Absorption and bioavailability of oestradiol from a gel, a patch and a tablet

A Novel Tissue-Specific Insight into Sex Steroid Fluctuations Throughout the Murine Estrous Cycle

Serum sex steroid levels fluctuate throughout the reproductive cycle. However, the degree to which sex steroid tissue content mimics circulating content is unknown. Understanding the flux and physiological quantity of tissue steroid content is imperative for targeted hormonal therapy development. Utilizing a gold-standard ultrasensitive liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) method we determined sex steroid (17β-estradiol [E2], testosterone, androstenedione, and progesterone) fluctuations in serum and in 15 tissues throughout the murine estrous cycle (proestrus, estrus, and diestrus I) and in ovariectomized (OVX) mice. We observed dynamic fluctuations in serum and tissue steroid content throughout the estrous cycle with proestrus generally presenting the highest content of E2, testosterone, and androstenedione, and lowest content of progesterone. In general, the trend in circulating steroid content between the stages of the estrous cycle was mimicked in tissue. However, the absolute amounts of steroid levels when normalized to tissue weight were found to be significantly different between the tissues with the serum steroid quantity often being significantly lower than the tissue quantity. Additionally, we found that OVX mice generally displayed a depletion of all steroids in the various tissues assessed, except in the adrenal glands which were determined to be the main site of peripheral E2 production after ovary removal. This investigation provides a comprehensive analysis of steroid content throughout the estrous cycle in a multitude of tissues and serum. We believe this information will help serve as the basis for the development of physiologically relevant, tissue-specific hormonal therapies.

Hormonal Agents for the Treatment of Depression Associated with the Menopause

Perimenopause marks the transition from a woman’s reproductive stage to menopause. Usually occurring between 42 and 52 years of age, it is determined clinically by the onset of irregular menstrual cycles or variable cycle lengths. Women are at an increased risk of depression and anxiety during perimenopause and the menopausal transition. Depressive symptoms experienced in perimenopause are often more severe compared to pre- and post-menopause. During menopausal transition, the impact of fluctuating estrogen in the central nervous system (CNS) can have negative psychological effects for some women. Traditional first-line management of menopausal depression involves antidepressants, with modest outcomes. The positive effects of estrogen treatment in the CNS are becoming increasingly recognised, and hormonal therapy (HT) with estrogen may have a role in the treatment of menopausal depression. In this review we will outline the prevalence, impact and neurochemical basis of menopausal-associated depression, as well as hormone-based approaches that have increasing promise as effective treatments.

Variability of response to early puberty induction demonstrated by transverse uterine diameter measurement and a novel method of 3D breast imaging

OBJECTIVE

Induction of puberty with exogenous oestrogen results in considerable variability in final uterine and breast volumes. We set out to quantify the variability of these two outcome measures with a view to establishing monitoring methods that could be used to individualise treatment protocols.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen participants with pubertal delay and primary amenorrhoea, due to hypogonadism were recruited from paediatric gynaecology and endocrinology clinics at University College London Hospital. A standardised protocol of transdermal 17β oestradiol (17βE) was used (Evorel™), with a starting dose of 12.5 mcg increasing to 25 mcg (patch changed twice weekly) after 4 months. Follow up was every 2 months for a total of 8 months.

MEASUREMENTS

Uterine dimensions using ultrasound, oestradiol concentrations and breast development assessed by both Tanner staging and 3D photographic imaging.

RESULTS

After 8 months of treatment, the changes in oestradiol concentrations (0-174 pmol), uterine volume growth (4.4-16.4 ml) and breast volume (1.76-140.1 ml) varied greatly between individuals. Of uterine parameters, transverse uterine diameter was most closely associated with serum oestradiol levels at 8 months (beta standardised coefficient = 0.80, p = .001). Change in breast volume was associated with age of treatment initiation (beta standardised coefficient 0.55 p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate variation in response to exogenous oestrogen, emphasising the necessity for individualised dose titration. In the absence of sensitive oestradiol assays, uterine transverse measurements may be used as a surrogate marker of oestrogen sensitivity to guide early dose adjustment. 3D breast imaging may provide a quantitative assessment of breast development to complement Tanner breast staging.

Oestrogen therapy for postpartum depression: efficacy and adverse effects. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Postpartum depression (PPD) is detrimental to the mother and the family as a whole. Early initiation of appropriate treatment is important. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of oestradiol treatment.

METHODS

We performed a pilot double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Major depression was diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), and the severity of depression was evaluated using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The duration of treatment with sublingual oestradiol hemihydrate (1-3 mg/day) was 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The treatment group consisted of 16 mothers and the placebo group of 14 mothers. Thirteen mothers in the treatment group and ten in the placebo group recovered from depression during the treatment period as measured with the EPDS (<10). There was no evidence to suggest that oestradiol was more effective than placebo. More mothers in the treatment group than in the placebo group (eight vs. one) received gestagen treatment for irregular bleeding. Oestradiol did not disturb breastfeeding. The mean number of other adverse effects per mother was lower in the treatment group, and these were mostly somatic symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Our findings warrant further studies on oestrogen therapy for PPD with and without antidepressant and gestagen therapy, and on adverse effects (including effects on vaginal bleeding and breastfeeding).

