Dosimetric and volumetric criteria for selecting a source activity and a source type ((125)I or (103)Pd) in the presence of irregular seed placement in permanent prostate implants

A novel three-dimensional template combined with MR-guided 125I brachytherapy for recurrent glioblastoma

Background

At present, the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma is extremely challenging. In this study, we used a novel three-dimensional non-coplanar template (3DNPT) combined with open MR to guide ¹²⁵I seed implantation for recurrent glioblastoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and effectiveness of this technique.

Methods

Twenty-four patients of recurrent glioblastoma underwent 3DNPT with open MR-guided ¹²⁵I brachytherapy from August 2017 to January 2019. Preoperative treatment plan and 3DNPT were made according to enhanced isovoxel T1-weighted MR images. ¹²⁵I seeds were implanted using 3DNPT and 1.0-T open MR imaging guidance. Dosimetry verification was performed after brachytherapy based on postoperative CT/MR fusion images. Preoperative and postoperative dosimetry parameters of D90, V100, V200, conformity index (CI), external index (EI) were compared. The objective response rate (ORR) at 6 months and 1-year survival rate were calculated. Median overall survival (OS) measured from the date of brachytherapy was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

There were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative dosimetry parameters of D90, V100, V200, CI, EI (P > 0.05). The ORR at 6 months was 75.0%. The 1-year survival rate was 58.3%. Median OS was 12.9 months. One case of small amount of epidural hemorrhage occurred during the procedure. There were 3 cases of symptomatic brain edema after brachytherapy treatment, including grade three toxicity in 1 case and grade two toxicity in 2 cases. The three patients were treated with corticosteroid for 2 to 4 weeks. The clinical symptoms related to brain edema were significantly alleviated thereafter.

Conclusions

3DNPT combined with open MR-guided ¹²⁵I brachytherapy for circumscribed recurrent glioblastoma is feasible, effective, and with low risk of complications. Postoperative dosimetry matched the preoperative treatment plan. The described method can be used as a novel implantation technique for ¹²⁵I brachytherapy in the treatment of recurrent gliomas.

Trial registration

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University (NSFC:NO.2017–058), registered 1st July 2017.

Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants

There are advantages in using lower numbers of higher activity seeds for prostate seed implants. This work investigated the use of higher strength seeds for our manually optimized prostate implants. Following a planning study using a range of seeds strengths between 0.4 U and 0.7 U, a series of patients were implanted using seeds of strength ~ 0.7 U. Twenty consecutive patients were selected for this study; ten patients were implanted with 0.4 U seeds and the next ten patients implanted with 0.7 U seeds. Postimplant dosimetry for the target volume, urethra, and rectal wall was compared between the two groups. Our data showed a small and insignificant decrease in the total theatre time when implanting seeds of higher strength. The mean number of seeds required per implant decreased by over 30% for the 0.7 U implants, and the mean number of needles decreased by eight needles. The mean D90 (%) was marginally lower for the 0.7 U group, and spread over a wider range of values. Doses to the rectal wall were slightly higher for the 0.7 U group. At six years postimplant, the symptom scores for urinary and rectal toxicity and erectile function were similar to those reported before brachytherapy, with little differences between the 0.4 U and 0.7 U groups. Our experiences and practical advice in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants are reported in this paper.

Automated estimation of number of implanted iodine-125 seeds for prostate brachytherapy based on two-view analysis of pelvic radiographs

Digital pelvic radiographs are used to identify the locations of implanted iodine-125 seeds and their numbers after insertion. However, it is difficult and laborious to visually identify and count all implanted seeds on the pelvic radiographs within a short time. Therefore, our purpose in this research was to develop an automated method for estimation of the number of implanted seeds based on two-view analysis of pelvic radiographs. First, the images of the seed candidates on the pelvic image were enhanced using a difference of Gaussian filter, and were identified by binarizing the enhanced image with a threshold value determined by multiple-gray level thresholding. Second, a simple rule-base method using ten image features was applied for false positive removal. Third, the candidates for the likely number of a multiply overlapping seed region, which may include one or more seeds, were estimated by a seed area histogram analysis and calculation of the probability of the likely number of overlapping seeds. As a result, the proposed method detected 99.9% of implanted seeds with 0.71 false positives per image on average in a test for training cases, and 99.2% with 0.32 false positives in a validation test. Moreover, the number of implanted seeds was estimated correctly at an overall recognition rate of 100% in the validation test using the proposed method. Therefore, the verification time for the number of implanted seeds could be reduced by the provision of several candidates for the likely number of seeds.

