Differentiation of hepatic cavernous hemangioma from metastases by rare sequence MR imaging

Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo

Objective

To determine the variability, and preferred values, for normal liver longitudinal water proton relaxation rate R₁ in the published literature.

Methods

Values of mean R₁ and between-subject variance were obtained from literature searching. Weighted means were fitted to a heuristic and to a model.

Results

After exclusions, 116 publications (143 studies) remained, representing apparently normal liver in 3392 humans, 99 mice and 249 rats. Seventeen field strengths were included between 0.04 T and 9.4 T. Older studies tended to report higher between-subject coefficients of variation (CoV), but for studies published since 1992, the median between-subject CoV was 7.4%, and in half of those studies, measured R₁ deviated from model by 8.0% or less.

Discussion

The within-study between-subject CoV incorporates repeatability error and true between-subject variation. Between-study variation also incorporates between-population variation, together with bias from interactions between methodology and physiology. While quantitative relaxometry ultimately requires validation with phantoms and analysis of propagation of errors, this survey allows investigators to compare their own R₁ and variability values with the range of existing literature.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10334-021-00928-x.

Use of two-dimensional multiple-slice magnetic resonance hydrography for diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas and cysts

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Although hepatic hemangiomas and cysts display very high signal intensities on conventional T2 images, their appearances are quite distinct using magnetic resonance hydrography (MRH). We examined the feasibility of using MRH in distinguishing hepatic cysts from hemangiomas.

METHODS

We recruited 97 patients with hepatic hemangiomas and 65 with hepatic cysts. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (including two-dimensional multiple slice MRH, TR/TE: 8000/800) and the results were reviewed independently by two radiologists. The signal intensities of the lesions were measured. For each lesion, the variation in signal to noise ratio between MRH and the fat-saturated T2-weighted images was calculated, and the results were validated using a receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the signal to noise ratio of hepatic hemangiomas and cysts using MRH (p < 0.001). This difference could be identified by visual inspection. The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the ideal cut-off value for the signal intensity reduction ratio between hepatic cysts and hemangiomas was -0.1. Using this ratio, the derived sensitivity was 95.4%, specificity 99.0%, and accuracy 99.7%.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic hemangiomas and cysts have significantly different signal intensities on non-contrast two-dimensional multiple-slice MRH. This approach uses a non-invasive, reliable, and accurate imaging technique to differentiate the two diagnoses.