Vigabatrin as add-on therapy in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy: an open trial

Impaired activity-dependent neural circuit assembly and refinement in autism spectrum disorder genetic models

Early-use activity during circuit-specific critical periods refines brain circuitry by the coupled processes of eliminating inappropriate synapses and strengthening maintained synapses. We theorize these activity-dependent (A-D) developmental processes are specifically impaired in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). ASD genetic models in both mouse and Drosophila have pioneered our insights into normal A-D neural circuit assembly and consolidation, and how these developmental mechanisms go awry in specific genetic conditions. The monogenic fragile X syndrome (FXS), a common cause of heritable ASD and intellectual disability, has been particularly well linked to defects in A-D critical period processes. The fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is positively activity-regulated in expression and function, in turn regulates excitability and activity in a negative feedback loop, and appears to be required for the A-D remodeling of synaptic connectivity during early-use critical periods. The Drosophila FXS model has been shown to functionally conserve the roles of human FMRP in synaptogenesis, and has been centrally important in generating our current mechanistic understanding of the FXS disease state. Recent advances in Drosophila optogenetics, transgenic calcium reporters, highly-targeted transgenic drivers for individually-identified neurons, and a vastly improved connectome of the brain are now being combined to provide unparalleled opportunities to both manipulate and monitor A-D processes during critical period brain development in defined neural circuits. The field is now poised to exploit this new Drosophila transgenic toolbox for the systematic dissection of A-D mechanisms in normal versus ASD brain development, particularly utilizing the well-established Drosophila FXS disease model.

The safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs in children and adolescents

The newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) provide more therapeutic options and overall improved safety and tolerability for patients. To provide the best care, physicians must be familiar with the latest tolerability and safety data. This is particularly true in children, given there are relatively fewer studies examining the effects of AEDs in children compared with adults. Since we now have significant paediatric literature on each of these agents, we provide a comprehensive and current literature review of the newer AEDs, focusing on safety and tolerability data in children and adolescents. Because the safety profiles in children differ from those in adults, familiarity with this literature is important for child neurologists and other paediatric caregivers. We have organized the data by organ system for each AED for easier reference.

Transient brain magnetic resonance imaging hyperintensity in basal ganglia and brain stem of epileptic infants treated with vigabatrin

Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug that produces intramyelinic edema in several animal models. This study investigates the effect of vigabatrin on the developing human brain. The authors retrospectively blindly review 34 brain magnetic resonance imaging of 22 epileptic infants (age: 9 +/- 1 months) that received vigabatrin, focusing on the presence of hyperintensity on T2- and diffusion-weighted images. Patients treated with vigabatrin displayed significant magnetic resonance imaging hyperintensity of basal ganglia and brain stem (P < .001, Wilcoxon test). This hyperintensity was transient and maximal 3 to 6 months after the beginning of vigabatrin. Hyperintensity was independent from duration and type of epilepsy, and from the presence or absence of seizures. The authors conclude that vigabatrin treatment is associated with transient hypersignal of the basal ganglia and brain stem in epileptic infants. Such transient hyperintensity is likely to be age-dependent and time-dependent because it has never been observed in adult patients.

Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs

Because the efficacies of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are often equivalent, selection of an AED is often determined by adverse effects. Differences in methods for labeling adverse effects and in the adverse effect terms themselves, variations in the populations studied, and inconsistent classifications of adverse effects make it difficult to know how to use information on adverse effects to choose an AED. Effort is underway to develop more extensive and internationally acceptable descriptive terms for adverse effects. Comparison of adverse effects in patients taking AEDs with adverse events in control groups is helpful; however, data from controlled studies are often lacking for most AEDs. Because of these limitations, the clinician must adopt a preventative and early detection approach based on some general principles. This review outlines factors to consider for avoiding and detecting AED adverse effects. The occurrence of weight change with AEDs is reviewed extensively, serving to illustrate how the principle factors can be used to avoid and manage adverse effects and where there is need for better studies of the short- and long-term adverse effects of AEDs.

Efficacy of lamotrigine and vigabatrin in drug-resistant epilepsies of childhood

It was the purpose of this study to compare the efficacy and side effects of lamotrigine (LTG) and vigabatrin (VGB) as add-on therapy in epilepsies of childhood resistant to conventional drugs. Retrospective analysis of the medical charts and electroencephalograms of 134 children (LTG 57, VGB 77) was performed considering the various epileptic seizures and syndromes. In general, LTG and VGB had similar efficacy, with 30-40 % of patients demonstrating significant improvement. Few differences according to seizure type and epileptic syndrome were observed. Primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures more frequently improved and less frequently worsened with LTG than with VGB. In tonic seizures the treatment results were significantly more favorable with VGB. Only insignificantly better results occurred with LTG in the generalized group and with VGB in the localization-related group. VGB was significantly more effective in symptomatic than in idiopathic and cryptogenic syndromes. The frequency of adverse reactions with both drugs was close to 60%. However, treatment had to be discontinued because of severe rashes in only a few patients taking LTG or because of behavior disturbances in patients taking VGB.