The Role of Estrone in Feminizing Hormone Treatment

CONTEXT

In trans women, hormone treatment induces feminization; however, the degree of feminization varies from person to person. A possible contributing factor could be estrone, a weak estrogen that interferes with the estrogen receptor.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed whether estrone is involved in feminization induced by hormone treatment.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study, with follow-up of 1 year, included 212 adult trans women at a gender identity clinic, who were starting gender-affirming hormone treatment between July 2017 and December 2019, median age 25 years. Change in fat percentage and breast development were assessed.

RESULTS

After 12 months of hormone treatment, estrone concentration was 187 pmol/L (95% CI, 153-220) in transdermal and 1516 pmol/L (95% CI, 1284-1748) in oral estradiol users. Fat percentage increased by 1.2% (interquartile range [IQR], 0.3-4.8) in transdermal and 4.6% (IQR, 2.5-5.9) in oral estradiol users. This was not associated with estrone concentrations in transdermal (+4.4% (95% CI, -4.0 to 13) per 100 pmol/L increase in estrone concentration) nor in oral estradiol users (-0.7% [95% CI, -1.7 to 0.3]). Breast volume increased by 69 mL (IQR, 58-134) in transdermal and 62 mL (IQR, 32-95) in oral estradiol users. This was not associated with estrone concentrations in transdermal (+14% [95% CI, -49 to 156] per 100 pmol/L increase in estrone concentration) nor oral estradiol users (+11% [95% CI -14 to 43]).

CONCLUSIONS

Change in fat percentage and breast development in trans women were not associated with estrone concentrations nor with administration route. Therefore, measurement of estrone concentrations does not have a place in the monitoring of feminization in trans women.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of menopausal symptoms

Introduction: Menopausal symptoms can be very overwhelming for women. Over the years, many pharmacotherapeutic options have been tested, and others are still being developed. Hormone therapy (HT) is the most efficient therapy for managing vasomotor symptoms and related disturbances. The term HT comprises estrogens and progestogens, androgens, tibolone, the tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC), a combination of bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens, and the selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as ospemifene. Estrogens and progestogens and androgens may differ significantly for chemical structure and can be delivered through different routes, thereby displaying various pharmacological and clinical properties. Tibolone, TSEC and SERM also exhibit unique pharmacodynamics that can be exploited to obtain distinctive therapeutic effects. Non-hormonal options fall mainly into the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and selective noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), GABA-analogue drug classes.Areas covered: Herein, the authors describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of hormonal (androgens, estrogens, progestogens, tibolone, TSEC, SERMs) and non-hormonal (SSRIs, SNRIs, Gabapentin, Pregabalin, Oxybutynin, Neurokinin antagonists) treatments for menopausal symptoms and report essential clinical trial data in humans.Expert opinion: Patient tailoring of treatment is key to managing symptoms of menopause. Physicians must have in-depth knowledge of the pharmacology of compounds to tailor therapy to the individual patient's characteristics and needs.

Sublingual Estradiol Is Associated with Higher Estrone Concentrations than Transdermal or Injectable Preparations in Transgender Women and Gender Nonbinary Adults

Purpose: Serum hormone profiles among different feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapies (GAHT) are poorly characterized. To address this gap, we described the serum estrogen profiles of three 17β-estradiol preparations, taken with or without an antiandrogen, using a novel liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay in adults taking feminizing GAHT. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of 93 healthy transgender women and gender nonbinary adults taking feminizing GAHT in a prospective cross-sectional study. Eligible participants took 17β-estradiol (sublingual tablet, transdermal patch, or intramuscular/subcutaneous injection) with or without oral spironolactone for ≥12 months before study entry. We determined serum estrone and estradiol concentrations for each hormone preparation and described the association between estrone and (1) clinically relevant estradiol concentration ranges (≤200 and >200 pg/mL) and (2) antiandrogen use. To achieve our objectives, we described our protocol for developing an LC-MS/MS assay to measure estrone and estradiol concentrations. Results: Estrone concentrations were higher among participants taking sublingual 17β-estradiol tablets compared with transdermal or injectable preparations (p < 0.0001). Estradiol concentrations were higher for injectable versus transdermal preparations (p = 0.0201), but both were similar to sublingual tablet concentrations (p > 0.05). Estradiol >200 pg/mL (vs. ≤200 pg/mL) was associated with higher estrone concentrations among participants taking sublingual 17β-estradiol, but not transdermal or injectable 17β-estradiol. We observed no association between spironolactone and estrone concentrations (p > 0.5). Conclusion: Estrone concentrations were higher among transgender women and gender nonbinary adults taking sublingual 17β-estradiol compared with transdermal or injectable preparations. The role of estrone in clinical monitoring and the influence of other antiandrogens (e.g., cyproterone acetate) on the estrogen profile remain to be determined.

