Treatment of superficial esophageal cancer by external radiation therapy alone: results of a multi-institutional experience

Outcomes following hypofractionated radiation therapy alone for surgically unfit early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients; a retrospective single center analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report the feasibility of hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) alone for early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The oncologic outcomes of 60 cT1-2 N0 ESCC patients who received hypofractionated RT (54 ∼ 60 Gy by 3.0 Gy per fraction) from 2004 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The 5-year rates of local control (LC), progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 81.1 %, 44.2 %, 73.7 %, and 54.5 %, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, tumor length < 3 cm was correlated with favorable LC (HR 0.167, p = 0.090), and the 5-year LC rates were 95.7 % and 72.0 % in < 3 cm and ≥ 3 cm subgroups, respectively (p = 0.053). Grade ≥ 2 esophagitis was observed in 44 patients (73.3 %) and grade ≥ 2 esophageal strictures developed in five (8.3 %), respectively. The patients with ≥ 3 cm tumor more frequently suffered from grade ≥ 2 esophagitis (13/24 vs. 31/36, p = 0.006) and grade ≥ 2 esophageal stricture (0/24 vs. 5/36, p = 0.056), respectively. The patients with cT2 tumor suffered from grade ≥ 2 esophagitis more frequently than those with T1 tumor (29/44 vs. 15/16, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypofractionated RT alone, with the merit of short treatment course, could be used as feasible option in treating the early stage ESCC patients who are unfit for surgical resection or chemoradiation. Especially, tumor length < 3 cm seems a good indication of this treatment scheme based on favorable LC rate with low incidence of esophageal toxicities.

Current status of radiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer in Japan, based on the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan from 2009 to 2011 by the Japan Esophageal Society

BACKGROUND

Although esophagectomy is the standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer, chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone is also selected for some cases. However, there have been very few detailed studies conducted on a large scale on the efficacy of these treatments in Japan.

METHODS

Of the patients enrolled in the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan by the Japan Esophageal Society for the 2015-2017 surveys (patients treated between 2009 and 2011), the data of 388 patients treated by definitive radiotherapy alone (RTx) and 1964 patients treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRTx) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 78 years in the RTx group and 69 years in the CRTx group; thus, the proportion of elderly patients was significantly higher in the RTx group than in the CRTx group (p < 0.0001). With regard to the rates of treatment by the two modalities according to the depth of invasion, extent of lymph node metastasis, and disease stage, the treatment rate by CRTx increased more significantly than that by RTx as the disease progressed (p < 0.0001). With regard to the distribution of the total irradiation dose, 11.4% and 2.3% of patients in the RTx and CRTx groups, respectively, received a dose of 67 Gy or more; thus, the RTx group received significantly higher total irradiation doses (p < 0.0001). In the RTx group, the 5-year overall survival rate was 23.2%, and the rates in patients with cStage 0-I, II, III, and IV disease were 41.8%,18.5%, 9.3%, and 13.9%, respectively. In the patients of the RTx group showing complete response (CR), the 5-year overall survival rate was 46.6% and the rates in patients with cStage 0-I, II, III, and IV disease were 54.8%, 39.6%, 32.4%, and 38.9%, respectively. In the CRTx group, the 5-year overall survival rate was 30.6% and the rates in patients with cStage 0-I, II, III, and IV disease were 57.8%, 47.8%, 23.4%, and 13.0%, respectively. In the patients of the CRTx group showing CR, the 5-year overall survival rate was 59.2% and the rates in patients with cStage 0-I, II, III, and IV disease were 67.9%, 59.5%, 56.5%, and 39.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the current status of treatment of esophageal cancer in Japan, and we think that we have been able to establish the grounds for explaining to patients with esophageal cancer and their families the treatment decisions made for them in daily clinical practice.

The Importance of Concurrent Chemotherapy for T1 Esophageal Cancer: Role of FDG-PET/CT for Local Control

AIM

To evaluate whether patients with T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive radiotherapy can be managed without concurrent chemotherapy, and the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in demonstrating local control (LC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four out of 37 patients with newly-diagnosed T1 EC treated with definitive radiotherapy between July 2009 and July 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. FDG-PET/CT was performed before treatment. Eleven patients were assigned to a concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group. Thirteen were placed in a no-CRT group. The two groups were compared and univariate analysis of clinical factors influencing the prognosis in each group was conducted.