Low-dose rate brachytherapy for men with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Localized prostate cancer is a slow growing tumor for many years for the majority of affected men. Low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) is short-distance radiotherapy using low-energy radioactive sources. LDR-BT has been recommended for men with low risk localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefit and harm of LDR-BT compared to radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and no primary therapy (NPT) in men with localized prostatic cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1950), and EMBASE (from 1980) were searched in June 2010 as well as online trials registers and reference lists of reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, controlled trials comparing LDR-BT versus RP, EBRT, and NPT in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data on study methods, participants, treatment regimens, observation period and outcomes were recorded by two reviewers independently.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified only one RCT (N = 200; mean follow up 68 months). This trial compared LDR-BT and RP. The risk of bias was deemed high. Primary outcomes (overall survival, cause-specific mortality, or metastatic-free survival) were not reported. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years follow up was not significantly different between LDR-BT (78/85 (91.8%)) and RP (81/89 (91.0%)); P = 0.875; relative risk 0.92 (95% CI: 0.35 to 2.42).For severe adverse events reported at 6 months follow up, results favored LDR-BT for urinary incontinence (LDR-BT 0/85 (0.0%) versus RP 16/89 (18.0%); P < 0.001; relative risk 0) and favored RP for urinary irritation (LDR-BT 68/85 (80.0%) versus RP 4/89 (4.5%); P < 0.001; relative risk 17.80, 95% CI 6.79 to 46.66). The occurrence of urinary stricture did not significantly differ between the treatment groups (LDR-BT 2/85 (2.4%) versus RP 6/89 (6.7%); P = 0.221; relative risk 0.35, 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.68). Long-term information was not available.We did not identify significant differences of mean scores between treatment groups for patient-reported outcomes function and bother as well as generic health-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rate brachytherapy did not reduce biochemical recurrence-free survival versus radical prostatectomy at 5 years. For short-term severe adverse events, low-dose rate brachytherapy was significantly more favorable for urinary incontinence, but radical prostatectomy was significantly more favorable for urinary irritation. Evidence is based on one RCT with high risk of bias.

Postimplant rectal dosimetry is not dependent on 103Pd or 125I seed activity

PURPOSE

In this study, the effect of prostate brachytherapy seed activity on postimplant rectal dosimetry was evaluated in Pro-Qura (Prostate Brachytherapy Quality Assurance; Seattle, WA) proctored, community-based programs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-three hundred patients (1563 iodine-125 [(125)I] and 737 palladium-103 [(103)Pd]) from 78 brachytherapists with postimplant rectal dosimetry were identified. Seed activity was stratified into three tertiles for each isotope (≤0.300, 0.301-0.326, and >0.326 mCi/seed for (125)I and ≤1.330, 1.331-1.547, and >1.547 mCi/seed for (103)Pd). Postimplant dosimetry was performed in a standardized fashion. The rectum was contoured by outlining the outer rectal wall. The volume of the rectum receiving 100% of the prescription dose (R(100)) was calculated in cubic centimeters. The prostate V(100) and D(90) volumes were also calculated.

RESULTS

The mean prostate volume was 35.8 and 32.3 cm(3) for (125)I and (103)Pd. The median time to postimplant CT was 30 days. For (125)I, the V(100) increased from 91.0% to 93.7% (p=0.012) and the D(90) increased from 105.9% to 108.7% (p<0.001) for the lowest to the highest (125)I seed activities. In contrast, no significant changes in V(100) (p=0.751) or D(90) (p=0.200) were discerned when stratified by seed activity. For both isotopes, there was no correlation between seed activity and R(100), and R(100) was highest for the intermediate seed activities. Overall, the R(100) was lower for (103)Pd vs. (125)I (0.63 vs. 0.82 cm(3), p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the confines of seed activities used in this study, higher activity seeds did not result in a deleterious effect on rectal dose. Higher activity seeds were associated with improved prostate dosimetry for (125)I, whereas (103)Pd dosimetry was not dependent on seed activity.

A Novel Approach for Treatment of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Design of Radioactive Stents and Trial Studies on Normal Pigs

PURPOSE

Patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer typically have a poor prognosis. The aims of these studies were to design radioactive stents and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the stents in animals.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

To combine the effects of stents and brachytherapy, plastic stents with inserted iodine-125 seeds were designed and tested in 18 normal pigs. The pigs were divided into five groups on the basis of radiation dose. The estimated radiation dose at a 5-mm radial distance from the axis of the seeds was 50 Gy in group A, 100 Gy in group B, 150 Gy in group C, and 200 Gy in group D, with four pigs in each group. In the control group (n = 2), the same plastic stents with non-radioactive seeds were implanted in the pancreatic duct.

