Rationale for on-site cardiac surgery for primary angioplasty: a time for reappraisal

Rationale and design of the MASS COMM trial: A randomized trial to compare percutaneous coronary intervention between MASSachusetts hospitals with cardiac surgery on-site and COMMunity hospitals without cardiac surgery on-site

BACKGROUND

Emergency surgery has become an increasingly rare event after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There have been no randomized trials evaluating whether cardiac surgery services on-site are essential for patient safety and optimal outcomes during and after PCI.

STUDY DESIGN

The MASS COMM trial (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01116882) is a randomized trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of nonemergency PCI at hospitals without surgery on-site (SOS) (non-SOS hospitals) and hospitals with SOS (SOS hospitals). A total of 3,690 subjects will be randomized in a 3:1 fashion to undergo PCI at non-SOS and SOS hospitals, with follow-up at hospital discharge, 30 days, and 12 months after PCI. The rate of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke) will serve as the primary safety end point at 30 days and the primary effectiveness end point at 12 months. The design is a 1-way randomized trial with a statistical hypothesis of noninferiority of nonemergency PCI at non-SOS hospitals for both safety and effectiveness end points.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter, randomized trial will compare the relative safety and effectiveness of nonemergency PCI at sites with and without cardiac SOS.

Financial consequences of implementing a partner-in-care in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

In 2003, a satellite cardiac surgery program (SAT) was implemented at an affiliated community hospital located in an area historically served by an academic medical center (AMC). This study assessed the financial consequences and the changes in case-mix that occurred at the AMC after SAT implementation.

METHODS

From June 2002 through December 2005, 4593 adult patients underwent cardiac operations at the AMC. Excluded were 400 patients operated on during the 4-month transition period after SAT implementation and 1210 patients living more than 35 miles from the AMC. Multivariable regression was used to compare changes in case-mix and propensity-score adjusted costs for AMC patients referred from SAT area (N(before/after =) 328/291) vs other patients (N(before/after =) 897/1467).

RESULTS

The SAT area referral rate decreased by 55%. Compared with other patients, AMC patients referred from the SAT area showed a greater increase in age in the second period (p = 0.013). The nursing workload and adjusted mean costs increased more for patients from the SAT area (p = 0.015 and 0.014, respectively). The hospital margin decreased in the second period for both referral areas (p < 0.001). For the patient subgroup undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, this hospital margin decrease was greater for SAT area patients (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

After implementation of SAT program, fewer patients of lower complexity came to the AMC from the SAT area, and there was a significant increase in nursing workload and costs. During this interval, hospital margin for cardiac operations decreased from both referral areas but decreased significantly more for coronary artery bypass graft patients from the SAT area.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with off-site cardiac surgery backup for acute myocardial infarction as a strategy to reduce door-to-balloon time

We investigated whether primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients admitted with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction could be performed more rapidly and with comparable outcomes in a community hospital versus a tertiary center with cardiac surgery. We started the first PCI with an off-site surgery program in The Netherlands in 2002 and report the results of 439 consecutive patients. In the safety phase, 199 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to treatment at our off-site center versus a more distant cardiac surgery center. In the confirmation phase, 240 consecutive patients were treated in the off-site hospital. Safety and efficacy end points were the rate of an angiographically successful PCI procedure (diameter stenosis <50% and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow) in the absence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. The randomization phase showed a 37-minute decrease in door-to-balloon time (p <0.001) with comparable procedural and clinical successes (91% Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow in the 2 groups). In the confirmation phase, the 30-day rate without major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was 95%. None of the 439 patients in the study required emergency surgery for failed primary PCI. In conclusion, time to treatment with primary PCI can be significantly shortened when treating patients in a community hospital setting with off-site cardiac surgery backup compared with transport for PCI to a referral center with on-site surgery. PCI at hospitals with off-site cardiac surgery backup can be considered a needed strategy to improve access to primary PCI for a larger segment of the population and can be delivered with a very favorable safety profile.

On-site surgical standby for percutaneous coronary intervention: a thing of the past?

Is the requirement for onsite surgical back-up in centres performing percutaneous coronary intervention still relevant today?

U.S. Trends In CABG Hospital Volume: The Effect Of Adding Cardiac Surgery Programs

Hospital coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) volume is inversely related to mortality--with low-volume hospitals having the highest mortality. Medicare data (1992-2003) show that the number of CABG procedures increased from 158,000 in 1992 to a peak of 190,000 in 1996 and then fell to 152,000 in 2003, while the number of hospitals performing CABG increased steadily. Predictably, the proportion of CABG procedures performed at low-volume hospitals increased, and the proportion in high-volume hospitals declined. An unintended consequence of starting new cardiac surgery programs is declining CABG hospital volume--a side effect that might increase mortality.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Performed at Hospitals With and Without On-Site Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is performed in hospitals without on-site coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the ;real world'. However, data on the in-hospital outcomes of primary PCI performed at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery are still lacking in Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the present study, 2,230 AMI patients were enrolled in the AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study between January 2000 and December 2005. Of these, 1,817 patients underwent primary PCI. Excluding patients without adequate data, we retrospectively compared clinical background, coronary risk factors, angiographic findings, acute results of primary PCI and in-hospital prognosis between patients undergoing primary PCI in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery (without surgery group, n=792) and those in hospitals with (with surgery group, n=993). The without surgery group had higher prevalence of previous myocardial infarction, Killip class>or=3 at admission and multivessels as a culprit lesion than the with surgery group. The without surgery group was more likely to have lower frequency of stent usage and lower thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade just after PCI, whereas it was more likely to have intra-aortic balloon pumping and temporary pacing during procedures. The overall in-hospital mortality did not differ between the 2 groups. On multivariate analysis, in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI, Killip class>or=3 at admission, multivessels or left main trunk (LMT) as culprit lesions, number of diseased vessels>or=2 or diseased LMT, and age were the independent predictors of the in-hospital mortality, but the presence of on-site cardiac surgery was not.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that in-hospital outcomes in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery are comparable to those at hospitals with on-site cardiac surgery in Japan.

Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby

OBJECTIVE

To compare characteristics and outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinics with (WSB) or without (NOSB) on-site cardiac surgery backup.

DESIGN

Analysis according to hospital, type of prospectively collected data of all patients who underwent PCI during 2000-3.

SETTING

The Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry covers all PCI procedures performed in Sweden.

PATIENTS

34,363 patients underwent PCI between January 2000 and December 2003. 8838 procedures were performed in NOSB (mean age of patients was 64.5 years) hospitals and 25,525 in WSB (mean age of patients was 64.1 years) hospitals (p = 0.002).

RESULTS

More patients in NOSB hospitals had diabetes (17.8% vs 16.8%; p = 0.03). Other clinical characteristics (previous infarct, previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)) also showed a tendency towards worse patients being treated in NOSB hospitals. However, there was a higher percentage of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (18% vs 9.7%; p<0.01) in WSB hospitals. After adjusting for differences in baseline risk no significant differences regarding outcome (30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, stroke and emergency CABG) were observable between WSB and NOSB hospitals. This applied to elective and non-elective procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these data it does not seem warranted to recommend against percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in NOSB hospitals.

Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the changes in incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 1979 to 2003.

BACKGROUND

Emergency CABG after PCI is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Data from 23,087 patients who underwent PCI at Mayo Clinic from 1979 to 2003 were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: the "pre-stent" era, 1979 to 1994 (n = 8,905); the "initial stent era," 1995 to 1999 (n = 7,605); and the "current stent era," 2000 to 2003 (n = 6,577).

RESULTS

Although patients undergoing PCI in the recent time periods had more high-risk features, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of emergency CABG from 2.9% to 0.7% to 0.3% across the groups (p < 0.001). Patients requiring emergency surgery in the recent time periods had a higher prevalence of hypertension, prior revascularization, and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%), as well as more complex coronary lesions. Fewer patients in the current stent era had coronary artery dissections and abrupt vessel closure requiring emergency CABG. The in-hospital mortality rate for emergency CABG patients remains unchanged and ranges from 10% to 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates that despite the increase in high-risk patients undergoing PCI, there has been a marked decrease in the incidence of patients requiring emergency CABG. However, the in-hospital mortality rate for those requiring emergency CABG remains high and unchanged.

Transport and centralization of acute coronary syndrome care

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the optimal treatment for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). But PCI facilities are not widely available, and the majority of patients who receive reperfusion therapy are treated with thrombolytic therapy. However, with significant improvements in the procedural success of PCI, there has been a concomitant reduction in the need for emergency bypass surgery and there is evidence to support primary PCI without on-site cardiac surgical facilities. Others have proposed immediate transfer to a suitable hospital for immediate primary PCI. An alternative treatment strategy is facilitated PCI, which might combine the early benefits of thrombolysis with the higher patency rates and superior clinical outcomes of primary PCI, although this remains unproven. Finally, rescue PCI remains a reasonable treatment option for patients with failed thrombolysis, but there is insufficient evidence to support this option as a preferred treatment strategy for patients with STEMI.

Impact of delays to cardiac surgery after failed angioplasty and stenting

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine the likelihood of harm in patients having additional delays before urgent coronary artery bypass graft (UCABG) surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Patients who have PCI at hospitals without cardiac surgery have additional delays to surgery when UCABG is indicated.

METHODS

Detailed chart review was performed on all patients who had a failed PCI leading to UCABG at a large tertiary care hospital. A prespecified set of criteria (hemodynamic instability, coronary perforation with significant effusion or tamponade, or severe ischemia) was used to identify patients who would have an increased likelihood of harm with additional delays to surgery.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2000, 6,582 PCIs were performed. There were 45 patients (0.7%) identified to have UCABG. The demographic characteristics of the UCABG patients were similar to the rest of the patients in the PCI database, except for significantly more type C lesions (45.3% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001) and more urgent cases (66.6% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.03) in patients with UCABG. Myocardial infarction occurred in eight patients (17.0%) after UCABG, with a mean peak creatine kinase of 2,445 +/- 1,212 IU/l. Death during the index hospital admission occurred in two patients. Eleven of the 45 patients (24.4%) were identified by the prespecified criteria to be at high likelihood of harm with additional delays to surgery. The absolute risk of harm is approximately one to two patients per 1,000 PCIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one in four patients referred for UCABG would be placed at increased risk of harm if delays to surgery were encountered.

Reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: current concepts

Myocardial reperfusion is the treatment of choice in acute myocardial infarction. Pharmacological thrombolysis restores coronary artery patency in about two thirds of patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, mechanical reperfusion with primary angioplasty and stenting achieves higher patency rates with less complications, especially in high-risk patients. Adjunctive pharmacotherapy and new device technology may improve the outcome of primary angioplasty. Facilitated angioplasty using a combination of half-dose thrombolysis, platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, and early intervention, appears to be a promising strategy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the modern era. The efficacy and safety of this approach are currently evaluated in several ongoing trials.