Response to alendronate in osteoporotic women previously treated with pamidronate

Pharmacological Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: a Level I Evidence Based - Expert Opinion

Objectives: Postmenopausal osteoporosis carries a high risk of fractures, which decrease quality of life and are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. The best pharmacological treatment options to manage and prevent osteoporotic fractures remain still unclear. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of the most commonly employed drugs in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Methods: Only RCTs comparing different drugs for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis were included. Data from 76 RCTs (205,011 patients) were collected. The mean follow-up was 27.6 ± 14.9 months. Results: Denosumab reported the lowest rate of non-vertebral fractures (LOR -1.57), Romosozumab the lowest rate of vertebral fractures (LOR 1.99), and Ibandronate the lowest rate of hip fractures (LOR0.18). Serious adverse events resulted in the lowest in the Raloxifene group (LOR 3.11), while those leading to study discontinuation were lowest in the Romosozumab cohort (LOR 2.65). Conclusions: Denosumab resulted in most effective, particularly in reducing the occurrence of non-vertebral fractures. Romosozumab and Ibandronate resulted best to prevent, respectively, vertebral fractures and hip fractures. Adverse events leading to study discontinuation were less frequent in the Romosozumab and Denosumab groups, while Raloxifene and Alendronate showed a lower incidence of serious adverse events overall. Level of evidence: I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Biochemical markers in preclinical models of osteoporosis

Although several treatments for osteoporosis exist, further understanding of the mode of action of current treatments, as well as development of novel treatments, are of interest. Thus, preclinical models of osteoporosis are very useful, as they provide the possibility for gaining knowledge about the cellular mechanisms underlying the disease and for studying pharmaceutical prevention or intervention of the disease in simple and strictly controlled systems. In this review, we present a comprehensive collection of studies using biochemical markers of bone turnover for investigation of preclinical models of osteoporosis. These range from pure and simple in vitro systems, such as osteoclast cultures, to ex vivo models, such as cultures of embryonic murine tibiae and, finally, to in vivo models, such as ovariectomy and orchidectomy of rats. We discuss the relevance of the markers in the individual models, and compare their responses to those observed using 'golden standard' methods.

Bone turnover 18 months after a single intravenous dose of zoledronic acid

Zoledronic acid inhibits bone resorption for up to 12 months. It is not known whether the duration of this antiresorptive effect extends beyond this period of time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in bone turnover at 12 months (T12) and 18 months (T18) after a single injection of 4 mg of zoledronic acid. It is a prospective, longitudinal study, with a follow-up for 18 months. We studied male and female patients (60.5 +/- 11.0 years old), with low bone mineral density (BMD) coming from the outpatient clinic in a metabolic bone unit of a tertiary care hospital. All patients received a single intravenous dose of 4 mg of zoledronic acid, bone turnover markers [serum carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP)] and BMD [lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH)] were measured at baseline, and after 12 months (T12) and 18 months (T18). Median serum CTX-I and BSAP levels were suppressed at T12 in comparison with baseline values: 0.183 to 0.039 ng/ml for CTX-I (p = 0.0002) and 16.95 to 13.96 U/l for BSAP (p = 0.005). At T18, both CTX-I and BSAP continued to be suppressed below baseline at 0.108 ng/ml and 12.23 U/l (p = 0.009 and p = 0.02, vs. T0). Significant increases in BMD at T18 as compared with T12 were observed in patients (median increase 6.1% for LS and 2.0% for TH). Zoledronic acid inhibits bone turnover effectively for 12 months, with evidence for continued suppression and gains in BMD even after 18 months.

In Vitro, Ex Vivo, andIn VivoMethodological Approaches for Studying Therapeutic Targets of Osteoporosis and Degenerative Joint Diseases: How Biomarkers Can Assist?

Although our approach to the clinical management of osteoporosis (OP) and degenerative joint diseases (DJD)-major causes of disability and morbidity in the elderly-has greatly advanced in the past decades, curative treatments that could bring ultimate solutions have yet to be found or developed. Effective and timely development of candidate drugs is a critical function of the availability of sensitive and accurate methodological arsenal enabling the recognition and quantification of pharmacodynamic effects. The established concept that both OP and DJD arise from an imbalance in processes of tissue formation and degradation draws attention to need of establishing in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experimental settings, which allow obtaining insights into the mechanisms driving increased bone and cartilage degradation at cellular, organ, and organism levels. When addressing changes in bone or cartilage turnover at the organ or organism level, monitoring tools adequately reflecting the outcome of tissue homeostasis become particularly critical. In this context, bioassays targeting the quantification of various degradation and formation products of bone and cartilage matrix elements represent a useful approach. In this review, a comprehensive overview of widely used and recently established in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo set-ups is provided, which in many cases effectively take advantage of the potentials of biomarkers. In addition to describing and discussing the advantages and limitations of each assay and their methods of evaluation, we added experimental and clinical data illustrating the utility of biomarkers for these methodological approaches.

[Cyclic intravenous pamidronate in treatment of osteoporosis]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of cyclic intravenous pamidronate therapy in women with severe osteoporosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement was performed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using LUNAR DPX-L device. Slow intravenous infusion regimens of pamidronate (30 mg) every three months were used in treatment of 240 women, in addition to supplemental Ca and vitamin D. Bone mineral density was measured from lumbar spine 1 year later (120 mg of pamidronate) in 195 women and 2 years later (240 mg of pamidronate) in 29 women. The placebo group included 63 women treated only with calcium and vitamin D.

RESULTS

The average age of 240 women with severe osteoporosis was 61.2 +/- 9.5. All were postmenopausal, except for two of them. Their mean age at the onset of menopause was 46.2 +/- 5.6. Mean duration of menopause was 15.7 +/- 8.1. After 1 year of therapy, bone mineral density increased from 0.781 g/cm2 to 0.83 7 g/cm2 (p < 0.001), the mean increase bone mass was 7.2% (p < 0.0001). After 2 years, bone mineral density increased to 0.844 g/cm2, the improvement was 8.1% from baseline (p < 0.001). Bone mineral density in the placebo group, after one year, significantly increased (p = 0.046) from 0.966 g/cm2 to 1.004 g/cm2, the improvement was 3.9%. However, after two years, bone mineral density decreased to 0.973 g/cm2, and compared with baseline this change was 0.7% and not significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pamidronate prevented further decrease of BMD in our patients with severe osteoporosis and also increased BMD in these patients. This safe and efficient drug is well tolerated.