RESULTS

The procedures were successfully done on 14 of 18 (78%) pigs, whereas pancreatic duct perforation occurred in four pigs (22%). The thickened wall of the dilated pancreatic duct was clearly observed in the control group. However, the normal morphologic structure of the pancreatic duct wall disappeared in the experimental groups. Histopathologic examination revealed that the stents were surrounded with necrotic tissues and lateral fibrous tissues. During the follow-up period, the width of outside fibrous tissues gradually increased.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the radioactive stents are safe in all dose groups, and it is feasible to design a special radioactive stent for each patient according to the size, shape, and position of the pancreatic tumor.

Effects of seed migration on post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy

Brachytherapy using permanent seed implants has been an effective treatment for prostate cancer. However, seeds will migrate after implant, thus making the evaluation of post-implant dosimetry difficult. In this study, we developed a computer program to simulate seed migration and analyzed dosimetric changes due to seed migration at various migration amounts. The study was based on 14 patients treated with Pd-103 at the James Cancer Hospital. Modeling of seed migration, including direction, distance as well as day of migration, was based on clinical observations. Changes of commonly used dosimetric parameters as a function of migration amount (2, 4, 6 mm respectively), prostate size (from 20 to 90 cc), and prostate region (central vs peripheral) were studied. Change of biological outcome (tumor control probability) due to migration was also estimated. Migration reduced prostate D90 to 99+/-2% of original value in 2 mm migration, and the reduction increased to 94+/-6% in 6 mm migration. The reduction of prostate dose led to a 14% (40%) drop in the tumor control probability for 2 mm (6 mm) migration, assuming radiosensitive tumors. However, migration has less effect on a prostate implanted with a larger number of seeds. Prostate V100 was less sensitive to migration than D90 since its mean value was still 99% of original value even in 6 mm migration. Migration also showed a different effect in the peripheral region vs the central region of the prostate, where the peripheral mean dose tended to drop more significantly. Therefore, extra activity implanted in the peripheral region during pre-plan can be considered. The detrimental effects of migration were more severe in terms of increasing the dose to normal structures, as rectum V50 may be 70% higher and urethra V100 may be 50% higher in the case of 6 mm migration. Quantitative knowledge of these effects is helpful in treatment planning and post-implant evaluation.

Effect of random seed placement error in permanent transperineal prostate seed implant

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Random seed placement error may adversely effect dose distribution in transperineal prostate seed implants. In this study, we investigated the extent to which individual seed activity influences dose-distribution degradation due to random seed placement error.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Separate initial treatment plans were prepared for three prostate sizes, 27.3, 43.2 and 48.9 cc, using 0.35, 0.55 and 0.75 mCi iodine-125 seeds. All stated activities are understood to be apparent activities. The combinations produced a total of nine treatment plans. Each initial treatment plan was subjected to 1000 stochastic three-dimensional Gaussian perturbations of seed location, with a standard deviation of 4mm for a total of 9000 treatment plans. The resulting plans were evaluated for target coverage and urethra involvement.

RESULTS

Satisfactory initial treatment plans were prepared for all prostate sizes and seed activities. All 9000 perturbed treatment plans showed acceptable target coverage under the D90/90 criterion. Some of the perturbed plans for the 27.3 and 43.2 cc prostates with 0.55 and 0.75 mCi seeds failed the V100/90 criterion. Some of the randomly perturbed seed distributions showed significantly increased doses to the urethra relative to the unperturbed treatment plan. This effect was more pronounced with greater seed activity.

CONCLUSIONS

There may be a higher probability of unfavorable target coverage due to random seed placement error when performing transperineal iodine-125 prostate seed implants using seeds with activity greater than 0.35 mCi. There may also be a higher probability of unfavorable urethra involvement when using higher activity seeds.

Is an 192Ir permanent seed implant feasible for prostate brachytherapy?

PURPOSE

(125)I permanent seed brachytherapy for prostate cancer produces good clinical outcomes and limits radiation exposure to medical staff and patients' families. However, (125)I seeds cost thousands of dollars per implant. An encapsulated (192)Ir permanent seed possibly could cost less than 10 dollars. Could inexpensive permanent (192)Ir seeds be used for prostate implants?