Estradiol matrix patches for pubertal induction: stability of cut pieces at different temperatures

OBJECTIVE

Transdermal estradiol patches are primarily designed for adult women. No low-dose patches are licensed for pubertal induction in hypogonadal girls. Low doses can be achieved by cutting a matrix patch into smaller pieces. However, the manufacturers do not guarantee stability or utility of cut estradiol patches. The aim of the study was to assess 1-month stability of cut estradiol patches from four different manufacturers in the laboratory at room temperature (+21°C) and at an elevated temperature (+35°C).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Estraderm MX 50 µg, Systen 50 µg and Oesclim 25 µg matrix patches were cut into eight pieces while Estradot 50 µg small patches were cut in half. The cut patches were stored in their respective pouches at +21°C or at +35°C for up to 1 month. The estradiol drug was extracted from the patch by ethyl acetate n-hexane and determined by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Storage at +21°C or +35°C up to 1 month did not reduce the estradiol concentration in Estraderm MX, Systen and Oesclim patches. However, although the estradiol in Estradot patches was not affected by storage at +21°C, at +35°C, estradiol decreased by 57% (±1%) in cut pieces.

CONCLUSIONS

Unused Estraderm MX, Systen and Oesclim patch pieces may be stored for at least 1 month at ≤+35°C. Where estradiol patches for children are not available, cut pieces of these or similar patches can be used for pubertal induction. The Estradot patch was too small to properly cut into low doses and not stable in elevated temperatures.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Transdermal Contraceptive Patch and an Oral Contraceptive

This open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study characterized the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a transdermal contraceptive patch and a norgestimate-containing oral contraceptive. Healthy women (n = 34) applied a patch once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks during each of 2 cycles and received an oral contraceptive for 21 consecutive days during each of 2 cycles. Plasma concentrations of norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol peaked and waned after daily oral contraceptive administration, whereas they rose and reached steady-state levels after first patch application. Norelgestromin exposure was similar; ethinyl estradiol exposure was higher for the patch than oral contraceptive. Hepatic estrogenic activity, assessed by hepatic globulin synthesis, was similar for corticosteroid-binding globulin and corticosteroid-binding globulin-binding capacity and higher for sex hormone-binding globulin for the patch versus oral contraceptive. The clinical significance of the differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles between the patch and oral contraceptive is not fully known. No serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events were recorded.

Bioidentical compounded hormones: a pharmacokinetic evaluation in a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Bioidentical compounded hormone therapy is popular among patients, but providers do not have pharmacokinetic information or dosing guidelines for these preparations. Our objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics of the commonly used compounded preparations with conventional hormonal preparations that are considered bioequivalent in practice.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, blinded, four-arm 16-day clinical trial of forty postmenopausal women assigned to one of three doses of a compounded estrogen cream (Bi-est (80:20); 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 mg)+compounded oral progesterone 100 mg, or to a conventional estradiol patch (Vivelle-Dot™ 0.05 mg)+Prometrium™ 100mg. Serum levels of estrone, estradiol, estriol, and progesterone were obtained at multiple time intervals during the first 24-h, and at steady-state.

RESULTS

Results were analyzable for 37/40 women. Study medications were well tolerated. The AUC at 24h and at steady-state for estrogens remained consistently lower for all doses of Bi-est tested relative to the patch. The difference was statistically significant for Bi-est 2.0mg (AUC-estradiol=181 vs. 956; p<0.001) and 2.5mg (AUC-estradiol=286 vs. 917; p<0.001). Estriol levels remained low in all study arms. Serum progesterone levels were comparable in conventional vs. compounded groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This pharmacokinetic trial showed that the currently used doses of compounded hormones yield lower levels of estrogen compared to the standard-dose estradiol patch. To find comparable doses, further studies are needed. This successfully conducted randomized controlled study attests to the feasibility of using a similar design in the setting of a larger clinical trial.

Interindividual variation in transdermal and oral drug deliveries

It is generally assumed that the topical absorption of drugs is subject to more interindividual variation than the oral absorption of drugs. To date, we are unaware of any clinical studies or meta-analyses that compare the interindividual variation of transdermal and oral drug deliveries for a large number of medications. In this research article, the absorption data for 10 medications that can be used as an oral medication or a transdermal patch were compiled, and from the collected data, the interindividual variance was calculated for topical and oral absorption as an overall average and by drug. This research article also briefly reviews the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of transdermal and oral drug absorption. Our results indicate that there is considerable interindividual variation in topical and oral absorption for the 10 medications investigated. Yet, surprisingly, the calculated overall mean and median coefficient of variation (CV) for topical and oral absorption were comparable (within 10% of each other). Therefore, the interindividual variation in topical and oral absorption may not be as divergent as assumed previously. In a drug-by-drug comparison, certain medications demonstrated considerably more variation when absorbed orally versus topically and vice versa. It is unclear why certain drugs had less variation in absorption when delivered topically versus orally (or vice versa). However, patterns in drug molecular weight (MW) or octanol partition coefficient (log K(OCT) ) could not totally explain these findings. In our analysis, the previously reported correlation between MW or log K(OCT) and interindividual variation in absorption could only be replicated when plotting the topical absorption CV and MW. What became clear from our analysis is that the drug itself is an important variable when considering which route of delivery (oral or topical) will provide the least amount of interindividual variation. Our study had many limitations because of study design, which may have affected our calculations and conclusions. Further experimentation is needed to support and reveal the basic science of skin or drug chemistry that can further explain these findings.

