Geographical miss during intracoronary irradiation: impact on restenosis and determination of required safety margin length

Failure patterns after intravascular brachytherapy for in-stent coronary restenosis

INTRODUCTION

One strategy to improve the effectiveness of intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) is to study its failures. Previous investigations described mostly discrete, focal recurrences, typically at the proximal or distal edges of the irradiated segment after plain angioplasty or bare metal stents. We reviewed failure patterns of 30 unselected drug-eluting stent (DES) patients who had follow-up angiograms for recurrence within their IVBT-treated vessel.

METHODS

Records of 53 unselected IVBT patients treated between 2016 and 2021 were reviewed. Thirty of the 53 patients had at least one subsequent percutaneous intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after IVBT. Angiographic findings of those 30 patients with ISR within their previously irradiated vessel are reported here.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients, 21 (70%) developed recurrent ISR within the irradiated segment. Six of the 21 patients who failed within the irradiated segment also experienced ISR proximal or distal to the irradiated segment. Only 15 patients (50%) failed exclusively within the irradiated segment. In nine patients (30%), restenosis occurred proximally and/or distally to the irradiated segment, but not inside of the irradiated segment itself.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown here that 50% of failures after coronary IVBT for DES ISR occur exclusively within the irradiated segment. An additional 20% of patients had failure within and outside of the irradiated segment. These percentages suggest that a higher radiation dose might improve the long-term patency rates, a conclusion that should be tempered by the lack of universal follow-up.

Randomized comparison between intracoronary β-radiation brachytherapy and implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracoronary brachytherapy was the primary therapeutic option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) during the last years. Especially for the treatment of diffuse ISR (lesions >10mm), beta-source brachytherapy was significantly superior to singular balloon angioplasty. Despite lacking clinical database, the implantation of drug eluting stents recently became a common procedure for the treatment of ISR. This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy of beta-brachytherapy with beta-radioisotopes (90)Sr/(90)Y and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of diffuse ISR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to beta-brachytherapy after balloon angioplasty (Beta-Cath in 17 patients) or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (Taxus-Express2 in 20 patients). Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained for all patients, while angiographic follow-up was available for 30 patients.

RESULTS

Binary ISR (restenosis >50%) within target segment was observed in three patients treated with Beta-Cath, of which one needed target segment revascularisation for recurrent ISR, whereas no significant restenosis occurred in the patients treated with Taxus-Express2 (P=0.037). No further major adverse cardiac (target segment revascularisation, myocardial infarction, death) was found in either group (P=NS). Stent implantation was the more time-saving (31+/-11 min versus 60+/-23 min, P<0.001) procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this trial revealed a significant reduction of binary restenosis in the Taxus-Express2 arm, we found no difference in clinical outcome after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse ISR when compared to beta-brachytherapy.

Edge restenosis: impact of low dose irradiation on cell proliferation and ICAM-1 expression

BACKGROUND

Low dose irradiation (LDI) of uninjured segments is the consequence of the suggestion of many authors to extend the irradiation area in vascular brachytherapy to minimize the edge effect. Atherosclerosis is a general disease and the uninjured segment close to the intervention area is often atherosclerotic as well, consisting of neointimal smooth muscle cells (SMC) and quiescent monocytes (MC). The current study imitates this complex situation in vitro and investigates the effect of LDI on proliferation of SMC and expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in MC.

METHODS

Plaque tissue from advanced primary stenosing lesions of human coronary arteries (9 patients, age: 61 +/- 7 years) was extracted by local or extensive thrombendarterectomy. SMC were isolated and identified by positive reaction with smooth muscle alpha-actin. MC were isolated from buffy coat leukocytes using the MACS cell isolation kit. For identification of MC flow-cytometry analysis of FITC-conjugated CD68 and CD14 (FACScan) was applied. SMC and MC were irradiated using megavoltage photon irradiation (CLINAC2300 C/D, VARIAN, USA) of 6 mV at a focus-surface distance of 100 cm and a dose rate of 6 Gy min-1 with single doses of 1 Gy, 4 Gy, and 10 Gy. The effect on proliferation of SMC was analysed at day 10, 15, and 20. Secondly, total RNA of MC was isolated 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, and 4 h after irradiation and 5 microg of RNA was used in standard Northern blot analysis with ICAM-1 cDNA-probes.

