, IIA, IIB, III, and IVA were 9, 290, 51, 579, and 23, respectively. The total radiation dose to the reference point via NBT was 8-25 Gy-eq in three to five fractions with one fraction/week. The total dose via EBRT was 40-60 Gy delivered over a period of 5-6 weeks with normal fractionation.

RESULTS

The overall median survival time was 20.3 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 67.1%, 36.3%, and 26.6%, respectively. These results compare favorably with the results obtained from conventional high-dose rate in combination with EBRT. Although a majority of the patients (860 or 90.3%) developed Grades 1 and 2 esophagitis during treatment, the symptoms were effectively relieved after the application of antacid and surface anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data show that NBT in combination with EBRT produced favorable local control and long-term survival rates for patients with esophageal cancer and that the side effects are tolerable. As such, we conclude that this dual-modality method is an effective and safe way for treating esophageal cancer.

[Brachytherapy for oesophageal cancer]

The main indication of oesophageal brachytherapy is palliative: it can improve dysphagia in patients with a tumor not suitable for surgery or chemoradiotherapy. A randomized clinical trial showed that survival without dysphagia and quality of life was improved by endoluminal brachytherapy in comparison to self-expansible metallic stents. It also increases the duration of palliation after laser deobstruction. Its role as a curative treatment of locally advanced tumors is still discussed: in combination with external beam radiotherapy, it seems that brachytherapy increased the rate of severe toxicity (haemorrhages, fistula, stenosis). In superficial lesions, brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy seems logical but large prospective studies are missing in this setting.

Radiation Therapy and Esophageal Cancer

Background

Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma account for more than 90% of all esophageal cancer cases. Although the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma has declined, the incidence of adenocarcinoma has risen due to increases in obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Methods

The authors examine the role of radiation therapy alone (external beam and brachytherapy) for the management of esophageal cancer or combined with other modalities. The impact on staging and appropriate stratification of patients referred for curative vs palliative intent with modalities is reviewed. The authors also explore the role of emerging radiation technologies.

Results

Current data show that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection is the accepted standard of care, with 3-year overall survival rates ranging from 30% to 60%. The benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy is limited to patients with node-positive cancer. The survival benefit of surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy remains controversial. External beam radiation therapy alone results in few long-term survivors and is considered palliative at best. Radiation dose-escalation has failed to improve local control or survival. Brachytherapy can provide better long-term palliation of dysphagia than metal stent placement. Although three-dimensional conformal treatment planning is the accepted standard, the roles of IMRT and proton therapy are evolving and potentially reduce adverse events due to better sparing of normal tissue.

Conclusions

Future directions will evaluate the benefit of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy, the role of surgery in locally advanced disease, and the identification of responders prior to treatment based on microarray analysis.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy boost in patients with superficial esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and the incidence of complications of high-dose-rate (HDR) and low-dose-rate (LDR) intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) boost after external beam radiation therapy in patients with superficial esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-four consecutive patients with Stage I thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with definitive radiotherapy using IBT between 1991 and 2007 were studied retrospectively. LDR-IBT and HDR-IBT were performed for 19 and 35 patients, respectively. After external beam radiation therapy of 56-60 Gy with a conventional fractionation, LDR-IBT (5 Gy × 2) or HDR-IBT (3 Gy × 3) was given within 2 weeks. The median follow-up was 47 months (7-151 months).

RESULTS

Overall, the 5-year overall survival, cause-specific survival (CSS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were 61%, 86%, and 79%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival, CCS, and LRC rates did not differ significantly between the LDR-IBT and HDR-IBT groups (68% vs. 58% (p=0.50), 83% vs. 85% (p=0.63), and 84% vs. 75% (p=0.42), respectively). Salvage treatment was given in 8 locally recurrent patients, and 6 patients were rescued. The Grade ≥2 late morbidities of esophagus and heart/lung were observed in 5 patients (4 in the LDR-IBT group and 1 in the HDR-IBT group) and 2 patients (one from each group), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the safety profile and effectiveness, our results encourage the continued adoption of HDR-IBT as radiation boost in medically inoperable or elderly superficial esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy.