RESULTS

Mean radiotherapy doses were 59.2 Gy in the no-CRT group and 55.5 Gy in the CRT group (p=0.025). Overall survival, disease-free survival, and LC rates at 2 years were lower in the no-CRT group compared to the CRT group. Disease-free survival and LC rates at 2 years were significantly lower in the patients with FDG-avid primary tumor in the no-CRT group (p=0.002 and p=0.002, respectively). All patients with FDG-avid primary tumors in the no-CRT group developed local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

It is important to note that all patients with FDG-avid primary tumor in the no-CRT group developed local recurrence. This would suggest that concurrent chemotherapy is an integral part of disease management in patients with T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Clinical results of proton beam therapy for twenty older patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

In an aging society, increasing number of older patients are diagnosed with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for older patients with esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Older patients (age: ≥ 65 years) newly diagnosed with esophageal cancer between January 2009 and June 2013 were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent either proton beam therapy alone or proton beam therapy with initial X-ray irradiation. Toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were eligible for this study and all completed the treatment. The median age was 78 years (range: 65-89 years) and the median follow-up time was 26.5 months (range: 6-62 months). Seven patients had lymph node metastases and 10 had stage II/III cancer. The median dose of proton beam therapy was 72.6 Gy relative biological dose effectiveness (RBE) (range: 66-74.8 Gy [RBE]) for proton beam therapy alone and 33 Gy (RBE) (range: 30.8-39.6 Gy [RBE]; total dose range: 66.8-75.6 Gy [RBE]) for proton beam therapy with initial X-ray irradiation. The 2-year overall survival rate was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.4%-100%), and the 2-year local control rate was 89.4% (95% CI: 75.5%-100%). Grade 2 or 3 toxicities occurred in some cases; however, no grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose (66-75.6 Gy [RBE]) proton beam therapy without chemotherapy was an efficacious and safe treatment for older patients with esophageal cancer.

Clinical outcomes of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2008: the second survey of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG)

BACKGROUND

This second questionnaire-based survey was performed to determine the clinical results of definitive esophageal cancer treatment with radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between 2004 and 2008.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Clinical results of definitive RT for patients were collected from major Japanese institutions. Patients were classified into three groups: (A) stage I, (B) resectable stages II-III, (C) unresectable stages III-IVA. For group A, all patients treated with RT alone or CRT were included. For groups B and C, only those treated with CRT were included.

RESULTS

In total, 990 patients (group A 259, group B 333, group C 398 patients) were included from 11 institutions. In group A, 199 patients (78 %) were treated with CRT, and 60 patients (23 %) received RT alone. In groups B and C, 420 patients (57 %) were treated with full-dose cisplatin/5-FU, and 181 patients (25 %) with low-dose protracted-infusion cisplatin/5-FU. The median and range of the 5-year overall survival rate were 73 % (40-94 %) for group A, 40 % (0-57 %) for group B, and 18 % (6-26 %) for group C, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were consistently good for five high-volume centers where more than 20 patients/year with esophageal cancer were treated definitively as compared with the remaining six medium-volume centers (5-15 patients/year). The median and range of the incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicities were 10 % and 6-22 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide disparity in 5-year overall survival rates among the institutions was still apparent in the second survey for groups A and B.

Clinical practice and outcome of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer between 1999 and 2003: the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG) Survey

BACKGROUND

To determine the clinical results of radiotherapy (RT) for esophageal cancer in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire-based survey was conducted for esophageal cancer treated by definitive RT between 1999 and 2003. Clinical results of definitive RT for patients were collected from 9 major institutions. Only patients with good performance status (PS 0-2) who received a total dose of 50 Gy or more were included. Patients were classified into three groups: (A) stage I, (B) resectable stages II-III, (C) unresectable stages III-IVA. For group A, all patients treated by RT alone or chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) were included. For groups B and C, only those treated by CRT were included.

RESULTS

In total, 167 patients were included in group A, 239 in group B, and 244 in group C. Approximately half of the patients in group A were treated by CRT. The median total RT dose ranged from 60 to 66 Gy. The median and range of the 5-year overall survival rates were 56% (48-83%) for group A, 29% (12-52%) for group B, and 19% (0-31%) for group C, respectively. A wide disparity in overall survival rates was noted among the institutions. A significant correlation between the number of patients treated per year and the 5-year overall survival rate was noted for groups B and C (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although the overall survival rates for stage I esophageal cancer were excellent, a significant disparity in survival rates was noted among the institutions for stage II-IVA tumors treated by CRT.