RESULTS

Both inhibitory and stimulatory effects were detected after irradiation of SMC with a dose of 1 Gy. At day 10 and 15 a significant antiproliferative effect was found; at day 20 after irradiation cell proliferation was significantly stimulated. Irradiation with 4 Gy and 10 Gy caused dose dependent inhibitory effects at day 10, 15, and 20. Expression of ICAM-1 in human MC was neihter inhibited nor stimulated by LDI.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the stimulatory effect of LDI on SMC proliferation at day 20 days after irradiation may be the in vitro equivalent of a beginning edge effect. Extending the irradiation area in vascular brachytherapy in vivo may therefore merely postpone and not inhibit the edge effect. The data do not indicate that expression of ICAM-1 in quiescent MC is involved in the process.

Determinants of model of renarrowing after beta radiation for in-stent restenosis

It is unknown whether model of renarrowing after beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is influenced by the type of geographic miss (GM).

METHODS

In 166 ISR treated with Galileo, serial quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was done. Minimal lumen diameters and lengths were measured for (1) stent, (2) peri-stent subsegments subjected to angioplasty with/without irradiation, and (3) irradiation margins. GM was defined as: (Type 1) edge injury within the 32P source dose fall-off: 2.0 mm inside and outside the source end marker or (Type 2) overt, nonirradiated injury: beyond the outer 2.0-mm long dose fall-off zone.

RESULTS

Restenosis rate was 28.3% at 8.9+/-4.5 months with 60% located exclusively outside the stent. Type 1 GM was present in 24.7% of proximal edges, whereas Type 2 in 18.1%. Respective percentages for distal edges were 23.5% and 15.7%. Regardless of presence and type of GM, significant late lumen loss occurred only outside the stent. However, the biggest late lumen loss at the proximal edge was induced by the Type 1 GM (0.65+/-0.79, p<0.001), while proximal Type 2 GM was not associated with edge renarrowing (-0.04+/-0.48, p=NS). Both reference lumen diameter and proximal Type 1 GM influenced restenosis independently (OR 0.47; 95%CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.023 and OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.12-5.40; p=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of presence and type of geographic miss, late lumen loss after beta-radiation occurs only outside the stent. However, injury within the proximal 32P dose fall-off but not overt edge injury is associated with the biggest late lumen loss at the respective edge, triggering recurrent restenosis.

Randomized blinded clinical trial of intracoronary brachytherapy with 90Sr/Y beta-radiation for the prevention of restenosis after stent implantation in native coronary arteries in diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

We report a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of intracoronary beta-radiation for prevention of restenosis after stent implantation in native coronary de novo lesions in diabetic patients.

METHODS

After successful stent implantation in native coronary de novo lesions, 106 lesions in 89 diabetic patients were randomly allocated to treatment with beta-radiation with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel depth (n = 53) or placebo treatment (n = 53).

RESULTS

Angiographic analysis at 9 month follow-up revealed a late lumen loss of 0.7+/-0.9 mm in the radiotherapy group versus 1.2+/-0.8 mm in the control group at the injured segment (P = 0.006), 0.9+/-1.0 versus 1.3+/-0.7 mm at the radiated segment (P = 0.02), and 0.9+/-1.0 versus 1.3+/-0.7 mm at the target segment (P = 0.04) (defined as active source length plus 5mm on proximal and distal sites). Binary restenosis rates were significantly lower in the radiation group in all subsegments (injured segment: 10.9 versus 37.3%, P = 0.003; radiated segment: 21.7 versus 49.0%, P = 0.005; target segment: 23.9 versus 49.0%, P = 0.01). Target lesion revascularization for restenosis was required in nine lesions (17.6%) in the radiotherapy group versus 18 (34.0%) in the placebo group (P = 0.05). Late thrombosis occurred in four radiated patients (after premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy in all), resulting in a major adverse clinical event rate of 37.2% in the brachytherapy group versus 38.6% in the placebo group (P = ns).

CONCLUSIONS

In diabetic patients with de novo coronary lesions, intracoronary radiation after stent implantation significantly reduced restenosis. However, this clinical benefit was reduced by the frequent occurrence of late thrombosis.