The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancer

A group of Swedish oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours and normal tissues. In gastrointestinal cancers, it is assessed that at least 345 patients, mainly non-resectable rectal cancers, oesophageal and liver cancers, are eligible. Great uncertainties do however exist both in the number of patients with gastrointestinal cancers suitable for radiation therapy, and in the proportion of those where proton beams may give sufficiently better results.

Long-term survivorship of esophageal cancer patients treated with radical intent

To investigate the recent trends in definitive management of esophageal cancer, the records of 138 consecutive patients treated with radical intent in a single institution between 1995 and 2003 were reviewed and analyzed. The median follow-up period was 5.7 years (range 1.1 to 10.4 years). Seventy-seven patients were treated with radiation therapy (RT) only and 61 with combined regimens (CRT), in which RT was combined with either radical surgery or chemotherapy, or both. The overall survival of the entire cohort was 32% over two years and 20% over five years. The survivorship in the RT group was 17% over two years and 5% over five years. In the CRT group, 51% and 35% survived over two and five years, respectively. From all the potential prognostic factors examined by univariate and multivariate analyses, only male sex and use of CRT were strongly associated with better survivorship. There was no significant difference in the outcomes among the different regimens of CRT. Survivorship was not affected by the location or histology of the tumour, clinical stage, dose of RT or use of endoluminal brachytherapy in addition to external beam RT. There was a greater tendency to use RT only more often in older patients, but patient age did not affect survivorship. The proportion of patients treated with CRT did not change significantly over the last versus the first four years of the observed period. Combined regimens are undoubtedly superior to RT as a single modality. The long-term survivorship of patients in a subgroup of our patients treated with combined modality protocols compared favourably with the previously reported results in the literature and specifically in prospective randomized trials. However, the optimal combined modality regimen is yet to be defined.

Treatment outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with stage I esophageal cancer: a single institute experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of radiotherapy for patients with stage I esophageal cancer.

METHODS

From 1995 to 2005, 34 patients with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without lymph node metastasis were treated with radiotherapy at our institute. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 68 years; range, 47 to 84 years; male:female, 33:1; performance status, 0/1/2/3 = 23/9/1/1; T1a/T1b = 4/30. Median fraction and total doses of external irradiation given were 2.0 Gy and 60 Gy, respectively. Twenty-three patients had local irradiation to the primary lesion only; the remaining 11 patients received regional field irradiation, including one or 2 regional lymph node areas. Only one patient received adjuvant intracavitary radiotherapy after radiotherapy. Thirty of the patients received concurrent chemotherapy, most of the regimens of which included cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 5 patients. Fifteen patients (44%) had coexisting malignancies. The median follow-up was 38 months (range, 8-107 months).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall, cause-specific, and local-progression-free survival rates were 50.4%, 91.2%, and 81.1%, respectively. Of the 34 patients, 6 had in-field local recurrence, and one had recurrence in the esophagus outside of the irradiated field. Two patients experienced regional lymph node metastasis outside of the irradiated field, and one had distant metastasis. Two patients received salvage surgery, and 4 patients received salvage intracavitary radiotherapy after local recurrence. A late toxicity greater than grade 2 was not observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality for patients with stage I esophageal cancer.

High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Clinic response and survival related to biological equivalent dose (BED)

INTRODUCTION

Ninety percent of oesophageal cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis, and treatment yields discouraging results. High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) permits an increment of local doses without a significant increment of toxicity. The goal of our study is to compare different HDR-BT fractions and assess global survival (GS) and cause-specific survival (CSS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients were treated for locally advanced oesophageal cancer with chemotherapy concomitant with conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy (C3DR) from January 1994 to December 2000. Of this group, 96.2% were males, mean age 63.08 years; the most frequent location was medium third, for 50% of cases. Eighty-four percent of cases were G2-3 epidermoid carcinomas. The administration consisted of 44.2 Gy with C3DR and 5 applications of HDR-BT of 500 cGy each.

RESULTS

Actuarial GS and CSS at 5 years is 10.18% and 12.96%, a mean survival of 25.68 and 29.14 months respectively. The following factors (C3DR total dose, fraction dose and total dose of HDR-BT, number of applications, active length of application, total dose of C3DR plus HDR-BT, and BED of HDR-BT) are evaluated to find if they have an influence on treatment response, GS and actuarial CSS. The only result that yields statistical significance, in univariant analysis, is the active length in HDR-BT, thus for a greater active length of application, a minor response is obtained and GS diminishes (p=0.05). We grouped BT fractions on biological equivalent dose (BED) into: <28, 28-33 and >33 Gy; mean survival and GS at 5 years increases with BED>or=28 Gy (p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Tumour response increases (complete and partial) when BED on HDR-BT is increased, regardless of the fraction employed. A BED higher than 28 Gy yields a significant increase of mean survival and GS at 5 years (p=0.016).

