Impact of Coronary Artery Disease on Valvular Heart Surgery

Adding coronary artery bypass grafting to aortic valve replacement increases operative mortality for elderly (70 years and older) patients with aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to determine the effect of simultaneous aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on operative outcomes and long-term survival in elderly patients with a high prevalence of comorbidity.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-seven elderly patients (70 years old or older) undergoing isolated AVR (n = 120) or combined AVR/CABG (n = 37) were evaluated. Operative outcomes were compared between the two surgical groups. Long-term survival was also compared between the groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and long-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 0.8 % for the isolated AVR group and 5.4 % for the combined AVR/CABG group (p = 0.076). The length of the intensive care unit stay for the combined AVR/CABG group was significantly longer than that for the isolated AVR group (median: 40 vs. 21 h, p = 0.008). However, the occurrence rate of hospital complications, such as reoperation for bleeding, deep sternal infection, supra-ventricular arrhythmia, and neurological complications, was similar between the two groups. Actuarial survival at 3 and 5 years was 82.3 and 80.9 % for the isolated AVR group, and 88.3 and 73.0 % for the combined AVR/CABG group, respectively (p = 0.637).

CONCLUSIONS

The satisfactory operative and long-term results in our study support a more aggressive simultaneous coronary revascularization combined with AVR for aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients.

Ruling out coronary artery disease with noninvasive coronary multidetector CT angiography before noncoronary cardiovascular surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the usefulness of preoperative coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in nonselected patients scheduled to undergo noncoronary cardiovascular surgery to avoid unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved the study protocol; informed consent was given. This prospective study involved 161 consecutive patients who underwent coronary calcium scoring and coronary CT angiography before undergoing noncoronary cardiovascular surgery. Seven patients were excluded because of contraindications to CT angiography. The major indication of noncoronary cardiovascular surgery was valvular heart disease (121 patients). Follow-up was performed at a median of 20 months to define ischemic events described as acute coronary syndrome or death secondary to acute coronary syndrome, arrhythmias, or cardiac failure. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of nondiagnostic coronary CT angiography. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate outcome at follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients did not undergo surgery, which left 133 patients as the study group. Atrial fibrillation was present in 45 of 133 patients. The interquartile range of the Agatston coronary calcium score was 0-471. Coronary CT angiography was diagnostic in 108 of 133 patients. Of these, 93 of 108 had no significant CAD (≤ 50% stenosis), and noncoronary cardiovascular surgery was performed in them without preoperative ICA. No patients in this group had postoperative ischemic events at follow-up. Coronary CT angiography was nondiagnostic in 25 of 133 patients who were referred for preoperative ICA. Multivariate analysis showed Agatston score to be the only independent predictor of nondiagnostic coronary CT angiography (odds ratio = 1.002; 95% confidence interval: 1.001, 1.003; P = .001). The best Agatston score cutoff for diagnostic coronary CT angiography was 579.

CONCLUSION

In nonselected patients scheduled to undergo noncoronary cardiovascular surgery, preoperative coronary CT angiography was diagnostic in 81% of cases. Preoperative ICA could be safely avoided in patients without significant CAD by using coronary CT angiography. The Agatston score, but not the presence of atrial fibrillation, was an independent predictor of nondiagnostic coronary CT angiography.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10100384/-/DC1.

Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery

OBJECTIVES

We studied the diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to rule out or detect significant coronary stenosis in patients referred for valve surgery.

BACKGROUND

Invasive conventional coronary angiography (CCA) is recommended in most patients scheduled for valve surgery.

METHODS

During a 6-month period, 145 patients were prospectively identified from a consecutive patient population scheduled for valve surgery. Thirty-five patients were excluded because of CTCA criteria: irregular heart rhythm (n = 26), impaired renal function (n = 5), and known contrast allergy (n = 4). General exclusion criteria were: hospitalization in community hospital (n = 4), no need for CCA (n = 4), previous coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 1), or percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 4). Of the remaining 97 patients, 27 denied written informed consent. Thus, the study population comprised 70 patients (49 male, 21 female; mean age 63 +/- 11 years).

RESULTS

Prevalence of significant coronary artery disease, defined as having at least 1 > or =50% stenosis per patient, was 25.7%. Beta-blockers were administered in 71%, and 64% received lorazepam. The mean heart rate dropped from 72.5 +/- 12.4 to 59.5 +/- 7.5 beats/min. The mean scan time was 12.8 +/- 1.3 s. On a per-patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were: 100% (18 of 18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 78 to 100), 92% (48 of 52; 95% CI 81 to 98), 82% (18 of 22; 95% CI 59 to 94), and 100% (48 of 48; 95% CI 91 to 100), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CTCA for ruling out the presence of significant coronary stenoses in patients undergoing valve surgery is excellent and allows CTCA implementation as a gatekeeper for invasive CCA in these patients.