Evolution of vascular brachytherapy over time: Data from the RENO-registry analysis

OBJECTIVE

To study the evolution of procedural variations in vascular brachytherapy (VBT) and their relationship to medium-term outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The RENO (European Surveillance Registry with Novoste Beta-Cath) prospectively collected procedural and clinical outcome data on 1098 patients treated with VBT. Patients were divided for this analysis into Group-I, the first 50% registered, and Group-II, the last 50% registered. Shorter 30-mm source trains were more commonly used in Group-I (p<0.001) while longer 40-mm (p=NS) and 60-mm (p<0.001) source trains were more commonly used in Group-II. Mean dwell time for radiation seeds was longer in Group-II compared to Group-I (4.20+/-1.48 min vs. 4.14+/-1.44 min; p<0.05). Mean radiation dose was higher in Group-II (19.73+/-3.33 Gy vs. 17.92+/-2.68 Gy; p<0.001). Cutting balloons were more frequently used in Group-II (p<0.001). There was significant drop in the incidence of geographic miss in Group-II (3.2% vs. 9%; p<0.00005). There were nonsignificant trends towards reduction in angiographic restenosis, target vessel (TV) revascularisation, death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

CONCLUSION

There has been a learning curve and evolution of VBT techniques over time. In general, there has been an increase in radiation source length, use of cutting balloons, dwell time and radiation dose. This has resulted in significant reduction of geographic miss and a trend towards improve clinical outcomes. Continued development may result in further improvement in the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Intracoronary 166Holmium brachytherapy combined with cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Brachytherapy is the only effective treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The preliminary data regarding cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) are encouraging and suggest a possible additive effect of CBA with combination with vascular brachytherapy. Hence, in this study, we evaluated the efficacy, feasibility and safety of cutting balloon angioplasty followed by intracoronary Holmium (166Ho) brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-six patients with in-stent restenosis were treated with cutting balloon angioplasty and intracoronary 166Ho brachytherapy. For irradiation, a balloon approximately 10 mm longer than the initially deployed stent was filled with liquid 166Ho and placed at the in-stent restenosis lesion. The patients were followed angiographically at 6 months and clinically for 19.0+/-9.8 months.

RESULTS

The initial procedures were successful in all of the patients. The preprocedural average minimal luminal diameter (MLD) and stenosis rate were 0.57+/-0.30 mm and 80.2+/-11.6%, respectively. The MLD and residual stenosis immediately after the procedure was 2.43+/-0.37 and 13.8+/-9.9%, respectively. Thirty-nine (69.6%) patients have completed their angiographic follow-up at 6 months. The MLD, late loss and loss index at follow-up were 1.97+/-0.79 mm, 0.72+/-0.69 mm and 0.36+/-0.34, respectively. The target lesion restenosis rate was 20.5% and the target lesion revascularization rate was 3.6%. None of these patients presented with adverse coronary events such as MI, sudden cardiac death or stent thrombosis during the follow up period.

CONCLUSION

The combination therapy using cutting balloon angioplasty and intracoronary 166Ho brachytherapy may be an effective new treatment modality for in-stent restenosis.

Two-year clinical follow-up results of intracoronary radiation therapy with rhenium-188-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid-filled balloon

We investigated the 2-year clinical follow-up results as well as 6-month angiographic and clinical follow-up results of intracoronary radiation therapy using a rhenium-188-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid ((188)Re-DTPA)-filled balloon system. The study comprised of 161 patients with significant de novo (83%) or in-stent restenosis (17%) lesions. Irradiation to deliver 17.6 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall was carried out after successful intervention. At 6-month follow-up, binary restenosis developed with significantly lower frequency in the radiation group than in the control group (24.3% vs. 46.3%; P = 0.009), although target lesion revascularization rate did not show significant benefit. At 2-year follow-up, cumulative target lesion revascularization rate was not significantly different between radiation group (n = 86) and control group (n = 75; 20.0% vs. 26.0%; P = 0.368). The rate of major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization did not show significant difference between two groups either (22.3% vs. 30.1%; P = 0.266). In conclusion, although significant reduction in restenosis rate was noted at 6-month angiographic follow-up, intracoronary radiation therapy mostly in patients with de novo lesion did not show significant clinical benefit in 6-month and 2-year follow-up results. The benefit was noted only in a small subgroup of patients with in-stent restenosis.