A randomised trial of radiotherapy compared with cisplatin chemo-radiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell cancer of the esophagus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Following our phase II experience, a randomised trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell cancer of the esophagus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients randomised to the RT group received 50 Gy/25 fx/5 weeks of teletherapy followed 1-2 weeks later with 12 Gy/2 fx of high-dose-rate intra-lumenal brachytherapy spaced a week apart. Following the first 3 years of recruitment, due to unexpected late morbidity, brachytherapy was excluded and the protocol modified to 66 Gy/33 fx/6.5 weeks. The CRT group received identical radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin at 35 mg/m(2) for 6-7 cycles.

RESULTS

Between April 1999 and December 2005, 125 patients were randomised to a RT (n=60) or CRT group (n=65). Radiotherapy treatment was completed in 78% (47/60) of the RT group and 89% (58/65) of the CRT group (P=0.10). Six or more cycles of cisplatin could be delivered in 63% (41/65), which resulted in RTOG grade 3 neutropenia of 3%. Late morbidity in the form of ulcers (5% vs. 15% odds ratio 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-1.11, P=0.08) and strictures (13% vs. 28%, odds ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-1.01, P=0.05) was observed in the RT and CRT groups, respectively. At a median follow up of 23 months of all patients alive (range 6-82 months) and with 95/125 events, the median, 1, 2 and 5 year projected survival was 7.1 months, 32.3%, 22.8% and 13.7% vs. 13.4 months, 57.6%, 38.9% and 24.8% for the RT and CRT groups, respectively (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.98, P=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of concurrent cisplatin to radiotherapy resulted in a modest improvement in survival and was associated with manageable additional acute and late morbidity.

Severe toxicity after permanent radioactive seed implantation for mediastinal carcinoid tumors

PURPOSE

Permanent implantation of 125I seeds may be used when uninvolved surgical margins are unobtainable or close. Two cases of mediastinal carcinoid tumors with prior chemoradiation had tumors adherent to esophageal muscularis. Both underwent intraoperative permanent seed implantation and developed esophageal fistulas requiring surgical correction.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Custom permanent 125I seed mesh implants were fashioned intraoperatively in a geometrically coherent pattern. The implants were directly sutured to the partially resected esophageal wall. The postimplant CT scans were fused with the postfistula scans to provide dosimetric information at the fistula site. Doses were calculated from time of insertion to time of fistula formation. Neither patient showed evidence of disease recurrence at the time of fistula repair.

RESULTS

Patient 1 developed an esophageal-pleural fistula 83 days after seed implantation. Patient 2 developed a broncho-pleural fistula 300 days after seed implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases demonstrated that implantation in the setting of extensive subcarinal space dissection and partial esophageal wall resection could cause fistula formation and the need for additional surgery. The high mucosal dose, despite the relatively low activity implant, was due to lack of geometric sparing of the mucosa. We recommend that extensive subcarinal space dissection be considered a contraindication to permanent seed implantation.

External beam radiation therapy followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy for inoperable superficial esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance of external beam radiotherapy followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy in inoperable patients with superficial esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 1992 to May 1999, 66 patients with superficial esophageal cancer were treated with exclusive radiotherapy. The median age was 60 years (range, 41-85). Fifty-three percent of them were ineligible for surgery owing to synchronous or previously treated head-and-neck cancer. Most of the patients (n = 49) were evaluated with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or computed tomography (CT). The mean doses of external beam radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy were 57.1 Gy (+/-4.83) and 8.82 Gy (+/-3.98), respectively. The most frequently used regimen was 60 Gy followed by 7 Gy at 5 mm depth in two applications.

