Continuous-combined treatment of the menopause with combinations of oestradiol valerate and dienogest - a dose-ranging study

Primary choice of estrogen and progestogen as components for HRT: a clinical pharmacological view

Prescribing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) requires consideration of the selection of its two components, the estrogen and the progestogen. In terms of the estrogen, the decision is mainly whether to use estradiol (E2) or conjugated equine estrogens (CEE). These are the components needed to efficiently treat climacteric symptoms or/and prevent osteoporosis, currently the only labeled indications. There is still controversy regarding the adequate dosages comparing E2 and CEE; however, the consensus is that the differences in the efficacy of E2 and CEE are not a real issue. Therefore, other criteria have to be used. The first reason to add the progestogen is to avoid the development of endometrial cancer (i.e. to achieve 'endometrial safety'). Any available 'fixed-combined' HRT preparation has to be tested for sufficient endometrial efficacy, because the first question the health authorities ask before product registration relates to endometrial safety. We can generally rely on the endometrial safety of these fixed-combined products. However, it could be that we want to use 'free' combinations, which are necessary if we use transdermal E2 (patches, gel, spray), but also to individualize schedules, for example when treating bleeding problems. The question here is how to attain knowledge about the endometrial efficacy of the different progestogens and how to monitor therapy. We will try to answer these two questions from a 'clinical pharmacology' point of view, as a discipline which preferably considers pharmacological properties, but also relating to clinical practice, to achieve individualized therapy with optimal efficacy, best tolerability and minimal risks.

Antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid health benefits of COC containing newer progestogens: dienogest and drospirenone

Data have demonstrated that COCs, besides offering a satisfactory and safe contraception, offer a variety of non-contraceptive health benefits and therapeutic positive aspects. Many prescribes and users, however, do not realize these positive aspects especially the non-contraceptive health benefits. While the contraceptive use is the primary indication for COC use for most women, these users should be advised in regard of the non-contraceptive benefits when contraception is discussed and prescribed.

Using COCs specifically for non-contraceptive indications is an off-label use in many clinical situations (only some exceptions as e.g. acne vulgaris in some countries are allowed clinical entities for the use of these drugs). Therefore, appropriate discussions with the patient regarding this fact should performed and documented by the prescribing physicians.

Independent of the off-label situation, COCs containing the newer progestogens dienogest and drospirenone with their antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid health benefits play an important role in the management of many diseases and their use should therefore be considered by clinician’s.

This review will focus on the effects of these COCs on the endometrium, the skin, the fat tissue and the premenstrual syndrome.

Comparison of dienogest versus triptorelin acetate in premenopausal women with adenomyosis: a prospective clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of the oral dienogest versus triptorelin acetate injection for treatment of premenopausal menorrhagia and pelvic pains in women with uterine adenomyosis.

METHODS

A total of 41 patients with adenomyosis suffering from pelvic pains and menorrhagia were recruited. First group was managed with oral dienogest (2 mg/day, orally) while the second group received triptorelin acetate (3.75 mg/4 weeks, subcutaneous injection) for 16 weeks. Outpatient follow-up was undertaken after 8 weeks but mean values were calculated at baseline and after 16 weeks (end of treatment).

RESULTS

A total of 41 women were allocated to treatment with dienogest (n = 22) or triptorelin acetate (n = 19); 19 (86.4 %) and 18 (94.7 %) % of the respective groups completed the trial. Significant reductions in pelvic pains after 16 weeks treatment were obtained in both groups demonstrating the equivalence of dienogest relative to triptorelin acetate. Triptorelin acetate was more effective in controlling of menorrhagia and reduction of uterine volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest may be a valuable alternative to depot triptorelin acetate for treatment of premenopausal pelvic pains in women with uterine adenomyosis.

Endometrial safety of an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the endometrial safety of an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate/dienogest (E(2)V/DNG) administered as an estrogen step-down and progestogen step-up regimen in women of reproductive age (18-50 years), using histological assessment of endometrial biopsy samples.

METHODS

Endometrial biopsies were taken in a subset of healthy women who took part in a multicenter, open-label, noncomparative study assessing the contraceptive efficacy and safety of an E(2)V/DNG oral contraceptive. In each 28-day cycle, women received E(2)V 3 mg on days 1-2, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3-7, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8-24, E(2)V 1 mg on days 25-26, and placebo on days 27-28. Women underwent endometrial biopsy between days 12 and 19 of the cycle, both at screening and at cycle 20 (or at the final examination).

RESULTS

Of the 283 women who underwent an endometrial biopsy at screening, 218 underwent a follow-up biopsy at cycle 20. At screening, abnormal biopsy results, both classified as "simple hyperplasia without atypia", were seen in two women, who were withdrawn from the trial. At cycle 20, there were no abnormal findings of endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy, and 80.9% of women had atrophic, inactive, or secretory endometrium.

CONCLUSION

After 20 cycles of treatment, an oral contraceptive containing E(2)V and DNG is safe and effective to transform the endometrium into a secretory/inactive or atrophic status, and exhibits no deleterious effects on endometrial histology in women aged 18-50 years.