Basic treatment planning parameters for a 90Sr / 90Y source train used in endovascular brachytherapy

Working groups of the AAPM, DGMP, and ESTRO have published recommendations for endovascular brachytherapy, introducing concepts of relevant parameters for dose specification and treatment planning. However, the procedures for this treatment remain often mainly based on trial protocols and manufacturer instructions. Treatment planning requires the essential knowledge of the radial and longitudinal dose distribution, as well as information about geometrical uncertainties. The present study includes a whole data set for daily clinical practice using a commercially available device for endovascular brachytherapy (Novoste Betacath). The dose distribution around the 90Sr seed train was calculated with Monte-Carlo algorithms and verified by film dosimetry. The radial dose profile was determined starting from the surface of the delivery catheter Calculated dose profiles were in good agreement to measured values. The geometrical uncertainties were estimated with a retrospective analysis of 51 patient treatments. This shows the importance of using a safety margin of at least 10 mm between Intervention Length and Reference Isodose Length. Based on the longitudinal dose profile and the necessary safety margins, the maximum treatable intervention length is 25 mm and 45 mm for a 40 mm and 60 mm source train, respectively.

Direct Stenting Versus Direct Stenting Followed by Centered Beta-Radiation With Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Dosimetry and Long-Term Anti-Platelet Treatment

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the efficacy of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) combined with stenting for the primary prevention of restenosis.

BACKGROUND

Intravascular brachytherapy after stent implantation for de novo lesions has been abandoned for the present. We revisited this procedure by optimizing all procedural steps-the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIa blockers, direct stenting, adequate radiation coverage, avoidance of edge damage, source centering, intravascular ultrasound-guided dosimetry, and continuation of a dual anti-platelet regimen for one year.

METHODS

The Beta-Radiation Investigation with Direct stenting and Galileo in Europe (BRIDGE) study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the long-term efficacy of VBT with P-32 (20 Gy at 1 mm in the coronary wall) after direct stenting. The primary end point was angiographic intra-stent late loss; secondary end points were six months binary restenosis and neo-intimal hyperplasia. Patients (n = 112) with de novo lesions (2.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter up to 15 mm long) were randomized to either VBT or no-VBT.

RESULTS

At six months, intra-stent loss was 0.43 and 0.84 mm (p < 0.001) in the irradiated and control groups, respectively. Intra-stent neo-intimal volume was reduced from 36 mm3 to 10 mm3. However, in the irradiated group there were six late occlusions as well as eight restenoses outside the stented and peri-stented area at the fall-off dose edges of the irradiated area. Accordingly, the target vessel revascularization and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rates at one year in the VBT group (20.4% and 25.9%, respectively) were higher than in the control group (12.1% and 17.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the optimization of pre-, peri-, and post-procedural factors and despite the relative efficacy of the brachytherapy for the prevention of the intra-stent neo-intimal hyperplasia, the clinical outcome of the irradiated group was less favorable than that of the control group.

Intracoronary brachytherapy with ??-radiation for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR).

METHODS

As recurrent ISR depends on intimal injury after coronary angioplasty, long in-stent restenotic lesions were defined as lesions with a treatment length >26 mm (lesion length >20 mm plus a treatment margin of 3 mm at each end). Seventy-eight patients with long ISR were treated at our institution with beta-brachytherapy after coronary angioplasty. Patients were irradiated with either an approximate dose of 12 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth or with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth. Clinical follow-up was available for 69 patients and angiographic follow-up for 65 patients. Late lumen loss (LLL), binary restenosis (stenosis >50%), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed for a follow-up time of 6.6+/-2.2 months.

RESULTS

Mean interventional treatment length was 46+/-18 mm. TLR was performed in all 23 patients with binary restenosis (33%). Death of cardiac cause was reported for two patients, one of whom did not undergo TLR. Thus, overall MACE rate was 35%. Recurrent ISR was significantly more frequent in patients with geographic miss. Comparison of the different radiation dose regimens revealed significantly lower LLL in patients irradiated with the higher dose (0.20+/-0.68 mm compared with 0.65+/-0.96 mm, P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the reduction of recurrent ISR in long diffuse lesions. We recommend a high-dose irradiation with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth.

