The Poisoned Child

The utility of the history and clinical signs of poisoning in childhood: a prospective study

The authors aimed to evaluate the utility of the history and clinical signs for predicting ingestion of poisons in children. A prospective cohort study was performed of all patients presenting with suspected poisoning to a pediatric emergency department over a 13-month period. Clinical data were collected on a preformatted consultation sheet. Urine drug screens (UDS) were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Serum toxicologic tests were performed when clinically indicated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of the history and clinical signs were calculated, first using UDS and, second, using all available toxicologic tests as the gold standards. Of 249 patients, 110 (46%) had a UDS performed. The purported poison ingested was potentially identifiable by GC/MS in 57 (52%) of these UDS. Only the results from these 57 UDS were included in our statistical analysis. Overall, the suspected poison was identified in 33 (58%) of the 57 UDS. Similarly, in the less than 5 years age subgroup, 28 (56%) of 50 UDS were positive. Odor on the breath (PPV 100%), followed by symptoms consistent with poisoning (PPV 92%) and presence of poison on clothes (PPV 86%) were the most useful predictors of a positive UDS. Similar results were obtained when all available toxicologic tests were used as the gold standard. The best clinical predictors of poisonous ingestion in children were found to be odor on the breath, symptoms consistent with poisoning, and presence of poison on the patient's clothes. Approximately 40% of children who present with poisoning have not been exposed to the putative toxin.

Suspected Pediatric Ingestions: Effectiveness of Immunoassay Screens vs. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy in the Detection of Drugs and Chemicals

Rapid and accurate analytical testing can be of great value when determining treatment for pediatric patients suspected of ingesting an unknown chemical. Though often overlooked, gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) can be a valuable resource in emergency toxicology testing. In a recent 24-month period (July 1999-June 2001), the Analytical Toxicology Laboratory at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, compared the results of GC/MS analysis to results obtained by immunoassay testing. The laboratory tested 139 urine samples referred for STAT toxicology testing from the hospital's Pediatric Emergency Department. All samples were tested in parallel using an immunoassay technique (EMIT) and GC/MS. With analysis by immunoassay, 17.3% of the samples were positive for a drug of abuse. The number of positive drug classes ranged from 0 to 2 per sample (mean 0.17 +/- 0.43) using immunoassay. With analysis by GC/MS, drugs were detected in 88.5% of the samples. The number of drugs detected ranged from 0 to 11 per sample (mean 2.2 +/- 1.8) with GC/MS. A total of 64 different pharmaceuticals were identified by GC/MS. This study shows that analysis by GC/MS offers the clinician a more comprehensive view into the exposure of the pediatric patient presenting with an unknown chemical ingestion.

Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home

OBJECTIVE

Activated charcoal (AC) is recognized as the treatment of choice for gastrointestinal decontamination after many ingestions. AC use in the home has been limited by concerns that parents would not administer it properly and that children would refuse to take AC. Previous descriptions of home administration have reported mixed results.

METHODS

This was an 18-month consecutive case series of all patients for whom AC administration was recommended in the home. Data collected included AC availability in the home and/or a local pharmacy, success in administration, amount administered, time after ingestion to AC administration, difficulties in administration, adverse effects, age and gender of patient, substance involved in poisoning, and medical outcome. All cases were followed for at least 3 days after the ingestion. Patients who initially had home AC recommendation but who ultimately were treated in the emergency department (ED) served as a comparison group.

RESULTS

Home administration of AC was recommended in 138 cases. A total of 115 individuals (83%) were treated with AC in the home, with no failures to administer AC. Reasons for failure to manage at home were 1) mother preferred ED (8 cases), 2) could not locate AC (7 cases), 3) pharmacy closed for the night (6 cases) and 4) no home telephone for follow-up (2 cases). Time to AC administration after ingestion was a mean of 38 minutes (+/-18.3) for home treatment and 73 minutes (+/-18.1) for ED treatment. Ninety-five percent of home cases received AC in < or =60 minutes versus 33% for ED management. AC was in the home in 11 cases at the time of recommendation. The amount of AC administered was a mean of 12.1 g (standard deviation: 6.9) and a median of 12 g. Eight children (6.9%) who were treated at home vomited after AC versus 3 (13%) who received ED treatment. No aspirations or complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

AC can be administered successfully by the lay public in the home. Home use of AC significantly reduces the time to AC administration.