Dienogest is as effective as intranasal buserelin acetate for the relief of pain symptoms associated with endometriosis--a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of dienogest (DNG) with intranasal buserelin acetate (BA) in patients with endometriosis.

DESIGN

Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.

SETTING

Twenty-four study centers in Japan.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred seventy-one patients with endometriosis.

INTERVENTION(S)

Dienogest (2 mg/day, orally) or BA (900 microg/day, intranasally) for 24 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The pre- to posttreatment changes in the scores of five subjective symptoms during nonmenstruation (lower abdominal pain, lumbago, defecation pain, dyspareunia, and pain on internal examination) and two objective findings (induration in the pouch of Douglas and limited uterine mobility).

RESULT(S)

Dienogest reduced the scores of all symptoms and findings at the end of treatment, and the mean changes in the scores of all symptoms and findings except induration in the pouch of Douglas were comparable to those obtained with BA. Compared with BA, DNG was associated with irregular genital bleeding more frequently and with fewer hot flushes. The reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) during DNG treatment was significantly lower than that during BA treatment.

CONCLUSION(S)

DNG is as effective as intranasal BA in alleviating endometriosis, and causes less BMD loss.

Identifying target regions for vigilance improvement under hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal syndrome patients by means of electroencephalographic tomography (LORETA)

RATIONALE

Daytime fatigue, which at the neurophysiological level is due to vigilance decrements, is a frequent complaint in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES

In a three-arm, 2-month, parallel group-design study, vigilance-promoting effects of a novel continuous combination (=Climodien 2/3) of estradiol valerate (EV; 2 mg) and dienogest (DNG; 3 mg) were compared with the effects of both EV alone and placebo in 55 insomniac, postmenopausal syndrome patients.

METHODS

Low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) was undertaken to identify the cerebral target regions of hormone replacement therapy.

RESULTS

An omnibus significance test revealed Climodien to increase activity in 882 of 2,394 voxels in the alpha-2 band, followed by 733, 706, and 664 voxels in the beta-2, beta-1, and beta-3 bands, and 509 voxels in the delta band, whereas 2 mg EV alone did not produce a significant suprathreshold activity. Current density increased predominantly in the right hemisphere, which had already been described in the literature as the center of the vigilance system. In the fast alpha range, which plays a major role in the context of vigilance, increased activity was found in the right prefrontal, temporal, and superior parietal cortices, i.e., those brain areas of the right-sided fronto-parietal neuronal network that are responsible for sustained attention. A further activity increase was seen in the anterior cingulate gyrus associated with attentional control and conflict monitoring. The right temporal lobe showed increased current density in all frequency bands.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroencephalographic tomography (LORETA) identified the right-hemispheric vigilance system as the target region of Climodien.

Effect of hormone therapy on BP in normotensive and hypertensive postmenopausal women

High blood pressure (BP) ranks as the greatest risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The increased cardiovascular risk determined in recent interventional studies has led the health authorities in some countries to re-ignite the discussion about whether hypertension should be listed as a contraindication for hormone replacement therapy (HRT). We reviewed papers published since 1960 and listed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Biosis, on studies that monitored the course of BP during HRT. We found that both primarily normotensive and hypertensive postmenopausal women actually run only a very low risk of BP increase during HRT, indeed, BP was often lowered. In one of our own studies 1397 hypertensive women with BP diastolic >95 mmHg received transdermal HRT regimens; BP was lowered by an average of 7 mmHg systolic and 9 mmHg diastolic. The results of the more recent 24-h ambulatory BP studies are particularly conclusive. At least 19 such studies have been performed, 13 placebo-controlled and 10 cross-over; 5 found no effect on BP and 14 studies demonstrated BP reductions. BP was lowered by treatment with transdermal estradiol in 11 of 13 studies and by oral estrogen in 4 of 11 studies. The effects were not consistent with regard to systolic or diastolic BP nor to action on day- and night-time BP. It cannot be ruled out that some women with a particular predisposition exhibit an abnormal reaction to the vasoactive effects of HRT, and there is a paucity of long-term data on risk populations, specifically on the progestogenic effects in patients with pre-existing arteriosclerotic lesions. In conclusion, the risk of developing hypertension during HRT is very low, but hormone therapy should always be appropriately indicated and during therapy BP should be checked regularly.

Effects of hormone replacement therapy on perceptual and cognitive event-related potentials in menopausal insomnia

