Dysautonomic and reflex syncope syndromes

Orthostatic hypotension: managing a difficult problem

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) leads to a significant number of hospitalizations each year, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality among affected individuals. Given the increased risk for cardiovascular events and falls, it is important to identify the underlying etiology of OH and to choose appropriate therapeutic agents. OH can be non-neurogenic or neurogenic (arising from a central or peripheral lesion). The initial evaluation includes orthostatic vital signs, complete history and a physical examination. Patients should also be evaluated for concomitant symptoms of post-prandial hypotension and supine hypertension. Non-pharmacologic interventions are the first step for treatment of OH. The appropriate selection of medications can also help with symptomatic relief. This review highlights the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnostic work-up and treatment of patients with neurogenic OH.

Management and therapy of vasovagal syncope: A review

Vasovagal syncope is a common cause of recurrent syncope. Clinically, these episodes may present as an isolated event with an identifiable trigger, or manifest as a cluster of recurrent episodes warranting intensive evaluation. The mechanism of vasovagal syncope is incompletely understood. Diagnostic tools such as implantable loop recorders may facilitate the identification of patients with arrhythmia mimicking benign vasovagal syncope. This review focuses on the management of vasovagal syncope and discusses the non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options, especially the use of midodrine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The role of cardiac pacing may be meaningful for a subgroup of patients who manifest severe bradycardia or asystole but this still remains controversial.

Clinical findings as predictors of positivity of head-up tilt table test in neurocardiogenic syncope

BACKGROUND

Neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope occurs frequently and can be diagnosed with the head-up tilt table (HUTT) test. Our objective in this study was to identify clinical predictors of the positivity of HUTT test in neurocardiogenic syncope.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of 117 cases (81 women and 36 men, 13-85 years of age) referred to our Institution for HUTT testing. The ability of 10 symptoms and signs of clinical history to predict HUTT positivity were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

We observed a low rate of test-negative cases (24%) and 89 positives. Nearly all positives (87/89) were neurocardiogenic, principally of vasodepressor and mixed types (43 and 34 cases, respectively) and a few were cardioinhibitory (10, mostly young males). Regression analysis established that dizziness, nausea, and diaphoresis in past history were associated with HUTT positivity nearly 25 times more frequently than when absent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our three conclusions are that syncope in absence of heart disease accompanied by dizziness, nausea, and diaphoresis may be treated as neurocardiogenic in settings where no HUTT is available. In addition, our low rate of negative tests may have been the result of our reexamining referrals prior to deciding test performance, and high frequency of young males in cardioinhibitory syncope needs further research.

Unconventional applications in pacemaker therapy

Since its inception, the principal application of permanent pacing has been for the correction of symptomatic bradycardia. During the past 3 decades, pacemaker therapy indications have evolved, through scientific research and through advances in technology, beyond conduction system disorders and sinus node dysfunction. This article presents recent progress in the application of permanent pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, neurocardiogenic syncope, and in long-QT syndrome. In each clinical entity, certain pacing parameters are crucial for achieving the therapeutic goal. Advanced practice clinicians will encounter these patients in practice and are urged to recognize the therapeutic goal and optimal function of the device.

Vasodepressor Syncope

Neurocardiogenic syncope is a common disorder affecting various individuals of different ages with a wide variety of circumstances and comorbid conditions. Although a large amount of data is available regarding evaluation and treatment options, there is still sufficient latitude for the physician to exercise clinical judgment. We summarize current opinions on treatment here and also add some of our own bias regarding how to manage such patients. The vast majority of patients can be assessed by a reduction of symptomatic episodes with therapy. In all patients, careful follow-up should be made after initiating therapy. Not all patients will obtain complete resolution of symptoms. If episodes of complete syncope are reduced to infrequent dizzy spells, however, this may be satisfactory. In other patients, abrupt syncope may be converted to spells with a sufficient prodromal warning for the patient to take evasive action.