Differential sensitivities of pyrogenic chemokine fevers to cyclooxygenase isozymes antibodies

Antipyretic activity of Caesalpinia digyna (Rottl.) leaves extract along with phytoconstituent's binding affinity to COX-1, COX-2, and mPGES-1 receptors: In vivo and in silico approaches

Caesalpinia digyna (Rottl.) (Family: Fabaceae) is well known for its numerous medicinal values against several human disorders including fever, senile pruritis, diarrhea, tuberculosis, tonic disorder, diabetes, etc. The current study is intended to investigate the in vivo antipyretic activity of the methanol extract of C. digyna leaves (MECD) and its carbon-tetrachloride (CTCD) and butanol fraction (BTCD). Besides, in silico molecular docking and ADME/T profiling of the selective identified bioactive compounds of C. digyna has been also studied to validate the experimental outcomes and establish a better insight into the possible receptor-ligand interaction affinity. In vivo antipyretic activity of MECD, CTCD and BTCD were evaluated by employing yeast induced pyrexia technique in mice model and in silico analysis of the identified compounds of C. digyna has been implemented using PyRx autodock vina, Discovery Studio 2020, UCSF Chimera software and ADME/T online tools. MECD and BTCD unveiled significant antipyretic activity in dose dependent manner whereas, CTCD failed to exhibit significant antipyretic activity. Comparing to other test sample, MECD (400 mg/kg; b.w) (p < 0.001) displayed maximum inhibition of pyrexia. In molecular docking approach, docking score between −6.60 to −10.20 kcal/mol have been revealed. Besides, in ADME/T analysis, no compound violated the lipiniski’s 5 rules and displayed any toxicity. Biological and computational approaches ascertain the ethno-botanical use of C. digyna as a good agent against pyrexia and the compounds of C. digyna are primarily proved as safe. Hereafter, further analysis is suggested to validate this research.

Once upon a time, inflammation

Inflammation has accompanied humans since their first ancestors appeared on Earth. Aulus Cornelius Celsus (25 BC-50 AD), a Roman encyclopedist, offered a still valid statement about inflammation: "Notae vero inflammationis sunt quatuor: rubor et tumor cum calore and dolore", defining the four cardinal signs of inflammation as redness and swelling with heat and pain. While inflammation has long been considered as a morbid phenomenon, John Hunter (18th century) and Elie Metchnikoff (19th century) understood that it was a natural and beneficial event that aims to address a sterile or an infectious insult. Many other famous scientists and some forgotten ones have identified the different cellular and molecular players, and deciphered the different mechanisms of inflammation. This review pays tribute to some of the giants who made major contributions, from Hippocrates to the late 19th and first half of the 20th century. We particularly address the discoveries related to phagocytes, diapedesis, chemotactism, and fever. We also mention the findings of the various inflammatory mediators and the different approaches designed to treat inflammatory disorders.

Virtual screening and biological evaluation of novel antipyretic compounds

Due to the absence of safety of the antipyretics to patients with cardiovascular dysfunction, new targets to treat inflammation have been pursued. mPGES-1 is a promising target because its inhibition would not cause the side-effects related to COX inhibition. To identify novel inhibitors of mPGES-1, we developed a ligand-based pharmacophore model that differentiates true inhibitors from decoys and enlightens the structure-activity relationships for known mPGES-1 inhibitors. The model (four hydrophobic centers, two hydrogen bond acceptor and two hydrogen bond donor points) was employed to select lead-like compounds from ZINC database for in vivo evaluation. Among the 18 compounds selected, five inhibited the fever induced by LPS. The most potent compound (5-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-({6-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-2-yl}methyl)-2,3dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-one) is active peripherally (i.v.) or centrally (i.c.v.) (82.18% and 112% reduction, respectively) and reduces (69.13%) hypothalamic PGE₂ production, without significant COX-1/2 inhibition. In conclusion, our in silico approach leads to the selection of a compound that presents the chemical features to inhibit mPGES-1 and reduces fever induced by LPS. Furthermore, the in vivo and in vitro results support the hypothesis that its mechanism of action does not depend on COX inhibition. Hence, it can be considered a promising lead compound for antipyretic development, once it would not have the side-effects of COX-1/2 inhibitors.

