Chromatographic analysis of the enantiomers of ifosfamide and some of its metabolites in plasma and urine

Antineoplastic drugs and their analysis: a state of the art review

We provide an overview of the analytical methods available for the quantification of antineoplastic drugs in pharmaceutical formulations, biological and environmental samples.

Quantification of dimethyl-ifosfamide and its N-deschloropropylated metabolites in mouse plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Among antitumor oxazaphosphorine drugs, the prodrug ifosfamide (IFO) and its analogs require metabolic activation by specific liver cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes to become therapeutically active. New 7,9-dimethyl-ifosfamide analogs have shown greater cytotoxic activity than IFO, whereas side-chain oxidation still occurred leading to monochloroacetone after N-dechloropropylation. A sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantitation of the prodrug 7S,9S-dimethyl-ifosfamide (diMeIFO) and its two inactive metabolites, N(2)- and N(3)-deschloropropyl-dimethylifosfamide (N(2)-DCP-diMeIFO and N(3)-DCP-diMeIFO) in mouse plasma. After protein precipitation with methanol, the analytes were separated by isocratic reversed-phase chromatography with (methanol/ammonium formate pH 5.5, 60:40, v/v) and detected by tandem mass spectrometry using multiple reaction monitoring of transitions ions m/z 289→168 for diMeIFO, m/z 213→168 for N(2)-DCP-diMeIFO, m/z 213→92 for N(3)-DCP-diMeIFO and m/z 261→154 for IFO (internal standard). The calibration curves were linear over the concentration range of 20-10,000ng/mL for the three analytes. Mean extraction recoveries from mouse plasma were 99, 96, 99 and 100% for diMeIFO, N(2)-DCP-diMeIFO, N(3)-DCP-diMeIFO and IFO, respectively. The lower limit of quantitation for diMeIFO and its metabolites was 20 ng/mL in 50 μL plasma. The method was accurate with calculated bias from -5.8 to 4.0% for diMeIFO, from -1.1 to 10.6% for N(2)-DCP-diMeIFO and from -6.9 to 9.8% for N(3)-DCP-diMeIFO, and precise with coefficients of variation lower than 6.8%, 7.8% and 14.3%, respectively. The assay was successfully applied to a preliminary pharmacokinetic study of diMeIFO and of its metabolites in mice.

Enantioselective liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay for the determination of ifosfamide and identification of the N-dechloroethylated metabolites of ifosfamide in human plasma

A sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method has been developed and validated for the enantioselective determination of ifosfamide [(R)-IF and (S)-IF] in human plasma and for the detection of the N-dechloroethylated metabolites of IF, 2-N-dechloroethylifosfamide [(R)-2-DCl-IF and (S)-2-DCl-IF] and 3-N-dechloroethylifosfamide [(R)-3-DCl-IF and (S)-3-DCl-IF]. IF, 2-DCl-IF and 3-DCl-IF were extracted from plasma using solid-phase extraction and resolved by liquid chromatography on a column containing a Chirabiotic T chiral stationary phase. The enantioselective separations were achieved using a mobile phase composed of 2-propanol:methanol (60:40, v/v) and a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The observed enantioselectivities (alpha) for IF, 2-DCl-IF and 3-DCl-IF were 1.20, 1.17 and 1.20, respectively. The calibration curve was linear in the concentration range of 37.50-4800 ng/ml for each ifosfamide enantiomer (r(2)>0.997). The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was 5.00 ng/ml. The inter- and intra-day precision ranged from 3.63 to 15.8% relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) and 10.1 to 14.3% R.S.D., respectively, and the accuracy ranged from 89.2 to 101.5% of the nominal values. The method was applied to the analysis of plasma samples obtained from a cancer patient who received 3.75 g/m(2)/day dose of (R,S)-ifosfamide as a 96-h continuous infusion.

Separation methods for alkylating antineoplastic compounds

The separating method for alkylating neoplastic compounds were reviewed based on the classification of the Merck Index (12th Edition). Each section, whenever available or relevant, was subdivided according to the following approach: stability studies, extraction methods, gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. At the end of each chapter a separate table summarizing the main characteristics of the separating method were established. In particular LODs and/or LOQs were expressed as quantity to facilitate comparison between methods. This review highlights the problems to measure trace levels of these compounds into biological fluids with respect to their instability, adsorption to glass and plastic or derivatization requirements. Over the last decades, HPLC seems to be more popular than GC for separating the alkylating agents. The development of narrow- or microbore LC coupled to MS is certainly the way to further improve both separation and sensitivity obtained in the different papers surveyed for this review.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ifosfamide and its metabolites

This review discusses several issues in the clinical pharmacology of the antitumour agent ifosfamide and its metabolites. Ifosfamide is effective in a large number of malignant diseases. Its use, however, can be accompanied by haematological toxicity, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Since its development in the middle of the 1960s, most of the extensive metabolism of ifosfamide has been elucidated. Identification of specific isoenzymes responsible for ifosfamide metabolism may lead to an improved efficacy/toxicity ratio by modulation of the metabolic pathways. Whether ifosfamide is specifically transported by erythrocytes and which activated ifosfamide metabolites play a key role in this transport is currently being debated. In most clinical pharmacokinetic studies, the phenomenon of autoinduction has been observed, but the mechanism is not completely understood. Assessment of the pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide and metabolites has long been impaired by the lack of reliable bioanalytical assays. The recent development of improved bioanalytical assays has changed this dramatically, allowing extensive pharmacokinetic assessment, identifying key issues such as population differences in pharmacokinetic parameters, differences in elimination dependent upon route and schedule of administration, implications of the chirality of the drug and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. The mechanisms of action of cytotoxicity, neurotoxicity, urotoxicity and nephrotoxicity have been pivotal issues in the assessment of the pharmacodynamics of ifosfamide. Correlations between the new insights into ifosfamide metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics will rationalise the further development of therapeutic drug monitoring and dose individualisation of ifosfamide treatment.

Determination of ifosfamide, 2- and 3-dechloroethyifosfamide using gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus or mass spectrometry detection

A comparison was made between methods for determining ifosfamide (IF), 2- (2DCE) and 3-dechloroethylifosfamide (3DCE) using gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection (GC-NPD) versus positive ion electron-impact ion-trap mass spectrometry (GC-MS2). Sample pretreatment involved liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate after adding trofosfamide as internal standard and alkalinization. The GC-NPD was linear, specific, and sensitive for all analytes in the range of 0.0500-100 microg/mL with lower limits of quantification (LLQ) of 0.0500 microg/mL using a 50-microgL plasma sample. The GC-MS2 was linear, specific, and sensitive for IF, 2DCE, and 3DCE in the ranges of 0.250-100, 0.500-25.0, and 0.500-25.0 microg/mL, respectively, with LLQs of 0.250, 0.500, and 0.500 microg/mL. The ranges of accuracy, within-day precision, and between-day precision for analysis of all compounds with GC-NPD did not exceed 93.3% to 105.4%, 8.0% and 9.8%, respectively. The ranges of accuracy, within-day precision, and between-day precision for analysis of all compounds with GC-MS2 did not exceed 86.5% to 99.0%, 9.0% and 12.7%, respectively. In conclusion, GC-NPD proved to be superior to GC-MS2 in sensitivity, detection range, accuracy, and precisions. Therefore GC-NPD is the method of choice for fast un-derivatized determination of IF, 2DCE, and 3DCE in human plasma, and it can readily be used for clinical pharmacokinetic studies and routine monitoring of IF-treated patients in a hospital setting.