Prognostic factors and current practice in treatment of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: an update anno 2000

Practical management of classical myeloproliferative disorder patients: a clinician's guide

The classical myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) are comprised of the clonal, BCR-ABL-negative, chronic myeloid disorders of essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Management of these disorders remains a significant challenge due to the varied range of prognosis and phenotypic manifestations. Curative therapy, achieved in some patients through allogeneic stem cell transplantation, is elusive or inappropriate in most. Additionally, no available medical therapy has been shown to clearly improve survival or delay disease progression. Current management involves an emphasis on prevention of thrombohemorrhagic complications (through aspirin treatment, phlebotomy and cytoreduction in high-risk patients) in early-stage patients and symptomatic care in those with advanced disease. Leukemic transformation from MPDs remains a rapidly fatal complication, unresponsive to current therapies. Recent elucidation of the role of the activating tyrosine kinase mutation JAK2 (V617F) is anticipated to usher in an era of greater understanding and targeted therapy for the MPDs.

Transplant strategies for idiopathic myelofibrosis

Idiopathic myelofibrosis (IMF) is a clonal stem cell disorder and is one of the four major myeloproliferative disorders, which include essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Patients may be asymptomatic at the early stages, but later progress to marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly with pancytopenia leading to anemia, and other constitutional symptoms. Most of the care available is supportive and only palliates the constitutional symptoms. Prognosis for these patients is dependent on karyotype, hemoglobin count, and age. Stem cell transplantation is the only curative therapy, which results in eradication of the stem cell clone, with the cessation of extramedullary hematopoiesis and resolution of marrow fibrosis and its sequelae. Stem cell replacement therapy using either autologous or allogeneic stem cells has been attempted in small populations of patients with variable benefit. A nonmyeloablative approach has shown promise in a very small number of patients, but additional investigation is required for the ideal management of these patients.

Relationship among densitometry, bone histomorphometry, and histologic stage in idiopathic myelofibrosis

Idiopathic myelofibrosis (IMF) induces dramatic changes in bone. Bone remodeling and densitometric alterations in a series of nine patients with IMF and their relationship with the histologic stage of the disease were assessed. Patients were included at diagnosis and a bone marrow biopsy, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and transiliac bone biopsy for histomorphometric analysis were performed. Five cases were classified as IMF histologic stage 1, one as stage 2, and three as stage 3. Compared with 40 age- and sex-matched controls, the following histomorphometric parameters were significantly higher in our patients: bone volume (BV/TV), osteoblast surface (Ob.S/BS), eroded surface (ES/BS), osteoclast surface (Oc.S/BS), osteoclast number (N.Oc/TA), mineralizing surface (MS/BS), reversal period (Rv.P), and remodeling period (Rm.P). Mineral apposition rate (MAR) and erosion depth (E.Depth) were significantly decreased (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements showed high values for patient age and sex both at femur neck (Z score range +0.19 to +7) and total femur (Z score range -0.09 to +6.48). When densitometric values were analyzed according to IMF histologic stage, patients in stages 1 and 2 had significantly lower BMD values than to those in stage 3 (P = 0.024). In conclusion, patients with IMF present a characteristic bone histomorphometric pattern with increased bone volume and bone cells but low apposition and decreased erosion depth, suggesting a positive balance in bone remodeling units. This balance would produce the increase in bone mass observed in this disease. Given the increase in BMD observed with more advanced stages of IMF, this noninvasive method could be useful tool for assessing IMF progression.

The therapy of myelofibrosis: targeting pathogenesis

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) encompasses the diagnoses of agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (idiopathic myelofibrosis), as well as the advanced phases of polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia (post polycythemic and post thrombocythemia myeloid metaplasia, respectively). MMM is a clonal, hematopoietic stem cell disorder in which neither the pathogenesis, nor a broadly applicable effective therapy have been described. Clinically, these patients experience progressive marrow replacement by fibrotic tissue, ineffective hematopoiesis, problematic cytopenia's, significant hepato-splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, profound constitutional symptoms, and a risk of blastic transformation. Historically, therapies have been targeted at palliating symptoms (i.e. splenectomy, transfusions, hydroxyurea, erythropoietin, androgens, localized radiotherapy). Stem cell transplantation appears promising, but is often toxic and not broadly applicable due to co-morbidities and age of MMM patients. Non-myeloablative approaches to conditioning may broaden the applicability of stem cell transplantation in MMM, yet results to date are preliminary. Although a definitive molecular abnormality responsible for the pathogenesis of MMM has not been described, much has been learned about the aberrant expression of pro-fibrotic cytokines and the presence of increased angiogenesis in MMM. These pathogenetic insights have led to a series of pilot clinical trials with therapeutic agents targeting aberrantly expressed cytokines (and possibly angiogenesis) including Thalidomide (alone or in combination), Etanercept, and STI-571. Amongst these later agents Thalidomide has demonstrated the most promise (palliating disease associated cytopenia's), whereas the TNF-alpha inhibitor Etanercept has aided with MMM associated constitutional symptoms. Although these later trials have been helpful in a subset of patients, no agent to date has led to solid complete responses in MMM across the spectrum of disease manifestations. Further insights into the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for myeloproliferation (aberrant cell signaling pathways, apoptotic resistance, other) are necessary to guide selection and testing of the expanding number of novel anti-neoplastic agents in chronic myeloid disorders and MMM.

Clinical and scientific advances in the Philadelphia-chromosome negative chronic myeloproliferative disorders

The chronic myeloproliferative disorders are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders and include chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (AMM). These diseases are characterized by clonal expansion of the myeloid compartment, increased marrow angiogenesis, and varying risks for blastic transformation. A clear molecular abnormality exists (t(9;22) leading to the fusion of BCR-Abl) only for CML, which led to effective targeted therapy (STI-571). Since no similar pathogenetic mechanism has been discovered for the t(9;22) negative chronic myeloproliferative disorders, their respective diagnosis is currently based on a variety of rather cumbersome diagnostic criteria. Polycythemia vera is distinguished from reactive erythrocytosis through erythropoietin independent growth of erythroid progenitors in vitro, suppressed levels of endogenous erythropoietin, possible overexpression of PRV-1 (polycythemia rubra vera-1), decreased c-Mpl expression on megakaryocytes, as well as overexpression of bcl-xL, and potentially aberrant activity of the Jak-Stat pathway. ET is defined by thrombocytosis and is distinguished from reactive states by decreased megakaryocyte c-Mpl expression, and a propensity for thrombosis. AMM has been associated with a variety of observations including increased concentrations of pro-fibrotic cytokines, increased angiogenesis, and myeloid expansion. AMM is often indistinguishable clinically and prognostically from the advanced phases of other CMPD (specifically post-polycythemic and post-thrombocythemia myeloid metaplasia), all of which are subentities of a diagnosis of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM). The management of CMPD patients is quite varied given the broad range of disease severity and survival observed. The role of stem cell transplantation is limited by the age and comorbidities encountered in CMPD patients. Since no broadly applicable therapy effects the mortality of the CMPD, management currently focuses on the prevention/palliation of disease morbidity (i.e. vascular complications, pruritus, organomegaly, constitutional symptoms). Palliative strategies which currently focus on non-specific myelosuppresion, will hopefully be soon replaced by targeted therapies as insight into pathogenetic mechanisms of these diseases evolves.