Etat de la résistance du pneumocoque à la pénicilline G dans le cadre de l'épidémiologie bactérienne actuelle de l'otite moyenne aiguë de l'enfant

Ribosomal immunostimulation: assessment of studies evaluating its clinical relevance in the prevention of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in children and adults

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy of the ribosomal immunostimulant Ribomunyl in preventing upper and lower respiratory tract infections.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Review of studies of 3 and 6 months' duration comprising part of the international registration file.

PATIENTS

Data from 2117 patients (1215 children and 902 adults); ribosomal immunostimulant n = 1062, placebo n = 1055.

RESULTS

Nineteen randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials were performed between 1983 and 1994 in Europe. In children with ear-nose-throat (ENT) infections, 3 months' ribosomal immunostimulant treatment significantly decreased the mean number of recurrences (27-68% reduction), and reduced the duration of infection (28-66% reduction) and antibacterial requirement (29-60% reduction). Ribosomal immunostimulant was similarly effective in children with ENT and bronchopulmonary infections, reducing the mean number of recurrences by 32-61% compared with placebo. In children with otitis media, ribosomal immunostimulant reduced recurrences by 10-53% and also reduced the duration of infection, antibacterial use and local surgery requirement. Results obtained from studies of 6 months' duration confirmed or extended these results. In adult patients with ENT or mixed respiratory infections, ribosomal immunostimulant produced similar reductions to those seen in children for recurrent infections (54-78% reduction), duration of infection (42-79% reduction) and antibacterial use (38% reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

These results clearly demonstrate that ribosomal immunostimulant is effective in preventing and in reducing upper and lower respiratory tract infections in children and adults.

Management of acute otitis media caused by resistant pneumococci in infants

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical outcome and risk of failure after oral vs. intravenous treatment in otitis media caused by penicillin-resistant pneumococci. To determine the possible correlations between pneumococcal minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) to penicillin and clinical outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of 156 cases collected between 1993 and 1995. Mean follow-up: 5 months. Setting. Two tertiary academic medical centers in Paris, France.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pneumococcus was isolated from 191 of 570 ear samples obtained from children with otitis media and shown to be penicillin-resistant in 156. Medical history, antibiotic therapy during the previous 3 months and day-care center attendance were reviewed. For the current episode microbiologic characteristics of the isolated strains, type of treatment, therapy efficacy and clinical outcome were analyzed. Patients were predominantly young (76.3% were <1 year old) and bacteriologic samples were taken mainly because of previous treatment failure.

RESULTS

Among 156 children with pneumococcal penicillin-resistant otitis media, 72.2% attended day-care centers, 71.8% had been previously treated with aminopenicillin and 52.5% with cephalosporins. Failure of previous empirical oral therapy was noted in 84% (one-third of these had been receiving amoxicillin-clavulanate). Patients treated intravenously had had a more protracted otitis but no greater number of previous episodes of acute otitis media than those receiving oral therapy. Acute mastoiditis occurred in 4 infants resulting in mastoidectomy. Oral treatment (mainly with high dose amoxicillin,120 to 150 mg/kg/day) and intravenous therapy (cephalosporin or glycopeptide) had been used in 59 and 41%, respectively. Mean duration of therapy was 10.7 days. Three failures (1.9%) and 10 recurrences (6.4%, average 28 days) occurred. No statistical difference was found between intravenous and oral therapy with respect to risk of recurrence. A high penicillin MIC value was correlated with previous antibiotic treatment but not with clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral therapy appears to be as effective as intravenous therapy for the treatment of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal otitis media. Intravenous treatment should not necessarily be dictated by the penicillin susceptibility value but should be considered in cases of failure to thrive, persistent otitis or other complications.