RESULTS

Among patients evaluated with EUS or CT, the complete response rate was 98%. The 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 57.9%, 35.6%, and 26.6%, respectively. Median overall survival was 3.8 years. The 5-year relapse-free survival and cause-specific survival were 54.6% and 76.9%. The 5-year overall, relapse-free, and cause-specific survival of the whole population of 66 patients was 33%, 53%, and 77%, respectively. Local failure occurred in 15 of 66 patients; 6 were treated with brachytherapy. Severe late toxicity (mostly esophageal stenosis) rated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scale occurred in 6 of 66 patients (9%).

CONCLUSION

This well tolerated regimen may be a therapeutic alternative for inoperable patients with superficial esophageal cancer. Only a randomized study could be able to check the potential benefit of brachytherapy after external beam radiation in superficial esophageal cancer.

Clinical application of self-expandable medical memorial metallic stent with iodine-125 seeds in treatment of esophageal carcinoma

AIM: To analyze the curative effect of self-expan-dable medical memorial metallic stent with iodine-125 seeds in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma at advanced stage.

METHODS: Forty-five patients with esophageal carcinoma at advanced stage were divided into group A and B. The patients in group A were treated with normal self-expandable stents, while those in group B received the stents with iodine-125 seeds. After the operation, the patients were followed up and their complications and survival time were analyzed.

RESULTS: The stents were successfully implanted in all the 45 patients. The patients were obviously relieved from their difficulties in swallowing. The survival time of patients in group A were 90-300 d, with an average of 171 ± 56 d, and those in group B were 120-450 d, with an average of 316 ± 116 d. There was significant difference between them (t = -3.385, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Self-expandable stent with iodine-125 seeds can obviously alleviate the symptoms of difficulty in swallowing, improve the patients' life quality and survival time.

The safety and usefulness of high-dose-rate endoluminal brachytherapy as a boost in the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer with external beam radiation with or without chemotherapy

PURPOSE

This study reports the results of a single-institution experience with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) used as a boost in the treatment of esophageal cancer with external beam radiation therapy (ERT) with or without chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients without evidence of metastatic disease were identified. HDRBT was given before ERT with a dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients with a Karnofsky performance of more than 70 received treatment with 50 Gy in 25 fractions and concurrent 5-fluorouracil and cis-platinum during Weeks 1 and 5, whereas patients with a Karnofsky performance of less than 70 were treated with radiation therapy alone with 35 Gy in 14 fractions.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients received HDRBT treatment with combined ERT and chemotherapy and 17 patients with ERT alone. The incidence of acute bone marrow toxicity was 55% Grade 2 and 15% Grade 3, and 85% of patients had Grade 2 esophagitis. With a median follow-up time of 26 months, the median survival was 21 months; the 2-year local recurrence was 25%, and the 5-year survival rate was 28%.

CONCLUSION

HDRBT is safe and beneficial for local control in the radical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.

Clinical results of radiation therapy for stage I esophageal cancer: a single institutional experience

From 1992 through 2001, 29 patients with stage I esophageal cancer were treated with radiation therapy. All patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Seventeen patients were treated with radiotherapy alone, and 12 were treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Most of the chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin and/or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Twelve patients were treated with intracavitary irradiation (low-dose rate: 6, high-dose rate: 6) after external radiotherapy. Median fraction and total doses of external radiotherapy given were 2.0 Gy and 60.6 Gy, respectively. Median doses of intracavitary irradiation were 18 Gy/6 fractions in low-dose-rate brachytherapy and 13.5 Gy/4.5 fractions in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The 5-year overall survival rate was 62%. The 5-year local control rate was 44%. Of the 29 patients, 9 had in-field recurrence in the esophagus and 1 had recurrence in the esophagus outside of the irradiated field. Of 9 patients with in-field local recurrence, 1 also developed mediastinal lymph node metastases and 1 had distant metastasis. Radiation therapy is an effective treatment modality for stage I esophageal cancer.

Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

PURPOSE

Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time.

RESULTS

The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P < .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group.