Evaluation of clinical significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in superficial squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus

(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is used for pre-treatment staging and evaluation of response to pre-operative therapy in advanced thoracic esophageal cancers. To evaluate the clinical significance of PET diagnosis of superficial thoracic esophageal cancers, FDG-PET was conducted preoperatively in 41 patients with such cancers without pre-operative therapy. We compared the PET diagnosis with clinicopathological findings with respect to both the primary tumor and lymph node (LN) metastasis. Of the 41 superficial thoracic esophageal cancers, 21 (51.2%) were PET positive for primary tumors. Although tumor length and histological type did not correlate with FDG uptake by primary tumors, non-flat (elevated or depressed) tumors showed significantly stronger FDG uptake than flat ones. Of 28 tumors infiltrating the deep submucosal layer, 19 (67.9%) were PET positive, while only two (15.4%) of 13 tumors infiltrating only the mucosa or shallow submucosal layer were PET positive. Manova identified FDG uptake as the only independent risk factor for deep submucosal invasion (odds ratio, 7.407; P = 0.0279). In 13 patients with pathological LN metastasis, although no LN metastasis was detected by FDG-PET, FDG uptake by the primary tumors was the only risk factor for LN metastasis (P = 0.0318). PET-negative tumors tended to reflect longer disease-free survival than PET-positive tumors, although this was not significant. FDG-PET is useful for detecting tumors infiltrating the middle or deep submucosal layer (sm2/sm3), and for predicting LN metastasis in patients with superficial thoracic esophageal cancers. FDG-PET is helpful for decision-making regarding treatment of such patients.

Treatment outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with stage I esophageal cancer: a single institute experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of radiotherapy for patients with stage I esophageal cancer.

METHODS

From 1995 to 2005, 34 patients with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without lymph node metastasis were treated with radiotherapy at our institute. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 68 years; range, 47 to 84 years; male:female, 33:1; performance status, 0/1/2/3 = 23/9/1/1; T1a/T1b = 4/30. Median fraction and total doses of external irradiation given were 2.0 Gy and 60 Gy, respectively. Twenty-three patients had local irradiation to the primary lesion only; the remaining 11 patients received regional field irradiation, including one or 2 regional lymph node areas. Only one patient received adjuvant intracavitary radiotherapy after radiotherapy. Thirty of the patients received concurrent chemotherapy, most of the regimens of which included cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 5 patients. Fifteen patients (44%) had coexisting malignancies. The median follow-up was 38 months (range, 8-107 months).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall, cause-specific, and local-progression-free survival rates were 50.4%, 91.2%, and 81.1%, respectively. Of the 34 patients, 6 had in-field local recurrence, and one had recurrence in the esophagus outside of the irradiated field. Two patients experienced regional lymph node metastasis outside of the irradiated field, and one had distant metastasis. Two patients received salvage surgery, and 4 patients received salvage intracavitary radiotherapy after local recurrence. A late toxicity greater than grade 2 was not observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality for patients with stage I esophageal cancer.

Radiation therapy for gastrointestinal cancer

This article has reviewed the current role of radiation in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies and discussed the data supporting its use. Radiation treatment in this setting continues to evolve with the increasing implementation of more conformal delivery techniques. Further scientific investigation is needed to establish the optimal role of radiation and to better define its integration with novel systemic and biologic modalities.

Radiation therapy alone for stage I (UICC T1N0M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: indications for surgery or combined chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy and limitations of radiation therapy (RT) for superficial esophageal carcinoma, and to explore the indications for more aggressive therapy, such as combined chemo-radiotherapy.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with stage I (UICC T1N0M0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by definitive RT alone were analyzed. Brachytherapy was administered in 36 patients as a boost, and the prescribed doses were 10 Gy (5 Gy x 2 times) at a low dose rate (19 patients) and 9 Gy (3 Gy x 3 times) at a high dose rate (17 patients). Recurrence patterns and survival rates were assessed and the factors predisposing to recurrences after RT were statistically investigated by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The 5-year cause-specific survival rate and the locoregional control rate were 79.9% and 82.1%, respectively. No case of recurrence or disease-related death was observed in any of the patients with mucosal cancer. Among the cases with the cancer invading the submucosa, there were 12 cases with locoregional recurrence and two cases with distant metastases. In cases of submucosal esophageal cancer, the tumor length was the only statistically significant factor predicting locoregional control. The 5-year locoregional control rate in cases with a short length of the tumor (<or=5 cm) was 83.3%, whereas the corresponding rate in cases with the tumor measuring >5 cm in length was 57.8% (P = 0.036). Patients treated by additional brachytherapy exhibited better cause-specific survival and locoregional control rates than those receiving external RT alone, however, the addition had no statistically significant influence on the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

RT was a successful treatment for stage I esophageal cancer, and the treatment outcome using RT was nearly comparable to that of surgery. However, it is suggested that chemo-radiation should be considered in inoperable cases of submucosal cancer when the tumor is more than 5 cm in length.