Effects of β-radiation with a 188rhenium-filled balloon catheter system on non-stented adjacent coronary artery segments

BACKGROUND

The effects of beta-radiation with a (188)rhenium ((188)Re)-filled balloon catheter system on angiographically normal reference segments have not been well defined.

METHODS

In the Seoul National University Post-Angioplasty Rhenium irradiation (SPARE) trial, patients with de novo or restenotic lesions were first treated with a conventional catheter-based technique and then randomized to either a radiation group or a control group. Irradiation was performed using a (188)Re-filled conventional balloon catheter system. Among 97 radiation group enrolled in this study from April 1998 through May 2001, 20 patients with de novo lesions who received brachytherapy with a balloon at least 10 mm longer than the length of an implanted stent, were selected and their post-intervention and follow-up intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were analyzed. Each reference segment was divided into two segments; full dose-irradiation with injury segment (irradiated segment; from the stent edge to the radiopaque balloon markers), and low dose-irradiation without injury segment (edge segment; 5-mm long segment proximal or distal to the location of radiopaque markers). In control group, serial IVUS analysis was available only in 10 patients, and IVUS parameters of the non-stented adjacent segments in these patients were compared to those of irradiated segments in radiation group patients.

RESULTS

Forty irradiated and 38 edge segments of the 20 radiation group patients were analyzed. In proximal irradiated segments, no significant changes were found in external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen or in the plaque plus media (P&M) areas. In distal irradiated segments, significant increases in the EEM (12.5+/-4.5 to 14.0+/-5.0 mm(2), P<0.01) and P&M areas (5.5+/-2.0 to 6.6+/-2.3 mm(2), P<0.01) were found to occur without a change in lumen area. In proximal edge segments, P&M areas were significantly increased (9.0+/-1.7 to 10.5+/-2.6 mm(2), P=0.03). No significant changes in EEM, lumen or P&M areas were observed in the distal edge segments. Comparisons between the irradiated segments (n=40) in the radiation group and the non-stented adjacent segments (n=19) in the control group showed a significant difference in the percentage change of EEM areas (18.5+/-33.2% in radiation group vs. -3.1+/-32.1% in control group, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

beta-radiation with a (188)Re-filled conventional balloon catheter system appears to have no significant deleterious effect on angiographically normal reference segments over a 6 months follow up after brachytherapy.

Quality assurance in intracoronary brachytherapy. Recommendations for determining the planning target length to avoid geographic miss

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A new method of assessing geographic miss (GM) in endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) is applied to evaluate the quality of intracoronary brachytherapy treatments, retrospectively. Based on the Vienna experience, recommendations for adequate safety margins are derived to avoid GM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Evaluation is done on 136 vessels of 128 consecutive patients treated between October 1999 and July 2001. The quality of EVBT is assessed using the concept and terminology of the EVA GEC ESTRO task group. Evaluation of GM and/or safety margin is performed by comparing the outermost interventions with the reference isodose length (RIL) of the applied delivering devices on recorded compact disk (CD) angiograms. The RIL is defined as the length of the vessel segment, which receives at least 90% of the reference dose at the reference depth (=1 mm within the vessel). GM is defined as injured vessel segments, which receive a dose lower than 90% of reference dose. Measurements of intervention length (IL) and active source length (ASL) are performed with respect to anatomical landmarks within the vessel in the region of interest (e.g. stent edges), and by using the nominal length of the devices (balloons, sources) as a reference scale. The edges of RIL are determined by subtracting the length of the dose-fall-off zone (specific to the applied delivery devices: (192)Ir 4.5 mm, (90)Sr 2.5 mm, (32)P 2.0 mm) from the edges of ASL.

RESULTS

The described method to assess GM is applicable to 128 vessels (94%). GM is found in 23% of proximal edges and 20% of distal edges. 95% of all GM are observed if the total margin (proximal+distal margin) between RIL and IL is shorter than 10.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

GM in intracoronary brachytherapy can be widely avoided by adding an appropriate safety margin to the IL (5-6 mm each edge in this study) in order to determine the necessary RIL for a treatment.