Review: Infection, fever, and exogenous and endogenous pyrogens: some concepts have changed

For many years, it was thought that bacterial products caused fever via the intermediate production of a host-derived, fever-producing molecule, called endogenous pyrogen (EP). Bacterial products and other fever-producing substances were termed exogenous pyrogens. It was considered highly unlikely that exogenous pyrogens caused fever by acting directly on the hypothalamic thermoregulatory center since there were countless fever-producing microbial products, mostly large molecules, with no common physical structure. In vivo and in vitro, lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) and other microbial products induced EP, subsequently shown to be interleukin-1 (IL-1). The concept of the `endogenous pyrogen' cause of fever gained considerable support when pure, recombinant IL-1 produced fever in humans and in animals at subnanomolar concentrations. Subsequently, recombinant tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-6 and other cytokines were also shown to cause fever and EPs are now termed pyrogenic cytokines. However, the concept was challenged when specific blockade of either IL-1 or TNF activity did not diminish the febrile response to LPS, to other microbial products or to natural infections in animals and in humans. During infection, fever could occur independently of IL-1 or TNF activity. The cytokine-like property of Toll-like receptor (TLR) signal transduction provides an explanation by which any microbial product can cause fever by engaging its specific TLR on the vascular network supplying the thermoregulatory center in the anterior hypothalamus. Since fever induced by IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6 or TLR ligands requires cyclooxygenase-2, production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE 2) and activation of hypothalamic PGE2 receptors provides a unifying mechanism for fever by endogenous and exogenous pyrogens. Thus, fever is the result of either cytokine receptor or TLR triggering; in autoimmune diseases, fever is mostly cytokine mediated whereas both cytokine and TLR account for fever during infection.

Diverse effects of variant doses of dexamethasone in lithium–pilocarpine induced seizures in rats

Corticosteroids are used in the management of several epileptic aliments; however, their effectiveness in combating seizures remains controversial, with pro- and anti-convulsive effects ascribed. The current study aimed to address the modulatory effect of dexamethasone (DEX) utilizing 3 dose levels (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg body mass of male Wistar rat) in the rat lithium–pilocarpine (Li-PIL) epilepsy model. Li-PIL induced seizures that were associated with neuronal cell loss in the CA3 region, and increased prostaglandin (PG)E2, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-10, nitric oxide, and neutrophil infiltration in the hippocampus. However, Li-PIL compromised the oxidant–antioxidant balance of the hippocampus. Effective anticonvulsant activity was only observed with10 mg DEX/kg body mass, which reduced seizure production and incidence, as well as neuronal cell loss in the CA3 region. At this anticonvulsant dose, enhancements in the antioxidant system and IL-10, as well as suppression of altered inflammatory markers were observed. Conversely, doubling the dose showed a tendency to shorten seizure latency, and neither affected seizure incidence nor CA3 neuronal cell loss. These effects were associated with an increase in levels of PGE2 and TNF-α. The present study found a lack of protection at 5 mg DEX/kg body mass, an anticonvulsant effect at 10 mg/kg, and a loss of protection at 20 mg/kg in the Li-PIL epilepsy model, which indicates that there is an optimal dose of DEX for preventing the induction of seizures.

CCR1 and CCR5 chemokine receptors are involved in fever induced by LPS (E. coli) and RANTES in rats

This study, besides examining the involvement of CCR1 and CCR5 receptors in the LPS-induced fever (lipopolysaccharide, Escherichia coli) in male Wistar rats, evaluated if RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted) injected into the preoptic area of the anterior hypothalamus (AH/POA) would promote an integrated febrile response via these receptors. Moreover, the effects of selective and non-selective cyclooxygenase blockers on both fever and the level of prostaglandin (PG)E(2) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after injection of RANTES into the AH/POA were also investigated. Met-RANTES, CCR1 and CCR5 receptor antagonist, reduced LPS-evoked fever dose dependently. RANTES microinjected into the AH/POA increased the rectal temperature of rats dose dependently and caused a significant decrease in the tail skin temperature and an increase (at 2.5 and 5 h) of the levels of PGE(2) in the CSF. Met-RANTES prevented the fever induced by RANTES. Ibuprofen abolished the fever caused by RANTES between 60 min and 2.5 h, and it reduced the temperature until the end of observation period. Celecoxib blocked the RANTES-induced fever, while indomethacin reduced it in the last 60 min of the experimental period. At 2.5 and 5 h all antipyretics brought the CSF PGE(2) level near to the control. These results indicate that CCR1 and CCR5 receptors are involved in the fever induced by systemic LPS and intrahypothalamic RANTES. RANTES promotes an integrated febrile response accompanied by an increase of CSF PGE(2). The inhibitory effects of celecoxib and ibuprofen suggest that PGE(2) was generated via COX-2. As indomethacin dissociates fever and the decrease of PGE(2) level during the RANTES-induced fever, an alternative COX-2-independent pathway or other mechanisms of action of celecoxib and ibuprofen might be considered.

