RTOG 90-05: the real conclusion

Radiosurgery of limited brain metastases from primary solid tumor: results of the randomized phase III trial (NCT02355613) comparing treatments executed with a specialized or a C-arm linac-based platform

BACKGROUND

Comparative prospective data regarding different radiosurgery (SRS) modalities for treating brain metastases (BMs) from solid tumors are not available. To investigate with a single institute phase III randomized trial whether SRS executed with linac (Arm-B) is superior to a dedicated multi-source gamma-ray stereotactic platform (Arm-A).

METHODS

Adults patients with 1-4 BMs from solid tumors up to 30 mm in maximum diameter were randomly assigned to arms A and B. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2-3) radionecrosis (CIRN). Secondary endpoints were local progression cumulative incidence (CILP), distant brain failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 251 patients were randomly assigned to Arm-A (121) or Arm-B (130). The 1-year RN cumulative incidence was 6.7% in whole cohort, 3.8% (95% CI 1.9-7.4%) in Arm-B, and 9.3% (95% CI 6.2-13.8%) in the Arm-A (p = 0.43). CIRN was influenced by target volume irradiated only for the Arm-A (p << 0.001; HR 1.36 [95% CI 1.25-1.48]). Symptomatic RN occurred in 56 cases at a median time of 10.3 months (range 1.15-54.8 months), 27 in the Arm-B at a median time of 15.9 months (range 4.9-54.8 months), and 29 in the Arm-A at a median time of 6.9 months (1.2-32.3 months), without statistically significant differences between the two arms. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two arms in CILP, BDF, DFS or OS. The mean beam-on time to deliver SRS was 49.0 ± 36.2 min in Arm-A, and 3.1 ± 1.6 min in Arm-B.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the technical differences between the treatment platforms investigated in this single-institution study, linac-based SRS (Arm-B) did not lead to significantly lower grade 2-3 RN rates versus the multi-source gamma-ray system (Arm-A) in a population of patients with limited brain metastases of small volume. No significant difference in local control was observed between both arms. For Arm-B, the treatment delivery time was significantly lower than for Arm-A.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02355613.

Validation of the Fabricated Cast Nylon Head Phantom for Stereotactic Radiosurgery End-to-End Test using Alanine Dosimeter

Background

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to surgery as it precisely delivers single-large doses to small tumors. Cast nylon is used in phantom due to its computed tomography (CT) number of about 56-95 HU, which is close to that of the soft tissue. Moreover, cast nylon is also more budget-friendly than the commercial phantoms.

Aims

The aim of this study is to design and validate the fabricated cast nylon head phantom for SRS end-to-end test using an alanine dosimeter.

Materials and Methods

The phantom was designed using cast nylon. It was initially created by a computer numerical control three-axis vertical machining center. Then, the cast nylon phantom was scanned using a CT simulator. Finally, the validation of the fabricated phantom using alanine dosimeter proficiency with four Varian LINAC machines was performed.

Results

The fabricated phantom presented a CT number of 85-90 HU. The outcomes of VMAT SRS plans showed percentage dose differences from 0.24 to 1.55, whereas the percentage dose differences in organ at risk (OAR) were 0.09-10.80 due to the low-dose region. The distance between the target (position 2) and the brainstem (position 3) was 0.88 cm.

Conclusions

Variation in dose for OAR is higher, which might be due to a high-dose gradient in the area where measurement was being conducted. The fabricated cast nylon end-to-end test head phantom had been suitably designed to image and irradiate during an end-to-end test for SRS using an alanine dosimeter.

Re-irradiation of multiple brain metastases using CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy: Case report

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastasis (BM) is the commonest adult intracranial malignancy and many patients with brain metastases require two course radiotherapy. Re-irradiation is frequently performed in Radiotherapy (RT) departments for multiple brain metastases.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present a case of a 55-year-old male patient suffering from brain metastases, who had previously received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and first CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy (CKSRT) for metastases, presented with a recurrence of metastasis and new lesions in the brain.

DIAGNOSES

An enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain revealed abnormalities with double-dosing of intravenous contrast that identified >10 lesions scattered in the whole brain.

INTERVENTIONS

Re-irradiation was performed using CKSRT. The patient was treated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions for new lesions and 25 Gy in 5 fractions for lesion that were locally recurrent and close to brainstem lesions.

OUTCOME

The lesions were well-controlled, and the headache of the patient was significantly relieved one month after radiotherapy. The total survival time of the patients was 17 months from the beginning of the Cyberknife treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present case report demonstrates that CyberKnife therapy plays a significant role in the repeated radiotherapy for multiple metastatic brain tumors. CKSRT can be used as a salvage method in recurrent multiple brain metastases.

Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for small to medium-sized brain metastases are exceptionally dependent upon tumor size and prescribed dose

BACKGROUND

At our institution, we have historically treated brain metastasis (BM) ≤2 cm in eloquent brain with a radiosurgery (SRS) lower prescription dose (PD) to reduce the risk of radionecrosis (RN). We sought to evaluate the impact of this practice on outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective registry of BM patients treated with SRS between 2008 and 2017. Incidences of local failure (LF) and RN were determined and Cox regression was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses (MVAs).