The effect of estrone on thrombin generation may explain the different thrombotic risk between oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

The metabolism of estrogen contained within hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is influenced by the route of administration, and this may affect the risk of venous thromboembolism. Thrombin generation, a global coagulation assay, is a marker of hypercoagulability and is of potential use in determining the thrombotic risk associated with particular HRT administration routes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether any effect of oral and transdermal HRT on thrombin generation is related to the plasma estrogen profile.

METHODS

We investigated the effects of oral, transdermal and no HRT (controls) in 52, 39 and 52 postmenopausal women, respectively, on thrombin generation, standard markers of thrombophilia, estradiol level and estrone level.

RESULTS

All parameters of thrombin generation were altered in women using oral HRT as compared with controls (P<0.001 for all comparisons). No such differences were found in women using transdermal HRT. Estrone levels correlated with peak thrombin generation (R=0.451, P<0.001) in women using oral HRT, but there was no correlation in women using the transdermal route.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombin generation is significantly increased in women who use HRT administered by the oral route. This is probably mediated by the hepatic first-pass metabolism of estrone, the main metabolite of oral estradiol, which is avoided by the transdermal route. The effect of estrone on thrombin generation may provide the explanation for the higher thrombotic risk seen in women using oral rather than transdermal HRT.

Transdermal hormone therapy: gels and patches

Hormone therapy (HT) in the climacteric has a number of beneficial effects including mitigation of climacteric symptoms and prevention of osteoporosis. Administration of HT via the transdermal route avoids hepatic first-pass metabolism and therefore the high plasma levels of estrogen metabolites that are associated with oral administration. Patch formulations have traditionally been the most common form of transdermal HT. However, as patches may be associated with local skin reactions, gel formulations have been developed in an attempt to improve acceptability and compliance with transdermal HT. Patch and gel formulations are equally as effective in treating climacteric symptoms and improving bone mineral density, and the effects are comparable to those achieved by oral HT.

Reprint of Are all estrogens the same?

This paper focuses on the question whether different estrogens (E) have different qualitative pharmacodynamic effects when used by women for contraception, Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) or prevention of osteoporosis. In this context estrogens have been defined as the estrogen agonists estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), estriol (E3), conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), diethylstilbestrol (DES) and ethinylestradiol (EE). Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator's (SERM's) have been excluded from this analysis primarily because of lack of comparative (clinical) data with estrogen agonists. A major problem when addressing the issue of comparability of estrogen agonists is the lack of data from head-to-head estrogen-only comparative studies. Comparative studies have been performed almost exclusively with estrogen agonists combined with a series of different progestogens (P), that have been added to protect the uterus from endometrial hyperplasia. Since progestogens are known to exhibit different intrinsic pharmacodynamic properties and interactions with estrogens, it is impossible to judge which role the estrogen plays when qualitative differences between different combined E/P preparations are observed. In summary, no convincing evidence has been found that the estrogens mentioned differ qualitatively. Obviously quantitative differences are present due to differences in e.g. receptor affinity, metabolism (half life) and route of administration (transdermal/vaginal). Since DES has been discarded for human use due to teratogenicity, EE used in all combined E/P oral contraceptives is the most potent estrogen agonist available at present. In HRT, E2 and CEE are equally effective for the treatment of hot flushes and urogenital atrophy and superior to any other treatment option. For long-term treatment to prevent osteoporosis and even for short-term HRT, estrogen agonists are heavily debated recently because of a small increased risk of breast cancer, that has been known for a long time already. Well informed and individualised choice of treatment seems the appropriate solution.

Effects of non-oral postmenopausal hormone therapy on markers of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review the effects of non-oral administration of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on risk markers for atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease.Non-oral postmenopausal HT appears not to increase venous thromboembolic risk, whereas the effect on coronary heart disease risk is less clear.

DESIGN

Systematic review of literature obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases from 1980 until and including April 2006. Terms for "postmenopausal hormone therapy" and for "non-oral administration" were combined in the search.

SETTING

Randomized clinical trials.

PATIENT(S)

Postmenopausal women, both healthy and with established cardiovascular disease or specified cardiovascular risk factors

INTERVENTION(S)

Non-oral HT (e.g., transdermal or intranasal) compared with oral HT or no treatment/placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, C-reactive protein (CRP), cell adhesion molecules, markers of endothelial dysfunction, coagulation, and fibrinolysis.

RESULT(S)

Seventy-two studies investigating either transdermal or intranasal administration were included. For non-oral HT, decreases in lipoprotein(a), cell adhesion molecules, and factor VII generally were significant, resistance to activated protein C (APCr) was slightly increased, and other markers including CRP and homocysteine did not change. Compared with oral HT, changes in CRP and APCr were smaller, changes in cell adhesion molecules and some fibrinolytic parameters tended to be smaller, whereas changes in other factors including lipoprotein(a) and homocysteine did not differ.