Endotoxin fever in granulocytopenic rats: evidence that brain cyclooxygenase-2 is more important than circulating prostaglandin E2

PGE(2) is a recognized mediator of many fevers, and cyclooxygenase (COX) is the major therapeutic target for antipyretic therapy. The source, as well as the site of action of PGE(2), as an endogenous pyrogen, is widely accepted as being central, but PGE(2) in the circulation, possibly from leukocytes, may also contribute to the development of fever. However, bacterial infections are important causes of high fever in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and such fevers persist despite the use of COX inhibitors. In the study reported here, the febrile response to bacterial LPS was measured in rats made leukopenic by cyclophosphamide. A striking increase in LPS fever occurred in these granulocytopenic rats when compared with febrile responses in normal animals. Unlike LPS fever in normal rats, fever in granulocytopenic rats was neither accompanied by an increase in blood PGE(2) nor inhibited by ibuprofen. Both leukopenic and normal rats showed LPS-induced COX-2-immunoreactivity in cells associated with brain blood vessels. Furthermore, LPS induced an increase of PGE(2) in cerebrospinal fluid. Induction of COX-2-expression and PGE(2) production was inhibited by ibuprofen in normal but not in leukopenic rats. Although the results presented are, in part, confirmatory, they add new information to this field and open a number of important questions as yet unresolved. Overall, the present results indicate that, in contrast to immunocompetent rats, leukocytes and/or other mechanisms other than PGE(2) are implicated in the mechanisms restricting and reducing the enhanced febrile response to endotoxin in immunosuppressed hosts.

CCL3/Macrophage inflammatory protein-1α induces fever and increases prostaglandin E2 in cerebrospinal fluid of rats: Effect of antipyretic drugs

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the increase in body temperature caused by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of recombinant mouse CCL3/MIP1alpha [C-C (two adjacent conserved cysteines) ligand 3/macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha] constitutes solely a hyperthermic response or a true integrated fever. Additionally, we examined the effects of systemic administration of different antipyretic drugs including the glucocorticoid dexamethasone, on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration of prostaglandin (PG) E2 and on febrile response induced by CCL3/MIP1alpha. I.c.v. administration of CCL3/MIP1alpha evokes an integrated fever accompanied by a reduction in tail skin temperature and an increase in PGE2 concentration in the CSF. Dexamethasone and indomethacin markedly reduced the fever and the elevation of CSF PGE2 concentration induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) whereas both response evoked by i.c.v. CCL3/MIP1alpha were insensitive to this steroid. Indomethacin only blocked the PGE2 increase in the CSF whereas ibuprofen and celecoxib each blocked the fever and the elevation of CSF PGE2. In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that CCL3/MIP1alpha evokes an integrated febrile response accompanied by an increase of PGE2 levels in the CSF. These events are dissociated, especially in animals treated with indomethacin. If PGE2 does not participate in the febrile response evoked by CCL3/MIP1alpha, the inhibition of this response by celecoxib and ibuprofen indicates additional mechanisms to the well-known inhibition of COX enzymes by these drugs. Such mechanisms do not seem to depend on cytokine synthesis and subsequent COX-2 induction.

Intracisternal administration of chemokines facilitated formalin-induced behavioral responses in the orofacial area of freely moving rats

The present study investigated the effects of intracisternal administration of MCP-1, Rantes or IL-8 on pain transmission in the orofacial area. We also investigated mechanisms of hyperalgesic responses produced by intracisternal administration of IL-8. An orofacial formalin test was employed to assess the effects of chemokines on nociceptive processing. For each animal, the number of behavioral responses and the time spent grooming, rubbing and/or scratching the facial region proximal to the formalin injection site was recorded for nine successive 5-min intervals. Intracisternal administration of MCP-1, Rantes or IL-8 significantly increased formalin-induced scratching behavioral responses in the orofacial area. Intracisternal pretreatment with indomethacin, a non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor, did not block IL-8-induced hyperalgesia. Pretreatment with 100 microg propranolol, a non-selective beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist and 50 microg atenolol, a selective beta(1)-adrenergic receptor antagonist, inhibited the number of scratches and the duration of scratching produced by 1 ng of IL-8 injected intracisternally. These results indicate that intracisternal administration of chemokines produce a hyperalgesic response with an orofacial inflammatory pain model and that the IL-8-induced hyperalgesia is mediated by central beta(1)-adrenergic receptor.