The Experience of Concurrent Chemoradiation for Japanese Patients With Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment outcome of concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) for 13 clinically confirmed T1 esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

Between June 2000 and February 2004, patients with T1 esophageal cancer (tumor invading lamina propria or submucosa) received cCRT (50.4 Gy; CDDP: 75 mg/m2, day 1, bolus; 5-FU: 1000 mg/m2, days 1 to 4, continuous) (n = 13, T1 group). This treatment regimen was compared with the following 2 other groups treated during the same period: one was treated with radiation therapy alone for T1 disease (n = 5, RT-alone group); and the other group of patients consisted of those with T2 disease (tumor invading muscularis propria) who received the same cCRT regimen as the first T1 group (n = 9, T2 group).

RESULTS

The overall survival rates at 1 and 3 years were in the T1 group, 75% and 75%; in the T2 group, 75% and 45% (P =0.2890); and in the RT-alone group, 60% and 40% (P = 0.2978). No treatment-related mortalities occurred in the T1 and RT-alone groups, but one patient in the T2 group died of radiation-induced pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study was not randomized, the results showed that cCRT is a safe and effective method for treating patients with superficial esophageal cancer.

Clinical results of radiation therapy for stage I esophageal cancer: a single institutional experience

From 1992 through 2001, 29 patients with stage I esophageal cancer were treated with radiation therapy. All patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Seventeen patients were treated with radiotherapy alone, and 12 were treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Most of the chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin and/or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Twelve patients were treated with intracavitary irradiation (low-dose rate: 6, high-dose rate: 6) after external radiotherapy. Median fraction and total doses of external radiotherapy given were 2.0 Gy and 60.6 Gy, respectively. Median doses of intracavitary irradiation were 18 Gy/6 fractions in low-dose-rate brachytherapy and 13.5 Gy/4.5 fractions in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The 5-year overall survival rate was 62%. The 5-year local control rate was 44%. Of the 29 patients, 9 had in-field recurrence in the esophagus and 1 had recurrence in the esophagus outside of the irradiated field. Of 9 patients with in-field local recurrence, 1 also developed mediastinal lymph node metastases and 1 had distant metastasis. Radiation therapy is an effective treatment modality for stage I esophageal cancer.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiation therapy alone

GOALS AND BACKGROUND

There are great differences between treatment methods for early-stage esophageal cancer in institutions. Radiation therapy has been considered to be an effective modality as organ-preserving treatment of the disease. The aim of this study is to assess the effect and limitation of radiation therapy on patients with early esophageal cancer.

STUDY

The subjects were 38 patients with stage I (T1N0M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus who had received definitive radiation therapy alone. Eleven tumors were assessed within the mucosal layer, whereas 27 tumors showed submucosal invasion by examination using endoscopic ultrasound. All patients were treated with more than 60 Gy using a conventional daily fractionation dose at 2 Gy. An additional boost with brachytherapy was performed for 20 patients, and the prescribed doses were 10 Gy (5 Gy x 2 times) with low dose rate (8 patients) and 9 Gy (3 Gy x 3 times) with high dose rate (12 patients). Outcomes and prognostic factors, including the efficacy of intraluminal brachytherapy, were investigated.

RESULTS

The cause-specific survival rate and the local control rate at 5 years were 82.6% and 86.3%, respectively. Recurrences were noted in 8 patients with submucosal cancer, but no recurrence was observed in patients with mucosal cancer. In the present study, tumor length was a statistically significant prognostic factor for cause-specific survival (P = 0.018) and tumor depth tended toward statistical significance (P = 0.073). In 27 patients with submucosal cancer, the tumor length was also statistically significant for the survival (P = 0.032). The 5-year cause-specific survival rates for the short tumor group and the long tumor group were 85.7% and 55.6%, respectively. On the other hand, the use of intraluminal brachytherapy had no significant effect on patient survival.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy is very effective for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with tumor length less than 5 cm, but other treatment modalities, including chemoradiotherapy especially for inoperable patients, should be considered for submucosal cancer with a tumor length of 5 cm or more.