Palliative treatment by high–dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to analyze the results of palliative HDR brachytherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-one patients with unresectable, advanced esophageal cancer were treated palliatively by HDR brachytherapy. All patients received a total dose of 22.5 Gy in three fractions per week. Remissions of dysphagia and other clinical and radiological factors were assessed in the first month posttreatment, and then in the third, sixth, and twelfth months. The survival rate was compared with some chosen clinical factors using a log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The median survival time among all patients was 8.2 months. The median survival time according to the obtained remission was 14.6, 7.2, and 3.8 months (log-rank p = 00001, F Cox p = 0.00001) for complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), and lack of remission (NR), respectively. A longer median survival time was observed when tumor size was less then 5 cm (12.1 months), than between 5 and 10 cm (7.8 months), or longer than 10 cm (6.4 months) (log-rank p = 0.002). Longer median survival times were observed in clinical stage II (14.1 months), compared with clinical stage III (7.7 months) and IV (7.2 months) (log-rank p = 0.01). Significant correlations were found between survival and the Karnofsky Performance Status, grade of dysphagia, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy for advanced esophageal cancer allowed for improvement of dysphagia in most patients. The complete or partial remission, the older age of patients, and the lower grade of dysphagia observed in first month posttreatment were the most important prognostic factors allowing for prolonged survival (confirmed by a multivariate analysis). In the univariate analysis, important prognostic factors for prolonged survival were: a higher Karnofsky Performance Status, a lower clinical stage and a small tumor size.

Multivariate analysis of treatment outcome in patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy

To evaluate patient characteristics and treatment factors influencing outcome of patients treated with definitive radiotherapy, we performed retrospective analysis. From 1983 to 2000, 154 patients who were diagnosed as esophageal carcinoma without distant metastasis received definitive radiotherapy with (N = 90) or without (N = 64) systemic chemotherapy. One hundred forty-two males and 12 females were entered in the analysis. Thirty-four patients received an additional boost of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). The median patient age was 68 years (range: 46-86). Disease stage was distributed as stage I, II, III, and IV for 33, 42, 33, and 45 patients, respectively. External beam radiotherapy was prescribed with a median 63 Gy (range: 38-77.8 Gy). The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OAS) and local control (LC) rates were 40.8/18.4% and 48.6/28.9%, respectively. In uni-/multivariate analyses, significant prognostic factors of OAS proved to be advanced T stage, absence of ICBT, and age less than 65 years. As for LC, adverse prognostic factors of uni/multivariate analysis were advanced T stage and poor performance status. The pretreatment T stage showed the most powerful influence on both survival and LC. Combination use of ICBT is proven to refine treatment outcome, although eligible criteria should be decided by a prospective study.

Tolerance of organs at risk in small-volume, hypofractionated, image-guided radiotherapy for primary and metastatic lung cancers

PURPOSE

To determine the organ at risk and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of radiation that could be delivered to lung cancer using small-volume, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using hypofractionated, coplanar, and noncoplanar multiple fields.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable lung cancer (except small-cell lung cancer) 6 cm or less in diameter for whom surgery was not indicated were eligible for this study. Internal target volume was determined using averaged CT under normal breathing, and for patients with large respiratory motion, using two additional CT scans with breath-holding at the expiratory and inspiratory phases in the same table position. Patients were localized at the isocenter after three-dimensional treatment planning. Their setup was corrected by comparing two linacographies that were orthogonal at the isocenter with corresponding digitally reconstructed images. Megavoltage X-rays using noncoplanar multiple static ports or arcs were used to cover the parenchymal tumor mass. Prophylactic nodal irradiation was not performed. The radiation dose was started at 60 Gy in 8 fractions over 2 weeks (60 Gy/8 Fr/2 weeks) for peripheral lesions 3.0 cm or less, and at 48 Gy/8 Fr/2 weeks at the isocenter for central lesions or tumors more than 3.0 cm at their greatest dimension.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven lesions in 45 patients were treated. Tumor size ranged from 0.6 to 6.0 cm, with a median of 2.6 cm. Using the starting dose, 1 patient with a central lesion died of a radiation-induced ulcer in the esophagus after receiving 48 Gy/8 Fr at isocenter. Although the contour of esophagus received 80% or less of the prescribed dose in the planning, recontouring of esophagus in retrospective review revealed that 1 cc of esophagus might have received 42.5 Gy, with the maximum dose of 50.5 Gy. One patient with a peripheral lesion experienced Grade 2 pain at the internal chest wall or visceral pleura after receiving 54 Gy/8 Fr. No adverse respiratory reaction was noted in the symptoms or respiratory function tests. The 3-year local control rate was 80.4% +/- 7.1% (a standard error) with a median follow-up period of 17 months for survivors. Because of the Grade 5 toxicity, we have halted this Phase I/II study and are planning to rearrange the protocol setting accordingly. The 3-year local control rate was 69.6 +/- 10.6% for patients who received 48 Gy and 100% for patients who received 60 Gy (p = 0.0442).