CONCLUSION(S)

Potentially unfavorable changes seen with oral HT on two important markers, CRP and APCr, are substantially smaller with non-oral HT. Non-oral HT has minor effects on the other cardiovascular risk markers studied. Therefore, compared with oral HT, non-oral HT appears be safer with respect to atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease risk.

Drug delivery systems for hormone therapy

Various types of formulations and delivery devices have been developed for hormone therapy (HT) and their modes of hormone action and patient responses have been evaluated. Although the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) reported the controversial results on estrogen/progestin combination therapy, HT still remains a primary therapeutic option for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and osteoporosis. As a novel alternative to HT may not be probable in clinical use for the next decade, the currently available formulations containing estrogen and progestogen should be properly optimized for HT. The extensive reviews and comparisons on the characteristics of various types of HT could lead to the development of an efficient delivery formulation which maximizes patient compliance and minimizes adverse effects for individual users.

Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration

This review comprises the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of natural and synthetic estrogens and progestogens used in contraception and therapy, with special consideration of hormone replacement therapy. The paper describes the mechanisms of action, the relation between structure and hormonal activity, differences in hormonal pattern and potency, peculiarities in the properties of certain steroids, tissue-specific effects, and the metabolism of the available estrogens and progestogens. The influence of the route of administration on pharmacokinetics, hormonal activity and metabolism is presented, and the effects of oral and transdermal treatment with estrogens on tissues, clinical and serum parameters are compared. The effects of oral, transdermal (patch and gel), intranasal, sublingual, buccal, vaginal, subcutaneous and intramuscular administration of estrogens, as well as of oral, vaginal, transdermal, intranasal, buccal, intramuscular and intrauterine application of progestogens are discussed. The various types of progestogens, their receptor interaction, hormonal pattern and the hormonal activity of certain metabolites are described in detail. The structural formulae, serum concentrations, binding affinities to steroid receptors and serum binding globulins, and the relative potencies of the available estrogens and progestins are presented. Differences in the tissue-specific effects of the various compounds and regimens and their potential implications with the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy are discussed.

Pharmaceutical development and clinical effectiveness of a novel gel technology for transdermal drug delivery

Transdermal gels are designed to deliver sustained drug amounts, resulting in systemically consistent levels. They represent an improvement compared with transdermal delivery by patches because they offer more dosage flexibility, less irritation potential and a better cosmetic appearance. Advanced Transdermal Delivery (ATD) gel technology was developed in order to provide enhanced passive skin permeation of various active drugs for the treatment of many conditions, including hypogonadism, female sexual dysfunction, postmenopausal symptoms, overactive bladder and anxiety. The technology consists of a combination of solvent systems and permeation enhancers enabling systemic drug delivery, and is covered by many patents. Pharmaceutical development of formulations based on the technology allowed optimisation of physicochemical parameters (rheological profile, pH) as well as skin permeation properties (type and concentration of permeation enhancers, thermodynamic activity of the drug). This gel technology has demonstrated to be efficient for many drugs, as shown in the preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic studies presented in this technology evaluation.

Cutaneous Estradiol Permeation, Penetration and Metabolism in Pig and Man

AIM AND METHODS

Drug development in dermatotherapy and also development of transdermal therapeutic systems (TTS) demand high-predictive in vitro models to estimate drug levels in skin and systemic uptake. Here we compare three ready-to-use models, reconstructed human epidermis, split porcine skin and the perfused porcine forelimb. 17beta-Estradiol (E(2)), which is highly metabolized by skin cells, serves as model drug since E(2) application is of high relevance in hormone replacement therapy while topical E(2) may promote wound healing. E(2) TTS, gel and an ethanolic solution were investigated for cutaneous penetration, permeation and metabolism.

RESULTS

E(2) TTS enabled an E(2) uptake of 42.9% of the applied dose accompanied by a high percentage of E(2) metabolism (30% of the penetrated dose) in the perfused porcine forelimb. In Franz cell experiments with reconstructed human epidermis and split porcine skin, the gel allowed an E(2) uptake of 41.7 and 22.9% of the applied dose accompanied by a high E(2) metabolism (42.6 and 28.6% of the penetrated dose). Due to toxic effects of the vehicle, this was not true with an ethanolic solution, then E(2) permeation and metabolism were clearly diminished. Most importantly, the in vitro models proved to be predictive with respect to the E(2)/estrone ratio in female plasma under transdermal hormone replacement therapy.

CONCLUSION

In vitro tests should reduce the need for both animal and human studies for cutaneous uptake and metabolism in the future.