Geographical miss during centered intracoronary beta-radiation with 90Yttrium: incidence and implications for recurrence rates after vascular brachytherapy for de novo lesions

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine the incidence and causes of geographical miss (GM) and evaluate its impact on edge restenosis after 'primary', centered, intracoronary beta-radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND

Edge restenosis is a limitation of intracoronary beta-radiation therapy. GM occurs when the radiation source does not fully cover the injured segment and may account for this phenomenon.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients enrolled in the Dose-Finding study were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomized to receive 9, 12, 15 or 18 Gy at 1 mm tissue depth. Using quantitative coronary angiography the effective irradiated segment (EIRS) and both edges were studied prior to and after intervention, and at six-month follow-up. GM was defined as a situation where the effective radiation source length (24 mm) did not fully cover the injured segment. The edges of the EIRS that were injured during the procedure constituted the GM edges. A greater than 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up was considered significant. GM was determined by the simultaneous, electrocardiographically matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons in place, in identical projections surrounded by contrast.

RESULTS

In 16% of patients GM was noninterpretable owing to inadequate filming. GM constituted 21.1% of the interpretable edges and 40.1% of the interpretable vessels analyzed. The occurrence of restenosis in the EIRS and the analyzed vessel segment (VS) was similar between procedures with and without GM. In vessels with GM, restenosis was significantly increased from the EIRS to the VS (from 8.77% to 21%, p = 0.05) as opposed to non-GM vessels (from 11.9% to 19%, p = 0.6). GM tended to be associated with a greater incidence of significant stenosis at the edges of the EIRS (8.3% versus 4.0%, p = 0.15) compared with individuals with >50 % stenosis but no GM. This effect was more prominent at the distal edge. The relation of GM and edge restenosis was independent of dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

Since GM does not affect the incidence of restenosis in the EIRS, restenosis in this segment should be considered a treatment failure, probably due to inadequate dosage. GM is related to significant increase in restenosis from the EIRS to the VS. GM tends to be associated with restenosis at the edges of the EIRS. This is a local phenomenon, which is independent of dosage and which has a specific pathophysiology (combination of injury and low-dose radiation). If GM can be eliminated, the results of vascular brachytherapy will be improved.

Optimal source position for irradiation of coronary bifurcations in endovascular brachytherapy with catheter based beta or iridium-192 sources

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracoronary brachytherapy after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is usually performed with catheter-based treatment techniques in a straight vessel segment. There is a growing interest for treatment of bifurcations, which requires consecutive positioning of the source in main vessel and side branch.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In-house developed software (IC-BT doseplan) is used to explore the optimal positioning of the source in modelled bifurcations with different shape for the source types available in our hospital, i.e. (90)Sr/(90)Y, (32)P and (192)Ir. The results were summarised in look-up tables. The usefulness of these look-up tables was tested on various clinical examples.

RESULTS

Tabulated results for the modelled bifurcations yield an estimation of the distance between the sources (gap width) in relation to the geometry and source type: (90)Sr/(90)Y gap range 3-8.5 mm, (32)P gap range 2-7 mm and (192)Ir gap range 3.5-8 mm. The average dose relative to 2 mm from the source axis is: (90)Sr/(90)Y, (mean+/-SD) 120+/-40%; (32)P, 125+/-50% and (192)Ir, 120+/-22%. The look-up tables also provide the coarse location and value of maximum and minimum dose: (90)Sr/(90)Y, 220-60%, (32)P, 230-55% and (192)Ir, 170-85%. It appeared that the look-up tables provide a good approximation of the optimal gap width in the clinical examples.

CONCLUSIONS

Tabulated optimal gap widths are very useful for quick estimation of the required gap width for a given bifurcation and source type, in case the prescribed dose in both vessels is the same. In unfavourable geometries there is a risk of local underdosage. Individual treatment planning using a program such as IC-BT doseplan is then recommended.