CONCLUSIONS

Small-volume IGRT using 60 Gy in eight fractions is highly effective for the local control of lung tumors, but MTD has not been determined in this study. The organs at risk are extrapleural organs such as the esophagus and internal chest wall/visceral pleura rather than the pulmonary parenchyma in the present protocol setting. Consideration of the uncertainty in the contouring of normal structures is critically important, as is uncertainty in setup of patients and internal organ in the high-dose hypofractionated IGRT.

p53 gene therapy for esophageal cancer

Despite improvement of surgical treatment and application of multimodality therapies to advanced esophageal cancer, the prognosis is extremely poor for patients with unresectable tumors. Based on the genetic background of esophageal cancer, we have developed various gene therapy strategies against human esophageal cancer. In this article, we review molecular events of esophageal cancer and p53 gene therapy approaches for its treatment. First, we analyzed p53 genetic alterations and angiogenesis in esophageal cancer. Second, we tested a p53 recombinant adenoviral vector (Ad5CMV-p53). Significant growth suppression was observed following infection with Ad5CMV-p53 in human esophageal cancer cell lines. This observation suggests that Ad5CMV-p53 may be a potentially effective therapeutic agent for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Promising avenues for investigation include double gene therapy and adjuvant use of gene therapy with radiation therapy. Third, based on recent reports of clinical trials of p53 gene therapy for lung cancer and head and neck cancer, we developed a clinical protocol for p53 gene therapy for unresectable advanced esophageal cancer. This clinical trial was planned to evaluate vector tolerability and efficacy. Up to December 1, 2001, four patients were enrolled in this phase I/II trial. No serious adverse events related to Ad5CMV-p53 have occurred so far in these patients, and the trial has been safely conducted.

Self-expandable covered metallic esophageal stent impregnated with beta-emitting radionuclide: an experimental study in canine esophagus

PURPOSE

A specially designed self-expandable covered metallic stent impregnated with the beta-emitting radioisotope 166Ho (166Ho, energy: 1.85 and 1.76 MeV, T12: 26.8 h) was developed at our institute for the purpose of intraluminal palliative brachytherapy, as well as for treating malignant esophageal stricture and swallowing difficulty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tissue response to brachytherapy and the safety of the radioactive metallic stent with regard to the normal canine esophagus before clinical application.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

166Ho was impregnated into the polyurethane membrane (50 micron thickness) covering the outer surface of a self-expandable metallic stent (diameter, 18 mm; length, 40 mm). Stents with radioactivity 4.0-7.8 mCi (Group A, n = 15), 1.0-1.8 mCi (Group B, n = 5), and 0.5-0.7 mCi (Group C, n = 5) were placed in the esophagi of 25 healthy beagle dogs, and the stents were tightly anchored surgically to prevent migration. The estimated radiation dose calculated by Monte Carlo simulation was 194-383 Gy in Group A, 48-90 Gy in Group B, and 23-32 Gy in Group C. The dogs were killed 8-12 weeks after insertion of the stents, and histologic examinations of the esophageal walls were performed.

RESULTS

In Group A, 3 of 15 dogs died of wound infection, so specimens were obtained from only 12 dogs; all 12 cases showed esophageal stricture with mucosal ulceration. Microscopically, severe fibrosis and degeneration of the muscular propria were found in 3 dogs, complete fibrosis of the entire esophageal wall was found in 7 dogs, and esophageal fibrosis with radiation damage within periesophageal soft tissue was found in 2 dogs. However, esophageal perforation did not develop, despite extremely high radiation doses. In Group B, glandular atrophy and submucosal fibrosis were found, but the muscular layer was intact. In Group C, no histologic change was found in 3 dogs, but submucosal inflammation and glandular atrophy with intact mucosa were found in 2 dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

A radioactive, self-expandable covered metallic stent can be used as an alternative therapeutic modality for the palliative treatment of malignant esophageal stricture.

