The Mangled Extremity

Dispelling Dogma: American Association for Surgery of Trauma Prospective, Multicenter Trial of Index vs Delayed Fasciotomy after Extremity Trauma

BACKGROUND

Surgical dogma states that "if you think about doing a fasciotomy, you do it," yet the benefit of this approach remains unclear. We hypothesized that early fasciotomy during index operative procedures for extremity vascular trauma would be associated with improved patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective, observational multicenter (17 level 1, 1 level 2) analysis included patients ≥15 years old with extremity vascular injury requiring operative management. Clinical variables were analyzed with respect to fasciotomy timing for correlation with outcomes, including muscle necrosis and limb amputation. Associated variables (p < 0.05) were input into multivariable logistic regression models evaluating these endpoints.

RESULTS

Of 436 study patients, most were male (87%) with penetrating (57%), lower extremity (77%), arterial (73%), vein (40%), and bony (53%) injury with prolonged hospital length of stay (11 days). Patients who had index fasciotomy (66%) were compared with those who did not (34%), and no differences were appreciated with respect to age, initial systolic blood pressure, tourniquet time, "hard" signs of vascular injury, massive transfusion protocol activation, or Injury Severity Score (all p < 0.05). Of the 289 patients who underwent index fasciotomy, 49% had prophylactic fasciotomy, 11% developed muscle necrosis, 4% required an additional fasciotomy, and 8% required amputation, although only 28 of 147 (19%) required delayed fasciotomy in those without index fasciotomy. Importantly, forgoing index fasciotomy did not correlate (p > 0.05) with additional muscle necrosis or amputation risk in the delayed fasciotomy group. After controlling for confounders, index surgery fasciotomy was not associated with either muscle necrosis or limb salvage in multivariable models.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine, index operation fasciotomy failed to demonstrate an outcome benefit in this prospective, multicenter analysis. Our data suggest that a careful observation and fasciotomy-when-needed approach may limit unnecessary surgery and its resulting morbidity in extremity vascular trauma patients.

Mangled extremity- Modern concepts in treatment

A mangled extremity is the most devastating limb injury and presents a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. There are two main treatment options, reconstruction or amputation, but sometimes indications for either are not clear. There are many pro and contra arguments for both options. To make the decision easier numerous score systems have been introduced, but the final decision is based on the judgment and experience of the treating surgeon. Early extremity reconstruction appears to give better results than delayed or late reconstruction and should be the treatment of choice where possible. The goal in reconstruction of a lower extremity is to restore and maintain balance and ambulation, while restoration of an upper extremity's numerous functions is more demanding. In this paper the authors describe and suggest treatment approaches in patients with a severely mangled extremity, including assessment and treatment of all injured tissues, using defined protocols, with special attention to bone stabilization, revascularization, soft-tissue coverage and nerve reconstruction. These have a great impact on the outcome and function of the injured extremity. Rehabilitation and return to the preinjury level is slow and sometimes uncertain.

Severely comminuted radius fracture presenting as a signature patterned injury

Dilemma still prevails, regarding the exact management of mangled extremity injuries between limb salvage versus amputation, each having there own set of complications. We here present a case of severely comminuted fractures of radius (bag of bones) along with the multiple criss-cross shaped lacerated wounds on the forearm and wrist presenting as a "signature pattern injury" caused by entrapment of the limb in the concrete mixer. MESS score of patient was 8, a score valid for amputation, but contrary, we successfully salvaged the patient's limb with use of radio-carpal distracter. Management of mangled injuries should be individualized, with due consideration to the mechanism and force of injury, associated injuries, and the patient profile.