Predictors of 32P beta brachytherapy failure in patients with high-risk in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of coronary radiation therapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has been established in several randomized clinical trials. The efficacy of this treatment in the general population is less well established.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We report our experience in 118 consecutive patients with nonselected high-risk ISR who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention and brachytherapy with (32)P beta-irradiation and who were prospectively enrolled in a quantitative angiographic and clinical follow-up protocol at 7 months after the index procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the independent predictor of angiographic restenosis after (32)P brachytherapy treatment.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 28.8% were diabetics. The mean lesion and mean radiated lengths were, respectively, 30.1 +/- 17.2 and 43.8 +/- 16.9 mm. The ISR pattern was diffuse in 96% of the treated lesions; in particular, 22.1% presented an occlusive pattern and 37.1% a proliferative pattern. At follow-up angiographic, restenosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates were, respectively, 20.8% and 29.6%. The univariate predictors of angiographic restenosis were procedural geographic miss, pattern IV ISR, manual pullback maneuver of the radiation source, preprocedural lesion percentage stenosis and preprocedural lesion MLD. At logistic regression analysis, only geographic miss and pattern IV ISR were independent predictors of post intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) angiographic restenosis.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that 7-month angiographic restenosis after (32)P IRT in complex patients with ISR is not a frequent event and is predicted mainly by an occlusive lesion at baseline and by procedural geographical miss.

Effects of gamma radiation on the noninjured and unprotected left main

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of gamma radiation on the noninjured, unprotected left main coronary artery. Noninjured vessel segments are often radiated during treatment of in-stent restenosis with PCI and gamma radiation. Angiographic analysis using QCA methods was performed on 55 left main arteries of patients (32 with radiation of the left main compared to 23 controls) who participated in the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trials (WRIST). Baseline demographics and follow-up were comparable between the two groups, concluding that gamma radiation with long radiation safety margins is feasible and safe. Gamma radiation of noninjured irradiated left main vessels when used to facilitate wide radiation margins for proximal irradiated injured LAD and LCx is safe and does not compromise the vessel integrity and its lumen.

A morphological–mechanical explanation of edge restenosis in lesions treated with vascular brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Edge restenosis in stenotic lesions treated by implantation of a conventional stent followed (or preceded) by a catheter-based brachytherapy is often attributed to "geographic miss" (GM). We propose a complementary (or, possibly, alternative) explanation based on the concept that a clear postprocedural mismatch between the in-stent lumen and the normal (undilated) lumens of the proximal and/or distal vessel segments results in an excessive, damageable increase of axial wall stress in these segments.

METHODS

The possible poststenting situations at both margins of a stent are examined, and based on the presence or absence of an increase in axial wall stress, predictions are made about the lesion evolution. The concept is then also examined in the light of published observations.

RESULTS

None of the analyzed observations appeared to be incompatible with the proposed morphological-mechanical explanation.

CONCLUSION

From a mechanical point of view, optimal matching of the proximal and distal stent diameters to the corresponding normal diameters of the adjacent arterial segment is likely to reduce the rate of edge restenosis.

Geographical miss and restenosis during catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiation for de novo lesions

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the impact of geographical miss (GM) on restenosis rates after intracoronary beta-radiation therapy for de novo lesions.

BACKGROUND

GM is the situation in which injured vessel segments (VSs) are receiving low-dose radiation and is accounted for edge restenosis. Its impact on the overall restenosis rates remains to be determined.

METHODS

We analyzed 330 patients (356 vessels) treated according to the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE) and the Dose Finding study protocols. Using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), the effective irradiated segment (EIRS), its edges and the total VS were analysed. The edges of the EIRS that were injured constituted the GM edges. Restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis > 50% at follow-up. GM was determined by the simultaneous electrocardiographic-matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons deflated and surrounded by contrast, at the site of injury, in identical angiographic projections.

RESULTS

In 20.5% of the vessels, GM was non-interpretable due to inadequate filming. GM occurred at 30.4% of the interpretable edges and 53% of the interpretable vessels that were analysed. Edge restenosis was significantly increased in the GM compared to non-GM edges (13.16% vs. 4.17%, respectively, P = .001), both in the proximal (P = .03) and the distal (P = .001) edges. GM associated with stent injury significantly increased edge restenosis (P = .006). GM related to balloon injury tended to be associated with increment in edge restenosis (P = .07). The restenosis in the EIRS was similar between vessels with and without GM (17.78% and 14.85%, respectively, P = .6). GM was associated with significant increment in the restenosis at the analyzed VS (31.85% vs. 21.48%, P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

GM is strongly associated with edges and restenosis in the analysed VS. GM does not increase restenosis in the EIRS.