Optimisation de l’interrogatoire dans l’évaluation du risque de maladie thromboembolique veineuse : l’étude OPTIMEV

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: What have we learnt from the OPTIMEV study?

The OPTIMEV (OPTimisation de l'Interrogatoire dans l'évaluation du risque throMbo-Embolique Veineux) study has provided some important and innovative information for the management of lower extremity isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (distal DVT). Indeed, if distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) therapeutic management is nowadays still debated, before the OPTIMEV study, the clinical relevance of these DVT itself was questioned. Via the publication of 6 articles, between 2009 and 2022, assessing risk factors, therapeutic management, and outcomes of 933 patients with distal DVT we were able to demonstrate that: - When distal deep veins are systematically screened for suspicion of DVT, distal DVT are the most frequent clinical presentation of the venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). This is also true in case of combined oral contraceptive related VTE. - Distal DVT share the same risk factors as proximal DVT and constitute two different clinical expressions of the same disease: the VTE disease. However, the weight of these risk factors differs: distal DVT are more often associated with transient risk factors whereas proximal DVT are more associated with permanent risk factors. - Deep calf vein and muscular DVT share the same risk factors, short and long-term prognoses. - In patients without history of cancer, risk of unknown cancer is similar in patients with a first distal or proximal DVT. - After 3years and once anticoagulation has been stopped, distal DVT recur twice less as proximal DVT and mainly as distal DVT; However, in cancer patients, prognosis of distal and proximal DVT appear similar in terms of death and VTE recurrence.

Low incidence of cancer after venous thromboembolism: An update from the French OPTIMEV Cohort

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown lower rates of cancer following venous thromboembolism (VTE) than previously described.

OBJECTIVES

To reassess the risk of cancer in patients with clinical symptoms of VTE with or without confirmed VTE.

PATIENTS

We used data from OPTIMEV, a French prospective multicenter observational study of patients presenting to hospital and community vascular medicine specialists with suspected VTE. Patients with confirmed VTE (1565) and matched controls without VTE (1847) were followed for 3 years (2006-2009). The main outcome was occurrence of cancer at 3 years, and death was a censoring event.

RESULTS

A total of 5.0% [4.0-6.3] of patients with VTE and 3.8% [3.0-4.9] without VTE developed cancer during follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.2 [0.9-1.8] for patients with confirmed VTE (P=0.22). The overall standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.4 [1.1-1.6] for our population, VTE+ and VTE-, compared with the general population, statistically significant (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a lower occurrence of cancer after VTE than previously described, with no significant difference between patients whether VTE was confirmed or not. Our results (low incidence and no difference between patients VTE+ or VTE-) provide no argument in favor of an extensive screening for cancer in case of VTE.

[Risk of venous thromboembolism in acute medical illnesses. Part 2: Situations at risk in ambulatory, hospital and internal medicine settings]

PURPOSE

The increased risk of thromboembolism in acute medical illnesses (AMI) is difficult to assess because of the diversity of medical conditions. The first part of this review of the literature was dedicated to methods of risk analysis based on our current pathophysiological knowledge. This second part describes more specifically the risk of venous thrombosis linked to AMI in hospital, ambulatory and internal medicine settings.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

The incidence of venous thromboembolism is higher in hospital than in ambulatory setting, albeit the latter remains significant. Stroke and affections leading to intensive care management represent conditions at great risk. Several mechanisms leading to a prothrombotic state have been identified, explaining the increased risk observed during relapses of pathologies specifically treated in internal medicine such as lupus erythematosus, Wegener granulomatosis, inflammatory bowel diseases and Behcet's disease.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Next to the pathophysiological understanding of venous thrombosis, the assessment of the specific thrombogenic burden of an AMI is an additive tool to screen medical patients at high risk. This systematic review of the literature shows uncertainties towards some risk factors as bedrest or acute inflammatory response. Taking into account the methodological difficulties inherent to prospective and epidemiological studies, a meta-analysis focusing on these factors would be useful to refine prevention guidelines for venous thromboembolism in medical setting.