RESULTS

We evaluated 1533 BM ≤2 cm. Median radiographic follow-up post SRS was 12.7 months (1.4-100). Overall, the 2-year incidence of LF was lower for BM treated with PD ≥21 Gy (9.3%) compared with PD ≤15 Gy (19.5%) (sub-hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.7; P = 0.0006). The 2-year incidence of RN was not significantly higher for the group treated with PD ≥21 Gy (9.5%) compared with the PD ≤15 Gy group (7.5%) (P = 0.16). MVA demonstrated that PD (≤15 Gy) and tumor size (>1 cm) were significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with higher rates of LF and RN, respectively. For tumors ≤1 cm, when comparing PD ≤15 Gy with ≥21 Gy, the risks of LF and RN are equivalent. However, for lesions >1 cm, PD ≥21 Gy is associated with a lower incidence of LF without significantly increasing the risk of RN.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that rates of LF or RN following SRS for BM are strongly correlated with size and PD. Based on our results, we now, depending upon the clinical context, consider increasing PD to 21 Gy for BM in eloquent brain, excluding the brainstem.

Linear accelerator-based radiosurgery is associated with lower incidence of radionecrosis compared with gamma knife for treatment of multiple brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Gamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) both offer excellent local control in the management of multiple brain metastases. The efficacy and toxicity of LINAC and GK SRS have not been directly compared in the modern era. We studied outcomes in patients treated with LINAC SRS and GK at two separate institutions.

METHODS

We identified patients treated with either LINAC or GK who were treated to ≥2 lesions and had available follow up. LINAC patients were treated using single-isocenter multitarget technique. We used Cox regression, Fine and Gray competing risks regression, and nearest neighbor propensity score matching to account for confounders and imbalance between cohorts. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate overall survival and rates of radionecrosis.

RESULTS

We identified 391 patients who were treated in 537 courses to a total 2699 lesions (LINAC: 1014, GK: 1685). After propensity score matching, GK was associated with similar overall survival (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.59-1.24; p = 0.41) and higher rate of radionecrosis (HR = 3.83; 95% CI 1.66-8.84; p = 0.002) compared to LINAC. In a secondary propensity score matched analysis comparing radionecrosis in single-fraction LINAC and GK, GK remained associated with higher incidence of radionecrosis (HR = 4.42; 95% CI 1.28-15.29; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multi-institutional study, we found similar overall survival with lower incidence of radionecrosis in patients treated with LINAC compared to GK SRS. These findings are hypothesis generating and should be validated in an independent cohort.

Re-Irradiation of Brain Metastases and Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Clinical Practice Suggestions

The recent improvements of therapeutic approaches in oncology have allowed a certain number of patients with advanced disease to survive much longer than in the past. So, the number of cases with brain metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression has increased, as has the possibility of developing a recurrence in areas of the central nervous system already treated with radiotherapy.

Clinicians are reluctant to perform re-irradiation of the brain, because of the risk of severe side effects. The tolerance dose for the brain to a single course of radiotherapy is 50–60 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions. New metastases appear in 22–73% of the cases after whole brain radiotherapy, but the percentage of re-irradiated patients is 3–10%. An accurate selection must be made before giving an indication to re-irradiation. Patients with Karnofsky performance status >70, age <65 years, controlled primary and no extracranial metastases are those with the best prognosis. The absence of extracranial disease was the most significant factor in conditioning survival, and maximum tumor diameter was the only variable associated with an increased risk of unacceptable acute and/or chronic neurotoxicity. Re-treatment of brain metastases can be done with whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Most patients had no relevant radiation-induced toxicity after a second course of whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. There are few data on fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the re-irradiation of brain metastases.

In general, the incidence of an “in-field” recurrence of spinal metastasis varies from 2.5–11% of cases and can occur 2–40 months after the first radiotherapy cycle. Radiation-induced myelopathy can occur months or years (6 months-7 years) after radiotherapy, and the pathogenesis remains obscure. Higher radiotherapy doses, larger doses per fraction, and previous exposure to radiation could be associated with a higher probability of developing radiation-induced myelopathy. Experimental data indicate that also the total dose of the first and second radiotherapy, interval to re-treatment, length of the irradiated spinal cord, and age of the treated animals influence the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy. An α/β ratio of 1.9–3 Gy could be generally the reference value for fractionated radiotherapy. However, when fraction sizes are up to 5 Gy, the linear-quadratic equation become a less valid model. The early diagnosis of relapse is crucial in conditioning response to re-treatment.

Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases: Preliminary Results

INTRODUCTION

 Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (pre-SRS) is a recent advancement in the strategy for brain metastasis (BM) management, and available data demonstrate the advantages of pre-SRS before postoperative radiation treatment, including lower rates of local toxicity, leptomeningeal progression, and a high percentage of local control. The authors presented the results of pre-SRS in patients with BM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with BM (11 female and eight male) have been treated at N.N. Burdenko Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery (Moscow, Russia) and Gamma-Knife Center (Moscow, Russia) using pre-SRS. A total of 22 symptomatic metastatic lesions were preoperatively irradiated in the series. Eight patients had multiple BM (number of metastases ranged between two and seven). The median target volume for combined treatment was 14.131 cc (volumes varied between 2.995 and 57.098 cc; mean - 19.986 cc). The median of the mean target dose was 18 Gy, ranging between 12.58 and 24.36 Gy.  Results: All patients tolerated pre-SRS well, without any neurological deterioration, and surgical treatment was performed as scheduled. The median follow-up period was 6.3 months (ranging between five weeks and 22.9 months). In 17 out of 19 patients, follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained two or three months after the combined treatment demonstrated the postoperative cavity without any signs of postradiation alterations in the perifocal tissues. In two observations, peritumoral edema was present. Local recurrences were found in two cases, 5.5 and 17.4 months after treatment. Radionecrosis was present in one observation after 4.6 months of follow-up. Two patients died of disease progression and are presented as illustrative cases.

CONCLUSION

The combined treatment of secondary brain tumors has proved to be the best treatment option. Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery may decrease radiation-induced toxicity and rates of local tumor progression. The potential hazards of pre-SRS associated with the postoperative healing of irradiated soft tissues of the head were not confirmed in our study. The decision of pre-SRS should be made by the tumor board, including specialists in neurosurgery, neuro-oncology, and radiation oncology, if the diagnosis of BM is based on oncological history and visualization data.

Systemic Treatment of Brain Metastases

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Brain metastases are a significant problem in patients with lung cancer and have conventionally been treated with whole-brain radiation. This article reviews the data for systemic chemotherapy to treat brain metastasis from lung cancer and examines the activity of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the targeted therapy for brain metastases from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Future directions for evaluating the role of immunotherapy in treating brain metastasis are also discussed.

A dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for lung cancer: robotic versus conventional linac-based systems

The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetric characteristics of robotic and conventional linac‐based SBRT techniques for lung cancer, and to provide planning guidance for each modality. Eight patients who received linac‐based SBRT were retrospectively included in this study. A dose of 60 Gy given in three fractions was prescribed to each target. The Synchrony Respiratory Tracking System and a 4D dose calculation methodology were used for CyberKnife and linac‐based SBRT, respectively, to minimize respiratory impact on dose calculation. Identical image and contour sets were used for both modalities. While both modalities can provide satisfactory target dose coverage, the dose to GTV was more heterogeneous for CyberKnife than for linac planning/delivery in all cases. The dose to 1000 cc lung was well below institutional constraints for both modalities. In the high dose region, the lung dose depended on tumor size, and was similar between both modalities. In the low dose region, however, the quality of CyberKnife plans was dependent on tumor location. With anteriorly‐located tumors, the CyberKnife may deliver less dose to normal lung than linac techniques. Conversely, for posteriorly‐located tumors, CyberKnife delivery may result in higher doses to normal lung. In all cases studied, more monitor units were required for CyberKnife delivery for given prescription. Both conventional linacs and CyberKnife provide acceptable target dose coverage while sparing normal tissues. The results of this study provide a general guideline for patient and treatment modality selection based on dosimetric, tumor and normal tissue sparing considerations.

PACS numbers: 87.53.Ly, 87.55.dk.

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy of brain metastases

The authors have reviewed the results, the indications and the controversies regarding radiotherapy and chemotherapy of patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent brain metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy, radiosurgery, hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, brachytherapy and chemotherapy are the available options. New radiosensitizers and cytotoxic or cytostatic agents are being investigated. Adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy, either after surgery or radiosurgery, and prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer are discussed, taking into account local control, survival, and risk of late neurotoxicity. Increasingly, the different treatments are tailored to the different prognostic subgroups, as defined by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RPA Classes.

Place de la radiochirurgie dans le traitement des oligodendrogliomes

Radiosurgery of oligodendrogliomas is not specific. It must be integrated into the overall treatment scheme for gliomas which remains to be strictly defined. Nevertheless, empirically, and in light of the limited constraints for the patient and the encouraging radiological and clinical benefits, radiosurgical teams usually propose this technique in the event of recurrence of malignant gliomas, as a second line treatment. Exceptionally radiation can be used for some small benign gliomas which could not be treated by open surgery and accurately defined radiologically. Radiosurgery can achieve local control of the lesion, mostly transitionally, with 15 to 18 Gy at the reference isodose. One of the key problems is the definition of the glioma boundaries. Despite progress in neuroimaging techniques most the limits of malignant forms are still not accessible. In routine practice, the nodular area, considered as the most active on MRI, i.e. the contrast enhanced area, is accepted as the target. Its widest dimension must be about 35-40 mm. Only patients with minimal disability can benefit from radiosurgery. Optimization of the target definition (in particular the most active zone) and prospective randomized studies should be helpful in clarifying indications for this technique.