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We review the radiobiology of permanent implants, calculate the (192)Ir permanent seed air kerma strength (activity) required, simulate (125)I and (192)Ir seed implants and mixtures thereof, calculate exposure rates near simulated (192)Ir prostate patients, calculate potential radiation exposure to medical staff and family members, review patient release regulations, and analyze the potential cost benefits of using (192)Ir permanent seed implants.

RESULTS

Low air kerma strength (<0.4 microGy m(2)/h/seed) [activity < 0.1-mCi/seed; <0.0558 mg Ra eq/seed] permanent (192)Ir seed implants yield more uniform prostate doses than (125)I seed implants and acceptable urethra, bladder, and rectal doses. The (192)Ir 73.83-day half-life allows mixing (192)Ir seeds and (125)I seeds.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe medical staff could safely implant 40 microGy m(2)/h [10-mCi; 5.58 mg Ra eq] (192)Ir per case. Occupancy factors (1/8, 1/16) could acceptably limit families' exposures. Seed costs could be reduced markedly. With adequate protection of medical staff and proper instructions to patients post-implant, low air kerma strength (<0.4 microGy m(2)/h/seed) [activity <0.1-mCi/seed; <0.0558 mg Ra eq/seed] (192)Ir permanent seed implants are feasible in large patients, with mixed ((125)I, (92)Ir) seed implants feasible for modest size patients. Such implants could be useful in populous countries (China, India, Brazil) and for others who find (125)I seed implants too expensive to perform.

The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs

PURPOSE

To investigate the robustness of permanent prostate implant dosimetry for various (125)I seed activities and various seed models. The dosimetric impact of seed misplacement and seed migration (seed loss) is also taken into account using various standard dose indices.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A dose-based inverse planning algorithm is used for automated dosimetric plan creation (45-60 s per plan) and provides an unbiased way to compare the robustness of various optimal dosimetric plans. Seed misplacement and seed migration are simulated by way of Monte Carlo, based on the measured displacement distributions from clinical postimplant cases. Plans were generated for seed activities between 0.2 and 1.4 mCi (0.25 to 1.78 U) and for 11 different seed models.

RESULTS

The numbers of seeds and needles are shown to decrease rapidly for a seed activity between 0.3 mCi and 0.6 mCi (0.38 and 0.76 U). The loss in V100, from 100%, because of seed misplacement is below 10% for an apparent activity ranging from 0.2 to 0.9 mCi (0.25 to 1.14 U). A minimum degradation in V100 is observed around 0.6-0.7 mCi (0.76-0.89 U). D90 increases from 150 to 170 Gy between 0.3 and 0.7 mCi (0.38 and 0.89 U) and decreases afterward to fall below 140 Gy at higher activity. V200 and D10 to the target volume both show an increase in hot spots up to 0.7 mCi, and then decrease linearly at higher activities for all seed models. V200 and D10 to the urethra remain about constant for all seed activities up to 0.8 mCi (1.02 U), at which point they start to decrease. All seed models follow this general trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Plans were shown to be robust to misplacement and migration of seeds over a wide range of seed activity and for various seed models. With a properly tuned inverse planning algorithm able to ensure the dose coverage and protection for the organs at risk in the presence of placement errors (displacement and migration), the choice of a preferred seed activity, in a range up to about 0.7 mCi (0.89 U), is open. The upper part of this range offers the opportunity to significantly reduce the number of seeds and needles, thus reducing surgical trauma to the patient, saving time in an operating room planning setting, and reducing the cost of a permanent prostate implant procedure.

Automatic post-implant needle reconstruction algorithm to characterize and improve implant robustness analyses

Post-implant analysis in permanent implant brachytherapy is an important process that provides a feedback on treatment quality. Random seed movements, edema, and needle related factors contribute to deteriorate dose coverage. For a complete study of these movements, it is important to reconstruct the post-implant seeds clusters but, up to now, this task was only possible via a long and difficult manual process. To facilitate post-implant analysis a simulated annealing algorithm was developed to perform automatic reconstructions. This process is fast (30-60 s on a 1.3 GHz pentium) and has a high level of success, even with up to 5% of seed loss. Tests on 21 clinical cases show that the algorithm yields exactly the same results as manual reconstructions. A realistic simulation tool was used to generate 58 synthetic post-implant data, in which cases the exact configuration was known. Even if some errors were found, pertinent information was extracted. For medium seed density [corresponding to seeds of 0.6 mCi (0.762 U)], 97% of seeds are matched with their correct needle and 89% are matched with their correct planned position. This method provides pertinent information that can be used to understand inhomogenous dose coverage in specific prostate quadrants; to make realistic post-implant simulations or to identify seeds belonging to a needle loaded with different seed types or activity.