Current management of the mangled upper extremity

Mangled describes an injury caused by cutting, tearing, or crushing, which leads to the limb becoming unrecognizable; in essence, there are two treatment options for mangled upper extremities, amputation and salvage reconstruction. With advances in our understanding of human physiology and basic science, and with the development of new fixation devices, modern microsurgical techniques and the possibility of different types of bony and soft tissue reconstruction, the clinical and functional outcomes are often good, and certainly preferable to those of contemporary prosthetics. Early or even immediate (emergency) complete upper extremity reconstruction appears to give better results than delayed or late reconstruction and should be the treatment of choice where possible. Before any reconstruction is attempted, injuries to other organs must be excluded. Each step in the assessment and treatment of a mangled extremity is of utmost importance. These include radical tissue debridement, prophylactic antibiotics, copious irrigation with a lavage system, stable bone fixation, revascularization, nerve repair, and soft tissue coverage. Well-planned and early rehabilitation leads to a better functional outcome. Despite the use of scoring systems to help guide decisions and predict outcomes, the decision to reconstruct or to amputate still ultimately lies with the surgical judgment and experience of the treating surgeon.

The impact of lower leg compartment syndrome on health related quality of life

Although the aetiology, pathophysiology and treatment of acute compartment syndrome have been well described in the literature, there is limited information on the long-term impact of compartment syndrome on quality of life. We reviewed the medical records and radiographs of all the patients treated with surgical decompression of compartment syndrome. Between 1993 and 1998, 42 cases were identified. There were 30 cases of tibial compartment syndrome and 12 cases involving other limbs. These 30 patients were recalled for a follow-up assessment during which they were asked to complete an EQ-5D (EuroQol), a standardised measure of health related quality of life based on five dimensions (self-care, pain/discomfort, mobility, usual activities and anxiety/depression). Patients were compared with EQ-5D age/sex norms derived from a randomly selected group of patients that had sustained isolated closed tibial shaft fractures. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Patients who stated that the appearance of the surgical site was a problem, reported significantly poorer health related quality of life than did patients who had no problem with the appearance. Patients with skin graft reported more problems with pain and discomfort than patients without skin graft. Patients with faster closure times of the wound showed significantly better self-rated health status than patients in whom the wound closure time was longer. Although the patients in this study reported significantly more problems on the dimensions of EQ-5D than were reported in the control group, their overall self-rated health was not statistically different. This study has demonstrated that compartment syndrome may be associated with long-term impact on health related quality of life.

Soft tissue complications of orthopedic emergencies

The emergency physician encounters a diversity of potentially devastating and disabling soft tissue maladies. This article reviews the literature and approach to the compartment syndrome and Volkmann contracture, reflex sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia, fracture blisters, and gas gangrene.

Compartment syndrome in the critically injured following massive resuscitation: case reports

Compartment syndrome of the extremities is usually associated with locally mediated events such as ischemia or injury. Three cases are presented of patients who did not sustain direct extremity trauma, but who developed compartment syndrome following massive fluid resuscitation. Global ischemia/reperfusion may be responsible for the observed morbidity. Patients undergoing large volume resuscitation should be closely monitored for this entity.

Protocol for lower extremity trauma

Trauma to the lower extremity has been treated in the past by many specialties and subspecialties of medicine. No specialty, however, should be better qualified or trained in treating lower extremity trauma than the podiatrist. This study reviews some critical principles of acute trauma management and treatment. A simple algorithm is suggested. Three representative case studies are presented, demonstrating the importance and value of an established protocol.

Anatomic bases of the forearm compartment syndrome

One of the most common sites for the compartment syndrome (CS) is the forearm. Its compartments have been studied by injection of colored gelatin into the particular anatomical spaces. The three "pressure-measuring-points" recommended in the clinical literature to measure intracompartmental tissue pressure in equivocal diagnostic cases were used for the dye injections on the forearms of five preserved cadavers of adults. However, instead of the compartments especially affected in CS two adjacent spaces were revealed. In order to elucidate the clinical relevant spaces two additional approaches for the injection had been used. Cross-sections at 15 mm intervals of the injected forearms had been performed. Some of them are presented and schematically summarized in this article. Recent studies have suggested that there are different guidelines for description of the anatomically isolated spaces. However, especially one of these spaces seems to be responsible for the CS on the forearm. The remarkable features of this so called "deep flexor compartment" are its very restrictive envelopes, its rare fascial contacts, its impermeable seal in proximal-radial direction as well as the extremely endangered structures within the compartment. The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle is recommended to be the "primary structure" for measuring the tissue pressure as well as for surgical decompression. The article reviews the anatomical base of the CS.