Use of surrogate antimicrobial agents to predict susceptibility to ertapenem

Use of vancomycin as a surrogate for dalbavancin in vitro susceptibility testing: results from the DISCOVER studies

Background

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopepetide antibiotic with activity against gram positive pathogens recently approved for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Pending the introduction of antimicrobial susceptibility tests, we examined the utility of vancomycin inhibitory concentrations to predict dalbavancin susceptibility in a panel of isolates obtained from phase 3 registration studies.

Findings

99.6% of Staphylococcus aureus and 99.0% of beta-hemolytic streptococci which are susceptible to vancomycin will have an MIC at or below the US FDA susceptibility breakpoint for dalbavancin.

Conclusion

Vancomycin should be considered as a surrogate for in vitro dalbavancin susceptibility testing.

The use of ertapenem for the treatment of lower extremity infections

Lower extremity infections are a growing challenge. Moderate to severe infections are frequently polymicrobial in nature and require appropriate parenteral antibiotic therapy. Ideally, empiric treatment should be broad spectrum in coverage, simplistic in use, and economically reasonable for the patient and the health care system. This article retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 230 patients, 159 (69.13%) of whom were diabetic, who were admitted with lower extremity infections and who were empirically treated with ertapenem. Ertapenem was well tolerated with a low adverse effect profile. We found a 79.13% rate (182 of 230 patients) of favorable outcome with this regimen, which is comparable to other published studies that have looked at the use of this agent. Ertapenem is a once-daily, broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic indicated for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSI). Ertapenem is an appropriate choice for empiric antibiotic therapy of lower extremity infections.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

2.

Ertapenem resistance among extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

Ertapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae is rare. We report on an ertapenem-nonsusceptible phenotype among 25 out of 663 (3.77%) extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing K. pneumoniae isolates in a multicenter Israeli study. These isolates originated from six different hospitals and were multiclonal, belonging to 12 different genetic clones. Repeat testing using Etest and agar dilution confirmed ertapenem nonsusceptibility in only 15/663 (2.3%) of the isolates. The molecular mechanisms of ertapenem resistance in seven single-clone resistant isolates was due to the presence of ESBL genes (CTX-M-2 in four isolates, CTX-M-10 and OXA-4 in one isolate, SHV-12 in one isolate, and SHV-28 in one isolate) combined with the absence of OMPK36. Seven of 10 isolates initially reported as ertapenem nonsusceptible and subsequently classified as susceptible showed an inoculum effect with ertapenem but not with imipenem or meropenem. Population analysis detected the presence of an ertapenem-resistant subpopulation at a frequency of 10(-6). These rare resistant subpopulations carried multiple ESBL genes, including TEM-30, SHV-44, CTX-M-2, and CTX-M-10, and they lacked OMPK36. The clinical and diagnostic significance of the results should be further studied.

First national surveillance of susceptibility of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. to antimicrobials in Israel

In this 1st national surveillance study, the susceptibility pattern of 1011 consecutive isolates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. isolated from patients hospitalized in Israel hospitals, covering 62.3% of all general hospital beds in the country, was investigated. Proportion of susceptibilities (range among institutions, MIC(50)/MIC(90) in micrograms per milliliter) were to ertapenem 95.0% (88.8-100%, 0.19/0.75), imipenem 98.8% (88.8-100%, 0.25/0.38), meropenem 98.2% (90.0-100%, 0.06/0.19), piperacillin-tazobactam 59.1% (42.6-77.0%, 16/256), ciprofloxacin 17.2% (9.0-24.6%, 32/32), levofloxacin 17.8% (9.0-24.6%, 32/32), amikacin 74.5% (63.8-98.0%, 6/32), and gentamicin 19.3% (12.3-28.5%, 96/256). Coresistance, cross-resistance, and variability between institutions were high. Only carbapenems retain predicted activity against ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp. across Israeli hospitals.

In vitro activities of three carbapenems against recent bacterial isolates from severely ill patients at Swedish hospitals

To study the in vitro activity of imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem against common pathogens isolated from patients in intensive care, haematology and dialysis/nephrology units at 7 Swedish university hospitals, a total of 788 isolates were collected during 2002-2003. The distribution of the isolates was as follows: Escherichia coli (n = 140), Klebsiella spp. (n = 132), Proteus spp. (n = 97), Enterobacter spp. (n = 113), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 126), Acinetobacter spp. (n = 53) and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 127). The susceptibility to the 3 carbapenems was determined by E-test, and the MICs were interpreted according to SRGA criteria. All 3 carbapenems were highly active against Enterobacteriaceae. The overall susceptibility to imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem was 90%, 98% and 93%, respectively. Against Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacter spp. excluded, ertapenem had an equal or lower MIC(90) than meropenem. Apart from being the most active carbapenem against Enterobacteriaceae, meropenem was also the most active carbapenem against P. aeruginosa, whereas imipenem was the most active drug against Acinetobacter spp. The carbapenems are still potent antibiotics. With the introduction of ertapenem, and an expected increase in the carbapenem consumption due to an increased prevalence of strains with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, continuous surveillance of carbapenem resistance appears to be warranted, with special attention to P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter and Proteus spp.