[Iodine-125 transperineal prostate brachytherapy with preplanning technique: pre and post-implant dosimetry results analysis]

PURPOSE

Post-implant CT-based dosimetry is the only method of assessing the quality of permanent prostate brachytherapy. As a consequence of our permanent feedback with the preplanned technique, geometric and dosimetric criteria for optimal seed implantation are proposed and pre and post-implantation dosimetric results are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 2000 and 2001, one hundred and twenty patients with early stage prostate cancer were treated with transperineal I-125 preplanned brachytherapy (RAPID Strand, Amersham Health). The prescription dose was 145 Gy to the planning target volume. For the pre-planning and post-implant dosimetry the Variseed 6.7 version software was used (Varian Medical Systems). The D90, V100 and V150 values, the position of the dose peak [Dose] peak) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) on differential dose volume histogram from both planned and post-implant dosimetry were compared for all patients.

RESULTS

For preplanned dosimetry, the mean values for D90, V100, V150, [Dose] peak, FWMH were respectively of 199Gy, 100%, 70%, 220Gy, 113Gy. For post-implantation, these values became respectively of 157Gy, 90%, 62%, 220Gy, 194Gy.

CONCLUSION

In our practice, differences are noted between preplanned and post-implant dosimetry parameters that should be anticipated to assure optimal definitive result. A working methodology both for performing the preplanned dosimetry and for evaluating the post-implantation dosimetric results is proposed.

Is there a preferred strength for regularly spaced 125I seeds in inverse-planned prostate implants?

PURPOSE

To determine whether a preferred seed strength exists for 125I prostate implants preplanned using a fixed intraneedle seed spacing of 1 cm and an objective needle placement strategy within the planning target volume (PTV), and incorporating explicit dose-volume constraints for the PTV and tissues at risk.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Prostate, urethra, and rectum contours for 10 patients were obtained from transrectal ultrasound studies. The PTV was defined in accordance with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0019 protocol. Inverse planning software was used to optimally arrange seeds of strength 0.3-0.8 U to cover the PTV to D(Rx) = 145 Gy, and limit urethra and rectum doses to 150% and 100% of D(Rx), respectively. Isodose distributions and dosimetric indices were calculated: V(200), V(150), V(100), V(90), D(100), D(90) for PTV; V(150) for urethra; and V(100) for rectum. For seeds of strength 0.414 and 0.6 U and three prostate sizes, the sensitivity of V(90) and D(90) to elementary perturbations of the optimal seed arrangement were examined.

RESULTS

For our planning scenario, 125I seeds of strength 0.5-0.6 U provided the best possible PTV coverage while maintaining V(200) at approximately 25%. The source arrangement for 0.6-U seeds was only modestly more sensitive to perturbations than that for 0.414-U seeds. These findings may not be applicable to implants planned manually or that involve needle placement outside the PTV.

CONCLUSION

Given a particular source arrangement, inverse planning aimed at maximizing dosimetric coverage of the prostate while limiting doses to the urethra and rectum can be used to search for a preferred seed strength. For regularly spaced sources within the PTV, higher strength seeds can provide better dose coverage and better urethral protection than lower strength seeds.

Prostate brachytherapy: comparison of dose distribution with different 125I source designs

PURPOSE

To evaluate the interchangeability of various commercially available iodine 125 ((125)I) sources and to assess the dosimetric effect of a change in source.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A modified peripherally loading prostate brachytherapy plan to deliver 145 Gy was devised by using a model (125)I source, which until recently was the only available (125)I source. A dose-volume histogram was generated. By using the available radial dose functions and anisotropy distributions for eight other currently commercially available sources, the same implant placement was planned and dose-volume histogram distributions tabulated. This exercise was performed for 15-, 45-, and 60-cm(3) glands. No implants were placed, and no physical radiation measurements were made. Dose calculations were theoretic: They were generated by using a widely available treatment planning system.

RESULTS

There was little difference in dose distribution to the volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (<6%); only one source showed a difference greater than 2%. Large differences, up to -40% to +60%, were seen in the volume of tissue encompassed within internal high-dose regions receiving 150% or 200% of the prescribed dose. These findings held true, irrespective of gland size, within a clinically relevant range (15-60 cm(3)) and for a uniformly loaded radionuclide distribution.

CONCLUSION

Reviewing only peripheral dose at or near the prescription dose of 145 Gy revealed little difference in doses for various source designs. Marked differences in high-dose regions were seen and may affect the dose received by internal sites. Effects of these changes on cure and/or complications remain speculative.