Surgery for Combined Rheumatic Valve and Coronary Artery Disease

Between 1986 and 1996, 147 patients underwent valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. The mitral valve was replaced in 104 patients, the aortic valve in 34, and both mitral and aortic valves were replaced in 9. One hundred and twenty-two (83%) were male with a mean age of 56 ± 5 years (range, 38 to 77 years). The mean age for female patients was 57.9 ± 5 years (range, 38 to 70 years). All of the patients had rheumatic valve disease. Preoperatively, 68% were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV and 32% were in class II. A total of 252 distal anastomoses were performed (mean, 1.71 per patient) in these patients of whom 48.9% had single-vessel disease, 45% had two-vessel or three-vessel disease, and 6.1% had left main coronary artery disease. The hospital mortality rate was 10.2%. Three patients died during the follow-up period and the overall actuarial survival rate at 10 years was 96.6% ± 1.9%. Operations that combine both valve replacement and coronary artery bypass are performed more frequently because perioperative risk has decreased through more effective myocardial protection. If untreated, both coronary artery disease and significant valve disease may reduce patient survival.

Mortality and morbidity among patients who undergo combined valve and coronary artery bypass surgery: early and late results

AIM

To describe mortality and morbidity early and late after combined valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as compared with CABG alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients from western Sweden in whom CABG in combination with valve surgery or CABG alone was carried out in 1988-1991.

RESULTS

Among 2116 patients who underwent CABG, 35 (2%) had this combined with mitral valve surgery and 134 (6%) had this combined with aortic valve surgery, whereas the remaining 92% underwent CABG alone. Patients who underwent combined valve surgery and CABG were older, included more women and had a higher prevalence of previous congestive heart failure and renal dysfunction but on the other hand a less severe coronary artery disease. Among patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG the mortality over the subsequent 5 years was 45%). The corresponding figure for patients who underwent aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG was 24%. Both were higher than for CABG alone (14%; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.003, respectively). In a stepwise multiple regression model mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG was found to be an independent significant predictor for death but aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG was not. Among patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG and were discharged alive from hospital 77% were rehospitalized during the 2 years following the operation as compared with 48% among patients who underwent aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG and 43% among patients with CABG alone. Multiple regression identified mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG as a significant independent predictor for rehospitalization but not aortic valve plus CABG.

CONCLUSION

Among patients who either underwent CABG in combination with mitral valve surgery or aortic valve surgery or CABG alone, mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG was independently associated with death and rehospitalization, but the combination of aortic valve surgery and CABG was not.

Recipient selection and management before cardiac transplantation

Cardiac transplantation is a proven, effective therapy for selected patients with end-stage congestive heart failure. Recipient selection is performed by a multidisciplinary team consisting of transplant physicians and surgeons. Clinicians responsible for patient assessment must establish the severity of cardiac dysfunction, formulate a prognosis, and stratify patients according to risk for mortality. Patients whose survival and quality of life are most limited without cardiac transplantation are candidates for therapy. The scarcity of organ donors makes careful screening of potential recipients necessary to identify those individuals most likely to obtain a long-term benefit. Recipient selection criteria and management strategies are evolving because of extended waiting times and high mortality caused by the lack of sufficient numbers of donors. Alternative therapies should be applied wherever possible.

Event status of the Starr-Edwards aortic valve to 20 years: a benchmark for comparison

BACKGROUND

Considerable effort and expense has been invested in the evolutionary development of cardiac valvular prostheses with the goal of reducing or minimizing specific events related to these prostheses. It is important to measure any improvement achieved with such development by comparison against a historic standard. The Starr-Edwards caged-ball prosthesis model 1260 has been used for 30 years as the predominant or sole model of its kind for aortic valve replacement. This historic opportunity provides a benchmark for subsequent improvement and comparison of current prostheses.

METHODS

Between 1969 and 1991, 1,100 patients (median age, 57 years; 838 men and 194 women) underwent aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (aortic valve replacement, 964; aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting, 136) with the 1260 Starr-Edwards caged-ball prosthesis.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 6.2% (68 patients). Univariate patient characteristics predictive of early mortality were female sex (p = 0.003), age (> 56 years; p = 0.002), recent operative interval (1985 to 1991 versus 1969 to 1976 or 1977 to 1984; p = 0.002), presence of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.001), and small valve size (7A to 8A = 19 to 21 mm; p < 0.001). Follow-up extended to 11,293 patient-years (mean, 24.8 years) and was 96.9% complete. Survival at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years for all patients including operative mortality was 76.6%, 59.6%, 44.9%, and 31.2%, respectively. Operative variables predictive of poor late survival were advanced New York Heart Association class (III or IV); (p = 0.0001), older age (> 56 years; p = 0.0001), and lower (< 0.56) ejection fraction (p = 0.0001). Freedom from thromboemboli and anticoagulant-related bleeding at 5 years was 90.8% and 98.7%, respectively. Univariate model for greater risk of late thromboemboli identified female sex (p = 0.04), older age (> 56 years; p = 0.0002), and New York Heart Association class III or IV (p = 0.0058), as risk factors. Multivariate analysis for thromboemboli demonstrated older age (p = 0.0007) and New York Heart Association class III or IV (p = 0.0041) as significant. Alternatively, univariate analysis for late bleeding found only the most recent operative interval (p = 0.009) as significant, and the rarity of events prevented a multivariate query. There were no valve failures.