The Spread ofKlebsiella pneumoniaeCarbapenemase–ProducingK. pneumoniaeto Upstate New York

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) have previously been identified in distinct geographic locations. We report the spread of KPC-2 to upstate New York. Our intention is to alert clinicians to problems encountered in identifying KPC-containing isolates. Possible errors as a result of inferring susceptibility of untested carbapenems from the routine antibiogram using agar-based methodology or microdilution testing are discussed.

Multicentre survey of the in-vitro activity of seven antimicrobial agents, including ertapenem, against recently isolated Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria in Greece

The in-vitro activities of penicillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, imipenem, ertapenem, metronidazole and clindamycin were evaluated against 138 Gram-negative anaerobic isolates (82 Bacteroides fragilis group, 17 non-fragilis Bacteroides spp., 31 Prevotella spp., four Fusobacterium spp., two Veillonella spp., one Porphyromonas sp. and one Tissierella praeacuta) collected from six general hospitals in Athens, Greece. Overall rates of non-susceptibility (both resistant and intermediately-resistant) to penicillin and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid were 81.8% and 2.3%, respectively. The rates of non-susceptibility to cefoxitin and clindamycin were 30.3% and 31.1%, respectively, and that for metronidazole was 4.3% (four Prevotella spp. isolates, one Porphyromonas sp. isolate and one B. fragilis isolate). Only the single B. fragilis isolate was nim-positive by PCR. Only one B. fragilis isolate was resistant to both carbapenems tested, while six more Bacteroides spp. isolates were imipenem-susceptible and ertapenem-non-susceptible. The MIC range, MIC(50) and MIC(90) values were comparable for imipenem and ertapenem, although ertapenem MIC(90)s were one or two two-fold dilutions higher.

Beta-lactam antibiotics: newer formulations and newer agents

beta-Lactam antibiotics share a common structure and mechanism of action, although they differ in their spectrum of antimicrobial activity and utility in treating different infections. The current classes include the penicillins, the penicillinase-resistant penicillins, the extended- spectrum penicillins, the cephalosporins, the carbapenems, and the monobactams. This article discusses some of the newest beta-lactams available for use in the United States: ertapenem, cefditoren, and cefepime. A new formulation of amoxicillin-clavulanate, which contains higher doses of amoxicillin, is also discussed.

Ertapenem as initial antimicrobial monotherapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalized with typical community-acquired pneumonia

This report describes a post-hoc analysis of two large studies of typical community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in hospitalized patients, focusing on demographics, disease characteristics, and outcome in patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In both studies, ertapenem 1 g IV daily was compared with ceftriaxone 1 g IV daily as initial antimicrobial therapy. Clinically improving patients could be switched to oral antibiotic therapy after 3 days. Of the 857 patients treated in both studies, 264 (31%) had COPD. The proportions of patients who were male, were >/=65 years of age, had a Pneumonia Severity Index of IV/V, or had Haemophilus influenzae isolated in a baseline culture were higher in patients with COPD. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common pathogen both in patients with and without COPD. Clinical response rates in assessable patients 7-14 days after completion of therapy for the combined treatment groups were 90% (187/208) for patients with COPD and 93% (424/456) for those without COPD (odds ratio 0.7 [95% CI, 0.4-1.2], P = 0.17). Of assessable COPD patients, 109/121 (90%) treated with ertapenem and 78/87 (90%) treated with ceftriaxone achieved a favorable clinical response (odds ratio 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6-1.8], P = 0.94). The outcome in patients with or without COPD was similar regardless of therapy. In patients with COPD as well as in the overall study population, the efficacy of ertapenem as initial antimicrobial monotherapy for patients with serious typical community-acquired pneumonia was comparable to that of ceftriaxone.

Efficacy of ertapenem against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in complicated skin/skin structure infections: results of a double-blind clinical trial versus piperacillin-tazobactam

Staphylococcus aureus is the predominant pathogen in complicated skin/skin structure infections. In this analysis of a subgroup of data from a randomised, double-blind trial, the efficacy of ertapenem 1 g daily was compared with piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g Q6H for treatment of complicated skin/skin structure infections caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Of the 529 treated patients in this trial, 185 (35.0%) had MSSA as a baseline pathogen. At the test of cure assessment 10-21 days post-therapy, 54 of 67 (80.6%) protocol evaluable patients in the ertapenem group and 55 of 68 (80.9%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam group were cured (odds ratio: 1.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-2.4), P = 0.99). In both treatment groups, cure rates were higher in patients with monomicrobial than polymicrobial infections, but the difference was not significant. In this subgroup analysis of patients with MSSA complicated skin/skin structure infections, therapy with ertapenem 1 g daily was as effective as piperacillin-tazobactam 13.5 g divided in four daily doses.