Role of endogenous macrophage inflammatory protein-2 in regulating fever induced by bacterial endotoxin in normal and immunosuppressed rats

During myelosuppressive chemotherapy, Gram-negative bacterial infection with consequent exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is one of the most important causes of persistent fever. The classical model of the pathogenesis of fever suggests that pro-inflammatory cytokines, produced by leucocytes in the bloodstream in response to exogenous pyrogens such as bacterial LPS, represent the distal mediators of the febrile response. Neutrophils are the first effectors cells and the most prominent leucocyte population involved in acute bacterial infection. Macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 plays a crucial role in influencing early cell trafficking and neutrophil activation during pathophysiological processes and serves the same chemotactic function as human interleukin-8. In the present study, we investigated the role of MIP-2 in the development of a febrile response induced by LPS in immunocompetent and leukopenic rats. Intraperitoneal injection of LPS in leukopenic rats elicited a biphasic febrile response of rapid onset, the magnitude and duration of which were significantly greater than in immunocompetent animals. The febrile responses to LPS were accompanied by a pronounced induction of serum MIP-2 levels at 1, 2 and 4 h compared with their respective controls. In both normal and leukopenic rats, neutralization of endogenous MIP-2 bioactivity by systemic administration of antirat MIP-2 antibody caused a significant attenuation of the early phase of LPS fever. However, in contrast with normal rats, the second phase of fever was unimpaired by anti-MIP-2 in leukopenic rats. These findings suggest that circulating MIP-2 is involved in the generation of the early phase of LPS fever that contributes to the maintenance of the later phase of fever in immunocompetent, but not leukopenic, rats. Our data support a regulatory role for endogenous MIP-2 in initiating the fever responses to LPS. Furthermore, these results provide evidence that different cellular and humoral mechanisms are implicated in the development of a febrile response triggered by Gram-negative bacterial infections in leukopenic hosts.

Intracerebroventricular interleukin-6, macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta and IL-18: pyrogenic and PGE(2)-mediated?

This study was undertaken to determine whether cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, the critical enzyme in the production of febrigenic prostaglandin (PG) E(2), may be involved centrally in the fever induced in mice by homologous interleukin (IL)-6, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 beta, and interleukin (IL)-18, a member of the pyrogenic IL-1 beta family. To this end, the core temperatures (Tc) of COX-1 and COX-2 gene-ablated mice and of their normal wild-type (WT) counterparts were recorded after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) challenge with recombinant murine (rm) IL-6 (10 ng/mouse), rmMIP-1 beta (20 pg/mouse), rmIL-18 (0.01-1 microgram/mouse), rmIL-1 beta (positive control; 0.1 microgram/mouse), or their vehicle (0.1% bovine serum albumin [BSA] in sterile phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]; 5 microl/mouse). rmIL-6 caused a approximately 1 degrees C T(c) rise in WT mice that peaked at approximately 120 min and gradually recovered over the next 3 h; COX-1(-/-) mice exhibited a relatively faster (peak at 45 min) and shorter (recovery at 150 min) febrile course, whereas COX-2(-/-) mice did not develop fever. rmMIP-1 beta induced a 1 degrees C fever (peak at 60 min) with a long time course (recovery incomplete at 300 min) in both WT and COX-2(-/-) mice; COX-1(-/-) mice displayed a quick-onset (peak at 40 min) and shorter (recovery at approximately 240 min) fever. rmIL-18 did not cause any thermal response at any dose whether administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) or i.c.v. in WT mice; COX gene-ablated mice, therefore, were not tested. These data indicate that COX-2-dependent PGE(2) is critical for the febrile response to IL-6, but not to MIP-1 beta. IL-18 i.p. or i.c.v. is not pyrogenic.