Drug delivery systems for oestrogenic hormones and antagonists: the need for selective targeting in estradiol-dependent cancers

The pleiotropic activity of oestrogens and their mechanism of action via their binding to the two oestrogen receptors alpha (ER alpha) and beta (ER beta) subtypes in the different tissues where oestrogens exert their action have been briefly described. The fate of these compounds trapped into different galenic forms is discussed with regard to their therapeutic applications. Firstly, the advantages and disadvantages of the different forms (pills, i.v. forms and transdermal patches) used in contraception are compared. Secondly, the therapeutic use of formulated oestrogens for the post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is analysed through the various results obtained in different trials. The link between HRT and the risks of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease is underlined. Finally, comparing the activity of selective oestrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen and pure anti-oestrogens such as RU58668 and ICI182780, we analysed the reasons leading to the need for a tumor targeting of the latters, but not of the former for the treatment of oestrogen-dependent breast cancer. Different injectable and biodegradable formulations, that lead to a remarkable anti-tumor efficiency in xenografts, have been recently developed and we believe that they may represent promising new administration ways of added therapeutic values for anti-oestrogens. Such devices could be extended to the delivery of other anti-cancer drugs with more aggressive activities than anti-oestrogens.

Are all estrogens the same?

This paper focuses on the question whether different estrogens (E) have different qualitative pharmacodynamic effects when used by women for contraception, Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) or prevention of osteoporosis. In this context estrogens have been defined as the estrogen agonists estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), estriol (E3), conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), diethylstilbestrol (DES) and ethinylestradiol (EE). Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator's (SERM's) have been excluded from this analysis primarily because of lack of comparative (clinical) data with estrogen agonists. A major problem when addressing the issue of comparability of estrogen agonists is the lack of data from head-to-head estrogen-only comparative studies. Comparative studies have been performed almost exclusively with estrogen agonists combined with a series of different progestogens (P), that have been added to protect the uterus from endometrial hyperplasia. Since progestogens are known to exhibit different intrinsic pharmacodynamic properties and interactions with estrogens, it is impossible to judge which role the estrogen plays when qualitative differences between different combined E/P preparations are observed. In summary, no convincing evidence has been found that the estrogens mentioned differ qualitatively. Obviously quantitative differences are present due to differences in e.g. receptor affinity, metabolism (half life) and route of administration (transdermal/vaginal). Since DES has been discarded for human use due to teratogenicity, EE used in all combined E/P oral contraceptives is the most potent estrogen agonist available at present. In HRT, E2 and CEE are equally effective for the treatment of hot flushes and urogenital atrophy and superior to any other treatment option. For long term treatment to prevent osteoporosis and even for short term HRT, estrogen agonists are heavily debated recently because of a small increased risk of breast cancer, that has been known for a long time already. Well informed and individualised choice of treatment seems the appropriate solution.

Pharmacokinetics of estradiol valerate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in different age groups of postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

To study whether ageing affects the pharmacokinetics of estradiol valerate (E2V) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Forty-six postmenopausal women from two essentially similar pharmacokinetic studies were divided into three age categories: under 60 years (n = 15), between 60 and 65 years (n = 18) and over 65 years (n = 13). They all were treated for 12 days or 14 days with four galenically identical tablets containing combinations of 1 mg or 2 mg E2V and 2.5 mg or 5 mg MPA. The studies followed an open, randomised cross-over design with no washout between the periods. Serum estradiol and MPA concentrations were measured at steady state on study day 12 or 14 of each period.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed in the peak concentration (Cmax), time to peak (t(max)), AUC or elimination half-life for estradiol or MPA between the different age groups. In spite of the lack of statistical significance the AUC was on an average 1.6-fold and Cmax 1.40-fold higher in the oldest group of women than in the youngest group and age was found significant as a continuous variable for AUC and Cmax for MPA but not for estradiol.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that there would be no significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of estradiol between women under 60 and over 65 years of age. However, a significant trend towards higher MPA concentrations and bioavailability was observed with increasing age. The results suggest that from the pharmacokinetic point of view the relationship between estradiol and MPA dose to be used in elderly could be different from that in younger postmenopausal women, while no pharmacokinetic reasons to use lower estradiol doses in the elderly were observed.

Molecular epidemiology of sporadic breast cancer. The role of polymorphic genes involved in oestrogen biosynthesis and metabolism

The major known risk factors for female breast cancer are associated with prolonged exposure to increased levels of oestrogen. The predominant theory relates to effects of oestrogen on cell growth. Enhanced cell proliferation, induced either by endogenous or exogenous oestrogens, increases the number of cell divisions and thereby the possibility for mutation. However, current evidence also supports a role for oxidative metabolites, in particular catechol oestrogens, in the initiation of breast cancer. As observed in drug and chemical metabolism, there is considerable interindividual variability (polymorphism) in the conjugation pathways of both oestrogen and catechol oestrogens. These person-to-person differences, which are attributed to polymorphisms in the genes encoding for the respective enzymes, might define subpopulations of women with higher lifetime exposure to hormone-dependent growth promotion, or to cellular damage from particular oestrogens and/or oestrogen metabolites. Such variation could explain a portion of the cancer susceptibility associated with reproductive effects and hormone exposure. In this paper the potential role of polymorphic genes encoding for enzymes involved in oestrogen biosynthesis (CYP17, CYP19, and 17beta-HSD) and conversion of the oestrogen metabolites and their by-products (COMT, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTP1, GSTT1 and MnSOD) in modulating individual susceptibility to breast cancer are reviewed. Although some of these low-penetrance genes appeared as good candidates for risk factors in the etiology of sporadic breast cancer, better designed and considerably larger studies than the majority of the studies conducted so far are evidently needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn.

