Antiarrhythmic drug therapy of atrial fibrillation

Managing arrhythmias in the intensive care unit

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at increased risk for cardiac arrhythmias, the most common of which can be subdivided into tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias. These arrhythmias may be the primary reason for ICU admission or may occur in the critically ill patient. This article addresses the occurrence of arrhythmias in the critically ill patient, and discusses their pathophysiology, implications, recognition, and management.

Alterations of atrial Ca(2+) handling as cause and consequence of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia. As the most important risk factor for embolic stroke, AF is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Despite decades of research, successful (pharmacological and interventional) 'ablation' of the arrhythmia remains challenging. AF is characterized by a diverse aetiology, including heart failure, hypertension, and valvular disease. Based on this understanding, new treatment strategies that are specifically tailored to the underlying pathophysiology of a certain 'type' of AF are being developed. One important aspect of AF pathophysiology is altered intracellular Ca(2+) handling. Due to the increase in the atrial activation rate and the subsequent initial [Ca(2+)](i) overload, AF induces 'remodelling' of intracellular Ca(2+) handling. Current research focuses on unravelling the contribution of altered intracellular Ca(2+) handling to different types of AF. More specifically, changes in intracellular Ca(2+) homeostasis preceding the onset of AF, in conditions which predispose to AF (e.g. heart failure), appear to be different from changes in Ca(2+) handling developing after the onset of AF. Here we review and critique altered intracellular Ca(2+) handling and its contribution to three specific aspects of AF pathophysiology, (i) excitation-transcription coupling and Ca(2+)-dependent signalling pathways, (ii) atrial contractile dysfunction, and (iii) arrhythmogenicity.

A formula for the stratified selection of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the emergency setting: a retrospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Amiodarone is a commonly used medication in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) of recent onset.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to identify a possible formula for selecting Emergency Department (ED) patients with paroxysmal AF who will spontaneously restore sinus rhythm (SR), successfully restore SR with the use of loading intravenous (i.v.) amiodarone, or require 24-h maintenance amiodarone infusion.

METHODS

This retrospective pilot study included 141 patients with recent-onset AF. Patients who did not restore SR spontaneously received i.v. amiodarone (5 mg/kg) within a period of 30 min. In case of no response, an additional dosage of 1000 mg of i.v. amiodarone was administered over a period of 24 h. Binary logistic regression models were used to determine the predictors of spontaneous conversion and the response to amiodarone administration.

RESULTS

The formula ([heart rate/systolic blood pressure] + 0.1 × number of past AF incidences) was chosen as the one with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity. This index identified the patients who spontaneously restored SR (cutoff point 1.31 with 78.6% sensitivity and 77.9% specificity), whereas for patients who responded to the loading i.v. amiodarone dose, the use of the index (cutoff point 1.24) exhibited 84.1% sensitivity and 75.3% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

This formula may be a useful and reliable bedside diagnostic tool to identify AF patients most likely to spontaneously convert, or respond to loading amiodarone administration in the emergency setting. The use of this index also can assist in patient risk stratification.

Intravenous and oral administration of amiodarone for the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation after digoxin administration

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a significant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity. Amiodarone is a potent antiarrhythmic drug. The safety and efficacy of oral versus intravenous (i.v.) Amiodarone in the treatment of AF of recent onset (duration <48 h) was investigated.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 223 patients with symptomatic AF, of whom 110 received 600 mg oral Amiodarone (Group A) in three divided doses and 113 received i.v. Amiodarone (5 mg/kg over 30 min followed by 1000 mg over the next 24 h) (Group B). Digoxin was administered to all patients, who had not previously received it. All patients were monitored for 24 h.

RESULTS

Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 85.45% of group A and 82.30% in group B (p=NS). Mean time of cardioversion in group A was 20+/-4.5 h and in group B was 12+/-8 h (p<0,001). However, blood pressure (BP) in group A remained stable for the observation period, whereas it fell significantly in group B. Treatment was not discontinued in any of the patients in either group, however 13 patients in group B developed superficial phlebitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both forms of the drug are extremely efficient in restoring sinus rhythm in AF of recent onset, although the i.v. form acts quicker. The oral form of the drug does not alter significantly the patients' BP.

In vivo antiarrhythmic and cardiac electrophysiologic effects of a novel diphenylphosphine oxide IKur blocker (2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl) diphenylphosphine oxide

The antiarrhythmic efficacy of the novel ultrarapid delayed rectifier potassium current (IKur) blocker (2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl) diphenylphosphine oxide (DPO-1) was compared with efficacies of the standard class III rapidly activating component of delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr) blockers [+-N-[1'-(6-cyano-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2-napthalenyl)-3,4-dihydro-4-hydroxyspiro[2H-1-benzopyran-2,4'-piperidin]-6-yl] methanesulfonamide hydrochloride (MK499) and ibutilide and the class IC agent propafenone in a canine model of Y-shaped intracaval and right atrial free wall surgical lesions producing the substrate for reentrant atrial flutter. Electrocardiographic and cardiac electrophysiologic effects also were assessed at the effective antiarrhythmic doses of test agents. DPO-1 terminated atrial arrhythmia (six/six preparations; 5.5 +/- 2.0 mg/kg i.v.) while significantly increasing atrial relative and effective refractory periods (+15.7 and +15.2%, respectively) but having no significant effects on ventricular refractory periods or electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals. Effective antiarrhythmic doses of MK499 (five/five preparations; 0.004 +/- 0.002 mg/kg i.v.) and ibutilide (five/five preparations; 0.003 +/- 0.001 mg/kg i.v.) similarly increased atrial relative (+23.2 and +25.1%, respectively) and effective (+21.6 and +31.9%, respectively) refractory periods. However, antiarrhythmic doses of MK499 and ibutilide also consistently and significantly increased ventricular relative (+9.9 and +7.6%, respectively) and effective (+10.4 and +9.9%, respectively) refractory periods, rate-corrected ECG QTc (+6.7 and +7.8%, respectively), and paced QT (+7.3 and +8.5%, respectively) intervals. Doses of propafenone that terminated atrial arrhythmia (five/five preparations; 0.94 +/- 0.54 mg/kg i.v.) significantly increased ECG QRS interval (+11.1%). These findings support the approach of atrial selective modulation of refractoriness through block of IKur for the development of potentially safer and more effective atrial antiarrhythmic agents.