Four-day incubation for detection of bacteremia using the BACTEC 9240

Clinical impact of reducing routine blood culture incubation time from 7 to 5 days

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical impact of reducing the blood culture incubation protocol from 7 to 5 days.A laboratory data extraction identified positive blood cultures occurring after 5 or more days of incubation at Canberra Hospital, Australia between 1 January 2001 and 31 August 2011. Isolates were identified as clinically significant using a pre-existing prospective bacteraemia database. Medical records review determined whether the positive result affected clinical management.Positive blood cultures after 5 or more days of incubation accounted for 2.65% (423/15979) of all positive blood cultures, although the majority were false positives or contaminants. Eighty-five were significant/indeterminate, representing an average of eight cases per year or 0.47% (85/15979) of all positive blood cultures sets. Forty-three were isolated for the first time, representing 1.1% of all significant/indeterminate blood culture episodes. Fungi and anaerobic bacteria compromised over 50% of isolates. In 26 cases (2.4 cases per year), the culture result led to a change in patient management.A 7 day incubation protocol is preferable due to late isolation of organisms; however, if space is required to accommodate increasing blood culture numbers, reducing to a 5 or 6 day protocol would miss only a small percentage of clinically significant isolates.

Optimum Time to Detection of Bacteria and Yeast Species with BACTEC 9120 Culture System from Blood and Sterile Body Fluids

The culture results of 4,807 blood and 383 sterile body fluid specimens received in our laboratory during a 54-month period, were analyzed to determine the time required for culture to become positive, time at which a culture could safely be considered negative, and the spectrum of isolated organisms. The specimens were processed by automated BACTEC 9120 culture system. A total of 1,677 clinically significant microorganisms were isolated. Gram positive and negative bacterial isolation rates were found to be 62.55% and 32.20%, respectively. Yeasts were recovered in 5.24%. False positivity rate was 1.5%. Clinically significant isolates recovered on day four and five were 97.81% and 99.88%, respectively. At day five, the sensitivity was 99.94% and negative predictive value 99.96%. Our data support a five-day incubation protocol for recovery of all clinically significant organisms with sensitivity reduced by 0.06%, when compared with a six-day protocol.

Direct identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from blood culture bottles by PCR-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay using oprI gene specific primers

A PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) was developed for direct identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from positive BACTEC blood culture bottles. PCR primers were designed to target a 249 bp sequence of the oprI gene in P. aeruginosa. Biotin-labeled probe (PA3) targeted to the species-specific motif were hybridized to the digoxigenin-labeled amplified products from P. aeruginosa and captured on streptavidin-coated microtiter plates. The specificity of the assay using the PA3 probe was investigated with a range of microorganisms, which are commonly isolated from blood culture bottles serving as negative controls. The PCR-ELISA assay was shown to be highly specific for the identification of P. aeruginosa and was 10-fold more sensitive than an agarose gel-based detection method using the same pair of primers, with a detection limit at 10 fg of template. The PCR-ELISA assay developed in this study is 100% sensitive and 100% specific as it correctly identified all 73 positive and 42 negative controls as well as 25 double blind clinical samples. It significantly reduces the time needed for the identification of P. aeruginosa from positive BACTEC blood cultures bottles from 2-3 days to 6-8h.

Surge capacity for response to bioterrorism in hospital clinical microbiology laboratories

Surge capacity is the ability to rapidly mobilize to meet an increased demand. While large amounts of federal funding have been allocated to public health laboratories, little federal funding has been allocated to hospital microbiology laboratories. There are concerns that hospital laboratories may have inadequate surge capacities to deal with a significant bioterrorism incident. A workflow analysis of a clinical microbiology laboratory that serves an urban medical center was performed to identify barriers to surge capacity in the setting of a bioterrorism event and to identify solutions to these problems. Barriers include a national shortage of trained medical technologists, the inability of clinical laboratories to deal with a dramatic increase in the number of blood cultures, a delay while manufacturers increase production of critical products and then transport and deliver these products to clinical laboratories, and a shortage of class II biological safety cabinets. Federal funding could remedy staffing shortages by making the salaries of medical technologists comparable to those of similarly educated health care professionals and by providing financial incentives for students to enroll in clinical laboratory science programs. Blood culture bottles, and possibly continuous-monitoring blood culture instruments, should be added to the national antibiotic stockpile. Federal support must ensure that companies that manufacture essential laboratory supplies are capable of rapidly scaling up production. Hospitals must provide increased numbers of biological safety cabinets and amounts of space dedicated to clinical microbiology laboratories. Laboratories should undertake limited cross-training of technologists, ensure that adequate packaging supplies are available, and be able to move to a 4-day blood culture protocol.

Detection of bacteria and fungi in BacT/Alert standard blood-culture bottles

Incubation periods of aerobic (AE) and anaerobic (AN) blood-culture bottles with the BacT/Alert system were assessed in our laboratory. We reviewed the results of 6229 blood-culture sets collected at Kyoto University Hospital from January 1999 to December 2000. Of these sets, 731 (11.7%) were positive for bacteria or yeast. Excluding 87 sets with growth evidence on arrival, of the 644 positive blood-culture sets from 341 patients, a total of 691 organisms were isolated. Of the 691 organisms, 413 (59.8%) were recovered from both bottles, 206 (29.8%) were recovered only from the AE bottle, and 72 (10.4%) were recovered only from the AN bottle. The AE bottle was significantly superior to the AN bottle in terms of both recovery rate and detection time for overall organisms, but there was no significant difference in detection time for facultative anaerobic bacteria between the two bottles. Of the 691 organisms, 530 (76.7%) were classified as usual pathogens. Of the 530 usual pathogens, 501 (94.5%) were recovered in at least one bottle of each set within the first 3 days, and 523 (98.7%) within the first 5 days of incubation. Twenty-nine organisms initially isolated on day 4 or later were recovered from 19 patients. Of these, chart reviews indicated that 21 organisms recovered from 11 patients were considered clinically significant bacteria, and the reviews also revealed that no patient had a treatment plan altered based on the results of positive blood culture. Seven organisms initially isolated on day 6 or later were recovered from 7 patients. Chart reviews revealed that 5 of these organisms from 5 patients were considered to be clinically significant. In conclusion, if the incubation period had been less than 3 days, 11 patients with clinically significant bacteremia or fungemia, (3.2% of all patients with bacteremia or fungemia) would have been undiagnosed. Similarly, with an incubation period of 5 days, 5 such patients (1.5%) would have been undiagnosed.