Comparative bioavailability of fluoxetine after transdermal and oral administration to healthy cats

OBJECTIVE

To determine bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and safety for transdermal (TD) and oral administration of fluoxetine hydrochloride to healthy cats.

ANIMALS

12 healthy mixed-breed sexually intact 1- to 4-year-old purpose-bred cats.

PROCEDURE

A single-dose pharmacokinetic study involving 3 groups of 4 cats each was conducted in parallel. Fluoxetine in a formulation of pluronic lecithin organogel (PLO gel) was applied to the hairless portion of the pinnae of cats at 2 dosages (5 or 10 mg/kg), or it was administered orally in capsules at a dosage of 1 mg/kg. Plasma samples were obtained and submitted for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry analysis of fluoxetine and its active metabolite, norfluoxetine.

RESULTS

Peak fluoxetine concentration (Cmax) was lower and time to Cmax longer for TD administration versus oral administration. Relative bioavailability of each dose administered via the TD route was 10% of the value for oral administration of the drug. Mean plasma elimination half-life after oral administration was 47 and 55 hours for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides evidence that fluoxetine in a 15% (wt:vol) PLO gel formulation can be absorbed through the skin of cats into the systemic circulation. However, the relative bioavailability for TD administration is approximately only 10% of that for the oral route of administration.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of a 17 beta-estradiol gel 0.6 mg/g (Gelestra) with a transdermal delivery system (Estraderm TTS 50) in postmenopausal women at steady state

OBJECTIVES

to compare the patterns of a 17 beta-estradiol (E(2)) gel containing 0.6 mg/g (1.5 mg E(2) per day, Gelestra); with the transdermal delivery system (Estraderm TTS 50) applied every 3 days over a 14-day period to women in spontaneous or surgical menopause.

METHODS

a single centre, open, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted. A total number of 33 postmenopausal women were enrolled. In 23 of them the menopause occurred spontaneously, while 10 women were bilaterally ovariectomized. Randomly, the subjects were treated with Estraderm TTS 50 (no. 8) or with Gelestra (no. 14). The pharmacokinetic study of the drugs was performed at the seventh, ninth and 14th day in Gelestra treated women and at the first, third and second day in Estraderm TTS 50 treated women. In fact, the seventh, ninth and 14th day of percutaneous treatment corresponds to the first, third and second day of application of the transdermal system application. Blood samples were taken by each subject at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after the gel or transdermal system application. In almost all samples the level of E(2) and estrone (E(1)) were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed by comparing the two groups of treatment. The following parameters were assessed: mean E(2) and E(1) concentrations, E(2) peak serum concentration within interval from 0 to 72 h (C(max)), E(2) trough concentration within interval from 0 to 72 h (C(min)), area under the E(2) time concentration curve in the interval from 0 to 72 h (AUC((0-72))), the average E(2) concentration during the measurement interval, calculated by dividing AUC((0-72)) by 72 h (C(av)), E(1)/E(2) ratio, and percentage fluctuation (%Fluct) which is equal to 100 (C(max)-C(min)/C(max)).

RESULTS

there was no significant difference in E(2) C(av) between the two treatments. However, significant differences in favour to the gel on the first day (first h) and on third day (72nd h) and in favour to the patch at the second day (48th h) were detected. C(max), E(1)/E(2) ratio and AUC((0-72)) were not statistically different, while a significantly higher C(min) for the gel was observed. Furthermore, the 90% confidence interval for AUC((0-72)) ratio (0.83-1.10) was within the commonly applied bioequivalence acceptance range (0.80-1.25). The %Fluct was significantly lower for Gelestra than for Estraderm TTS 50.

CONCLUSIONS

although the mean E(2) and E(1)concentrations, C(max), E(1)/E(2) ratio and the AUC((0-72)) did not differ between the two E(2) treatments, the Gelestra treatment showed a lower day-to-day variation over the three day application, than the Estraderm TTS 50.

Comparative absorption and variability in absorption of estradiol from a transdermal gel and a novel matrix-type transdermal patch

OBJECTIVES

To compare the absorption of estradiol from a transdermal gel and a novel matrix-type patch and to study the variability in absorption.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy postmenopausal women were treated in an open, randomized, cross-over study for 18 days with 1.0 mg estradiol daily as a transdermal gel and a transdermal patch releasing estradiol 50 microg/24 h without a wash-out between the periods. Venous blood samples for estradiol pharmacokinetics were taken on the 15th and 18th study days of the gel period and during the 15th-18th study days during the patch period.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in peak estradiol level or area under the estradiol time-concentration curve between the gel and the patch. However, trough estradiol concentration was significantly lower and fluctuation higher with the patch. Estradiol time-concentration curves on the 15th and 18th study days with the gel were almost superimposable. A significant difference was observed in peak estradiol levels, whereas area under the curve or trough estradiol level did not differ between the 15th and 18th study days with the gel. Inter- and intra-individual coefficients of variability were around 30% for peak estradiol level and area under the curve, except for the intra-individual coefficient of variability for area under the curve (21%) for the gel. The total coefficient of variability for area under the curve was 35% for the gel and 39% for the patch.