CONCLUSIONS

The late results of survival and freedom from late anticoagulant-related bleeding or thromboemboli are excellent, especially in larger (9A and above) sizes, and with the long implant record comparable with more recent prostheses, the Starr-Edwards valve provides an excellent, safe, and durable alternative in the aortic position and provides a benchmark against which to compare other prostheses.

Selection and treatment of candidates for heart transplantation. A statement for health professionals from the Committee on Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association

Improved outcome of heart failure in response to medical therapy, coupled with a critical shortage of donor organs, makes it imperative to restrict heart transplantation to patients who are most disabled by heart failure and who are likely to derive the maximum benefit from transplantation. Hemodynamic and functional indexes of prognosis are helpful in identifying these patients. Stratification of ambulatory heart failure patients by objective criteria, such as peak exercise oxygen consumption, has improved ability to select appropriate adult patients for heart transplantation. Such patients will have a poor prognosis despite optimal medical therapy. When determining the impact of individual comorbid conditions on a patient's candidacy for heart transplantation, the detrimental effects of each condition on posttransplantation outcome should be weighed. Evaluation of patients with severe heart failure should be done by a multidisciplinary team that is expert in management of heart failure, performance of cardiac surgery in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction, and transplantation. Potential heart transplant candidates should be reevaluated on a regular basis to assess continued need for transplantation. Long-term management of heart failure should include continuity of care by an experienced physician, optimal dosing in conventional therapy, and periodic reevaluation of left ventricular function and exercise capacity. The outcome of high-risk conventional cardiovascular surgery should be weighed against that of transplantation in patients with ischemic and valvular heart disease. Establishment of regional specialized heart failure centers may improve access to optimal medical therapy and new promising medical and surgical treatments for these patients as well as stimulate investigative efforts to accelerate progress in this critical area.

Determinants of survival and recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement

To determine factors that influence survival and recovery of ventricular function in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement in the current surgical era, baseline risk factors related to outcome were analyzed in 1,012 consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between 1983 and 1990. Forty-two percent of patients underwent concomitant coronary bypass. Observed survival probabilities (expressed as 30-day/5-year) were 0.97/0.81 overall, 0.99/0.89 for patients aged less than 70 years, and 0.95/0.74 for patients aged 70 years or greater. Advanced age (p < 0.0001), decreased ejection fraction (p < 0.0001), extent of coronary disease (p < 0.006), smaller prosthetic valve (p < 0.03), and advanced New York Heart Association class (p < 0.04) were incremental risk factors for mortality. In patients with preoperative ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 0.45), ejection fraction measured 1.4 years after aortic valve replacement improved in 72% and the mean increment in ejection fraction was 0.175 (95% confidence interval, 0.154 to 0.195). The increment in ejection fraction was greater in female patients than in male patients (p < 0.02) and greater in patients without than with coronary disease (p < 0.02). Female sex (p < 0.02) and lesser extent of coronary disease (p < 0.05) were independent predictors of change in ejection fraction. In all patients, early improvement in ejection fraction conveyed an independent subsequent survival benefit (p < 0.0001). The results of aortic valve replacement in the current era are excellent, and the majority of patients with ventricular dysfunction demonstrate significant improvement. Early improvement in ejection fraction, influenced by coexistent coronary artery disease and sex-associated factors, importantly affects subsequent survival.

Issues in contemporary cardiac rehabilitation: a historical perspective

Cardiac rehabilitation consists of exercise, psychosocial support and education and is prescribed most often for patients with coronary heart disease. Its purpose is to facilitate readaptation to normal life through the achievement of maximal functional capability and to reduce heart disease risk factors. It began historically with progressive ambulation after myocardial infarction and by 1980 became a standardized inpatient therapy performed according to a stepped procedure. Predischarge exercise testing was added and has become a meaningful contribution to the concept of risk stratification after an acute coronary event. Rehabilitation has subsequently become part of the outpatient environment and is delivered by multiple models. Meta-analyses have shown that rehabilitation reduces overall and cardiovascular deaths by about 20% and sudden death by about 37% during the year after an acute myocardial infarction. The significance of this, however, must now be modulated by the dynamic role of aggressive coronary intervention. Selection for such intervention has become an important adjunctive aspect of rehabilitation. Newer findings suggest that those stratified at low risk will benefit most by the modification of coronary risk factors, and that patients previously thought to be poor candidates for rehabilitation (such as those with significant left ventricular dysfunction and low work capacity) may experience substantial relative functional benefit. Beyond risk stratification, important contemporary issues include surveillance of patients after angioplasty, the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the attenuation or reversal of both native and vein graft atherosclerosis and consideration of such currently emphasized end points as quality of life and economic evaluation.