Prevention and management of early esophageal cancer

Early esophageal cancer is defined by its limitation to the esophageal mucosa and submucosa. It has become a curable malignant disease, in sharp contrast to the dismal prognosis of esophageal cancer at advanced stages, which still represents the majority of patients. Understanding the risk factors, establishing surveillance programs for patients at risk, and developing preventative interventions such as dietary and lifestyle changes or pharmacologic interventions hold the potential of reducing the incidence of the disease and of shifting the stage distribution toward early cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound examination is pivotal for distinguishing early from advanced stages of the disease because it allows for accurate assessment of tumor infiltration and regional lymph node involvement. The therapeutic mainstay for early esophageal cancer remains surgery. New, less invasive surgical techniques are being tested that are associated with less morbidity and mortality than standard radical esophagectomies. For patients who are not candidates for surgery, definitive chemoradiation is a viable alternative. New endoscopic ablation techniques, such as endoscopic mucosa resection and photodynamic therapy, are potential alternatives to surgery in patients with cancers limited to the mucosa. For patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction with submucosal involvement, adjuvant chemoradiation should be considered because of its potential to increase survival.

Clinical results of proton beam therapy for cancer of the esophagus

PURPOSE

To present the results of proton beam therapy for patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study reviewed 46 patients with esophageal cancer who were treated between 1985 and 1998 using proton beams with or without X-rays. All patients had locoregionally confined disease; all but one had squamous cell carcinoma. Of the 46 patients, 40 received combinations of X-rays (median, 48 Gy) and protons (median, 31.7 Gy) as a boost. The median total dose of combined X-ray and proton radiation for the 40 patients was 76.0 Gy (range, 69.1-87.4 Gy). The remaining 6 patients received only proton beam therapy (median, 82.0 Gy; range, 75-89.5 Gy).

RESULTS

The 5-year actuarial survival rate for the 46 patients, patients with T1 (n = 23), and those with T2-T4 (n = 23) was 34%, 55%, and 13%, respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate for the 46 patients, those with T1, and those with T2-T4 was 67%, 95%, and 33%, respectively. The 5-year local control rate for patients with T1 and T2-T4 lesions was 83% and 29%, respectively. The site of the first relapse was locoregional for 16 patients and distant organs for 2 patients.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that proton beam therapy is an effective treatment for patients with locally confined esophageal cancer. Additional studies are required to determine the optimal total dose, fractionation schedule, and best combinations of protons and conventional X-rays with or without chemotherapy.

Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Over the last year, several interesting studies have been published on the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Surprisingly, none of them was a randomized phase III trial. The debate on the necessary extent of a potentially curative surgical resection is ongoing. After initially disappointing results, the innovative technique of minimally invasive surgery draws new attention, but clear advantages for the endoscopic approach are yet to emerge. An updated meta-analysis on the value of preoperative radiotherapy showed negative results. There is a clear tendency toward combined-modality treatment, especially in patients with more advanced disease. Some new chemotherapeutic agents showed promising preliminary results (especially paclitaxel), whereas others were clearly disappointing (eg, gemcitabine, topotecan). Concurrent chemoradiation as primary treatment for proximal (cervical) tumors was remarkably effective.

Radiation therapy for superficial esophageal cancer: a comparison of radiotherapy methods

PURPOSE

A comparison of treatment outcomes in response to various methods of radiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC) was carried out for a large series of patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During the period from March 1987 to November 1998, 147 patients with superficial esophageal cancer received definitive radiation therapy at nine radiotherapy institutions in Japan. Fifty-five patients were treated with external radiation therapy alone, 69 with high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy with or without external radiation therapy, and 23 with low-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy and external radiation therapy.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rates for mucosal and submucosal cancer patients were 62% and 42%, respectively. The 5-year cause-specific survival rates for mucosal and submucosal cancer patients were 81% and 64%, respectively (p = 0.013). There was no statistically significant difference in the survival rates for either mucosal or submucosal cancer patients between treatment groups. Metastasis was observed only in submucosal cancer patients. Esophageal ulcers developed only in patients who received intracavitary radiation therapy, and were especially common in patients treated with a fraction size of 5 Gy or more.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intracavitary radiation therapy does not influence the survival or local control rate of SEC. Optimal radiotherapy methods for SEC should be determined by a randomized clinical trial.