The influence of a combined estrogen-progestin regimen (Climodien, Lafamme) on auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative, randomized 3-arm trial phase (Climodien 2/3=estradiol valerate 2 mg+the progestin dienogest 3 mg, EV=estradiol valerate 2 mg, and placebo), followed by an open-label phase in which all patients received Climodien 2/2 (estradiol valerate 2 mg+dienogest 2 mg). Both the double-blind and the open-label phase lasted 2 months. ERPs were recorded from 19 EEG leads in a two-tone odd-ball paradigm in 49 patients aged between 46 and 67 yr with the diagnosis of insomnia (G 47.0) related to postmenopausal syndrome (N 95.1). Climodien reduced standard N1 and target P300 latencies as compared to placebo, while EV did not affect N1 latency but similarly reduced P300 latency. Climodien increased N1, P2 and P300 amplitudes dose-dependently, predominantly at frontal leads. Estrogen alone had only minor effects on ERP amplitudes. The shortening of standard N1 latency and enhancement of N1 and P2 amplitudes indicates a positive effect of Climodien on perceptual processing, most likely due to vigilance improvements also observed in EEG mapping. Concerning target P300, it seems that estradiol is responsible for the improvement in stimulus evaluation time, as reflected by the shortening of the peak latency, while dienogest seems to account for the improvement in cognitive information processing capacity, whereby 3 mg induced a more pronounced augmentation of P300 amplitudes than 2 mg. Based on the spatial distribution of this increase, it can be speculated that Climodien mainly affects the more frontally distributed P3a subcomponent, which is associated with attention and orientation. Furthermore, the observed changes in ERP-components are consistent with recent studies showing significant positive effects of hormone replacement therapy on cholinergic functions. Thus, Climodien seems to be of interest in preventing cognitive decline and treating cognitive disorders in postmenopausal women. Indeed, there is increasing evidence of beneficial effects of estrogen in dementia. Our present findings suggest that the estrogen effects may be augmented by dienogest.

Hormone replacement therapy and vigilance: double-blind, placebo-controlled EEG-mapping studies with an estrogen-progestogen combination (Climodien, Lafamme) versus estrogen alone in menopausal syndrome patients

The aim of the double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate the effects of a continuous combined estrogen-progestogen treatment (Climodien, Lafamme) as compared with estrogen alone on vigilance in insomniac postmenopausal syndrome patients, objectified by EEG mapping.

METHODS

In a 3-arm, 2-month parallel group design phase, patients received a combination of estradiol valerate 2 mg and the novel progestogen dienogest 3 mg (Climodien 2/3) or estradiol valerate 2 mg alone or placebo. In a subsequent open-label phase, all patients received estradiol valerate 2 mg+dienogest 2 mg (Climodien 2/2). EEG mapping was carried out before and after the 2-month double-blind phase as well as after the 2-month open-label treatment.

RESULTS

As compared with placebo, Climodien 2/3 induced a marked and highly significant increase in absolute power in all frequency bands, specifically in alpha-2 activity. Moreover, a significant increase in relative alpha-2 power, a decrease in relative delta and beta power as well as an acceleration of the dominant frequency and of the delta and alpha centroids suggested a marked improvement in vigilance. In contrast, under estradiol valerate 2 mg alone, only a slight augmentation of alpha and attenuation of relative delta and beta power occurred, suggesting only a slight vigilance improvement as compared with placebo. Thus, dienogest 2 mg increased the estrogen effect, which was also confirmed by a statistical evaluation of the differences between Climodien 2/3 and estradiol valerate alone (augmentation of alpha-2, attenuation of relative beta, acceleration of the dominant frequency). Moreover, Climodien 2/2 also markedly increased alpha-2 power, decreased relative beta-2 power and accelerated the alpha centroid. Finally, comparing Climodien 2/3 with Climodien 2/2, there was even a dose-efficacy relation.

CONCLUSIONS

Estradiol valerate 2 mg improves vigilance slightly, thereby confirming previous findings. The additional administration of dienogest does not minimize the effect of estrogen, but on the contrary increases it, which makes the combination superior to both placebo and estradiol valerate alone. Vigilance improvement may be of great therapeutic benefit to menopausal syndrome patients at a time when increased adaptability is needed to adjust to increasing sexual, marital, occupational and social difficulties known to occur specifically in this period of life.

Lack of stimulatory effect of dienogest on the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 by endothelial cell as compared with other synthetic progestins

OBJECTIVES

Monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells is an important initial event at the onset of atherosclerosis. It is partially mediated by the expression of adhesion molecules on the endothelial cell surface. While estrogens inhibit the development of atherosclerosis, the effect of co-administered progestin remains controversial. We examined the effect of progestins on cytokine-stimulated human umbilical venous endothelial cell (HUVEC) expression of adhesion molecules.

METHODS

In HUVECs, mRNA expression of progesterone receptors (PRs) and androgen receptors (AR) was determined by RT-PCR. HUVECs were stimulated by interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) for 24 h with or without various steroids, and then the cell-surface expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) was semiquantified by ELISA.

RESULTS

In all preparations of HUVECs used in this study, RT-PCR confirmed mRNA expression of both isoforms of PR, PR-A and PR-B, as well as AR. Addition of progesterone (10(-10)-10(-7) M) or dienogest (DNG) (10(-10)-10(-8) M) did not affect IL-1beta-stimulated ICAM-1 or VCAM-1 expression. In contrast, medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethindrone acetate and levonorgestrel (10(-10)-10(-8) M) dose-dependently increased cell adhesion molecules. The progestin-induced increase was blocked by the concomitant addition of mifepristone, a PR antagonist, but not by hydroxyflutamide, an AR antagonist, indicating that the progestin stimulation was mediated predominantly via PR.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that DNG, unlike other synthetic progestins, lacks stimulation of cell adhesion molecules. For the prevention of atherosclerosis, estrogen in combination with DNG may be a suitable regimen in hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.