Randomized clinical trials in esophageal cancer

The level I evidence leading to current treatment practices in the management of esophageal cancer includes a total of 72 prospective, randomized controlled trials. The impact of these studies are varied. Numerous well-designed surgical trials address important technical issues in resection and reconstruction after esophagectomy; these studies define complication and morbidity rates in addition to overall survival. A large percentage of the prospective, randomized controlled trials address the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoradiation, with overall survival as the endpoint. The majoritv of these trials are designed to improve on the dismal resectability and overall survival rates in esophageal cancer by initiating novel combination strategies. However, further well-designed

Esophageal cancer: a systematic review

Carcinoma of the esophagus has one of the lowest possibilities of cure, with 5-year survival rates estimated to be approximately 10% overall; these rates are second only to hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers. This fact and the rapid increase in the incidence of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus in recent years challenges us to identify areas of improvement for all aspects of this disease. We discuss potential reasons for the increase in the incidence of adenocarcinomas, evidence that defines the similarity between tumors of the gastroesophageal junction and the tubular esophagus, and other prognostic factors that may influence future modifications of our staging classification of this disease. Surgical advances have translated into improvements in surgical morbidity and mortality rates. Current therapeutic options and the relative merits of the options are discussed. Improvements in patient outcome most likely hinge on earlier diagnosis, more accurate staging, and the optimal use of combined modalities, coupled with technical advances in the modalities. A systematic review approach was undertaken to evaluate the performance characteristics of newer staging tools and the value of different combined modality approaches with particular focus on the use of those approaches for patients with potentially curable disease. A similar methodologic approach was used to address the utility of the many strategies currently used in practice for the palliation of esophageal tumors, with particular focus on the relief of malignant dysphagia. Finally, a summary of published guidelines and population-based patterns of care are presented. This serves as an overview of how all of this evidence actually translates into the care we are providing. A coordinated international effort in population-based research and randomized controlled trials would be the cornerstone to future advances in this relatively uncommon but devastating disease.

The role of brachytherapy for palliation

The goal of palliative radiation is to alleviate symptoms in a short amount of time and maintain an optimal functional and quality-of-life level while minimizing toxicity and patient inconvenience. Despite advances in multimodality antineoplastic therapies, failure to control the tumor at its primary site frustratingly remains the predominant source of morbidity and mortality in many patients with cancer. Escalation of doses of radiation using external beam irradiation has been shown to improve local tumor control, but limits are imposed by the tolerance of normal surrounding structures. The highly conformal nature of brachytherapy enables the radiation oncologist to accomplish safe escalation of radiation doses to the tumor while minimizing doses to normal surrounding structures. Thus, by enhancing the potential for local control, brachytherapy used alone or as a supplement to external beam radiation therapy retains a significant and important role in achieving the goals of palliation. Proper patient selection, excellent technique, and adherence to implant rules will minimize the risk of complications. The advantages realized with the use of brachytherapy include good patient tolerance, short treatment time, and high rates of sustained palliation. This article reviews various aspects of palliative brachytherapy, including patient selection criteria, implant techniques, treatment planning, dose and fractionation schedules, results, and complications of treatment. Tumors of the head and neck, trachea and bronchi, esophagus, biliary tract, and brain, all in which local failure represents the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality, are highlighted.

Radiation treatment for cervical esophagus: patterns of practice study in Canada, 1996

PURPOSE

To assess the patterns of practice among Canadian radiation oncologists who treat esophageal cancers, using a trans-Canada survey, completed at the end of 1996.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One of 3 case presentations of different stages of cervical esophageal cancer was randomly assigned and sent to participating radiation oncologists by mail. Respondents were asked to fill in questionnaires regarding treatment techniques and to outline target volumes for the boost phase of radiotherapy. Radiation oncologists from 26 of 27 (96%) of all Canadian centers participated.

RESULTS

High-energy X-rays (>/= 10 MV) were employed by 68% of the respondents in part of the treatment course. The majority (83%) of the radiation oncologists used at least two phases of treatment. Very few, 10 of 59 (17%), responses started with multifield treatment. The most frequently used prescription dose was 60 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks, given with concurrent chemotherapy. Dose prescriptions were to the isocenter in 39 of 48 (81%) or to a particular isodose line in 9 of 48 (19%) of respondents.

CONCLUSION

There was a variety of radiation treatment techniques in this trans-Canada survey. The majority of the patients had combined cisplatin-based chemoradiation. The isocenter was not used consistently as a dose prescription point.