839-1 The long-term effect of surgical myectomy on survival in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

The Italian Registry for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

National registries are advocated as instrumental to the solution of rarity-related problems for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), including limited access to advanced treatment options. Thus, an Italian Registry for HCM was created to assess the clinical profile and the level of care nationwide of patients with HCM.

METHODS

Cardiology centers over the national territory were recruited to provide clinical data of all patients with HCM ever seen at each institution. The enrollment period was from May 2000 to May 2002.

RESULTS

The registry enrolled 1677 patients from 40 institutions. Most (69%) were followed at referral centers, whereas 31% were from community centers with intermediate-low patient flow. Patients diagnosed after routine medical examinations or familial screenings were 39%. Most patients were male (62%), in their fourth to sixth decade of life, and in New York Heart Association class I to II (89%); 24% had resting left ventricular obstruction and 18% had atrial fibrillation. During a 9.7-year average follow-up, cardiovascular mortality was 1%/y, mostly because of heart failure, with no significant change over the last 3 decades; sudden death was less common (0.4%/y). Only 4% of patients received a defibrillator; 14% of the 401 patients with LV outflow obstruction underwent invasive relief of obstruction; and <1% were offered genetic analyses or counseling.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian Registry represents the first comprehensive attempt to evaluate the clinical impact and management of HCM at a national level. Findings underscore the role of screening strategies for an early diagnosis and suggest limited use of the advanced therapeutic options for HCM.

The case for surgery in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Relief of left ventricular (LV) outflow obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and disabling symptoms refractory to maximum medical management has historically been a surgical problem. Surgical septal myectomy permanently abolishes systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve and mitral regurgitation, while normalizing LV pressures and wall stress. Also, these salutary goals are achieved without encumbering patients with post-procedural devices (e.g., pacemakers or defibrillators) or creating potentially arrhythmogenic substrates, as may occur with alcohol septal ablation. Procedural morbidity and mortality risk with myectomy is similar to, and in some institutions less than those for alcohol septal ablation. Over four decades, reports from numerous centers worldwide have consistently and unequivocably documented the benefits of surgery on hemodynamic and functional state, restoring normal and acceptable quality of life to patients of all ages by largely reversing the complications of heart failure. Long-term survival after myectomy is similar to that of the general population and superior to non-operated patients with obstruction. The LV outflow tract morphology in HCM is heterogeneous and not uncommonly includes congenital anomalies of the mitral valve apparatus for which the surgeon has the flexibility to adapt the repair, often employing an extended myectomy. In the current atmosphere of increasing and perhaps excessive enthusiasm for newer catheter-based interventions, it is a critical time to promote and re-emphasize that surgery is the time-honored (and presently the most effective) treatment strategy for relieving heart failure-related disability resulting from dynamic LV outflow obstruction in HCM, and is the primary treatment option for this subgroup of severely symptomatic drug-refractory patients.

Approach to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a genetic disease characterized by marked left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. A dynamic LV outflow obstruction is present in approximately 20% of patients. Many affected individuals remain asymptomatic throughout life, others develop heart failure symptoms or atrial fibrillation (AF), and some die suddenly, often young and in the absence of previous symptoms. Stratification of sudden death risk is based on several markers, including a previous cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia, family history of sudden death, extreme LV hypertrophy (>/= 30 mm), syncope, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter, and abnormal exercise blood pressure response. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is the most effective treatment for sudden death prevention, and should be considered in patients with either one strong or multiple risk factors. Important symptoms of heart failure develop in a minority of patients, largely as a consequence of diastolic dysfunction, and are usually treated with beta blockers, or verapamil. In patients with LV obstruction and severe symptoms unresponsive to medications, myectomy operation or alcohol septal ablation is indicated for relieving the gradient and improving quality of life. AF develops in approximately 20% of patients. Amiodarone is the most effective medication for preventing AF recurrences. In chronic AF, beta blockers or verapamil are usually effective for heart rate control. The threshold for anticoagulants is low, because even brief AF episodes have a substantial embolization risk.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in childhood

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heterogeneous and relatively common genetic cardiac disease that has been the subject of intense scrutiny and investigation for over 40 years. HCM is an important cause of disability and death in patients of all ages, although unexpected sudden death in the young is perhaps the most devastating component of the natural history. Therefore, while HCM is uncommon in pediatric cardiology practice, it is nevertheless a disease of great importance to young people and those clinicians charged with their care. Due to marked heterogeneity in clinical expression, natural history and prognosis, diagnostic and management strategies often represent a dilemma (and even the source of controversy) to both primary care clinicians and cardiovascular specialists. Consequently, it is timely to place perspective and clarify many of these relevant clinical issues, and profile the rapidly evolving concepts regarding HCM, especially as they may impact on this disease in childhood.