New Antiepileptic Medications

Antiepileptic drug treatment in children

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders of childhood, and antiepileptic drugs represent the main component of its treatment. The current emphasis in epilepsy treatment is to improve quality of life, not only by suppressing seizure, but also by minimizing the side effects of medications. The last 15 years have been characterized by significant advances in the development of new agents that have helped us to get closer to this goal. Knowledge of the essential properties, key indications and interactions of each antiepileptic drug will help to optimize efficacy and reduce adverse reactions. Age is also a determining factor of the epilepsy phenotype and its treatment. This review addresses the principles of pediatric epilepsy treatment, summarizes the profile of each of the commonly used antiepileptic drugs, and provides a treatment paradigm for particular seizures and epilepsy syndromes of childhood.

Analysis of the antiepileptic phenyltriazine compound lamotrigine using gas chromatography with nitrogen phosphorus detection

A method is described for the determination of lamotrigine in serum or plasma, based on gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection. The method requires minimal sample preparation. The drug is extracted from 1.0 ml of serum at pH 11 into butylacetate containing prazepam as internal standard. An aliquot of the organic phase is then injected onto an HP-5 fused silica capillary column and analyzed with temperature programming from 90 degrees to 250 degrees C. Lamotrigine is characterized by a relative retention time of 0.832 (+/-0.03) compared with prazepam. The method is competitive with the reported high-performance liquid chromatography procedures in terms of precision and sensitivity. Coefficients of variation, calculated from the results of between-run reproducibility tests, were 6.7%, 4.6%, 4.8%, and 6.2% for samples spiked with 0.20, 1.21, 2.42 and 10.84 micrograms/ml lamotrigine, respectively. The lower limit of quantitation of the method is 0.15 microgram/ml. The proposed procedure can be integrated easily in a comprehensive toxicology screening.

Oral pharmacotherapy for the movement disorders of cerebral palsy

Movement disorders are a well-recognized feature of some patients with cerebral palsy and often require treatment. However, treatments have been symptomatic and empiric, and there have been few pharmacologic studies. The major movement disorders in cerebral palsy are dystonia and the hyperkinesias choreoathetosis and myoclonus. They may occur in combination, often accompanied by spasticity and sometimes by epilepsy. Some drugs are useful treatments for all of these problems, but others may improve one while worsening another. Pitfalls in management include not diagnosing metabolic/degenerative disorders, which may mimic cerebral palsy, or not recognizing reversible complications of cerebral palsy, which may exacerbate symptoms. This review attempts to summarize empiric drug use and recommendations for therapy, drug studies in extrapyramidal cerebral palsy, and prospects for new drugs or models for the problem. Many new pharmacologic agents are available for study in cerebral palsy. Better methods of detecting basal ganglia injury after perinatal injury in asymptomatic infants may allow early intervention in the biologic process of recovery and adaptation.

Antidyskinetic drug therapy for pediatric movement disorders

The pharmacologic armamentarium used to treat dyskinesias in childhood is increasing. Anticonvulsant drugs as a class are still some of the broadest-spectrum antidyskinetic agents, probably because the class includes so many differently acting drugs or because dyskinesias are manifestations of subcortical electrical events. This group is enhanced by recent developments in gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate receptor pharmacology, which promise new antidyskinetic drugs. Other drugs acting at receptors for monoamines (dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin), acetylcholine, opioids, or histamine may provide symptomatic improvement. Fewer pharmacotherapies address the underlying pathophysiology of movement disorders. Of these, drugs or biologicals for immunomodulation are the most developed, but the group also includes antioxidants, cofactors, metabolic inhibitors, and chelators. There is potential for drugs that block the neurotoxic effects of glutamate to treat movement disorders and reverse or prevent brain injury. Peripheral blockade of focal dyskinesias through botulinum toxin offers a useful alternative to drugs in some patients.

Pharmaceutical Care in a State Operated Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Department

Pharmaceutical care in psychiatry is a specialized area of practice within the field of pharmacy and has been selected for Board Certification in the near future. In order to be maximally effective in this clinical setting, mental health pharmacists must combine their knowledge of psychopharmacology, pathophysiology, laboratory data, standardized assessment tools, and federal Health Care Financing Administration requirements, with non-pharmacological treatments to function within a treatment team concept. This treatment team concept aims at maximizing individual clinical outcomes while at the same time minimizing adverse side effects of the treatment regimen.

New drugs for the treatment of epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

This article will review current data on the metabolism, interactions, methods of analysis, and adverse effects observed with the use of new anticonvulsant drugs. The role of the laboratory in the provision of therapeutic drug monitoring for these drugs is discussed.

CONCLUSION

Certain of the newer anticonvulsant drugs require therapeutic drug monitoring for their optimal use in the treatment of epileptic seizures. The requirement for therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established for some of these drugs. Many of the newer anticonvulsant drugs, including lamotrigine, felbamate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide, interact clinically with established drugs, such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and valproic acid. Introduction of these new drugs will result in the need for more frequent monitoring of the established drugs during polytherapy. The need for a drug-monitoring service for anticonvulsant drugs overall will continue, due to the frequency of drug interactions, the incidence of adverse effects, and concerns about compliance with the dosing regimen in these patients.

Cognitive and behavioral effects of antiepileptic drugs

All antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have the potential for adverse effects on cognition and behavior. Most of the major AEDs, administered in therapeutic doses, cause little or no cognitive or behavioral impairment in group studies. However, individual variability is considerable, and some patients do not tolerate low serum levels, whereas others tolerate high levels without subjective or objective effects. In the past, carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) have been reported to have the fewest adverse cognitive and behavioral effects in children and adults. However, several recent, well-controlled studies have not found significant differences between the effects of phenytoin (PHT) and those of CBZ or VPA. Greater adverse effects have been found for phenobarbital (PB). However, we must use environmentally relevant measures of cognitive and behavioral functioning to measure effects on daily functioning. Future studies must define cognitive and behavioral toxicity in subpopulations (e.g., post-traumatic epilepsy, mental retardation, depression) and with the new AEDs.

New antiepileptic drugs for children: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin

After a 15-year hiatus, several new antiepileptic drugs have been approved or are under Food and Drug Administration investigation for use in the United States. This article reviews four of these new drugs--felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin. Although these drugs have been primarily developed for use in adults with partial seizures, they will also likely be used in children with partial epilepsy. Pediatric experience with several of these drugs has demonstrated safety and efficacy in other seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. These drugs will be an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for pediatric epilepsy. Additional studies are needed to fully explore the safety and efficacy of these drugs in a variety of pediatric epilepsies and to compare them to existing antiepileptic drugs.