CONCLUSIONS

A daily 1.0 mg estradiol dose as a transdermal gel seems to correspond with a matrix-type patch releasing 50 microg estradiol daily in the extent of estradiol absorption. High variability was associated with both treatments, and both the variabilities within and between the subjects were high with the gel. Wider than generally applied confidence limits should be applied for bioequivalence testing of transdermal estradiol formulations.

Serum concentrations of 17beta-estradiol and estrone after multiple-dose administration of percutaneous estradiol gel in symptomatic menopausal women

In two multicenter phase III efficacy studies, blood samples were obtained to evaluate the serum concentrations of 17beta-estradiol (E2) and unconjugated estrone (E1) after administration of a percutaneous gel or transdermal patch containing estradiol. In postmenopausal women, normal laboratory E2 and E1 serum concentrations range from 10-30 pg/mL and 20-40 pg/mL, respectively. Study subjects were healthy postmenopausal women with moderate to severe hot flushes occurring at least seven times daily or 60 times per week. Study 1 was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of percutaneous E2 gel 1.25 or 2.5 g (0.75 and 1.5 mg E2, respectively) versus placebo gel. Study 2 was a double-blind (blinded to E2 gel dose), randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, 12-week phase 3 study of E2 gel 0.625, 1.25, or 2.5 g (0.375, 0.75, or 1.5 mg E2, respectively) versus a transdermal E2 patch delivering 0.05 mg E2 per day. Serum E2 and E1 concentrations were evaluated at baseline and at week 12 for study 1 and at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 for study 2 using radioimmunoassay. Median serum concentrations of E2 after 1.25- and 2.5-g gel administration appeared to be dose-proportional throughout both studies. In study 1, the median serum concentrations of E2 at week 12 were 33.5 and 65.0 pg/mL for 1.25- and 2.5-g gel dose, respectively. The corresponding E1 values were 49.0 and 58.0 pg/mL. In study 2, both E2 and E1 concentrations were relatively stable at weeks 4, 8, and 12. E2 values at week 12 for 0.625-, 1.25-, and 2.5-g gel doses and E2 patch were 25.0, 32.0, 60.0, and 38.5 pg/mL, respectively. The corresponding E1 values were 39.0, 41.0, 62.5, and 40.0 pg/mL. Application of the 1.25-g gel dose and a transdermal patch delivering 50 microg per day of E2 resulted in comparable median E2 and E1 concentrations. However, the 0.625-g gel dose did not produce E2 levels in a range expected to be consistently therapeutic in most postmenopausal women.

Transdermal delivery of drugs for the treatment of bone diseases

The current status of transdermal drug delivery for the treatment of bone diseases is described in this review. The structure, physiology and function of skin and their importance in determining delivery into and across skin are discussed. Special emphasis has been devoted to a description of the major pathways of transport across the skin and the quite continuing controversy over the importance of the transfollicular route. An overview of anatomic site-dependent drug absorption is also provided and is particularly relevant to determination of transdermal patch location. Brief descriptions of the criteria for selection of transdermal drug candidate, transdermal patch designs and currently marketed transdermal products are also included. Transdermal estradiol delivery systems are examined in more detail for their clinical and biological effects. Finally, the feasibility of delivering drugs such as bisphosphonates across skin is discussed.

Effect of dose on the absorption of estradiol from a transdermal gel

OBJECTIVES

To study whether dose adjustments in transdermal estradiol gel treatment would result in proportional changes in estradiol bioavailability and concentrations.

METHODS

In an open study, 23 healthy postmenopausal women were treated consecutively with 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mg estradiol daily as a transdermal gel. Each dose was given for 16 days. Venous blood samples for serum estradiol and estrone measurements with RIA were taken at steady state on the 16th study day. From these concentrations, pharmacokinetic parameters for estradiol were calculated and corrected to correspond to equal dose by dividing the values by the dose.

RESULTS

Area under the estradiol time-concentration curve and peak estradiol level increased linearily and dose-proportionally with daily estradiol doses of 0.5-1.5 mg. This was shown by lack of significant differences in the dose-corrected parameters. However, the 90% confidence intervals between the doses were outside the commonly accepted levels for bioequivalence. Peak estradiol level was clearer and occurred earlier with the highest 1.5 mg estradiol dose, while more stable estradiol levels were seen with the lowest 0.5 mg estradiol dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of estradiol on a certain skin area seems to be the determining factor in absorption. With higher estradiol doses, the absorption will be accelerated with a clearer peak estradiol level. The linear and dose proportional absorption indicates that flexible dose adjustments within the dose range of 0.5-1.5 mg estradiol daily can be made with an anticipated effect in estradiol bioavailability and concentrations.